Homelessness and polysubstance use: A qualitative study on recovery and treatment access solutions around an urban library in Southern California, USA.

People experiencing homelessness face many obstacles and barriers when it comes to getting help for their substance use. Recently, there has been an increase in substance use and opioid overdoses at public libraries, which are easily accessible public places for those struggling with homelessness. We aimed to understand this population's experience with recovery. This has led to an exploration of the intersection of experiencing homelessness and substance use-related problems and its impact on barriers for recovery, along with facilitators to treatment and recovery. From January to June 2019, researchers interviewed 22 library patrons experiencing homelessness and actively using substances at a Southern Californian library in a major metropolitan area. Data were coded and analysed using a thematic analysis. Researchers independently coded text files for data analysis and discussed codes until consensus was reached. Library patrons who reported substance use were a mean age of 39 (range: 22-63); over half were white people (59%) and male (59%); 77% reported currently sleeping on the street; 18% lived in shelters. Themes for barriers to recovery were experiencing withdrawal, access to resources and coping with being homeless. Themes related to facilitators to treatment and recovery were Narcan access and overdose education, connectedness and trauma recovery. People experiencing homelessness are hard to reach and those using substances pose even more vulnerabilities. Many patrons attribute their circumstances to their substance use and disconnectedness to resources and supports to quit. Further research is needed on best practices for multidisciplinary care coordination for this population.

Organizational policy recommendations for control of STI/HIV among female sex workers in China: regular examination of workers in social hygiene clinics.

This article aims to address female sex workers at high risk for contracting HIV in China by recommending evidence-based socio-structural interventions and policies at the national level that have yielded effective outcomes in other countries. National governments such as the Philippines and Hong Kong have utilized the Social Hygiene Clinic (SHC) model. A similar national policy can be highly effective in China. Evidence-based research study results indicate significant reductions in STI and consistent condom use among female sex workers in both China and the Philippines. Consistent condom use in both countries continues to be significantly associated with interpersonal- and venue-level factors. Individuals who had higher appointment-keeping ratios in the Philippines had higher rates of consistent condom use (OR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.6-3.7) and significantly lower rates of STI (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.26-0.57). By beginning with provinces, which already have a good relationship between establishment venues and the local Health Department, China can develop city ordinances and establishment regulations that begin to require regular examinations of female sex workers and entertainers in the local STI clinic.

The Stroman Effect: Participants in MEN Count, an HIV/STI Reduction Intervention for Unemployed and Unstably Housed Black Heterosexual Men, Define Its Most Successful Elements.

Interventionists often prioritize quantitative evaluation criteria such as design (e.g., randomized controlled trials), delivery fidelity, and outcome effects to assess the success of an intervention. Albeit important, criteria such as these obscure other key metrics of success such as the role of the interactions between participants and intervention deliverers, or contextual factors that shape an intervention's activities and outcomes. In line with advocacy to expand evaluation criteria for health interventions, we designed this qualitative study to examine how a subsample of Black men in MEN Count, an HIV/STI risk reduction and healthy relationship intervention with employment and housing stability case management for Black men in Washington, DC, defined the intervention's success. We also examined the contextual factors that shaped participation in the study's peer counseling sessions. We conducted structured interviews with 38 Black men, ages 18 to 60 years (M = 31.1, SD = 9.33) who completed at least one of three peer counseling sessions. Analyses highlighted three key themes: (a) the favorable impact of Mr. Stroman, the lead peer counselor, on participants' willingness to participate in MEN Count and disclose their challenges-we dubbed this the "Stroman Effect"; (b) the importance of Black men intervention deliverers with relatable life experiences; and (c) how contextual factors such as the HIV/AIDS epidemic, needs for housing and employment services and safe spaces to talk about challenges, and absentee fathers shaped participation. We discuss the study's implications for sustainable programs after funding ends and future multilevel health interventions to promote health equity for poor urban Black men.

Multi-Site Evaluation of Community-Based Efforts to Improve Engagement in HIV Care Among Populations Disproportionately Affected by HIV in the United States.

This study assesses effects of a community-based intervention across seven sites in the United States on HIV care utilization and study retention, among people living with HIV (PLWH). A two-armed study was conducted from 2013 to 2016 in each of seven community-based agencies across the United States. Each site conducted interventions involving community engagement approaches in the form of case management or patient navigation. Control conditions were standard of care involving referral to HIV clinical care. Participants (N = 583) were adults reporting erratic or no HIV care in the past 6 months. Longitudinal survey data on demographics, behavioral risks, and HIV care were collected from participants at baseline, before service delivery, and at 6-month follow-up. Unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the intervention effects on HIV care utilization and study retention. Participants were majority black (75.5%), cisgender male (55.1%), and heterosexual (55.4%). No significant intervention effect was observed on HIV care utilization, although both groups improved significantly over time [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-3.37]. Intervention participants were more likely to be retained in the study (AOR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03-2.20). Community intervention did not affect HIV care utilization more than standard of care, but intervention participants were more likely to be retained in the study, suggesting that such approaches support relationship building in ways that can facilitate follow-up of socially vulnerable PLWH. More research is needed to understand how such community efforts can support better HIV care utilization in these populations.