Severe malaria in Europe: an 8-year multi-centre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains one of the most serious infections for travellers to tropical countries. Due to the lack of harmonized guidelines a large variety of treatment regimens is used in Europe to treat severe malaria. METHODS: The European Network for Tropical Medicine and Travel Health (TropNet) conducted an 8-year, multicentre, observational study to analyse epidemiology, treatment practices and outcomes of severe malaria in its member sites across Europe. Physicians at participating TropNet centres were asked to report pseudonymized retrospective data from all patients treated at their centre for microscopically confirmed severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria according to the 2006 WHO criteria. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2014 a total of 185 patients with severe malaria treated in 12 European countries were included. Three patients died, resulting in a 28-day survival rate of 98.4%. The majority of infections were acquired in West Africa (109/185, 59%). The proportion of patients treated with intravenous artesunate increased from 27% in 2006 to 60% in 2013. Altogether, 56 different combinations of intravenous and oral drugs were used across 28 study centres. The risk of acute renal failure (36 vs 17% p = 0.04) or cerebral malaria (54 vs 20%, p = 0.001) was significantly higher in patients ≥60 years than in younger patients. Respiratory distress with the need for mechanical ventilation was significantly associated with the risk of death in the study population (13 vs 0%, p = 0.001). Post-artemisinin delayed haemolysis was reported in 19/70 (27%) patients treated with intravenous artesunate. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with severe malaria in this study were tourists or migrants acquiring the infection in West Africa. Intravenous artesunate is increasingly used for treatment of severe malaria in many European treatment centres and can be given safely to European patients with severe malaria. Patients treated with intravenous artesunate should be followed up to detect and manage late haemolytic events.

The "Choosing Wisely" initiative in infectious diseases.

OBJECTIVE: "Choosing Wisely" is a growing international campaign aiming at practice changes to improve patient health and safety by both, conduct of essential and avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic procedures. The goal is to create an easily recognizable and distributable list ("Choosing Wisely items") that addresses common over- and underuse in the management of infectious diseases. METHODS: The German Society of Infectious Diseases (DGI) participates in the campaign "Klug Entscheiden" by the German Society of Internal Medicine. Committee members of the (DGI) listed potential 'Choosing Wisely items'. Topics were subjected to systematic evidence review and top ten items were selected for appropriateness. Five positive and negative recommendations were approved via individual member vote. RESULTS: The final recommendations are: (1) Imperatively start antimicrobial treatment and remove the focus in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. (2) Critically ill patients with signs of infection need early appropriate antibiotic therapy. (3) Annual influenza vaccination should be given to individuals with age >60 years, patients with specific co-morbidities and to contact persons who may spread influenza to others. (4) All children should receive measles vaccine. (5) Prefer oral formulations of highly bioavailable antimicrobials whenever possible. (6) Avoid prescribing antibiotics for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections. (7) Do not treat asymptomatic bacteriuria with antibiotics. (8) Do not treat Candida detected in respiratory or gastrointestinal tract specimens. (9) Do not prolong prophylactic administration of antibiotics in patients after they have left the operating room. (10) Do not treat an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin with antibiotics for patients without signs of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians will reduce potential harm to patients and increase the value of health care when implementing these recommendations.

A new strategy for the prevention of IgA anaphylactic transfusion reactions.

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with clinically significant anti-IgA is difficult and unsatisfactory in many aspects. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A 40-year-old man with common variable immunodeficiency had a previous history of anaphylaxis after an intramuscular immunoglobulin administration. His serum contained anti-IgA, and he required immunoglobulins for recurrent infections. RESULTS: The administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIgG) containing less than 0.1 mg per mL IgA led to an anaphylactic reaction after the transfusion of only 2 to 3 mL. The same IVIgG charge was subsequently pretreated with freshly separated autologous plasma and given to the patient on three consecutive days without any reaction (1.25, 10, and 10 g each in 400 mL plasma). Anti-IgA activity did not increase, and the patient was treated again without complications. DISCUSSION: Ex vivo pretreatment of IVIgG preparations with autologous plasma appears to be safe and useful in the management of patients with clinically significant anti-IgA. To achieve a significant IgA blockage, the preparation to be used should not contain large amounts of IgA. CONCLUSION: The strategy described here appears to be safe and may help prevent anaphylaxis in many instances.