Chinese expert consensus on the construction of the fluoroless cardiac electrophysiology laboratory and related techniques.

Transcatheter radiofrequency ablation has been widely introduced for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias. The demand for catheter ablation continues to grow rapidly as the level of recommendation for catheter ablation. Traditional catheter ablation is performed under the guidance of X-rays. X-rays can help display the heart contour and catheter position, but the radiobiological effects caused by ionizing radiation and the occupational injuries worn caused by medical staff wearing heavy protective equipment cannot be ignored. Three-dimensional mapping system and intracardiac echocardiography can provide detailed anatomical and electrical information during cardiac electrophysiological study and ablation procedure, and can also greatly reduce or avoid the use of X-rays. In recent years, fluoroless catheter ablation technique has been well demonstrated for most arrhythmic diseases. Several centers have reported performing procedures in a purposefully designed fluoroless electrophysiology catheterization laboratory (EP Lab) without fixed digital subtraction angiography equipment. In view of the lack of relevant standardized configurations and operating procedures, this expert task force has written this consensus statement in combination with relevant research and experience from China and abroad, with the aim of providing guidance for hospitals (institutions) and physicians intending to build a fluoroless cardiac EP Lab, implement relevant technologies, promote the standardized construction of the fluoroless cardiac EP Lab.

Current understanding of atrial fibrillation recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation: From pulmonary vein to epicardium.

Recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is common, with pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection considered the most likely cause. However, technologies such as contact force-sensing, irrigated catheters, and ablation index (AI)-guided ablation strategies have resulted in more durable PV isolation. As a result, it is difficult to predict which patients will develop AF recurrence despite durable PV isolation, with evolving non-PV atrial substrates thought to be a key contributor to late recurrences. Deciphering the complex mechanisms of AF recurrence beyond the cornerstone of PV isolation therefore remains challenging. Recently, there have been several important advances that may lead to better understanding and treatment of this challenging clinical entity: percutaneous epicardial access and mapping, late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI), improvements in high-resolution electroanatomic mapping, and new ablation energy sources, specifically pulsed-field ablation. This review aims to synthesize the current literature in an effort to better understand arrhythmia mechanisms and treatment targets in patients with AF/Atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence post-ablation.

Prevention of left atrium esophagus fistula: Appraisal of existing technologies and strategies.

Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare, but feared complication. With increasing utilization of ablation therapy for AF, the understanding of the relationship between AEF and ablation has been improved in recent years. Efforts to reduce the risk of AEF have focused on decreasing the risk of severe esophageal injury (EI) and the presumed subsequent progression from EI to AEF, including esophageal temperature monitoring, esophageal cooling systems, esophageal deviation devices, and decreasing and/or curtailing ablation energy delivery. Periprocedural assessment may help identify higher risk patients and detect early esophageal lesions. This review systematically summarizes and evaluates the current strategies and techniques utilized to reduce the risk of AEF in the clinical workflow for AF ablation. We expect that this review will help clinicians to better understand the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of these methods, and to find suitable strategies using current available tools.

10-year single center experience of catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Focal atrial tachycardias (ATs) represent 5-15% of sustained supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). Characteristic distribution of sites of origin and detailed electrophysiologic characterization of AT from specific sites of origin (SOO) have been described. Acute success and recurrence are less favorable than for other SVTs. In this series, we present our experience of focal AT ablation over a 10-year period. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of an electronically maintained database of all patients undergoing AT ablation at our institution between January 2011 and December 2020. Demographic, procedural, and outcomes data were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 293 distinct atrial tachycardias were treated during 279 procedures in 256 patients, including 207 first AT ablations. Acutely successful AT suppression was achieved in 91% of first-time ablations. Acute success was dependent on SOO of AT with lowest rates of acute suppression in the para-Hisian region and the crista terminalis (CT). The most common reason for failure to acutely suppress the AT was proximity to a critical structure (phrenic nerve, sinus node, and AV node). 8.9% of patients in this series presented with a tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy (TCM). 48% of TCM patients underwent an ablation attempt during an acute medical admission. Among the TCM group, median LV ejection fraction increased from 25% (range 10-50%) to 55% (range 35-65%) with successful treatment of AT. Five patients undergoing a repeat procedure had planned pericardial access for displacement of the phrenic nerve to permit ablation of the AT, which was successful in all cases. Among patients without a pre-existing diagnosis of AF, peri-procedural AF was not associated with a higher incidence of a subsequent diagnosis of AF (odds ratio 1.169, 95% CI 0.4058-3.475, p = 0.7628). Median duration of follow-up was 832 days. By Kaplan-Meier estimate, recurrence-free survival was 78% (95% CI 67-88%). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, focal AT ablation is associated with good acute results and a low rate of complications, but outcomes remain less favorable than previously reported for other forms of SVT.

