Therapy with hypomethlyating agents/venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia requiring admission to the intensive care unit: Possible reduction in side effects with preserved efficacy.

Patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia and severe acute complications, such as respiratory failure or sepsis, suffer from a high mortality rate when induction chemotherapy is delivered in an ICU setting. The report by Liang et al. implies that less intensive therapy with hypomethylating agents/venetoclax results in a lower mortality and morbidity rate whereby preserving efficacy in this patient group. Commentary on: Liang et al. Venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in critically ill patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Br J Haematol 2024;204:1219-1226.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF after induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan society of clinical oncology.

Although granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the incidence, duration, and severity of neutropenia, its prophylactic use for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial due to a theoretically increased risk of relapse. The present study investigated the effects of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for AML with remission induction therapy. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of pooled data was conducted, and the risk ratio with corresponding confidence intervals was calculated in the meta-analysis and summarized. Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis, nine of which were examined in the meta-analysis. Although G-CSF significantly shortened the duration of neutropenia, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not correlate with infection-related mortality. Moreover, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not affect disease progression/recurrence, overall survival, or adverse events, such as musculoskeletal pain. However, evidence to support or discourage the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for adult AML patients with induction therapy remains limited. Therefore, the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis can be considered for adult AML patients with remission induction therapy who are at a high risk of infectious complications.

Clofarabine Preconditioning followed by Allogeneic Transplant Using TBI and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Relapsed Refractory Leukemia.

Acute myeloid leukemia patients with induction failure or relapsed refractory disease have minimal chance of achieving remission with subsequent treatments. Several trials have shown the feasibility of clofarabine-based conditioning in allogeneic stem cell transplants (allo-HSCT) for non-remission AML patients. Pre-transplant conditioning with clofarabine followed by reduced-intensity allo-HSCT has also demonstrated a potential benefit in those patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical donors, but it is not commonly used in haploidentical and mismatched transplants. In this case report, we describe our experience of seven cases of non-remission AML who received clofarabine preconditioning followed by an allo-HSCT with PTCy. The 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival was 83.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 27.3-97.9%) and 85.7% (95% CI: 33.4-97.9%). Median days of neutrophil and platelet recovery were 16 (range of 13-23) and 28 (range of 17-75), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day 100 and chronic GVHD at 1-year showed 28.6% (95% CI: 8-74.2%) and 28.6% (95% CI: 3-63.9%), respectively. The two-year relapse rate was 14.3% (95% CI: 2.14-66.6%). One-year GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GFRS) at 1-year was 71.4% (95% CI: 25.8-92%). Our patients showed successful outcomes with clofarabine preconditioning to reduce the leukemic burden at the pre-transplant period followed by PTCy to reduce GVHD resulting in lower relapsed rate and better GFRS in these patients.

Results of a randomized phase 3 study of oral sapacitabine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (SEAMLESS).

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is fatal in elderly patients who are unfit for standard induction chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit of administering sapacitabine, an oral nucleoside analogue, in alternating cycles with decitabine, a low-intensity therapy, to elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, phase 3 study (SEAMLESS) was conducted at 87 sites in 11 countries. Patients aged ≥70 years who were not candidates for or chose not to receive standard induction chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to arm A (decitabine in alternating cycles with sapacitabine) received 1-hour intravenous infusions of decitabine 20 mg/m2 once daily for 5 consecutive days every 8 weeks (first cycle and subsequent odd cycles) and sapacitabine 300 mg twice daily on 3 consecutive days per week for 2 weeks every 8 weeks (second cycle and subsequent even cycles) or to control arm C who received 1-hour infusions of decitabine 20 mg/m2 once daily for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Prior hypomethylating agent therapy for preexisting myelodysplastic syndromes or myeloproliferative neoplasms was an exclusion criterion. Randomization was stratified by antecedent myelodysplastic syndromes or myeloproliferative neoplasms, white blood cell count (<10 × 109 /L and ≥10 × 109 /L), and bone marrow blast percentage (≥50% vs <50%). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were the rates of complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete platelet count recovery, partial remission, hematologic improvement, and stable disease along with the corresponding durations, transfusion requirements, number of hospitalized days, and 1-year survival. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01303796). RESULTS: Between October 2011 and December 2014, 482 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive decitabine administered in alternating cycles with sapacitabine (study arm, n = 241) or decitabine monotherapy (control arm, n = 241). The median OS was 5.9 months on the study arm versus 5.7 months on the control arm (P = .8902). The CR rate was 16.6% on the study arm and 10.8% on the control arm (P = .1468). In patients with white blood cell counts <10 × 109 /L (n = 321), the median OS was higher on the study arm versus the control arm (8.0 vs 5.8 months; P = .145), as was the CR rate (21.5% vs 8.6%; P = .0017). CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of decitabine administered in alternating cycles with sapacitabine was active but did not significantly improve OS compared with decitabine monotherapy. Subgroup analyses suggest that patients with baseline white blood cell counts <10 × 109 /L might benefit from decitabine alternating with sapacitabine, with an improved CR rate and the convenience of an oral drug. These findings should be prospectively confirmed.

