The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the quality of life of Chinese football referees: the chain mediating role of occupational stress and job burnout.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 lockdown measures have had a great negative impact on the development of sports competition in China, as well as on the quality of life of football referees. This study aims to explore the impact of lockdown measures implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life of football referees in China and its mechanism of action. METHODS: The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), the Effort-Reward Imbalance Scale (ERI), the Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey (MBI-GS), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF). The scale was used from August to September 2022. Using an online questionnaire, 350 questionnaires were sent out and 338 were returned, for a return rate of 96.57%. Invalid questionnaires were excluded, and 307 football referees with referee grades in 29 provinces registered with the CFA were surveyed. SPSS 24.0 and Mplus 8.0 were used for data analysis and structural equation model testing in this study. RESULTS: The results showed that the COVID-19 lockdown had no significant impact on the quality of life of Chinese football referees. However, the COVID-19 lockdown can affect the quality of life of Chinese football referees through occupational stress or job burnout. Occupational stress and job burnout also play a chain intermediary role between the COVID-19 lockdown and the quality of life of Chinese football referees. In addition, this study further explores the quality of life by dividing it into four dimensions (physical, social, psychological, and environmental). The results show that all four dimensions satisfy the chain mediation model. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, the quality of life of Chinese football referees can be improved by reducing their occupational stress and job burnout during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Combination treatment of allergic rhinitis using ketotifen fumarate and budesonide administered as nasal sprays
.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ketotifen fumarate and budesonide administered as nasal sprays to treat allergic rhinitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 allergic rhinitis patients, who were admitted to our hospital in recent years, were selected as research subjectes. All patients were treated with ketotifen fumarate and budesonide administered as nasal sprays. Clinical efficacy was evaluated after treatment. RESULTS: After treatment, the symptoms of nasal obstruction, nasal itching, sneezing, and runny nose significantly improved, and the score of these symptoms was significantly lower when compared to that before treatment (p < 0.05). After treatment, the eosinophils and IgE in peripheral blood of patients obviously reduced (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combination treatment of allergic rhinitis using ketotifen fumarate and budesonide administered as nasal sprays has a good clinical effect in treating allergic rhinitis, which is of great significance to improve the clinical symptoms and immune function of patients. Ketotifen fumarate and budesonide have good therapeutic effects on allergic rhinitis. The combination of these two drugs can rapidly relieve allergic symptoms.

Effects of preoperative nasal spray esketamine on separation anxiety and emergence agitation in pediatric strabismus surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of preoperative nasal spray esketamine on separation anxiety and postoperative emergence agitation in pediatric strabismus surgery. METHOD: Ninety children aged 3 to 6 years who underwent elective strabismus surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups that received 0.5 mg/kg (group S1), 1 mg/kg of esketamine (group S2), and the same volume of normal saline (group C) by nasal spray 10 minutes before surgery. The observation indicators of this test include the Ramsay sedation score, separation anxiety score, mask induction score, and the incidences of postoperative emergence agitation. Patient's heart rate, blood oxygen, post anesthesia care unit stay time, and any adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The Ramsay sedation score was significantly lower in group C than those in groups S1 and S2 (P < .001). The separation anxiety scores and the mask induction scores were significantly higher in group C than those in groups S1 and S2 (P < .001). The incidences of emergence agitation in groups S1 and S2 were significantly lower than that in C group (P < .001). No obvious clinical complication was observed. CONCLUSION: Preoperative nasal spray esketamine reduced the preoperative separation anxiety and decrease emergence agitation in pediatric strabismus surgery.

Two mechanical methods for thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaecological pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomised study.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism is known to be an important social and health care problem because of its high incidence among patients who undergo surgery. Studies on the mechanical prophylaxis of thromboembolism after gynaecological pelvic surgery are few. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaecological pelvic surgery using a combination of graduated compression stockings (GCS) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) or GCS alone. METHODS: The study was performed on 108 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received GCS before the operation and IPC during the operation (IPC + GCS group). The second group received GCS before the operation (GCS group). To analyze the effect of the preventive measures and the laboratory examination on the incidence of thrombosis and to compare the safety of these measures, the incidence of adverse reactions was assessed. RESULTS: The morbidity associated with DVT was 4.8% (5/104) in the IPC + GCS group and 12.5% (14/112) in the GCS group. There were significant statistical differences between the two groups. There were no adverse effects in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic combination of GCS and IPC was more effective than GCS alone for thrombosis prevention in high-risk patients undergoing gynaecological pelvic surgery, and there were no adverse effects in either group.