FOVELASS: A Randomised Trial of Endovenous Laser Ablation Versus Polidocanol Foam for Small Saphenous Vein Incompetence.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) to treat isolated small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence in a multicentre randomised controlled study (RCT; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05468450). METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing isolated SSV treatment (reflux > 0.5 seconds) were randomised to UGFS or EVLA. Patients treated with UGFS were allowed one additional truncal treatment at six weeks. Tributary treatments (phlebectomy or sclerotherapy) were permitted after six months. Participants were assessed at eight days, six months, and one, two, and three years. The primary endpoint was the absence of SSV reflux (> 0.5 seconds). Secondary outcomes included clinical scores and quality of life (QoL) scores. All analyses were done by intention to treat. RESULTS: Of 1 522 screened patients, 161 were randomised to UGFS (n = 82) and EVLA (n = 79). Only 3% of patients who received UGFS had the second (allowed) treatment and 86% of patients completed the three year study. Forty-one and 19 tributary treatments (by sclerotherapy) were performed in 27 UGFS patients (33%) and 15 EVLA patients (19%), respectively. The complete absence of reflux at three years was significantly better after EVLA (86%) than after UGFS (56%) (odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.31 - 12.44; risk ratio 1.59, 95% CI 1.26 - 2.01). Two deep vein thromboses (DVTs; one femoropopliteal and one gastrocnemius) and one endovenous heat induced thrombosis occurred in the EVLA group. Seven DVTs were seen in the UGFS group, including two partial popliteal DVTs and five gastrocnemius vein thromboses (four asymptomatic and incidental on day 8 screening). At three years, there was no difference between groups for the following: rate of visible varices (p = .87), revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (p = .28), and QoL (p = .59). Patient satisfaction scores were high in both groups (median score: EVLA 97/100 and UGFS 93/100; p = .080). Symptoms were significantly improved in both groups. (p < .001) CONCLUSION: Technical success was better for EVLA than for UGFS three years after SSV treatment. This agrees with studies that have reported on these treatments in the great saphenous vein. However, improvements in clinical outcome were similar for both groups.

Rationale and current evidence of aquatic exercise therapy in venous disease: A narrative review.

Chronic venous disorders (CVD) of the lower limbs can be treated with different strategies. Typically, conservative management is based on compression therapy, anticoagulants and venoactive drugs. Endovenous treatments remain the gold standard to treat saphenous insufficiency, with sclerotherapy and surgery maintaining a role in selected cases. In addition, several 'unconventional' approaches have been proposed to prevent CVD progression and complications, minimize symptoms and improve the quality of life and postoperative outcomes. Among these, balneotherapy and aquatic exercises are proving as valid and effective supporting treatments, as mentioned in a growing number of scientific publications. Moreover, aquatic protocols have been studied for both venous and lymphatic insufficiency. For these reasons, they were mentioned in the last CVD guidelines provided by the European Society for Vascular Surgery. The aim of this narrative review is to overview and summarize current literature evidences on the role and effectiveness of aquatic rehabilitative protocols in CVD, reviewing old and current literature. Furthermore, the physical basis of the effects of water immersion on lower limb venous and tissues modifications are also described.

A systematic review of endovenous ablation for the treatment of small saphenous varicose veins.

Insufficiency of the small saphenous vein causes 15% of varicose veins in the lower extremities. Endovenous ablation for the treatment of small saphenous vein varices has become a trend, and an increasing number of studies have reported the effects of different types of endovenous ablation in patients with small saphenous varicose veins. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the results of existing studies on endovenous ablation for the treatment of small saphenous varicose veins, compare its role and efficacy, and provide insights into the future development of endovenous ablation for treating small saphenous varicose veins. A systematic review of literature published from January 1, 2002 to January 1, 2022 was conducted from PubMed, Embase, and China Academic Journals full-text databases. The pre-determined inclusion criteria were clinical literature of endovenous ablation for treating small saphenous varicose veins. Keywords included "ablation", "small saphenous vein", "lesser saphenous vein", "short saphenous vein", "xiaoyinjingmai" and "xiaorong". Of the 506 articles screened, 33 articles were included in this review: 19 articles were related to endovenous laser ablation, five were related to mechanochemical ablation, seven were related to radiofrequency ablation, and two were related to both endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation. The anatomical success rate of endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and mechanochemical ablation were 94.3%, 96.0%, and 88.1%, respectively, and the heterogeneities were all moderate. Most of the current studies are of a low-quality level of research. Hence, long-term follow-up studies and large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to obtain high-quality evidence. Although the gold standard for the treatment of small saphenous vein insufficiency remains unclear, endovenous ablation is still the recommended method.