Performance of the REAL-AF Same-Day Discharge Protocol in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge (SDD) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been widely adopted. Nevertheless, planned SDD has been performed by using subjective criteria rather than standardized protocols. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the previously described SDD protocol in a prospective multicenter study. METHODS: Using the REAL-AF (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) SDD protocol eligibility criteria (stable anticoagulation, no bleeding history, left ventricular ejection fraction >40%, no pulmonary disease, no procedures within 60 days, and body mass index <35 kg/m2), operators prospectively determined whether patients undergoing ablation of AF were candidates for SDD (SDD vs non-SDD groups). Successful SDD was achieved if the patient met the protocol discharge criteria. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of SDD. The primary safety endpoints were readmission rates as well as acute and subacute complications. The secondary endpoints included procedural characteristics and freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias. RESULTS: A total of 2,332 patients were included. The REAL-AF SDD protocol identified 1,982 (85%) patients as potential candidates for SDD. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 1,707 (86.1%) patients. The readmission rate for SDD vs non-SDD group was similar (0.8% vs 0.9%; P = 0.924). The SDD group had a lower acute complication rate than the non-SDD group (0.8% vs 2.9%; P < 0.001), and there was no difference in the subacute complication rate between groups (P = 0.513). Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was comparable between groups (P = 0.212). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicenter prospective registry, the use of a standardized protocol showed the safety of SDD after catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent AF. (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation [REAL-AF]; NCT04088071).

Advantages and challenges for noninvasive atrial fibrillation ablation.

PURPOSE: Although catheter ablation is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), risks remain and improved efficacy is desired. Stereotactic radiotherapy is a well-established therapy used to noninvasively treat malignancies with precision. We sought to evaluate stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) as a therapeutic option for treating AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three cancer patients with drug refractory AF were enrolled. Planning software using 3-D CT of the left atrium was used to design a desired ablation volume encompassing antral circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, roof and floor lines to create a "box" lesion set. After planning, patients were treated in the radioablation suite. STAR was able to deliver the intended radiation dose to the target in all 3 patients. No complications were observed over a follow-up period of 24 months. One patient with paroxysmal AF died from deterioration of cancer. The autopsy revealed evidence of fibroblasts and fibrogenesis in the region of atrial tissues targeted with radioablation. In one of these patients, left atrial posterior wall electrograms recorded from the esophagus before and 3 months after STAR indicated successful electrical isolation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of non-invasive radioablation of the left atrium with demonstration of successful electrical isolation. Although STAR may be safe and effective in delivering ablative energy to the left atrium, further evaluation is warranted regarding effectiveness.

Optimal Programming of ICDs for Prevention of Appropriate and Inappropriate Shocks.

Expansion of indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has led to a significant increase in the number of patients receiving ICDs and the number of lives saved because of ICD therapy. However, appropriate or inappropriate shocks are frequent and may result in a significant decrease in quality of life in patients with ICDs. Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, sinus tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter with rapid conduction, and other supraventricular tachycardias are the most common arrhythmias causing inappropriate therapy. Other causes include oversensing of diaphragmatic potentials or myopotentials, T-wave oversensing, double or triple counting of intracardiac signals, lead fractures or header connection problems, lead chatter or noise, and electromagnetic interference. Strategies to reduce inappropriate therapy using device programming rely on the ability to distinguish supraventricular and atrial arrhythmias from ventricular tachycardia. Avoiding therapy for nonsustained ventricular arrhythmias and increasing the role of antitachycardia pacing to terminate ventricular tachycardia are key approaches to reducing shocks for ventricular arrhythmias. Optimal programming holds great promise for decreasing the overall incidence of shock therapy and increasing ICD acceptance.