Use of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy.

OPINION STATEMENT: The expanding availability of minimal or more precisely measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with its possible implications for therapeutic decisions is of high interest to clinicians treating AML patients. A variety of mostly retrospective studies have shown that AML patients with a positive MRD test, assessed by different techniques at defined cutoffs and time-points, are at significantly higher risk of relapse and experience shorter overall survival compared to MRD-negative patients. How this valuable information may be adapted in the daily routine of patients' treatment to distinguish individuals who need more aggressive therapy from the ones who can be spared additional therapy to avoid treatment-related toxicities is still being investigated. With the exception of MRD analyses in acute promyelocitic leukemia (APL), the clinical implications of MRD tests for the individual AML patient are still mostly unknown. We currently lack hard evidence that MRD-based therapy modulation during treatment or pre-emptive intervention in MRD-positive patients after therapy would improve outcomes in non-APL AML patients. These questions will be evaluated in prospective randomized clinical trials. Today, however, some conclusions with regard to MRD assessment in AML can be drawn from the published data and are reviewed in this article.

Successful treatment of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis presenting concomitantly with acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: There were reports of the occurrence of TB during therapy for leukemia with possible complications. In patients with acute leukemia, therapy might be delayed or complicated by the presence of tuberculosis. METHOD: We present a patient who was diagnosed with acute leukemia and concomitant tuberculosis. RESULTS: The patient's therapy of leukemia had to be delayed and he had relapse of leukemia but was subsequently treated successfully for both diseases despite a prolonged culture positivity for tuberculosis. He required a prolonged course of therapy and additional secondary anti-tuberculosis therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of tuberculosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with pneumonia, persistent fever, and those with focal signs or symptoms suggestive of tuberculosis. Despite having a sensitive organism, the infection was difficult to treat, even with the addition of two second-line drugs. The standard anti-tuberculosis therapy is usually adequate, but response may be slow, and inadequate even if the organism is sensitive requiring the addition of second-line agents.

Central nervous system disease in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has varied in past trials, and controversy exists over the degree of involvement requiring intensified CNS therapy. Two recent Children's Oncology Group protocols, AAML03P1 and AAML0531, directed additional intrathecal (IT) therapy to patients with CNS2 (≤5 white blood cell [WBC] with blasts) or CNS3 (>5 WBC with blasts or CNS symptoms) disease at diagnosis. METHODS: We examined disease characteristics and outcomes of the 1,344 patients on these protocols, 949 with CNS1 (no blasts), 217 with CNS2, and 178 with CNS3, with the latter two receiving additional IT therapy. RESULTS: Young age (P = 0.003), hyperleukocytosis (P < 0.001), and the presence of inversion 16 (P < 0.001) were the only factors more prevalent in patients with CNS2 or CNS3 disease. Complete remission at the end of induction (EOI) 2 was achieved less often in patients with CNS involvement (P < 0.001). From diagnosis, event-free survival (EFS) for patients with CNS involvement was significantly worse (P < 0.001), whereas overall survival (OS) was not (P = 0.16). From the EOI1, there was a higher relapse rate (RR) and worse disease-free survival (DFS), but less impact on OS (CNS1:DFS 58.9%, RR 34.1%, OS 69.3%; CNS2:DFS 53.2%, RR 40.9%, OS 74.7%; CNS3:DFS 45.2%, RR 48.8%, OS 60.8%; P = 0.006, P < 0.001, P = 0.045, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed that independently CNS2 and CNS3 status adversely affected RR and DFS. Traumatic diagnostic lumbar puncture was not associated with worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CNS leukemia confers greater relapse risk despite more aggressive locally directed therapy. Novel approaches need to be investigated in this group of patients.