The historical course of varicose vein surgery in the Persian medicine.

INTRODUCTION: Dawali (varicose veins) is the disease of chronic dilation of veins. The veins of the legs become dilated and blue due to excessive accumulation of blood. This disease and the effort to identify and treat it has a very long history. The condition may have first been described in the Ebers Papyrus more than 3500 years ago. The present study deals with the turning points and progress of varicose vein surgery since ancient times, emphasizing the innovations of the scholars of the Islamic period. METHODS: The present study is based on searching library documents and database data such as PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and search engines such as Google Scholar. In the end, the Prisma flow chart was drawn. RESULTS: Besides diagnosing different varicose veins (legs, thighs, abdomen, uterus, and testes), the scholars of the Islamic period were well-versed in their prevention, etiology, and treatment. In treating varicose veins, these physicians used methods such as cleansing, phlebotomy, compression, leech therapy, and surgery, and some of them were the founders of new treatments. CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment of varicose veins in the past was similar to modern surgical therapies. What distinguishes yesterday's varicose vein surgery from today's surgery is a more advanced tool. There is no denying the remarkable progress in using health principles, treatment techniques, and surgical instruments to facilitate surgery and reduce the disease's complications and recurrence. However, the treatment framework and foundation, such as phlebectomy and compression, were all invented and introduced in the distant past.

Female Gonadal Venous Insufficiency in a Clinical Presentation Which Suggested an Acute Abdomen-A Case Report and Literature Review.

Pelvic venous insufficiency (PVI) is frequently associated with symptoms of abdominal pain or discomfort that is overlooked or under-diagnosed in women. Despite the fact that pelvic venous insufficiency in men is very well documented, its occurrence in women needs to be further studied. Patients with pelvic varicose veins undergo a long and inconclusive diagnostic work-up before the exact cause of the symptoms is identified. Gonadal venous insufficiency (GVI) is a condition that can present acutely, leading to diagnostic challenges. We present a case report of a 47-year-old female with acute abdominal pain and GVI, where endovascular embolization was used for successful treatment. The patient was diagnosed with GVI based on imaging findings of an enlarged left ovarian vein with retrograde flow and dilated pelvic veins seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast material. Due to the severity of her symptoms and imaging findings, endovascular embolization was chosen as the treatment modality. The embolization was successful, and the patient's symptoms resolved completely. This case highlights the challenge of diagnosing GVI with acute clinical expression and the potential benefits of endovascular embolization as a treatment option. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal management strategies for acute GVI, but endovascular embolization should be considered a safe and effective option. At the same time, we present a short review of the recent literature data related to this topic.

MANAGEMENT OF MINIINVASIVE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY VARICOSE SUPERFICIAL VEINS.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: Determination of the optimal method for surgical correction of stages C2-C6s varicose superficial veins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The treatment results of 228 patients with stages C2-C6 of primary varicose according to the CEAP classification using thermal and non-thermal treatment methods were analyzed. RESULTS: Results: All patients underwent operations under the control of ultrasound scanning. In patients after EVLA, total trunk obliteration was detected in 148 patients (98.7%) after 1 week, and in 100% after a year. In 2 patients, reflux was diagnosed in the PDSV and in the ZDSV after 1 week. In patients after RFA, inflow reflux on the leg was in 1 patient (5.2%), in others - complete obliteration (18 patients - 94.7%). In patients after MOCA, recanalization was performed in 5 patients (19.2%) with a control ultrasound investigation after 1 month. In patients after cyanoacrylate obliteration, inflow reflux on the leg after 1 month was in 2 patients (14.2%). In patients who underwent UGS of the GSV trunk, 5 patients (33.3%) had persistence of pathological reflux after 1 month with control ultrasound. All corrections were performed using Foam form sclerotherapy. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: EVLA is the most effective method of treating varicose veins and gives the best long-term results. The advantage of non-thermal methods is the lack of influence on paravenous structures and no need for tumescent anesthesia, which is important in case of an allergic history. After applying cyanoacry¬late, there is no need for mandatory compression. The advantage of foam scleroobliteration is its lowest cost among all methods. Foam sclerotherapy was the method of choice for correction of postoperative treatment.

