Long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab in the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japanese patients: Results from an open-label Phase III study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to report the efficacy and safety of canakinumab treatment in Japanese patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) over a 48-week study period. METHODS: Patients were administered canakinumab 4 mg/kg (maximum dose 300 mg) every 4 weeks, with no dose adjustments. The key outcome measures included adapted American College of Rheumatology paediatric (aACR pedi) 30/50/70/90/100 response, proportion of patients with inactive disease, and corticosteroid (CS) tapering. RESULTS: In total, 16/19 (84.2%) patients received canakinumab for ≥96 weeks reaching end-of-study (EOS) visit without premature discontinuation. Regardless of the level of joint involvement at baseline, high aACR pedi responses were observed throughout the study; at the EOS, aACR pedi 90/100 response rates were 84.2%/63.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients who successfully tapered CSs at EOS was 66.7% (12/18), of which 10 patients were steroid-free. The most common adverse events were infections (238.3 events/100 patient-years). Serious adverse events were observed in 52.6%. The event (n=1) adjudicated as possible macrophage activation syndrome was preceded by sJIA flare. No deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Canakinumab treatment resulted in a sustained treatment response in sJIA patients over 48 weeks and was associated with CS tapering in majority of patients. No new safety findings were reported.

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 48-week results from an open-label phase III study in Japanese patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in Japanese patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm active treatment study. sJIA patients, aged ≥2 to <20 years, were administered canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks for ≤48 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved an adapted American College of Rheumatology pediatric (ACR pedi) 30 criteria at week 8, and the proportion of patients who successfully tapered corticosteroids at week 28. Herein, the efficacy and safety results up to 48 weeks are reported. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients enrolled, 15 (78.9%) had previously used tocilizumab. All patients achieved ACR pedi 30 at week 8 and 73.7% (14/19) successfully tapered corticosteroids at week 28. At week 48, ACR pedi 50/70/90/100 responses were achieved by 100.0%/100.0%/87.5%/68.8% of patients. The most common adverse events (AEs) were infections (271.6 patient-years), 42.1% (8/19) patients had serious AEs. Two potential cases of macrophage activation syndrome were identified. No deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Canakinumab was efficacious in Japanese patients with sJIA and was associated with substantial corticosteroid dose reduction in the majority of patients. The safety profile of canakinumab was consistent with that observed from previous studies. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV (IDENTIFIER: NCT02396212).

Clinical practice guidance for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) 2018.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common disease in pediatric rheumatism. There is no specific symptom or examination finding for JIA, and the diagnosis is made by exclusion and differentiation. Because non-pediatric rheumatologists are sometimes involved in medical care, 'proposal for JIA guidance on diagnosis and treatment for primary care pediatricians and non-pediatric rheumatologists' was first published in 2007. In these 10 years, a number of new findings on pathophysiology and treatment of JIA have been published; therefore, we propose this guidance of 2018th edition aiming at updating and standardization of JIA medical care in Japan. This edition included the management of uveitis, macrophage activation syndrome, infectious diseases before and during treatment. Moreover, details of biologics are also described. Although this guidance is tailored to adaptation of examinations and drugs, we do not purpose to limit the physicians' discretion in clinical practice. This guidance should be viewed as recommendations and be individualized according to the condition of the patient. We hope that medical care for JIA will advance and more patients will get benefit based on this guidance. Then, further revisions are needed due to changes in future conditions.