Final results of a phase 2 trial of clofarabine and low-dose cytarabine alternating with decitabine in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using standard intensive chemotherapy has been associated with poor outcomes. Effective, less toxic therapies are needed to achieve and maintain durable remissions. METHODS: One hundred eighteen patients with newly diagnosed AML (median age, 68 years; range, 60-81 years) were treated with a regimen of clofarabine and low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) alternating with decitabine (DAC). The induction consisted of intravenous clofarabine at 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5 combined with subcutaneous LDAC at 20 mg twice daily on days 1 to 10. Responding patients were then treated with a prolonged consolidation/maintenance regimen consisting of cycles of clofarabine plus LDAC alternating with cycles of DAC. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 68%. The complete remission (CR) rate was 60% overall, 71% for patients with a diploid karyotype, and 50% for patients with an adverse karyotype. The median overall survival (OS) was 11.1 months for all patients and 18.5 months for those achieving a CR/complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp). The median relapse-free survival for patients achieving a CR/CRp was 14.1 months. According to a multivariate analysis, only adverse cytogenetics and a white blood cell count ≥ 10 × 10(9)/L predicted worse OS. The regimen was well tolerated with 4- and 8-week mortality rates of 3% and 7%, respectively. The most common nonhematologic adverse events were nausea, elevated liver enzymes, and rash. CONCLUSIONS: The lower intensity, prolonged-therapy program of clofarabine and LDAC alternating with DAC is well tolerated and highly effective in older patients with AML.

A Case of Hypernatremia in a Newly Diagnosed Patient With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Lessons for Nephrologists.

Arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D), formerly known as central diabetes insipidus, is a disease characterized by polyuria, polydipsia, and hypernatremia. The concomitant diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an underappreciated event that requires prompt recognition and treatment by practicing nephrologists and hematologists. This report highlights this importance by describing the case of a 39-year-old patient newly diagnosed with AML who developed severe hypernatremia. The role of diagnostic testing through desmopressin (DDAVP) challenge and copeptin testing to confirm the diagnosis of AVP-D in this context and the use of DDVAP for treatment are discussed. Practicing nephrologists and primary care providers taking care of patients with similar symptoms will benefit from understanding the pathophysiology of AVP-D, its relationship with AML, and the prognosis in this patient cohort.

New treatment opportunities for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and the increasing importance of frailty assessment - An oncogeriatric perspective.

With the introduction of targeted chemotherapy drugs, a new age of treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has begun. The promotion of the azacitidine+venetoclax combination regimen to first line of treatment in patients deemed ineligible for intensive chemotherapy marks the first of many novel combination regimens becoming part of national treatment guidelines. We review recent phase II and III clinical trials and conclude that these novel regimens offer significant increases in response rates, remission rates, and overall survival. The incidence of adverse events, the accrued time toxicity, and the healthcare costs, however, are increasing as well. Compared with clinical trials, older patients in the real world frequently present with an inferior baseline health status, which is associated with an increased risk of experiencing side effects. The key to reaping the maximum benefit of the new agents and their combination regimens therefore lies in sufficient attention being given to a patients' preexisting comorbidities, potential frailty, and quality of life. A systematic collaboration between hemato-oncologists and geriatricians can be a potent first step towards addressing the increased treatment intensity patients with AML experience under the novel regimens. In this narrative review article we provide an overview of recent and ongoing clinical trials, highlight encountered adverse events, discuss frailty assessment options, and outline an oncogeriatic care path for older patients with AML.