Peri-procedural thromboprophylaxis in the prevention of DVT in varicose vein interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the role of thromboprophylaxis in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing varicose vein interventions. METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for comparative studies of patients undergoing varicose vein interventions and received either thromboprophylaxis or no thromboprophylaxis. Data were collected on the number of thrombotic events including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) as well as bleeding events. The primary outcomes for the meta-analysis were the risk of all thrombotic events, risk of DVT and risk of bleeding. Pooled risk ratios were calculated using random effects modelling. RESULTS: Eight studies (6479 participants) were included. The use of thromboprophylaxis reduces the risk of all thrombotic events (Pooled risk ratio = 0.63, 95% Confidence interval [CI], 0.04-10.43) and the risk of DVT (Pooled risk ratio = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.08-4.60) with no increased risk of bleeding (Pooled risk ratio = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.06-7.21]. Rivaroxaban has similar efficacy in the prevention of DVT compared to Fondaparinux in patients undergoing endovenous ablation of varicose veins (Pooled risk ratio = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.06-7.41). An extended course of thromboprophylaxis reduces the risk of developing DVT compared to a short course (Pooled risk ratio = 1.40, 95% CI, 0.44-4.46). However, the two studies reporting on the duration of thromboprophylaxis did not stratify patients according to their risk of developing venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSION: The use of thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing varicose vein interventions reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism with no significant increase in the risk of bleeding. However, the included studies were underpowered with high to moderate risk of bias. Therefore, more randomised controlled trials with a large sample size are needed in order to provide high quality evidence for clinical practice.

Endovenous ablation of varicose veins current status and overview of methods.

During the last two decades, superficial venous surgery has experienced an unprecedented boom. Traditional surgical procedures (crossectomy and stripping) are now being replaced to a greater or lesser extent by new less invasive endovenous methods. Our aim is to provide an up-todate review of all available endovenous techniques (laser, radiofrequency, steam, mechanochemical ablation and venous glue) describing the indications, the technique and mechanism of action, and the results. In experienced hands, all endovenous techniques are safe and effective, with long-term results comparable to conventional surgical procedures.

Complications and pitfalls of endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins of lower extremities.

Varicose veins of lower extremities are a common disorder affecting a significant proportion of adult population. Endovenous techniques have been used in clinical practice for more than 20 years for their radical treatment; of these, laser therapy is one of the most widely utilized options. However, this treatment modality, too, has its specific side effects and complications which can be divided into perioperative (difficult venous access, fiber or sheath damage, vasovagal reaction with a drop in blood pressure and bradycardia, cutaneous thermal injury), and postoperative (bruising and hematomas, exceptionally pain, superficial venous thrombosis (phlebitis) and fibrous cord formation or pigmentations). Paresthesias, infections, arteriovenous fistulas, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are very rare. The introduction of new generators with higher wavelengths and fibers with radial emission of laser energy has substantially reduced the side effects and complications. Performing the surgery in the outpatient setting using tumescent local anesthesia and under perioperative ultrasound control is an essential condition of the procedure.

[Truncal mechanochemical versus thermal endovenous ablation for varicose vein disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Sistematicheskii obzor i metaanaliz rezul'tatov primeneniya stvolovoi mekhanokhimicheskoi i termal'noi obliteratsii u patsientov s varikoznoi bolezn'yu.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of thermal and mechanochemical endovenous ablative techniques in patients with varicose veins. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for studies devoted to mechanochemical and thermal endovenous ablative techniques from inception until July 2021. The primary outcome was anatomical success. Secondary endpoints were intraoperative pain syndrome, complications, modification of disease severity and quality of life. RESULTS: This meta-analysis enrolled 10 comparative studies and 1.252 participants after truncal ablations. The follow-up period ranged from 4 weeks to 36 months. With regard to overall anatomical success, 245 out of 267 (91.8%) patients after mechanochemical ablation and 249 out of 266 (93.6%) patients after thermal ablation had favorable results after a month (low-quality evidence; odds ratio [OR] 0.79; 95% CI 0.40-1.55). No statistical heterogeneity was identified (χ2=1.48; df=2; p=0.48; I2=0%). Further analysis identified different incidence of total occlusion after 12 months or later (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.11-1.21; p=0.05; I2=68%). Mechanochemical ablation resulted less intraoperative pain. Mean difference was -1.3 (95% CI -2.53- -0.07; p=0.00001). MOCA was followed by fewer incidence of nerve injury, hematoma, deep vein thrombosis and phlebitis. There were more cases of skin pigmentation compared to thermal ablation (low-quality evidence, p>0.05). Subsequent assessment of disease severity identified significant between-group difference of means (-0.64 (95% CI -1.82-0.53; p=0.004) and -0.16 (95% CI -0.43-0.11; p=0.005) after 6 and 12 months, respectively). Further assessment of quality of life revealed no between-group differences. These data were characterized by moderate methodological quality. CONCLUSION: Mechanochemical ablation is as effective as standard TA within the first postoperative month. However, this approach is associated with lesser anatomical success after 12 months. In most studies, pain syndrome was less severe in case of mechanochemical ablation. These data suggest that mechanochemical ablation is a safe alternative for varicose veins. However, further large-scale trials are required to define the role of MOCA.

