Cost-Effectiveness of a Homeless Care Transition Program: Durham Homeless Care Transitions.

BACKGROUND Transitional care and medical respite programs provide assistance to people experiencing homelessness as they move from acute care into community settings. These programs can address issues that may fall outside the reach of traditional medical care yet have a profound impact on the health of vulnerable populations. This article focuses on the cost-effectiveness of the Durham Homeless Care Transitions (DHCT) program.METHOD This intervention study of the DHCT program uses a comparison group of people experiencing homelessness who were referred but did not participate. Encounter-level data, aggregated by quarterly segments of charges and reimbursements, were abstracted for all persons referred. Descriptive statistics were computed and models of charges and reimbursements were created using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to compare utilization for 12 months pre- and post-referral.RESULTS Patients referred to the DHCT program (N = 485) were primarily non-Hispanic Black (62.5%), male (68.4%), uninsured (35.5%), and had an average of 5.3 chronic conditions and an average age of 50.0 years (SD = 11.3). There was variability among charges and reimbursement based on health care visit type but a negative association between treatment and charges, indicating that being part of the DHCT program led to lower charges post-referral.LIMITATIONS The study is limited by lack of access to line-item details of charges, reimbursement, and payer mix.CONCLUSION There is evidence of benefit to patients from transitional care and medical respite programs that does not substantially increase the overall societal cost of care; however, health systems commonly require evidence of cost savings and benefit as a return on investment.

Do Live Discharge Rates Increase as Hospices Approach Their Medicare Aggregate Payment Caps?

CONTEXT: The rate of live discharge from hospice and the proportion of hospices exceeding their aggregate caps have both increased for the last 15 years, becoming a source of federal scrutiny. The cap restricts aggregate payments hospices receive from Medicare during a 12-month period. The risk of repayment and the manner in which the cap is calculated may incentivize hospices coming close to their cap ceilings to discharge existing patients before the end of the cap year. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to explore annual cap-risk trends and live discharge patterns. We hypothesized that as a hospice comes closer to exceeding its cap, a patient's likelihood of being discharged alive increases. METHODS: We analyzed monthly hospice outcomes using 2012-2013 Medicare claims. RESULTS: Adjusted analyses showed a positive and statistically significant relationship between cap risk and live discharges. CONCLUSION: Policymakers ought to consider the unintended consequences the aggregate cap may be having on patient outcomes of care.

Designating places and populations as medically underserved: a proposal for a new approach.

This article describes the development of a theory-based, data-driven replacement for the Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) and Medically Underserved Area (MUA) designation systems. Data describing utilization of primary medical care and the distribution of practitioners were used to develop estimates of the effects of demographic and community characteristics on use of primary medical care. A scoring system was developed that estimates each community's effective access to primary care. This approach was reviewed and contributed to by stakeholder groups. The proposed formula would designate over 90% of current geographic and low-income population HPSA designations. The scalability of the method allows for adjustment for local variations in need and was considered acceptable by stakeholder groups. A data-driven, theory-based metric to calculate relative need for geographic areas and geographically-bounded special populations can be developed and used. Its use, however, requires careful explanation to and support from affected groups.

Delivery of Community-Based Palliative Care: Findings from a Time and Motion Study.

BACKGROUND: Use of palliative care has increased substantially as the population ages and as evidence for its benefits grows. However, there is limited information regarding which care activities are necessary for delivering high-quality, interdisciplinary, community-based palliative care. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify and measure the discrete clinical and administrative activities completed by a multidisciplinary team in a hospice provider-led model for providing community-based palliative care. STUDY DESIGN: A time and motion study was conducted at three care settings within a large hospice and palliative care network and a process map was drawn to describe the personnel and activities recorded. METHODS: Researchers recorded activities performed by clinical and administrative staff. Activities were categorized into those related to patient care, administrative duties, care coordination, and other. A process map of palliative care delivery was created and descriptive statistics were used to calculate the proportion of time spent on discrete activities and within each activity category. RESULTS: Over 50 hours of activities were recorded during which the clinicians interacted with 25 patients and engaged in 20 distinct tasks. Physicians spent 94% of their time on tasks related to patient care and 1% on administrative tasks. Nurse practitioners and registered nurses spent 82% and 53% of their time on patient-related tasks and 2% and 37% on administrative tasks, respectively. CONCLUSION: The delivery of palliative care is interdisciplinary and involves numerous discrete tasks and activities. Understanding the components of a community-based palliative care model is the first step to designing incentives to encourage its spread.

A Positive Association Between Hospice Profit Margin And The Rate At Which Patients Are Discharged Before Death.

Hospice care is designed to support patients and families through the final phase of illness and death. Yet for more than a decade, hospices have steadily increased the rate at which they discharge patients before death-a practice known as "live discharge." Although certain live discharges are consistent with high-quality care, regulators have expressed concern that some hospices' desire to maximize profits drives them to inappropriately discharge patients. We used Medicare claims data for 2012-13 and cost reports for 2011-13 to explore relationships between hospice-level financial margins and live discharge rates among freestanding hospices. Adjusted analyses showed positive and significant associations between both operating and total margins and hospice-level rates of live discharge: One-unit increases in operating and total margin were associated with increases of 3 percent and 4 percent in expected hospice-level live discharge rates, respectively. These findings suggest that additional research is needed to explore links between profitability and patient-centeredness in the Medicare hospice program.

There is a mismatch between the medicare benefit package and the preferences of patients with cancer and their caregivers.

PURPOSE: To identify insured services that are most important to Medicare beneficiaries with cancer and their family caregivers when coverage is limited. METHODS: A total of 440 participants (patients, n = 246; caregivers, n = 194) were enrolled onto the CHAT (Choosing Health Plans All Together) study from August 2010 to March 2013. The exercise elicited preferences about what benefits Medicare should cover for patients with cancer in their last 6 months of life. Facilitated sessions lasted 2.5 hours, included 8 to 10 participants, and focused on choices about Medicare health benefits within the context of a resource-constrained environment. RESULTS: Six of 15 benefit categories were selected by > 80% of participants: cancer care, prescription drugs, primary care, home care, palliative care, and nursing home coverage. Only 12% of participants chose the maximum level of cancer benefits, a level of care commonly financed in the Medicare program. Between 40% and 50% of participants chose benefits not currently covered by Medicare: unrestricted cash, concurrent palliative care, and home-based long-term care. Nearly one in five participants picked some level of each of these three benefit categories and allocated on average 30% of their resources toward them. CONCLUSION: The mismatch between covered benefits and participant preferences shows that addressing quality of life and the financial burden of care is a priority for a substantial subset of patients with cancer in the Medicare program. Patient and caregiver preferences can be elicited, and the choices they express could suggest potential for Medicare benefit package reform and flexibility.