Ambulatory heart rate reduction after catheter-based renal denervation in hypertensive patients not receiving anti-hypertensive medications: data from SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED, a randomized, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial.

AIMS: The randomized sham-controlled SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED trial demonstrated that renal denervation (RDN) using a multi-electrode catheter lowers ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in non-medicated hypertensive patients. The current report describes the effects of RDN on heart rate (HR) in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were enrolled with an office systolic BP (SBP) of ≥150 mmHg and <180 mmHg, office diastolic BP (DBP) of ≥90 mmHg, and a mean ambulatory SBP of ≥140 mmHg and <170 mmHg. Patients were drug naïve or removed from their anti-hypertensive medications. Eighty patients were randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham procedure. This post hoc analysis examines the effect at 3 months of RDN on HR and of high baseline 24-h HR on BP and HR changes. There was a significant reduction in 24-h HR at 3 months for the RDN group (-2.5 b.p.m.) compared with sham (-0.2 b.p.m.), P = 0.003 (analysis of covariance). Mean baseline-adjusted treatment differences were significantly different between groups at 3 months for average morning HR (-4.4 b.p.m., P = 0.046) and minimum morning HR (-3.0 b.p.m., P = 0.026). RDN patients with baseline 24-h HR above the median (73.5 b.p.m.) had significant reductions in average ambulatory SBP (-10.7 mmHg difference, P = 0.001) and DBP (-7.5 mmHg, P < 0.001), whereas BP changes in RDN patients with below-median HRs were not significant. CONCLUSION: Average and minimum morning HR were significantly reduced at 3 months for RDN compared with sham patients. A baseline 24-h HR above the median predicted greater BP reductions and may allow physicians to select patients likely to respond to the procedure.

[Consensus statement: Management of oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation]. / Konsensuspapier: Schlaganfallprophylaxe bei Patienten mit nichtvalvulärem Vorhofflimmern.

With the introduction of edoxaban last year in Germany, four nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are now available for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. These novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) represent an attractive new option compared to vitamin K antagonists (e.g., warfarin or phenprocoumon) due to simple use and fewer interactions with other drugs or food. Therefore, no INR monitoring and dosage adjustments are required for NOAC. The compelling clinical advantage of NOAC is the dramatic risk reduction of hemorhagic stroke and intracranial bleeding compared to current standard. In addition, total mortality is significantly reduced by 10 %. These effects are demonstrated for all four NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban). Therefore, current national and international guidelines recommend NOAC as the preferred option or at least as an attractive alternative compared to the former standard of vitamin K antagonists. The economic impact and reimbursement by Statutory Health Insurance (GKV) is of major importance for treatment in an outpatient setting. For apixaban and edoxaban, an additional benefit was granted by the institution of G­BA and IQWiG in this clinical setting, whereas dabigatran and rivaroxaban were not assessed due to market entrance prior to 2011 before the AMNOG procedure was initiated. The members of this consensus paper recommend NOAC as the preferred option for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are currently not treated with anticoagulant drugs in spite of clear indication for anticoagulation. For new patients with nonvalvular fibrillation, it should be decided on an individual basis which treatment option is adequate for the patient with their respective comorbidities.