[Evolution and Application of Disease Control Priorities]. / ç–¾ç— æŽ§åˆ¶ä¼˜å ˆçš„æ¼”è¿›åŠåº”ç”¨.

Disease control priority (DCP) is an important public health intervention strategy. Diseases that should be prioritized for prevention and control are first screened with a series of criteria, including the severity of the disease burden, the effectiveness of disease control technologies, the prevention and control capacity of the existing health system, etc. Then, the prevention and control technologies for these diseases undergo qualitative evaluation (eg, face-to-face interviews, expert consultation, workshops, etc) and quantitative evaluation (eg, cost-benefit analysis, multi-criteria decision analysis, etc). Finally, the public health initiatives that should be prioritized are identified. From the conception of the idea, to the formal proposition of the concept, to guidance for practice, DCP has gone through more than 70 years of development. Through DCP, significant contributions has been made to improving the efficiency of health care service systems and promoting the health of populations in developing countries. Herein, we systematically reviewed the background, development history, realization method, and practical applications of DCP, focusing on exploring the application potential of DCP in health governance and providing technical support and decision-making reference for the comprehensive promotion of the Healthy China Initiative.

The effect of abdominal massage in reducing malignant ascites symptoms.

As many as 50% of end-stage cancer patients will develop ascites and associated symptoms, including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, loss of appetite, dyspnea, perceived abdominal bloating, and immobility. Abdominal massage may stimulate lymph return to the venous system and reduce ascites-related symptoms. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of abdominal massage in reducing these symptoms and reducing ascites itself as reflected in body weight. For a randomized controlled design using repeated measures, a sample of 80 patients with malignant ascites was recruited from gastroenterology and oncology units of a medical center in northern Taiwan and randomly assigned to the intervention or the control group. A 15-minute gentle abdominal massage, using straight rubbing, point rubbing, and kneading, was administered twice daily for 3 days. The control group received a twice-daily 15-minute social interaction contact with the same nurse. Symptoms and body weight were measured in the morning for 4 consecutive days from pre- to post-test. In generalized estimation equation modeling, a significant group-by-time interaction on depression, anxiety, poor wellbeing, and perceived abdominal bloating, indicated that abdominal massage improved these four symptoms, with the greatest effect on perceived bloating. The intervention had no effect on pain, tiredness, nausea, drowsiness, poor appetite, shortness of breath, mobility limitation, or body weight. Abdominal massage appears useful for managing selected symptoms of malignant ascites.

Comparison of Allograft and Autograft in Lumbar Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Purpose/Aim of the study: The purpose of this analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of vertebral fusion with allograft versus autograft bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until July 27, 2015 using the keywords: lumbar vertebrae, surgery, spondylolisthesis, bone transplantation, allograft, autograft. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two-arm prospective studies, retrospective studies, and cohort studies comparing the results of autograft and allograft in patients receiving lumbar spinal fusion. The outcomes were changes of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores from baseline at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery and fusion rates. RESULTS: Of 154 studies identified in the database searches, five were included in the quantitative analysis (one RCT, one prospective, and three retrospective studies). The mean patient age ranged from approximately 40 to 65 years, and approximately half of the patients were males. The total number of patients who received allografts was 333 and the total that received autografts was 175. The analysis revealed the change of ODI and VAS pain score at 1, 2 and 3 years was similar between the allograft and autograft groups (all, p > .05), as were the fusion rates (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Both allograft and autograft provide acceptable outcomes for spinal fusion.

Animation program used to encourage patients or family members to take an active role for eliminating wrong-site, wrong-person, wrong-procedure surgeries: preliminary evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Wrong-site surgeries (including wrong-site, wrong-person and wrong-procedure errors) remain the number one problem among adverse events of health care delivery. Patients and/or family members should be involved when possible to help prevent such errors. AIMS: 1) Design an educational animation program about patient safety for patients and/or family members to help eliminate wrong-site surgery errors. 2) Evaluate its educational effect. METHODS: The animation developed for this study includes an introduction, hypothetical story, and guided information, and was presented at a tertiary medical center in northern Taiwan. A single-group pretest and posttest design was used. RESULTS: Forty-six patients and 48 family members participated in the study. The pre-training score was 3.6 (on a scale of 1-4). After watching the animation, there was no significant increase (0.08 ± 0.5) for the patient group, but the family member group showed significant improvement (0.21 ± 0.6, P = .0309). Most participants (98.9%) were satisfied with the animation. CONCLUSION: The majority of participants reported good practices for avoiding wrong-site surgery mistakes before an operation. A significant improvement of post-training scores in the family member group was seen. The high satisfaction rating given by the participants after seeing the animation indicates that it was generally acceptable.