[Endovascular treatment of secondary varicose veins of the pelvis in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: to study the effectiveness of methods of endovascular treatment of May-Turner syndrome and nutcracker syndrome as a cause of varicose veins of the pelvis in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: a comprehensive examination was carried out in 445 men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome. The patients age ranged from 20 to 68 years (mean age 39.5 years). The diagnosis of varicose veins of the pelvis was established in 49 patients, of which 25 had primary varicose veins of the pelvis, in 24 - secondary varicose veins of the pelvis (13 patients with May-Turner syndrome, 11 patients with nutcracker syndrome). The patients with the nutcracker syndrome underwent embolization of the testicular and pelvic veins using the combined sandwich technique. Patients with May-Turner syndrome underwent stenting of the left common iliac vein. RESULTS: In order to assess the technical efficiency of endovascular treatment, control ultrasound was performed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. In 100% of cases, throughout the observation period, the patency of venous stents was maintained; in all cases of embolization of the left testicular vein, there was no blood flow in the embolized vein. In order to assess the clinical efficacy of endovascular treatment after 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. after it, patients were questioned using the NIH-CPSI scale and VAS. The most significant changes in clinical manifestations and ultrasound data were observed after 3 months. after endovascular treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon angioplasty and iliac vein stenting in May-Turner syndrome and left gonadal vein embolization in nutcracker syndrome are minimally invasive treatments with a favorable patient safety profile.

[Combined use of minimally invasive methods in treatment of varicose veins in an elderly woman]. / Sochetannoe primenenie maloinvazivnykh metodov v lechenii varikoznoi bolezni u pozhilogo patsienta.

The authors describe herein a clinical case report regarding a 70-year-old woman presenting with lower-limb varicosity in the system of the great and small saphenous veins, aneurysmal dilatation of the proximal portion of the great saphenous vein, and an open trophic ulcer of the crus with concomitant hypertension and coronary artery disease. Given these factors, she was subjected to endovenous laser coagulation of the great and small saphenous veins, microfoam echosclerotherapy of the distal portion of the trunk of the great saphenous vein and an incompetent perforating vein of the crus, followed by complete obliteration thereof. On POD 7, she developed positive dynamics in the process of healing of the trophic ulcer, and on POD 50 the ulcer healed completely. Thus, in elderly patients with lower limb varicose veins with incompetence of trunks of the great and small saphenous veins and pronounced trophic impairments of the crus, preference should be given to minimally invasive methods of treatment. Their combination ensures a good therapeutic effect without increasing the risk for local and systemic complications.

Editor's Choice - Role of Compression After Radiofrequency Ablation of Varicose Veins: A Randomised Controlled Trial☆.

OBJECTIVE: Post-procedure limb compression, hitherto routine following open varicose vein surgery, has been extended to endovenous procedures. However, no robust evidence exists to support this practice. Most of the previous studies have focused on the ideal duration of compression. This study evaluates the clinical and patient reported outcomes with and without post-procedure leg compression following radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: This single centre, prospective, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial recruited adult patients, into two groups (A: RFA with compression stocking for two weeks, B: RFA alone). The primary outcome was ultrasound determined target vein obliteration at 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included a Quality of Life (QoL) score [Aberdeen Varicose Vein Severity Score (AVSS) and Revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (RVCSS)], patient satisfaction, pain score, and complications. RESULTS: In total, 100 consecutive patients were recruited (A: 51; B: 49) classified as clinical class C2-C6 of the Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification. At 12 weeks the occlusion rate of the target vein was similar in both groups at 98% (n = 47) and 98% (n = 45), respectively (p = 1.0). There was no statistically significant difference in mean AVSS 6 vs. 5.0 (mean difference -1, 95% CI -2 - 3, p = .57) and mean RVCSS 3 vs. 4 (mean difference 1, 95% CI -1 - 2, p = .46) scores at 12 weeks. Comparable patient satisfaction scores were observed (p = .72) and pain score 2.0 vs. 2.0 (p = .92) were achieved in both groups. Two patients in each group developed deep vein thrombosis at two weeks follow up (p = 1.0 for above the knee and p = 1.0 for below the knee). CONCLUSION: The clinical and patient reported outcomes following RFA without compression are no worse than with compression. This trial supports the conclusion that the widely practised use of compression after RFA adds no clinical benefit for the patients. However, a much larger study, preferably a multicentre trial, may be required to confirm this conclusion.