Clinicians' Perspectives on the Telehealth Serious Illness Care Program for Older Adults With Myeloid Malignancies: Single-Arm Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Serious illness conversations may help patients avoid unwanted treatments. We previously piloted the telehealth Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to understand the experience of the telehealth SICP from the clinician's perspective. METHODS: We studied 10 clinicians who delivered the telehealth SICP to 20 older adults with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Quantitative outcomes included confidence and acceptability. Confidence was measured using a 22-item survey (range 1-7; a higher score is better). Acceptability was measured using an 11-item survey (5-point Likert scale). Hypothesis testing was performed at α=.10 (2-tailed) due to the pilot nature and small sample size. Clinicians participated in audio-recorded qualitative interviews at the end of the study to discuss their experience. RESULTS: A total of 8 clinicians completed the confidence measure and 7 clinicians completed the acceptability measure. We found a statistically significant increase in overall confidence (mean increase of 0.5, SD 0.6; P=.03). The largest increase in confidence was in helping families with reconciliation and goodbye (mean 1.4, SD 1.5; P=.04). The majority of clinicians agreed that the format was simple (6/7, 86%) and easy to use (6/7, 86%). Clinicians felt that the telehealth SICP was effective in understanding their patients' values about end-of-life care (7/7, 100%). A total of three qualitative themes emerged: (1) the telehealth SICP deepened relationships and renewed trust; (2) each telehealth SICP visit felt unique and personal in a positive way; and (3) uninterrupted, unrushed time optimized the visit experience. CONCLUSIONS: The telehealth SICP increased confidence in having serious illness conversations while deepening patient-clinician relationships. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04745676; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04745676.

Azacitidine and its role in the upfront treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects elderly population. This poses challenges in management, as patients are frequently not candidates for intensive therapy given comorbidities or frailty. Currently, azacitidine (AZA), either as monotherapy or in combination regimens, is the backbone treatment in this group of patients. AREAS COVERED: We review the mechanism of action, pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of AZA. It reviews current combination therapies of AZA with other targeted therapies for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML. EXPERT OPINION: AZA is a cornerstone for the treatment of patients considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy induction, but better results and therapies are required for these patients. AZA has shown synergistic properties when combined with other medications. Its safety profile and few drug interactions make it a suitable medication to use as backbone. Newer therapies are being combined with AZA, demonstrating safety and in cases, improved responses, and survival. AZA/venetoclax has emerged as the standard of care for patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Doublet and triplet combinations are increasingly being studied. With the results observed in elderly patients, the intensive chemotherapy paradigm might be put to test in younger populations, with AZA combinations being at the forefront.

Outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia treated with Mito-FLAG salvage chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Curative intended treatment is challenging in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (r/r AML) and associated with a dismal prognosis for long-term survival. Despite novel treatment options, the majority of patients are treated with chemotherapy-based regimens. Although widely used, little data exist on the combination of fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (FLAG) and mitoxantrone as salvage strategy for r/r AML. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients receiving Mito-FLAG for r/r AML treated at a German tertiary care center between 2009 and 2019 were analyzed with regard to response rates, survival and safety profile. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 75.8% with 56.1% of patients achieving complete remission (CR) and 19.7% partial remission (PR). After a median follow-up of 54 months, median overall survival (OS) was 13 months. Patients transitioned to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) (75.8%) showed a significant improvement in OS with a median OS of 17 (95% CI 8.5-25.4) months vs 3 (95% CI 1.7-4.3) months (p < 0.001). 30- and 60-day mortality rates for all patients after the initial cycle of Mito-FLAG were 4.5% and 7.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Mito-FLAG salvage protocol represents an effective and feasible treatment regimen for r/r AML. Importantly, a high rate of transition to successful alloHSCT with the aim of long-term disease-free survival has been shown.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Historical Perspective and Progress in Research and Therapy Over 5 Decades.

With the Food and Drug Administration approval of 9 agents for different acute myeloid leukemia (AML) indications, the prognosis and management of AML is evolving rapidly. Herein, we review the important milestones in the history of AML research and therapy, discuss insights regarding prognostic assessment and prediction of treatment outcome, detail practical supportive care measures, and summarize the current treatment landscape and areas of evolving research.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical efficacy of drug therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia.

BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis was performed to examine the clinical efficacy of drugs in the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). METHODS: combinations of terms of "acute myeloid leukemia", "fludara", "cytarabine", "cladribine", "aclacinomycin", "granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)", and "hyaluronic acid" were searched in Chinese databases. "acute myelogenous leukemia", "fludara", "cytarabine", "cladribine", "aclacinomycin", "granulocyte colony-stimulating factor", and "hyaluronic acid" were searched in English databases. Review Manager 5.3 was employed for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Ultimately, 12 articles were included. Most of the articles had a low-risk bias, and were of medium or high quality. The complete remission rates were tested for heterogeneity [chi-square test (Chi2) =4.10, degrees of freedom (df)=10, I2=0%; P=0.94]. The fixed effect model analysis showed that the difference between experimental participants and controls was considerable [Z=13.15, odds ratio (OR) =12.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): (8.77, 18.76); P<0.01]. The overall effective rates were tested for heterogeneity (Chi2=1.58, df=7, I2=0%; P=0.98), and difference between experimental participants and controls was considerable [Z=10.70, OR =1.32, 95% CI: (7.32,17.89); P<0.01]. The overall adverse reaction rates were tested for heterogeneity (Chi2=0.42, df=5, I2=0%; P=0.99), and the difference between experimental participants and controls was considerable [Z=5.00, OR =0.38, 95% CI: (0.26, 0.55); P<0.01]. The circles of some studies in the funnel diagrams were symmetrical with the midline, the accuracy of included trials was high, the publications were not biased, and the final conclusions were reliable. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that drug treatments of AML can improve complete remission and total effective rates and reduce adverse reaction rates, and thus are worthy of clinical promotion.

The complete story of less than complete responses: The evolution and application of acute myeloid leukemia clinical responses.

Complete remission (CR) has long been the critical therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, "less than CR" responses have been and continue to be proposed to define clinically meaningful post-therapy outcomes. These responses include CR with incomplete recovery (CRi), CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and, most recently, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), which has been introduced and subsequently used for regulatory approval. However, the clinical benefits associated with "less than CR" responses have primarily been evaluated in the context of intensive therapies. In an era with sophisticated measurable residual disease (MRD) assessments, including flow-based, cytogenetic and molecular techniques, and an increase in "targeted", non-intensive therapies, the clinical value of responses that are "less than CR" must be reevaluated. Improvements in the rate of CR has not always led to improvements in OS among older patients. As such, MRD techniques might help define a more stringent response criterion (MRD-negative CR) that might better correlate with OS and should be incorporated in future clinical trials. Here we discuss the evolution of CR and "less than CR" responses, data regarding their clinical benefits, and considerations relevant to response assessments with newer therapies.

Every-other-day palonosetron plus aprepitant for prevention of emesis following induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia: A randomized, controlled study from the "Rete Ematologica Pugliese".

BACKGROUND: Compared with older 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, palonosetron requires fewer drug administrations to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following multiple-day chemotherapy. We conducted a phase II multicenter study comparing palonosetron plus aprepitant to palonosetron alone in patients undergoing a range of induction chemotherapy regimens for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: Patients were randomized to palonosetron (0.25 mg) every other day until the last dose of chemotherapy alone or with aprepitant on days 1-3. Patients mainly received an anthracycline on days 1-3 plus cytarabine administered for 5-10 days. The primary end point was complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication) over the whole study period (days of chemotherapy plus two additional days). Unplanned analysis of time to anti-emetic treatment failure (TTF) was also performed. RESULTS: Of the 134 patients enrolled in the study, 130 were evaluable: 68 subjects received palonosetron plus aprepitant and 62 received palonosetron alone. Although the primary end point of CR was similar between the treatment arms (72% vs 69%; P = .55), a higher proportion of patients treated with palonosetron plus aprepitant were free from nausea during the whole study period (43% vs 27%; P = .03). There was also a significant difference in favor of the two-drug regimens in TTF (median: 5 days vs 3 days; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that every-other-day palonosetron plus 3-day aprepitant can add clinical benefit to the control of CINV caused by multiple-day, corticosteroid-free chemotherapy for AML. In this challenging setting of CINV, further investigations of palonosetron in combination with aprepitant administered with an expanded schedule are warranted. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02205164.