RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lateral mass screw placement techniques have been broadly described in the literature. Differences in these techniques are related to entry points, lateral angulations and the cephalocaudal axis. AIM: We evaluated 20 patients who underwent lateral mass screw placement between 2007 and 2009. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the cervical vertebrae were analyzed for each patient. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We measured the maximal transition from the midpoint of the lateral mass to a proposed intersection point by a line connecting the corresponding spinous process and outermost rim of the transverse foramen at each level. This determined an optimal entry point during the tip of screw tilted on the same level of spinous process. RESULTS: The results revealed that a screw entry point less than 3 mm medial to the midpoint of the lateral mass could safely avoid violation of the vertebral artery. CONCLUSIONS: The current study uses imaging analysis to demonstrate that spinous processes are an intraoperative landmark to aid surgeons in determining safe lateral mass screw trajectories. The limited-scale case results support our prediction from the image analysis. Depending on intraoperative landmarks, lateral mass screws could be safely and comfortably placed with good clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Parafusos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Fixadores Internos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Artéria Vertebral/lesõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: An occipital interhemispheric approach for the lesions in the middle part of the medial temporal region has been reported. However, this approach usually requires the excision of the tentorium to provide satisfactory exposure. In this case, we used this approach without the excision of the tentorium to remove the parahippocampal gyrus tumor, which was located superolateral to tentorial edge in the middle part of the medial temporal region. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 22-year-old man who had seizures for 3 years presented with a tumor in the right parahippocampal gyrus. The tumor was successfully removed by the occipital interhemispheric approach without the excision of the tentorium. The postoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: An occipital interhemispheric approach without the excision of tentorium is a feasible and safe approach for parahippocampal tumors superolateral to tentorial edge, even in a case where the tumor is deeply located in the middle part of medial temporal region.