RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Telotristat ethyl is indicated for use in combination with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) to treat carcinoid syndrome (CS) diarrhea uncontrolled by SSAs alone in adults, but long-term safety and efficacy data beyond 48 weeks are needed. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of telotristat ethyl and its effect on quality of life (QOL) in patients with CS. METHODS: In this phase 3, nonrandomized, multicenter, open-label, long-term extension study (TELEPATH), patients who participated in phase 2 or 3 trials of telotristat ethyl continued treatment at their present dose level (250 or 500 mg thrice daily) for 84 weeks. Safety and tolerability, the primary endpoint, were assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, AEs of special interest (AESIs; including liver-related AEs, depression, and gastrointestinal AEs), and deaths. The secondary objective was to evaluate changes in patients' QOL using validated cancer questionnaires and a subjective global assessment of CS symptoms. RESULTS: In 124 patients exposed to telotristat ethyl for a mean of 102.6 ± 53.2 weeks, the type and frequency of AEs were consistent with those reported in previous trials. The occurrence of AESIs was not related to dosage or duration of therapy. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity, and no deaths were related to telotristat ethyl. QOL scores remained stable, and the majority of patients reported adequate symptom relief throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Safety results of TELEPATH support the long-term use of telotristat ethyl in patients with CS diarrhea. Telotristat ethyl was well-tolerated and associated with sustained improvement in QOL scores (NCT02026063).
Assuntos
Síndrome do Carcinoide Maligno , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Humanos , Síndrome do Carcinoide Maligno/tratamento farmacológico , Fenilalanina/efeitos adversos , Fenilalanina/análogos & derivados , Pirimidinas , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The benefit from chemotherapy, specifically for patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC), has been poorly explored since GBC is mostly studied jointly with other biliary tract cancers (BTC). METHODS: Eligible studies reporting outcome of palliative systemic chemotherapy for advanced GBC were identified through MEDLINE, cross-referencing and conferences (PROSPERO-CRD42019155745). Meta-analysis of proportions and calculation of pooled weighted means were performed. RESULTS: 58 eligible studies (n = 1,986 patients); cisplatin/gemcitabine (33 % of patients), gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (14 %) or gemcitabine monotherapy (9%). Estimated pooled overall radiological response rate(ORR), and pooled weighted mean progression-free (PFS) and overall survivals (OS) were 23.2 % (95 %-CI 20.0-26.5) (I2: 52.5 % (p < 0.001)), 4.8 months (95 %-CI 4.3-5.2) and 8.3 months (95 %CI 7.6-8.9), respectively. Patients with non-GBC BTCs achieved a lower ORR than GBC [odds ratio 0.65 (95 % CI, 0.50-0.84)]. CONCLUSIONS: GBC benefit from chemotherapy differs from other BTCs, with shorter PFS/OS despite higher ORR; new treatment options are urgently required for management of advanced GBC.