Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation vs Solifenacin or Standard Urotherapy for Overactive Bladder Dry in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy and safety of high-dose vitamin D supplementation (VDS) plus standard urotherapy (SU) in managing overactive bladder dry in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3-arm, randomized clinical trial was performed at an academic center in China between January 2023 and June 2023. Eligible patients (n=303) were randomized to receive 8 weeks of high-dose VDS (vitamin D3 drops encapsulated as soft capsules, 2400 IU/d) plus SU (VDS + SU group; n=100), solifenacin (5-10 mg/d) plus SU (SOL + SU group; n=102), or SU alone (SU group; n=101). Reduction in voiding frequency was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes encompassed improvement in urgency, nocturia, quality of life score, pediatric lower urinary tract symptom score, and participant satisfaction. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded within each group. RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 82.0 months and their baseline mean vitamin D level was 22.64 ng/mL. The VDS + SU group showed greater improvements in voids/d than the SOL + SU group (median difference 3.0; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.5; P < .001) and the SU group (median difference 4.0; 95% CI, 3.0 to 5.0; P < .001) after intervention. The VDS + SU group also showed the greatest improvement in quality of life and pediatric lower urinary tract symptom scores. Patient satisfaction was similar between the SOL + SU and SU groups. The VDS + SU group did not exhibit a heightened risk of treatment-emergent adverse events compared to the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose VDS plus SU was effective and well-tolerated in managing overactive bladder dry in children, suggesting its potential as a novel therapeutic option for this population.

Anatomical location and number of injection sites of intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA for females with refractory idiopathic overactive bladder: A scoping review.

AIMS: The negative impact on quality of life and the economic-related burden to the patient and the health care system associated with idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) is well-documented. Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTN/A) injections are a well-used treatment modality for the management of overactive detrusor refractory to medical management, with well-documented efficacy and safety profiles. There is currently no best practice guideline for the administration of BTN/A for this procedure and historically the trigone of the bladder has been excluded from the injection paradigm given the risk of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). METHODS: A scoping review methodology was employed to assess available literature to evaluate current techniques used. There is emerging literature that the inclusion of the trigone may increase the efficacy of the procedure, while maintaining a similar adverse effect profile. Similar results could also be obtained by decreasing the number of injection sites. A scoping review was completed with systematic methodology using the Preferred Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses extension for Scoping Review checklist. The search strategy looked to evaluate BTN/A and number of injection sites and the inclusion of the trigone in female patients with iOAB. Studies with male or neurogenic bladder only were excluded. Mixed studies were included. A specialist research librarian was engaged, with supervision from a functional urologist using a combination of MeSH and natural language terms. Two investigators independently reviewed the titles and abstracts. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included and were published between 2005 and 2021. There was no evidence of VUR in any of the results. All but one study reported similar if not improved efficacy of trigone-inclusion. Lower number of injection sites had similar efficacy profiles to higher numbers of intradetrusor injections. CONCLUSIONS: Further high-quality randomized control trials of trigone inclusion and reduction of injection sites are required. It is hoped that with further exploration of intraoperative methods for BTN/A injections, the development of universally accepted guidelines may optimize management and experiences for patients with iOAB.

Shifts in patient preference of third-line overactive bladder therapy after introduction of the implantable tibial nerve stimulator.