[Anatomic challenges of foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins]. / Anatomische Herausforderungen der Schaumsklerosierung von Varizen.

BACKGROUND: Foam sclerotherapy is well established in the treatment of varicose veins of different sizes. METHODS: A literature review was performed to determine whether specific anatomical findings could be a limitation for foam sclerotherapy. RESULTS: The following anatomical aspects are relevant as a potential limitation for foam sclerotherapy: treatment of pudendal veins, varicose veins in patients with chronic lymphedema and lymph fistulas. CONCLUSION: In some indications foam sclerotherapy is the treatment of choice. It is an effective and safe treatment option.

[What is evidence-based in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency?] / Was ist gesichert in der Therapie der chronischen Veneninsuffizienz?

Chronic venous diseases belong to the most frequent diseases. They can be asymptomatic, cause subjective symptoms or lead to objectif alterations, such as edema, cutaneous alterations and venous leg ulcers. This ultimately results in chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Varicose veins are a progressive degenerative disease of the venous walls in the superficial venous system of the legs, which can decisively impair the quality of life of those affected. The classification of chronic venous diseases is carried out with the CEAP classification according to clinical, etiological, anatomical and pathophysiological criteria. Instruments, such as the venous clinical severity score, are used for assessment of the severity. The treatment of chronic venous diseases targets the improvement of the subjective complaints and objectifiable alterations. In addition, complications, such as phlebitis and formation of ulcers should be avoided. Invasive procedures, compression treatment and pharmaceutical treatment are complementary and a combination of these procedures can be meaningful. General physical measures, such as propping up the legs and frequent walking, are part of the basic measures for every patient with venous diseases. Compression therapy with medical compression stockings is the gold standard in the noninvasive treatment of symptomatic venous diseases, possibly supplemented by anti-inflammatory drugs. A varicose vein should be eliminated whenever possible. Stripping operations and the less invasive endovenous thermal ablation show comparable results for saphenous vein varicosis. Foam sclerotherapy and percutaneous phlebectomy are the methods of choice for elimination of side branch varicosis; however, recurrences of varicose veins are frequent.

[A case of successful endovascular treatment of a patient with chronic pelvic pain and recurrent varicocele]. / Sluchai uspeshnogo éndovaskuliarnogo lecheniia patsienta s khronicheskoi tazovoi bol'iu i retsidivom varikotsele.

Described in the article is a clinical case report regarding diagnosis and treatment of pelvic varicose veins in a 34-year-old male patient presenting with compressive stenosis of the left common iliac vein (May-Thurner syndrome). The man had developed clinical symptoms of the disease as varicocele when he was 17 years old. Multiple surgical interventions on the veins of the spermatic cord failed to result in significant success. The diagnosis was verified by means of ultrasound examination and contrast X-ray phlebography. The patient was subjected to balloon angioplasty and stenting of the compressive stenosis of the left common iliac vein. The endovascular treatment performed was followed by the patient's improved condition, confirmed by methods of instrumental diagnosis, as well as by regression of clinical symptomatology.

[A device for endoluminal thermal obliteration of varicose veins]. / Ustroistvo dlia provedeniia éndoliuminal'noi termicheskoi obliteratsii varikoznykh ven.

