Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine, cisplatin plus S-1 versus gemcitabine, cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer (KHBO1401- MITSUBA).

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) combination therapy has been the standard palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). No randomized clinical trials have been able to demonstrate the survival benefit over GC during the past decade. In our previous phase II trial, adding S-1 to GC (GCS) showed promising efficacy and we aimed to determine whether GCS could improve overall survival compared with GC for patients with advanced BTC. METHODS: We performed a mulitcenter, randomized phase III trial across 39 centers. Enrolled patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either the GCS or GC arm. The GCS regimen comprised gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 ) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 ) infusion on day 1 and 80 mg/m2 of S-1 on days 1-7 every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and adverse events (AEs). This study is registered with Clinical trial identification: NCT02182778. RESULTS: Between July 2014 and February 2016, 246 patients were enrolled. The median OS and 1-year OS rate were 13.5 months and 59.4% in the GCS arm and 12.6 months and 53.7% in the GC arm, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.628-0.996; P = .046 [stratified log-rank test]). Median PFS was 7.4 months in the GCS arm and 5.5 months in the GC arm (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.577-0.970; P = .015). RR was 41.5% in the GCS arm and 15.0% in the GC arm. Grade 3 or worse AEs did not show significant differences between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: GCS is the first regimen which demonstrated survival benefits as well as higher RR over GC in a randomized phase III trial and could be the new first-line standard chemotherapy for advanced BTC. To exploit the advantage of its high RR, GCS is now tested in the neoadjuvant setting in a randomized phase III trial for potentially resectable BTC.

Successful treatment switch from lenvatinib to sorafenib in a patient with radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer intolerant to lenvatinib due to severe proteinuria.

Sorafenib and lenvatinib showed efficacy for patients with radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in pivotal phase 3 clinical trials. Although the efficacy of lenvatinib in patients who received previous treatment with multi-target kinase inhibitors (m-TKIs), including sorafenib, was reported, the efficacy of sorafenib in patients who previously received lenvatinib remains unknown. A 75-year-old woman diagnosed as RAI-refractory poorly differentiated carcinoma with multiple lung metastases and started treatment with lenvatinib. She continued to receive lenvatinib but with repeated dose interruptions and reductions due to continuous proteinuria. Because of severe and persistent proteinuria as well as newly developed renal impairment, lenvatinib was suspended after two years of treatment. After the 7-month suspension, her proteinuria and renal impairment were partially improved, but her lung metastases progressed. Because she was unable to tolerate previous treatment with lenvatinib, sorafenib was started. At 7 months of treatment with sorafenib, her lung metastases shrank and she could continue sorafenib without exacerbation of proteinuria or renal impairment. This case may suggest that sorafenib does not exacerbate the proteinuria or renal impairment induced by lenvatinib, and may be an effective treatment option for RAI-refractory DTC patients who are unable to tolerate lenvatinib.

Pharmacokinetic Study of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Therapy for Biliary Tract Cancer following Major Hepatectomy (KHBO1101).

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients who have undergone surgical resection with major hepatectomy cannot tolerate the standard gemcitabine regimen (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks) due to severe toxicities such as myelosuppression. Our dose-finding study of adjuvant gemcitabine therapy for biliary tract cancer following major hepatectomy determined that the recommended dose is 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. Here, we evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gemcitabine in these subjects. METHODS: We evaluated BTC patients scheduled to undergo surgical resection with major hepatectomy followed by gemcitabine therapy. A pharmacokinetic evaluation of gemcitabine and its main metabolite, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU), was conducted at the initial administration of gemcitabine, which was given by intravenous infusion over 30 min at a dose of 800-1,000 mg/m2. Physical examination and adverse events were monitored for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled from August 2011 to January 2013, with 12 ultimately completing the pharmacokinetic study. Eight patients had hilar cholangiocarcinoma, three had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and one had superficial spreading type cholangiocarcinoma. The median interval from surgery to first administration of gemcitabine was 65.5 days (range, 43-83 days). We observed the following toxicities: neutropenia (n = 11, 91.7%), leukopenia (n = 10, 83.3%), thrombocytopenia (n = 6, 50.0%), and infection (n = 5, 41.7%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 25% (n = 3) of patients. There were differences in clearance of gemcitabine and dFdU between our subjects and the subjects who had not undergone hepatectomy. CONCLUSION: Major hepatectomy did not affect the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine or dFdU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR in (JPRN) UMIN000005109.