INTRODUCTION: Third-line therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) that are currently recommended include intravesical Onabotulinumtoxin-A injections (BTX-A), percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), and sacral neuromodulation (SNM). The implantable tibial nerve stimulator (ITNS) is a novel therapy that is now available to patients with OAB. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze shifts in patient preference of third-line therapies for OAB after introducing ITNS as an option among the previously established therapies for non-neurogenic OAB. METHODS: A survey was designed and distributed via SurveyMonkey to the platform's audience of U.S. adults of age 18 and older. Screening questions were asked to include only subjects who reported symptoms of OAB. Descriptions of current AUA/SUFU guideline-approved third-line therapies (BTX-A, PTNS, and SNM) were provided, and participants were asked to rank these therapies in order of preference (stage A). Subsequently, ITNS was introduced with a description, and participants were then asked to rank their preferences amongst current guideline-approved therapies and ITNS (stage B). Absolute and relative changes in therapy preferences between stage A and stage B were calculated. Associations between ultimate therapy choice in stage B and participant characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 485 participants completed the survey (62.5% female). The mean age was 49.1 ± 36.5 years (SD). The most common OAB symptoms reported were urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (73.0%) and urinary urgency (68.0%). 29.2% of patients had tried medication for OAB in the past, and 8.0%-10.3% of patients were previously treated with a third-line therapy for OAB. In stage A, participants ranked their first choice of third-line therapy as follows: 28% BTX-A, 27% PTNS, and 13.8% SNM. 26.6% of participants chose no therapy, and 4.5% chose all three equally. In stage B, participants ranked their first choice as follows: 27.6% BTX-A, 19.2% PTNS, 7.8% SNM, and 19.2% ITNS. 21.9% of participants chose no therapy and 4.3% chose all four equally as their first choice. There were both absolute and relative declines in proportions of patients interested in BTX-A, SNM, and PTNS as their first choice of third-line therapy with the introduction of ITNS. Patients originally interested in PTNS in stage A had the greatest absolute change after the introduction of ITNS with 7.8% of participants opting for ITNS in stage B. Those interested in SNM in stage A had the largest relative change in interest, with 43.5% of those originally interested in SNM opting for ITNS in stage B. Finally, with the introduction of ITNS, the number of participants initially not interested in any third-line therapy declined by an absolute change of 4.7% and relative change of 17.6%. Participants experiencing concurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms were more likely to choose a current guideline-approved third-line therapy than ITNS or no therapy at all (p = 0.047). Those who had prior experience with third-line therapies were more likely to choose a third-line therapy other than ITNS as their ultimate choice of therapy in stage B. Of those who had chosen a guideline-approved third-line therapy in stage B (not ITNS), 13.6% had prior experience with BTX-A, 14.7% with PTNS, and 32 (11.2%) with SNM (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: From our study, it appears that ITNS may attract a subset of patients who would not have otherwise pursued current guideline-approved third-line therapies for OAB. When patients are provided with descriptions of third-line OAB therapies including ITNS as an option, ITNS appears to compete with SNM and PTNS. It is possible that ITNS will provide patients with a different phenotype of neuromodulation therapy that can appeal to a niche OAB population. Given that ITNS devices have been introduced relatively recently to the market, their application will largely depend on cost and payer coverage, provider bias, and patient comorbidities. Further study is needed to understand how these factors interact with and influence patient preference of advanced OAB therapy to understand which patients will most benefit from this treatment modality.

Response to tibial and sacral nerve modulation in overactive bladder: Is there any correlation?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation between the response to transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and subsequent response to sacral nerve modulation (SNM) to treat overactive bladder (OAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who consecutively received TTNS followed by a two-stage SNM between January 2016 and June 2022 to treat OAB in two university hospital centers were included. The response to each therapy was evaluated with success defined by a 50% or greater improvement in one or more bothersome urinary symptoms from baseline. The primary endpoint was the statistical relationship between the response to TTNS and the response to SNM, assessed by logistic regression. Secondary endpoints were the statistical relationship between the response to TTNS and the response to SNM when controlling for gender, age (<57 years vs. >57 years), presence of an underlying neurological disease, and presence of DO, adding the factor and interaction to the previous regression model. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients enrolled in the study, 68 of them were women (73.9%), and the median age was 57.0 [41.0-69.0] years. The success was reported in 22 patients (23.9%) under TTNS and 66 patients (71.7%) during the SNM test phase. There was no statistical correlation between response to TTNS and response to SNM in the overall population (confidence interval: 95% [0.48-4.47], p = 0.51). Similarly, there was no statistical correlation when controlling for age <57 years or ≥57 years, with p = 1.0 and p = 0.69, respectively. No statistical study could be conducted for the other subpopulations due to small sample sizes. CONCLUSION: The response to TTNS does not predict the response to SNM in the treatment of OAB. TTNS and SNM should be considered as separate therapies, and the decision-making process for OAB treatment should take this into account.

Effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) on lower urinary tract dysfunction: An umbrella review.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) is a common, troublesome condition that often negatively affects patients' quality of life. Current literature has long been interested in how posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) can affect this condition. AIM: To extensively and systematically explore how PTNS affects LUTD based on the most recent systematic reviews. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All the systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis that assessed the effects of PTNS on LUTD were retrieved. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool, and analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3 tool. RESULTS: From a total of 3077 citations, 20 systematic reviews entered this study, and 13 of them included meta-analysis. The population of studies varied vastly, for instance, some studies included only children or women while other focused on a specific pathology like multiple sclerosis-induced neurogenic LUTD. The majority of included studies reported an overall improvement in LUTD following percutaneous PTNS, although admitting that these results were derived from moderate to low-quality evidence. CONCLUSION: The findings of this thorough umbrella review showed that the positive benefits of PTNS in treating LUTD are currently supported by low-quality evidence, and it is crucial to interpret them with great care.

Injection site number and outcomes of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA for refractory overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The optimal number of onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder syndrome is unknown. Our primary objective was to determine whether 10-injections sites with 100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA each were associated with less pain than 20-injections sites. METHODS: In a single-blinded randomized trial, 100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA was administered, either as 10 × 1 ml or as 20 × 0.5 ml injections following the instillation of 30 ml of bupivacaine and 5 ml of NaHCO3 solution for 15 min. The primary outcome was procedural pain, as measured on an 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) immediately following the procedure. A power calculation estimated that 16 subjects in each arm were needed to detect a mean difference of 1 with a standard deviation of 1, on the NPRS score between the two treatment groups, with α 0.05 and power 80%. To adjust for an estimated 20% dropout rate, the final sample size was planned for 20 patients per group. RESULTS: From October 2020 to November 2022, a total of 56 patients were approached and 40 were enrolled and randomized to two groups (21 in the 10-injections group and 19 in 20-injections group). The difference in the median pain score between the group was not statistically significant (4 [1.5-5] for 10 injections vs 3 [1-4] for 20 injections, p=0.823). CONCLUSION: Patients' perception of pain, efficacy, and adverse events did not significantly differ between patients receiving 10 and those receiving 20 injections of 100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA.

Efficacy and safety of solifenacin combined with biofeedback in children with overactive bladder.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder is a common chronic urological disorder in children, liable to impact normal social activities, disrupt sleep and even impair self-esteem. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of solifenacin combined with biofeedback for paediatric overactive bladder. METHOD: Forty-five children with overactive bladder were enrolled and divided into three groups: 15 patients in Group A were treated with solifenacin, 15 cases in Group B with biofeedback, and the other 15 patients in Group C with the combination of solifenacin plus biofeedback. Each group was subdivided into the non-urge incontinence (non-UI) and urge incontinence (UI) groups. The remission rates were compared among the three groups at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks from the beginning of treatment. The side effects of solifenacin were recorded and followed up. RESULT: After 2 weeks since initial treatment, the complete response rates were 33.3% (5/15), 20.0% (3/15), and 53.3% (8/15) in the three groups. At 4 weeks, the complete remission rates were 46.7% (7/15), 33.3% (5/15), and 60.0% (9/15) respectively. Moreover, the complete remission rates of the UI groups were higher than the non-UI groups (p < 0.05). At 8 weeks, the complete response rates were 53.3% (8/15), 40.0% (6/15), and 67.7% (10/15). At 12 weeks, the complete response rates were 67.8% (10/15), 60.0% (9/15), and 86.7% (13/15). The complete response rates were higher and urodynamic parameters were improved obviously in group C than the other two groups (p < 0.05) during the follow-ups. The median voiding frequency decreased and median functional bladder capacity increased obviously in Group C after 4 weeks (p < 0.05). Dry mouth was observed in 2 patients (4.4%). 2 patients experienced constipation (4.4%), and neither case was severe. The symptoms of these four patients had relieved by reducing the dose of solifenacin. CONCLUSION: Solifenacin combined with biofeedback had good efficacy and compliance for children experiencing overactive bladder. It took only 2 weeks to achieve the complete response rate over 50%, especially for the improvement of UI symptoms.

Sacral Neuromodulation: Device Improvement and Current Applications in Urology.