Intravenous abatacept in Japanese patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from a phase III open-label study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate efficacy and safety of intravenous abatacept in Japanese patients with active polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA). METHODS: In this phase III, open-label, multicenter, single-arm study, patients with pJIA aged 4-17 years who failed ≥1 biologic or methotrexate received weight-tiered (< 75 kg: 10 mg/kg; 75-100 kg: 750 mg; > 100 kg: 1000 mg) intravenous abatacept at Weeks 0, 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. The study comprised a short-term period (16 weeks) and ongoing long-term period. Primary endpoint: Week 16 JIA-American College of Rheumatology criteria 30 (JIA-ACR30) response rate. Secondary endpoints/outcomes included Week 16 JIA-ACR50/70/90 response and inactive disease rates, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI), pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity. Proportions of patients achieving Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 27 joints using C-reactive protein (JADAS27-CRP) remission (score < 1) and minimal disease activity (MDA; score < 3.8), were among exploratory endpoints. RESULTS: All 20 patients who received study medication completed the short-term period. During the long-term period, two patients discontinued due to insufficient efficacy or patient decision. Median age and disease duration at baseline were 10.5 and 0.75 years, respectively. Week 16 JIA-ACR30 response rate (primary endpoint) was 90.0% (18/20). JIA-ACR50/70/90 response and inactive disease rates at Week 16 were 75.0% (15/20), 70.0% (14/20), 35.0% (7/20), and 25.0% (5/20), respectively. At Week 52, JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 response and inactive disease rates were observed by 88.9% (16/18), 88.9% (16/18), 83.3% (15/18), 66.7% (12/18) and 44.4% (8/18), respectively. CHAQ-DI improved after Week 12. JADAS27-CRP remission and MDA were achieved by 15.0% (3/20) and 45.0% (9/20) of patients at Week 16, and by 50.0% (9/18) and 78.0% (14/18) of patients at Week 52, respectively. The mean abatacept pre-dose serum concentration was above the target therapeutic exposure (10 µg/ml) from Week 8 through Week 16. All adverse events were of mild/moderate intensity, except for one case of severe gastroenteritis. No deaths, malignancies, or autoimmune disorders were observed. No antidrug antibodies were detected through Week 16; one patient had a positive immunogenic response during the cumulative period. CONCLUSION: Intravenous abatacept was efficacious and well tolerated in Japanese patients with active pJIA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01835470 . Date of registration: April 19, 2013.

Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of adalimumab in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japan.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of adalimumab in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in Japan. Patients aged 4 to 17 years were enrolled in a single-arm, open-label, multicentre study of adalimumab. Patients weighing <30 kg received 20 mg every other week (eow), and those ≥30 kg received 40 mg eow. Concomitant methotrexate (MTX) was allowed (≤10 mg/m(2) per week). The primary efficacy outcome was the percent of patients with American College of Rheumatology Pediatric 30 response (ACR Pedi 30) at week 16. JIA core variables, serum adalimumab concentrations, and anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAAs) were analysed. Patients were monitored for adverse events (AEs). Twenty-five patients (20 with concomitant MTX at baseline and 5 without) were enrolled: 24 patients completed 16 weeks of therapy and 22 patients completed 60 weeks. At week 16, 90 % of patients with MTX and 100 % without MTX achieved ACR Pedi 30; response rates were maintained through week 60 in 94 and 80 % of patients, respectively. Each JIA core variable improved over time. Six patients became AAA positive (two each at weeks 8, 16, and 60), some of which were transient. All six AAA-positive patients achieved ACR Pedi 30 at week 16, and four maintained that response at week 60. Six patients (all with MTX) experienced nine serious AEs (JIA, pyrexia, arthralgia, pneumonia, hepatitis B infection, pharyngitis, dehydration, pharyngeal pain, and pneumonia). In pediatric patients with polyarticular JIA in Japan, adalimumab was safe and effective for reducing disease activity for up to 60 weeks.

Proposal for juvenile idiopathic arthritis guidance on diagnosis and treatment for primary care pediatricians and nonpediatric rheumatologists (2007).

The Pediatric Standing Committee of the Japan College of Rheumatology, in collaboration with the Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan, produced guidance on the diagnosis and treatment for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) for primary care pediatricians and nonpediatric rheumatologists in Japan. This guidance aims to achieve early diagnosis and treatment for JIA, which is similar to adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA), based on recent progress in rheumatology, and to resolve arthritis at an early stage and improve the prognosis of the affected inflammatory joints. It describes clinical symptoms and laboratory findings characteristic to JIA in order to make early diagnosis and treatment possible, and also serves as a triage of patients who are refractory to the treatment protocol described here and need more aggressive interventions. However, because JIA is a complicated and heterogeneous disease and the optimal treatment approach can be diverse and different patient by patient, these guidelines should be viewed as recommendations and be individualized according to the condition of the patient. Finally, we hope that this guidance will trigger exploration for further information by referring to the textbooks and literature listed at the end of these guidelines.