Thrombectomy alone vs thrombectomy with over 2/3-dose intravenous thrombolysis pretreatment in the DIRECT-MT trial.

BACKGROUND: The DIRECT-MT trial showed that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone was noninferior to EVT preceded by intravenous alteplase. However, the infusion of intravenous alteplase was uncompleted before the initiation of EVT in most cases of this trial. Therefore, the additional benefit and risk of over 2/3-dose intravenous alteplase pretreatment remain to be assessed. METHODS: We assessed patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke who received EVT alone or with over 2/3-dose intravenous alteplase pretreatment from the DIRECT-MT trial. Patients were assigned to the thrombectomy-alone group and the alteplase pretreatment group. The primary outcome was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. The interaction of treatment allocation and collateral capacity was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 393 patients (thrombectomy alone: 315; alteplase pretreatment: 78) were identified. The thrombectomy alone was comparable with alteplase pretreatment prior to the thrombectomy on the distribution of mRS at 90 days without significant effect modification by collateral capacity (adjusted common odds ratio (acOR), 1.12; 95% CI, 0.72-1.74; adjusted P for interaction = 0.83). Successful reperfusion before thrombectomy and the number of passes in the thrombectomy alone group differed significantly from the alteplase pretreatment group (2.6% vs. 11.5%; corrected P = 0.02 and 2 vs. 1; corrected P = 0.003). There was no interaction between treatment allocation and collateral capacity on all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: EVT alone and EVT preceded by over 2/3-dose intravenous alteplase might have equal efficacy and safety for patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, except for successful perfusion before thrombectomy and the number of passes.

Cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy alone versus alteplase before thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: results from the DIRECT-MT.

OBJECTIVE: The use of thrombectomy alone (endovascular thrombectomy [EVT]) was found to be noninferior to combination therapy (EVT plus intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] with alteplase before thrombectomy [EVT+IVT]) in the DIRECT-MT (Direct Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy in Order to Revascularize AIS Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial), yet the economic value of omitting alteplase was unclear. Thus, in this paper the authors assessed the cost-effectiveness of EVT alone versus EVT+IVT in the DIRECT-MT. METHODS: In the context of the Chinese healthcare system, the authors conducted a post hoc economic analysis of the DIRECT-MT based on an intention-to-treat approach. Index stroke costs were collected at the individual level, while costs after discharge were complemented with published literature and government websites. Utility weights assessed at 90 days using the 5-Level EQ-5D questionnaire were prospectively collected. For long-term modeled cost-effectiveness analysis, a Markov model with 7 health states corresponding to the 7 modified Rankin Scale scores was used. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. All costs are expressed in 2019 US dollars, discounted using the annual Consumer Price Index in China. RESULTS: During the index hospitalization, the mean medication cost in the EVT-alone group was $487 lower than that in the EVT+IVT group ($2453 [95% CI $2205-$2701] vs $2940 [95% CI $2703-$3178], p = 0.01), but the mean overall costs were similar between the groups ($15,565 [95% CI $14,876-$16,254] vs $15,472 [95% CI $14,714-$16,230], p = 0.73). Within 90 days of the trial, there were no significant differences in total costs (difference -$222 [95% CI -$603 to $161], p = 0.06, bootstrapping) or utility values (median 0.84 [IQR 0.48-0.95] vs median 0.85 [IQR 0.26-1.00]; beta coefficient < 0.01 [95% CI -0.06 to 0.07]) between EVT alone and EVT+IVT. Over the lifetime horizon, EVT alone and EVT+IVT yielded comparable lifetime QALYs (2.02 QALYs [95% CI -0.07 to 4.55 QALYs] vs 1.90 QALYs [95% CI -0.09 to 4.55 QALYs]) and costs ($26,795 [95% CI $15,281-$54,463] vs $27,632 [95% CI $14,558-$52,251]). CONCLUSIONS: In this economic analysis based on a trial conducted in China, the authors found that EVT alone was not associated with economic dominance over EVT+IVT in patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion.

Practice of integrated treatment process for acute ischaemic stroke in hospital coordinated by emergency stroke nurses.

AIMS: To explore the practice effect of establishing an integrated treatment process by stroke emergency nurses in general hospitals for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). DESIGN: Compared the time spent in each link before and after the establishment of AIS integrated treatment. METHODS: Since March 2016, we set up a team of emergency stroke nurses (ESN), trained and assessed the knowledge of emergency stroke, and set up a post of ESN. RESULTS: The median time of admission-judgement, admission-establishment of venous access, admission-cranial CT examination and admission-intravenous thrombolytic therapy was statistically significantly shortened after the implementation of the integrated treatment process of AIS coordinated by stroke emergency nurses (p < .01). The new treatment process of AIS further shortens the time of each treatment link and promotes the timeliness.