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) offers a therapeutic approach to urological patients suffering from idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome, with or without incontinence and non-obstructive urinary retention (NOR), who are not responding to or are not compliant with conservative or medical therapies. The exact mechanism of action of SNM is not fully understood but modulation of the spinal cord reflexes and brain networks by peripheral afferents is regarded as the main pathway. Over the years, surgical techniques improved, leading to the development of the modern two-stage implantation technique. The quadripolar lead is positioned percutaneously under fluoroscopy guidance through the third sacral foramen following the trajectory of S3. The procedure can be performed under local or general anesthesia with the patient in prone position. Current applications of sacral neuromodulation in urology are increasing thanks to the recent improvements of the devices that make this a valuable option not only in conditions such as overactive bladder and non-obstructing urinary retention but also neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

One treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA relieves symptoms of overactive bladder in patients refractory to one or more oral medications.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) often undergo prolonged treatment with one or more oral OAB medications. OnabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA), a type A botulinum toxin, may provide an appropriate alternative to oral treatments in patients intolerant of or refractory to one or more oral OAB medications. The GRACE study demonstrated real-world benefits of onabotA treatment for OAB in patients refractory to oral medications. This exploratory post hoc analysis of data from the GRACE study aims to determine if treatment history impacts benefit from treatment with onabotA. METHODS: This is a subanalysis of the GRACE study, a prospective observational study (NCT02161159) that enrolled patients with symptomatic OAB inadequately managed by at least one oral OAB medication. Patients had a treatment history of one or more anticholinergics (AC) and/or ß-3 adrenoreceptor agonists (ß-3) for relief of OAB; results were stratified according to treatment history. Patients in this analysis elected to discontinue oral medications upon treatment with onabotA. Safety was followed for 12 months in all patients that received at least 1 dose of onabotA; efficacy was determined over a 12-week period. RESULTS: Compared to baseline levels, significant reductions in urinary incontinence (UI), urgency, micturition, and nocturia were noted as early as 1 week and were sustained at 12 weeks, regardless of the type and number of oral medications taken before treatment with onabotA. At 12 weeks post-onabotA, the mean change from baseline UI episodes/day for those with a treatment history of only one AC was -2.4 (n = 43, p ≤ 0.001); more than one AC, -2.4 (n = 52, p ≤ 0.001); one ß-3, -3.3 (n = 12, p < 0.05); at least one AC and at least one ß-3, -3.2 (n = 56, p ≤ 0.001). Pad and liner use was significantly decreased at 12 weeks post-onabotA across all treatment history groups. Reductions in diaper pant use varied, with less of a reduction in patients with a treatment history of more than one AC compared to patients with a history of at least one AC and one ß-3 (p < 0.05) or those with a history of only one AC (p < 0.05). Overall, a total of 253/288 of patients (88%) reported improvements on the treatment benefit scale 12 weeks after treatment with onabotA, regardless of type and number of prior oral medications. In the population of patients that received at least one dose of onabotA (N = 504), 57 adverse events were reported in 38 patients (7.5%); 9 were serious (1.8%). Urinary retention was reported in 5 patients (1.0%); 1 was severe (0.2%). Symptomatic urinary tract infection was reported in 2 patients (0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory post hoc analysis of real-world data from the GRACE study, there were few significant differences in outcomes based on the type and number of prior oral medications. Thus, patients who are refractory to one or more oral OAB medications may benefit from earlier treatment with onabotA.

