RESUMO
OBJECT: Temporal lobectomy with amygdalohippocampectomy is the standard surgical treatment for appropriate candidates with medically-intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. More recently, because of the risk of postoperative language/memory decline in a subset of patients with intact memory, a multiple hippocampal transection (MHT) approach has been proposed to preserve function. METHODS: Studies of MHT reporting both Engel and verbal memory outcome measures were included in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting of systematic reviews. Data were extracted on verbal memory function pre- and postoperatively, seizure outcome, and demographic factors. A random effects model was used to determine overall verbal memory function after MHT, and a meta-regression model was applied to identify factors associated with outcome. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients across five studies were included. Engel class I seizure outcome across all studies ranged from 64.7% to 94.7%, with 84 of the 114 patients achieving this outcome. Preoperative verbal memory score was most strongly associated with postoperative verbal memory preservation (pâ¯=â¯0.003). Of 59 patients with full verbal memory outcome scores, 86.8% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6%-96%) had complete preservation of verbal memory relative to preoperative functional baseline. CONCLUSION: Multiple hippocampal transection is an evolving surgical technique. Although the present data are limited, the current systematic review suggests that this approach is effective at preserving verbal memory in patients with good baseline function. Although reasonable seizure outcomes have been reported with MHT, comparison to a well-established procedure such as temporal lobectomy and amydalohippocampectomy must be guided by further evidence.
Assuntos
Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal/cirurgia , Hipocampo/cirurgia , Transtornos da Memória/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Psicocirurgia/métodos , Hemisferectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Transtornos da Memória/etiologia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Psicocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Convulsões/cirurgia , Aprendizagem VerbalRESUMO
Major advances in menopause hormone therapy (MHT) hold promise in the future of better and safer care for women at and after the menopause. The principal advances are: (1) the critical window or 'window of opportunity' in the 10 years or so after the menopause, during which the benefits of MHT in healthy women exceed any risks; (2) use of transdermal instead of oral administration of estrogen to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism; (c) investigation of the use of oral micronized progesterone (MP) and vaginal MP to prevent endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma without any increased risk of breast cancer and venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women receiving estrogens; vaginal MP prevents endometrial proliferation in the short term but the long-term effects in MHT remain to be established; (4) investigation into the use of intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing devices (LNG-IUDs), which are an attractive form of MHT in perimenopausal women, providing contraception and reducing uterine bleeding, although the risk of breast cancer with LNG-IUDs requires clarification. Women in the future can look forward to a symptom-free menopause and to safer and more beneficial MHT.
Assuntos
Hiperplasia Endometrial/prevenção & controle , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/tendências , Menopausa/efeitos dos fármacos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Administração Cutânea , Administração Oral , Hiperplasia Endometrial/induzido quimicamente , Estrogênios/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados , Levanogestrel/administração & dosagem , Progesterona/administração & dosagem , Progestinas/administração & dosagem , Tromboembolia Venosa/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a frequent clinical condition which affects nearly 1 in 3 women. Estrogen deficiency leads to rapid bone loss which is maximal within the first 2-3 years after the menopause transition and can be prevented by menopause hormone therapy (MHT). Not only, MHT prevents bone loss and the degradation of the bone microarchitecture but it significantly reduces the risk of fracture at all bone sites by 20-40%. It is the only anti-osteoporotic therapy that has a proven efficacy regardless of basal level of risk, even in low-risk women for fracture. Following the publication of the WHI results, use of MHT has considerably declined due to safety concerns which raise the question as to whether it might still be used in the prevention of osteoporosis. Over the last years, subsequent re-analyses of the WHI and further trials have challenged the initial conclusions of the WHI. It is now clearer that the individual benefit-risk balance of MHT is dependent on the individual risk profile in each woman as well as whether estrogen is opposed or unopposed, the type of estrogens and progestogens or doses and routes of administration. It must be also reminded that to date osteoporosis is a chronic disease that cannot be cured. The choice of the 1st treatment option should thus always be made in the context of a more comprehensive long-term strategy. This is particular true in early postmenopausal women found to be at low/moderate risk of fragility fracture over the first 10 years after menopause but who may have a much greater lifetime risk. In the absence of contraindication, use of MHT should be considered as a 1st option for the maintenance of bone health in those women where specific bone active medications are not warranted. Subsequent reassessment of the individual benefit-risk balance of MHT is thereafter recommended, with the possibility of switching to another osteoporosis treatment if the balance is not considered as favourable as at the beginning of the menopause for women still at high risk of fracture.
Assuntos
Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa , Osteoporose , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios , Feminino , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Humanos , Menopausa , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/prevenção & controleRESUMO
The aim of this article is to analyze and critically appraise the literature regarding optimal bone health care in women with breast cancer and, more specifically, to present (1) the causes of bone loss in breast cancer patients, (2) the appropriate screening for osteoporosis and fracture risk estimation, (3) optimal prevention and therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis and fractures, (4) the role of antiresorptive agents as adjuvant therapy for the prevention of bone metastases and increase of overall survival, and (5) current data on the possible use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in these patients. The objective is to provide a sound pathophysiological background along with evidence-based and practical recommendations for physicians managing such women.