Amongst the techniques of endoluminal thermal obliteration of varicose veins, the most commonly employed treatment modalities are endovasal radiofrequency ablation and endovasal laser obliteration, both using a generating source and a special device for carrying out thermal obliteration. It has been noted that each of the methods of thermal obliteration has a number of disadvantages, irrespective of using the energy of magnetic oscillations in a radiofrequency range or laser radiation, including high cost of expendable materials and equipment. The device we worked out for endoluminal thermal obliteration of varicose veins was based on the principle of high efficacy and safety, with a significant decrease in the cost of carrying out the manipulation. This was achieved by means of developing a new device wherein a thermal effect is exerted not via the direct impact of laser radiation on the venous wall but at the expense of using laser energy exceptionally for heating a metal tip located at the distal end of high-strength metallized fibre coated with a heat-resistant polymer. Analysing the initial short-term results of using the new technique of thermal obliteration in treating a total of 50 patients presenting with varicose veins made it possible to draw a conclusion on high efficacy of the method and its safety. The proposed device may repeatedly be used with any and simplest-in-design source of laser radiation regardless of the wavelength and power of radiation. Implementation of this technique into clinical practice will make it possible to decrease manifold the cost of the procedure of thermal obliteration of varicose veins, currently carried out with the use of the classic techniques - endovasal laser obliteration and endovasal radiofrequency ablation.

Effects of 1064-nm Nd:YAG long-pulse laser on polidocanol microfoam injected for varicose vein treatment: a controlled observational study of 404 legs, after 5-year-long treatment.

Sclerotherapy continues to be the treatment of choice for varicose veins in the legs. However, isolated treatment using microfoam or lasers requires a high number of sessions to eliminate them. In 2013, we published results about the efficacy and safety 3 years after the combined treatment with microfoam injections and subsequent application of Nd:YAG laser. The aim of this paper is to clinically evaluate the treatment of varices in a control visit after 5 years, when polidocanol microfoam is used and is immediately irradiated in the tissue with 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser beam. The outcome persistence after 5 years was studied in the legs that had received combined treatment and had been studied 3 years after treatment. Patients were contacted by phone, interviewed, and examined with echo-Doppler. Out of the 259 patients who were contacted, 221 agreed to make the appointment, although in the end, only 202 came, which meant analysing 404 legs. At 5 years, the clearance rates were very high: patients were included in class CEAP C1 showing vessels of from 0.5 to 3 mm diameter. The patients showed a high level of satisfaction. Regarding adverse effects, only 4 cases of hypopigmentation described in the previous publication persisted. Although the action mechanisms between the microfoam and the Nd:YAG laser must still be elucidated, it is notable that combining microfoam with laser exposure obtained a complete, effective treatment of legs in only 2 sessions, with high clearance rates and high level of satisfaction among patients.

Tumescence Anesthesia Solution-Assisted Laser Ablation Treatment of Lower Limb Varicose Veins: The Effect of Temperature of the Tumescence Anesthesia Solution on Intraoperative and Postoperative Pain, Clinical Observations, and Comprehensive Nursing Care.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of cold and room temperature tumescence anesthesia solution (TAS) on the treatment of lower limb varicose veins via endovenous laser ablation. DESIGN: On the basis of the TAS temperature, patients were divided into two groups: group A (n = 26) received room temperature (24°C) TAS, and group B (n = 25) received cold (4°C) TAS. METHODS: A numerical rating scale was used to evaluate pain. Perioperative and intraoperative nursing care and clinical observations were performed following a generalized standard. FINDINGS: Percentages of patients who felt pain in groups A and B were 69.2% and 36.0%. Average numerical rating scale scores of patients in the two groups (A and B) on the day of surgery and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3 were 4.3 versus 2.1, 3.5 versus 1.0, 3.0 versus 0.8, and 1.6 versus 0.3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cold TAS reduces intraoperative and postoperative pain more effectively than room temperature.

Saphenous vein ablation with a new cyanoacrylate glue device: a systematic review on 1000 cases.

BACKGROUND: To review published evidence regarding an n-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) injection device for great (GSV) and small (SSV) saphenous vein incompetence in terms of occlusion rate, postoperative complications and quality of life improvement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: International bibliographic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus) were searched to identify possible target articles. The only inclusion criterion was the use of the Variclose® system (Biolas, Ankara, Turkey) for superficial vein insufficiency. Exclusion criteria were case reports, review, meta-analysis, article with <6-month follow-up data, abstracts and congress presentations. PRISMA guidelines were used to lead articles selection. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the final data analysis. A total of 918 patients (1000 limbs) underwent an NBCA procedure for GSV (947 cases) or SSV (53 cases) incompetence. The average procedure duration was 11.7 min. The most common postoperative complications were postoperative pain (4.8%) and superficial vein thrombosis (2.1%). No deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism cases were described. The occlusion rates at six, 12 and 30 months were 97.3%, 96.8% and 94.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: NBCA injection with the Variclose device seems to be a feasible, effective and safe treatment in GSV incompetence. Long-term follow-up studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to achieve high-quality evidence.