Bladder training compared to bladder training associated with pelvic floor muscle training for overactive bladder symptoms in women: A randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: To compare the effects of bladder training (BT) versus BT with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in women with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. METHODS: Randomized controlled clinical trial including women with OAB symptoms, randomized into two groups: BT versus BT + PFMT. For 12 consecutive weeks, the women received home BT. The BT + PFMT performed supervised PFMT, once/week, associated at home PFMT protocol. Primary outcomes were urinary urgency, daytime voiding frequency, nocturia and urgency urinary incontinence assisted by both 3-day bladder diary and International Consultation on Incontinence OAB (ICIQ-OAB) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were 24-h pad test and Patient Global Impression of Improvement. T-test, analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney (SPSS 20.0) and power/effect size (G-power) were applied in data analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-three women were included (B = 31; BT + PFMT = 32). There was no significant statistical difference between groups in terms of urinary symptoms: daytime frequency (BT: pre: 11.59 [±5.80], post: 9.10 [±4.05]; BT + PFMT: pre: 10.67 [±3.73], post: 8.08 [±3.38]) p = 0.75; nocturia: (BT: pre: 1.46 [±0.91], post: 0.82 [±0.82]; BT + PFMT: pre: 1.80 [±2.26], post: 0.82 [±1.15]) p = 0.70; urinary urgency (BT: pre: 3.22 [±4.70], post: 4.49 [±4.32]; BT + PFMT: pre: 6.87 [±5.60], post: 6.15 [±4.52]) p = 0.10; ICIQ-OAB total score: (BT: pre: 9.16 [±2.55], post: 6.32 [±3.77]; (BT + PFMT: pre: 9.75 [±2.06], post: 5.06 [±3.44] p = 0.30. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised PFMT added to BT did not provide further improvements than isolated BT in women with OAB symptoms.

The impact of postinjection urinary tract infection on efficacy of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA-A secondary analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment response in women who did and did not develop a urinary tract infection (UTI) within 14 days after intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections for treatment of refractory urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of women who received Onabotulinumtoxin A in the Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral Neuromodulation vs Botulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA) Trial. Participants were grouped by presence or absence of UTI within 14 days of injection. UTI was defined as symptomatic with positive urine culture per the primary ROSETTA protocol. Our primary outcome was change from baseline in mean number of UUI episodes based on monthly 3-day bladder diaries averaged over 6 months. We performed t tests and chi-square/Fisher's exact for continuous and categorical variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 187 participants in the onabotulinumtoxinA arm, 10 (5.3%) experienced UTI within 14 days of injection, and 177 (94.7%) did not. At baseline, groups did not differ in demographics, mean UUI episodes per day (no UTI [5.37 ± 2.65] vs. UTI [6.40 ± 3.02], p = 0.24), or other diary parameters. For our primary outcome, groups did not differ in the change in mean daily UUI episodes at 1 month (no UTI [-4.29 ± 2.75] vs. UTI [-3.74 ± 2.01]; mean difference [95% confidence interval, CI] -0.55 [-2.39 to 1.28], p: 0.55) or 6 months (no UTI [-3.63 ± 2.89] vs. UTI [-2.15 ± 3.18]; mean difference [95% CI] -1.48 [-3.44 to 0.48], p: 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: UTI within 14 days after intravesical injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for refractory UUI was not significantly associated with inferior treatment response at 1 or 6 months.

A treatment prediction strategy for overactive bladder using a machine learning algorithm that utilized data from the FAITH study.

AIMS: To use machine learning algorithms to develop a model to accurately predict treatment responses to mirabegron or antimuscarinic agents in patients with overactive bladder (OAB), using real-world data from the FAITH registry (NCT03572231). METHODS: The FAITH registry data included patients who had been diagnosed with OAB symptoms for at least 3 months and were due to initiate monotherapy with mirabegron or any antimuscarinic. For the development of the machine learning model, data from patients were included if they had completed the 183-day study period, had data for all timepoints and had completed the overactive bladder symptom scores (OABSS) at baseline and end of study. The primary outcome of the study was a composite outcome combining efficacy, persistence, and safety outcomes. Treatment was deemed "more effective" if the composite outcome criteria for "successful," "no treatment change," and "safe" were met, otherwise treatment was deemed "less effective." To explore the composite algorithm, a total of 14 clinical risk factors were included in the initial data set and a 10-fold cross-validation procedure was performed. A range of machine learning models were evaluated to determine the most effective algorithm. RESULTS: In total, data from 396 patients were included (266 [67.2%] treated with mirabegron and 130 [32.8%] treated with an antimuscarinic). Of these, 138 (34.8%) were in the "more effective" group and 258 (65.2%) were in the "less effective" group. The groups were comparable in terms of their characteristic distributions across patient age, sex, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Of the six models initially selected and tested, the decision tree (C5.0) model was chosen for further optimization, and the receiver operating characteristic of the final optimized model had an area under the curve result of 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.85) when 15 was used for the min n parameter. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully created a simple, rapid, and easy-to-use interface that could be further refined to produce a valuable educational or clinical decision-making aid.

