Simplified Rapid Hydration Prevents Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Among CKD Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) are at high risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) and mortality. Therefore, there is a clinical need to explore safe, convenient, and effective strategies for preventing CA-AKI. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess whether simplified rapid hydration is noninferior to standard hydration for CA-AKI prevention in patients with CKD. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study was conducted across 21 teaching hospitals and included 1,002 patients with CKD. Patients were randomized to either simplified hydration (SH) (SH group, with normal saline from 1 hour before to 4 hours after CAG at a rate of 3 mL/kg/h) or standard hydration (control group, with normal saline 12 hours before and 12 hours after CAG at a rate of 1 mL/kg/h). The primary endpoint of CA-AKI was a ≥25% or 0.5-mg/dL rise in serum creatinine from baseline within 48 to 72 hours. RESULTS: CA-AKI occurred in 29 of 466 (6.2%) patients in the SH group and in 38 of 455 (8.4%) patients in the control group (relative risk: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.5-1.2; P = 0.216). In addition, the risk of acute heart failure and 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the median hydration duration was significantly shorter in the SH group than in the control group (6 vs 25 hours; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In CKD patients undergoing CAG, SH is noninferior to standard hydration in preventing CA-AKI with a shorter hydration duration.

[A randomized controlled trial of rapid artificial cardiac pacing in thoracic endovascular aortic repair].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, efficacy and their impact on stent graft positioning between rapid artificial cardiac pacing induced hypotension and sodium nitroprusside induced hypotension during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: From September 2007 to February 2009, a randomized controlled trial as approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital was conducted in 197 patients undergoing elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair of thoracic aortic dissection (n = 175) or aneurysm (n = 22). The patients were randomized into sodium nitroprusside group (n = 98) and rapid artificial cardiac pacing group (n = 99). During the localization and deployment of stent graft, hypotension was induced by intravenous sodium nitroprusside or rapid artificial cardiac pacing. Hemodynamics, landing precision (deviation from planned placement site), duration of procedure, renal function, neurocognitive function, incidence of endoleaks and paraplegia/hemiplegia were compared. RESULTS: Rapid artificial cardiac pacing was conducted without technical difficulty in all 99 patients. The level of hypotension (mm Hg, 1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) was most pronounced in the rapid artificial cardiac pacing group (47 ± 5 vs 82 ± 7, P = 0.003. Once rapid pacing ceased, blood pressure recovered more quickly to the preparing levels in the rapid artificial cardiac pacing group [(9 ± 2) s vs (481 ± 107) s, P < 0.01]. And the duration of procedure was also shorter in the rapid artificial cardiac pacing group [(94 ± 16) min vs (103 ± 24) min, P < 0.01]. Moreover, precise positioning and deployment was observed in rapid artificial cardiac pacing group versus to the sodium nitroprusside group (P < 0.01). There was no difference in renal function and neurocognitive function before and after the procedure in both groups. There was no difference in the incidences of endoleaks and paraplegia/hemiplegia between different groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: As compared with sodium nitroprusside, rapid artificial cardiac pacing is safer in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. It shortens the endovascular procedure and enables more precise positioning and deployment of stent graft.

[Vulnerable plaque burden post pharmacological and interventional treatments in patients with acute coronary syndrome and borderline lesion: intravascular ultrasound follow up results].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety between the interventional and conservative treatment options for borderline vulnerable plaque lesion in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS: A total of 100 ACS patients [78 male, age 43 - 74 (60.4 ± 14.1) years] undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) with borderline lesion (coronary artery stenosis between 50% - 70%) were enrolled in May 2007 to February 2009, who were randomly divided into PCI group (50 patients) and conservative therapy group (50 patients). According to minimal lumen area (MLA) detected by IVUS, patients were further divided into MLA ≥ 4.0 mm(2) sub-group and MLA < 4.0 mm(2) sub-groups. Outcomes during hospitalization and after 10 - 12 month follow-up were compared. RESULTS: IVUS was performed in 40 patients at 10 - 12 months post PCI, there was no in-stent thrombosis and the extent of stent neointimal hyperplasia was comparable as at the time of immediately post PCI. IVUS was performed in 35 patients at 10 - 12 months post conservative therapy, IVUS results showed that MLA increased significantly [(7.32 ± 1.42) mm(2) vs. (4.98 ± 0.89) mm(2), P < 0.01], while plaque area [(7.70 ± 2.09) mm(2) vs. (10.01 ± 2.55) mm(2), P < 0.05], plaque burden [(55.94 ± 8.36)% vs. (67.97 ± 9.36)%] and low echo area [(4.08 ± 0.80) mm(2) vs. (2.27 ± 0.79) mm(2)] were significantly decreased at follow up compared to those as baseline (all P < 0.01). There was one patient in PCI group with MLA ≥ 4.0 mm(2) developed acute in-stent thrombosis in left anterior descending artery two days after the procedure and 9 patients in conservative therapy and MLA < 4.0 mm(2) group received PCI due to recurrent angina pectoris during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For the borderline lesion with MLA ≥ 4.0 mm(2) detected by IVUS, adequate medication could effectively attenuate and or reverse the plaque progression and stabilize plaque.

Ticagrelor and the risk of infections during hospitalization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although ticagrelor exerts an antibacterial activity, its effect on infections in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. We aimed to assess whether ticagrelor and clopidogrel affect infections in these patients during hospitalization. METHODS: A total of 2116 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing PCI were divided into the ticagrelor (n = 388) and clopidogrel (n = 1728) groups. The primary outcome was infection onset. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Propensity score analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Infections developed in 327 (15.4%) patients. There was no significant difference in infection between both groups (ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel: 13.1% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.164). Patients in the ticagrelor group had lower rates of in-hospital all-cause death and MACCE than patients in the clopidogrel group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that ticagrelor and clopidogrel had a similar preventive effect on infections during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-1.78, p = 0.380). Compared to the patients treated with clopidogrel, patients treated with ticagrelor had a slightly lower risk of other outcomes, but no statistical difference. Propensity score analyses demonstrated similar results for infections and other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with clopidogrel treatment, ticagrelor treatment did not significantly alter the risk of infections during hospitalization among STEMI patients undergoing PCI, but was associated with a slightly lower risk of in-hospital all-cause death and MACCE.