Does metabolic syndrome influence the efficacy of mirabegron treatment in female patients with overactive bladder?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to determine whether the presence of metabolic syndrome (MS) affects the efficacy of mirabegron in treatment-naïve women with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Women being treated with mirabegron 50 mg were allocated to MS and non-MS groups, and the efficacy of treatment of OAB was compared using the OAB symptom score (OABSS) and a 3-day voiding diary before and 12 weeks after starting treatment. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analyses, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered to represent statistical significance. RESULTS: Of the 197 patients who completed the trial, 43 (23.9%) had MS. After 12 weeks of mirabegron treatment, both the MS and non-MS groups showed significant improvements in OABSS score, the number of incontinence episodes/24 h, the number of micturition episodes/24 h, and the number of episodes of urgency/24 h. The factors associated with clinically important differences in OABSS were the presence of hyperglycemia (odds ratio 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-5.60) and OABSS score at baseline (odds ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron is effective in patients with and without MS, and comorbid hyperglycemia and severe OAB symptoms before treatment are predictors of the efficacy of mirabegron treatment.

Urobiome changes differ based on OAB treatment in adult females.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Representatives of two classes of oral medication are often used to treat urgency urinary incontinence (UUI): solifenacin, an M3-receptor-selective antimuscarinic, and mirabegron, a beta-3 agonist. Two previous asynchronous drug-specific studies suggested different interactions between these medications and the urobiome despite identical methodologies, including recruitment, sample procurement, medication dose escalation strategy, determination of 12-week responders versus nonresponders, and data collection. This analysis compares data from these two studies using a uniform analytic approach. METHODS: Urine was collected aseptically via transurethral catheter from consenting participants for subsequent processing by the Expanded Quantitative Urine Culture (EQUC) protocol in two cohorts (n=50 and n=47) that were demographically similar. Species accumulation curves were generated to compare the total number of unique species detected. Indices that measure richness, evenness, and/or abundance were used to compare alpha (within sample) diversity. The Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity Index was used to determine between sample (beta) diversity. RESULTS: The majority of the 40 species detected in the pre-treatment urobiomes were detected in both cohorts. Both pre-treatment urobiomes were substantially similar in species richness, evenness, and diversity. Differences in pre-treatment urobiomes were associated with treatment response for solifenacin-treated participants only. In contrast, the pre-treatment urobiomes of mirabegron-treated participants were not associated with treatment response. Changes in the post-treatment urobiomes were detected in both cohorts with an increase in richness for both solifenacin (5-mg dose only) and mirabegron. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment urobiome characteristics were associated with treatment response in participants treated with solifenacin, but not mirabegron. Differences exist in urobiome response after treatment with two medications that have known differences in mechanism of action.

Neural networks outperform expert humans in predicting patient impressions of symptomatic improvement following overactive bladder treatment.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to accurately predict patient-centered subjective outcomes following the overactive bladder (OAB) treatments OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBTX-A) injection and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) using a neural network-based machine-learning approach. In the context of treatments designed to improve quality of life, a patient's perception of improvement should be the gold standard outcome measure. METHODS: Cutting-edge neural network-based algorithms using reproducing kernel techniques were trained to predict patient-reported improvements in urinary leakage and bladder function as assessed by Patient Global Impression of Improvement score using the ROSETTA trial datasets. Blinded expert urologists provided with the same variables also predicted outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve were generated for algorithm and human expert predictions in an out-of-sample holdout dataset. RESULTS: Algorithms demonstrated excellent accuracy in predicting patient subjective improvement in urinary leakage (OBTX-A: AUC 0.75; SNM: 0.80). Similarly, algorithms accurately predicted patient subjective improvement in bladder function (OBTX-A: AUC 0.86; SNM: 0.96). The top-performing algorithms outcompeted human experts across outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Novel neural network-based machine-learning algorithms accurately predicted OBTX-A and SNM patient subjective outcomes, and generally outcompeted expert humans. Subtle aspects of the physician-patient interaction remain uncomputable, and thus the machine-learning approach may serve as an aid, rather than as an alternative, to human interaction and clinical judgment.

Effects of ospemifene on overactive bladder in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a complex and multifactorial syndrome associated with urinary frequency, urgency and incontinence. The menopause-associated hormonal changes play a role in the development of this condition. Vaginal estrogens are effective in improving OAB in postmenopausal women (PMW) with vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). Ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator licensed for the treatment of VVA. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ospemifene on OAB symptoms in PMW with VVA. METHODS: Forty PMW suffering from OAB and VVA received oral ospemifene (60 mg/day) for 12 weeks. All patients were assessed with a urodynamic study, a 3-day bladder diary and validated questionnaires (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form [ICIQ-UI SF] and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Overactive Bladder [ICIQ-OAB]) at enrollment and at the end of the study. RESULTS: Cytometric capacity, bladder compliance and verbal sensory threshold responses during bladder filling were improved after treatment. The voiding diary showed a significant reduction of daily voids, urge urinary incontinence episodes and nocturnal events. The median overall scores of the ICIQ-UI and ICIQ-OAB were also significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggest that treatment with ospemifene in PMW suffering from OAB is associated with a reduction of OAB symptoms due to a decreased bladder sensitivity and with an improvement in quality of life.

Financial Toxicity for Female Patients with Urinary Incontinence.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common global condition that has been noted to disproportionately affect women. In this review, the authors present discussion of factors contributing to cost of care and various modalities of cost-effective care for UI for female patients. RECENT FINDINGS: We found insurance and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs strongly impact of costs for patients. Further, in evaluation of UI, diagnosis can be a costly multi-step process for effective treatment. Treatment can be multimodal, including non-surgical (e.g., pessary, vaginal insert, pelvic floor muscle training, or PFMT), of which PFMT is a cost-effective, effective, and accessible treatment. Pharmacologic management is generally second-line for overactive bladder, but anti-muscarinic drugs and beta-3 agonists are cost-effective depending on willingness-to-pay and the health system in which they are acquired, respectively. Surgical management is considered the most cost-effective treatment as willingness-to-pay increased, with minimally invasive slings being the mainstay. Other relatively novel treatments are also discussed (e.g., EMSELLA) but require further research. Additionally, we discuss systematic barriers in decisions to seek care for urinary incontinence. Urologists are key agents in treating UI for their female patients, and seeking cost-effective options for treatment remains pivotal for quality care.

Predictive factors for postoperative medication therapy for overactive bladder symptoms after holmium laser enucleation of prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To preoperative factors that could predict the persisting storage symptoms after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). METHODS: Medical records of 257 patients who underwent HoLEP between December 2014 and January 2021 were reviewed. Participants with a follow-up period exceeding 6 months were included. Preoperative data, including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry, prostate size, and prostate-specific antigen, were collected. All participants underwent a preoperative urodynamic study. The correlation between perioperative variables and postoperative medication therapy (antimuscarinics or beta-3 agonists) was assessed. RESULTS: Out of 257 participants in the study, 46 (18.6%) were allocated to the medication group, of which 25 (54.3%) initiated medication therapy postoperatively. The medication group showed worse postoperative IPSS storage symptom score and quality of life score compared to the medication-free group (p = 0.048 and p = 0.002, respectively), but no significant differences were observed in complications or operative variables. In the de-novo medication group, patients had lower preoperative Qmax , larger prostate volume, and smaller maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) compared to the persisting medication group (p = 0.020, p = 0.009, and p = 0.008, respectively). Overactive bladder (OAB) history, terminal detrusor overactivity (DO), and IPSS urgency item were identified as possible predictive factors for post-HoLEP medication use. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative factors such as OAB history, terminal DO, and IPSS urgency item may predict the need for post-HoLEP medication therapy. Further follow-up studies are warranted to understand the characteristics of the de-novo medication group due to the significant discomfort it can cause to patients.

Detailed Investigation of Bladder Diary Parameters During Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Overactive Symptoms.

AIMS: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-accepted, minimally invasive modality for patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Successful response to SNM is defined as at least 50% improvement in key symptoms, evaluated in a bladder diary (BD). BDs provide much useful information on bladder behavior during daily life. The aim of this study is to investigate BD parameter changes during SNM therapy in patients with OAB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ)-BD was filled out by 34 patients with OAB, for three days at baseline and after three weeks of subthreshold sensory stimulation. The patients were considered responders for SNM when 50% improvement was seen in the BD. They underwent implantation of an internal pulse generator (IPG), and subsequently, an ICIQ-BD and a visual analog scale (VAS) evaluating bladder satisfaction during three days were filled out six weeks, six months, and one year after IPG implantation. RESULTS: IPGs were implanted in 29 patients (85%). The BD showed a significant decrease in 24-hour leakage at three weeks from 4.2 to 0.6 (-86%, p < 0.001), similar significant decreases at six weeks and six months, and at one year (-80%). Voided volume (VV) at corresponding bladder sensation codes was not different between baseline and at three weeks of tined-lead procedure (TLP) (p > 0.05), and at six weeks (p > 0.05), six months (p > 0.1), and one year of IPG (p > 0.08). After three weeks of TLP, urgency episodes decreased from 4.8 to 3.4 (-30%, p = 0.025), with 59% reduction at six-weeks IPG (p < 0.001) and 49% at six-months IPG (p = 0.013). At one year, a decrease from 4.7 to 2.3 (52% reduction, p = 0.017) was noted. VAS showed the strongest correlation with urgency (p < 0.001) and frequency (p = 0.006). No significant correlation was found with VV (p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our study describes how bladder sensation parameters change over time in patients on SNM. VV does not significantly increase, nor does frequency significantly decrease over the first year. Leaks and the percentage of urgency episodes significantly decrease, reaching a plateau level between six-weeks and six-months SNM.

Oral phenazopyridine vs intravesical lidocaine for bladder onabotulinumtoxinA analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the management of idiopathic overactive bladder has been well-established. The injections are typically performed in the office setting using local analgesia, most commonly a 20 to 30-minute intravesical instillation of lidocaine. There are limited data evaluating alternative bladder analgesics. OBJECTIVE: To compare pain scores with preprocedure oral phenazopyridine vs intravesical lidocaine in women undergoing intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for idiopathic overactive bladder. STUDY DESIGN: Nonpregnant adult females with idiopathic overactive bladder, scheduled for office injection of 100 units of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA were randomized to either 200 mg of oral phenazopyridine taken 1 to 2 hours preprocedure or a 20-minute preprocedure intravesical instillation of 50 mL of 2% lidocaine. We excluded participants with neurogenic bladders, and those who had received intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections in the previous 12 months. The primary outcome was pain measured by a 100-mm visual analog scale. Demographic characteristics and overall satisfaction with the procedure were also recorded. Providers answered questions about cystoscopic visualization, ease of procedure, and perception of participant comfort. Prespecified noninferiority margin was set to equal the anticipated minimum clinically important difference of 14 mm. A planned sample of 100 participants, 50 in each treatment arm, provided 80% power to detect noninferiority at a significance level of.05. We performed a modified intention-to-treat analysis and compared variables with the t test or the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 111 participants were enrolled, and complete data were obtained for 100 participants; 47 participants were randomized to phenazopyridine and 53 to lidocaine. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. There were 19.6% and 20.8% of participants in the phenazopyridine and lidocaine groups, respectively, who previously underwent intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections. The mean postprocedure pain was 2.7 mm lower in the phenazopyridine group than in the lidocaine group (95% confidence interval, -11.3 to 10.7), demonstrating noninferiority. More than 90% of participants in both groups stated that the pain was tolerable. Slightly more participants reported being "very satisfied" in the lidocaine group, although this was not statistically significant (50.0% vs 40.4%; P=.34). Providers reported clear visualization in 89.4% of participants in the phenazopyridine group and in 100% of participants in the lidocaine group (P=.02). Provider perception of participant comfort and overall ease of procedure were not different between groups. Length of time in the exam room was significantly shorter in the phenazopyridine than in the lidocaine group (44.4 vs 57.5 minutes; P=.0003). CONCLUSION: In women receiving intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for idiopathic overactive bladder, oral phenazopyridine was noninferior to intravesical lidocaine for procedural pain control. Phenazopyridine is well-tolerated by participants, allows for the procedure to be performed with similar ease, and is associated with shorter appointment times.