Drain placement in paediatric complicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Children undergoing appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis are at an increased risk of post-operative morbidity. Placement of an intra-peritoneal drain to prevent post-operative complications is controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic drain placement to prevent complications in children with complicated appendicitis. A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Cochrane, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to November 2022 for studies directly comparing drain placement to no drain placement in children ≤ 18 years of age undergoing operative treatment of complicated appendicitis. A total of 5108 children with complicated appendicitis were included from 16 studies; 2231 (44%) received a drain. Placement of a drain associated with a significantly increased risk of intra-peritoneal abscess formation (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.24, p = 0.004) but there was no significant difference in wound infection rate (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.74-2.88, p = 0.28). Length of stay was significantly longer in the drain group (mean difference 2.02 days, 95% CI 1.14-2.90, p < 0.001). Although the quality and certainty of the available evidence is low, prophylactic drain placement does not prevent intra-peritoneal abscess following appendicectomy in children with complicated appendicitis.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of a pelvic abscess - An alternative use of lumen-apposing metallic stents.

The use of lumen-apposing metal stent is well defined for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic collections (e.g. WON). However, it is not yet a well-established approach in the management of postsurgical collections. We present an alternative application of LAMS for EUS drainage of pelvic abscess, showing that it is a safe and minimally invasive technique, with excellent clinical results. This technique should be considered as a drainage alternative in these scenarios due to its lower morbidity and mortality, opening a new era in the approach to these lesions.

Postoperative Packing of Perianal Abscess Cavities (PPAC2): randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Perianal abscess is common. Traditionally, postoperative perianal abscess cavities are managed with internal wound packing, a practice not supported by evidence. The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to assess if non-packing is less painful and if it is associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: The Postoperative Packing of Perianal Abscess Cavities (PPAC2) trial was a multicentre, RCT (two-group parallel design) of adult participants admitted to an NHS hospital for incision and drainage of a primary perianal abscess. Participants were randomized 1:1 (via an online system) to receive continued postoperative wound packing or non-packing. Blinded data were collected via symptom diaries, telephone, and clinics over 6 months. The objective was to determine whether non-packing of perianal abscess cavities is less painful than packing, without an increase in perianal fistula or abscess recurrence. The primary outcome was pain (mean maximum pain score on a 100-point visual analogue scale). RESULTS: Between February 2018 and March 2020, 433 participants (mean age 42 years) were randomized across 50 sites. Two hundred and thirteen participants allocated to packing reported higher pain scores than 220 allocated to non-packing (38.2 versus 28.2, mean difference 9.9; P < 0.0001). The occurrence of fistula-in-ano was low in both groups: 32/213 (15 per cent) in the packing group and 24/220 (11 per cent) in the non-packing group (OR 0.69, 95 per cent c.i. 0.39 to 1.22; P = 0.20). The proportion of patients with abscess recurrence was also low: 13/223 (6 per cent) in the non-packing group and 7/213 (3 per cent) in the packing group (OR 1.85, 95 per cent c.i. 0.72 to 4.73; P = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Avoiding abscess cavity packing is less painful without a negative morbidity risk. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN93273484 (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN93273484). REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03315169 (http://clinicaltrials.gov).

Perianal abscess is a common, painful condition due to infection and swelling around the anus caused by blockage of the anal glands. The treatment of perianal abscess has stayed the same for over 50 years. An operation is performed under general anaesthetic to cut the skin and drain the infection. This is followed by continued internal dressing (packing) of the remaining cavity (hole) until the skin has healed over. Packing changes are needed multiple times a week for several weeks. Packing is the accepted treatment as it is believed to reduce the chance of the abscess coming back, and also reduces the chance of perianal fistula forming. There are no medical studies to support this idea. Perianal fistula (an abnormal passage between the skin around the anus, and the inside of the anal canal or rectum) is a long-term condition, which causes pain, and pus (and sometimes faeces) discharge, and often needs another operation (or multiple operations) to fix it. This trial was performed to demonstrate if no packing of a perianal abscess would result in a reduction of pain, with no increase in unwanted abscess recurrences and fistulas, in comparison to the standard treatment of packing. The trial recruited 433 people, who were randomly chosen to enter one of two groups; one to have their wound packed and the other to have no packing of the wound. After being discharged from hospital following surgery, the patients attended or were visited by a community nurse for the dressing to be changed or wound packed. Each patient provided information on pain from their wound, including worst pain each day and pain before, during, and after the changing of their dressing or packing. This and other information was gathered for the first 10 days after surgery and periodically until 6 months after surgery. The no-packing group experienced much less pain than the packing group. There was no difference in abscess recurrence and fistula formation between the non-packing and packing groups. The findings demonstrate that no packing of perianal abscess wounds after drainage operation is the best treatment.

Early versus delayed ileocolic resection for complicated Crohn's disease: is "cooling off" necessary?

BACKGROUND: Ileal Crohn's disease (CD) complicated by intraabdominal abscess, phlegmon, fistula, and/or microperforation is commonly treated with antibiotics, bowel rest, and percutaneous drainage followed by interval ileocolic resection (ICR). This "cool off" strategy is intended to facilitate the safe completion of a one-stage resection using a minimally invasive approach and minimize perioperative complications. There is limited data evaluating the benefits of delayed versus early resection. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) database at a tertiary center was queried from 2013-2020 to identify patients who underwent ICR for complicated ileal CD confirmed on preoperative imaging. ICR cohorts were classified as early (≤ 7 days) vs delayed (> 7 days) based on the interval from diagnostic imaging to surgery. Operative approach and 30-day postoperative morbidity were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 474 patients who underwent ICR over the 7-year period, 112 patients had complicated ileal CD including 99 patients (88%) with intraabdominal abscess. Early ICR was performed in 52 patients (46%) at a median of 3 days (IQR 2, 5) from diagnostic imaging. Delayed ICR was performed in 60 patients (54%) following a median "cool off" period of 23 days of non-operative treatment (IQR 14, 44), including preoperative percutaneous abscess drainage in 17 patients (28%). A higher proportion of patients with intraabdominal abscess underwent delayed vs early ICR (57% vs 43%, p = 0.19). Overall, there were no significant differences in the rate of laparoscopy (96% vs 90%), conversion to open surgery (12% vs 17%), rates of extended bowel resection (8% vs 13%), additional concurrent procedures (44% vs 52%), or fecal diversion (10% vs 2%) in the early vs delayed ICR groups. The median postoperative length of stay was 5 days in both groups with an overall 25% vs 17% (p = 0.39) 30-day postoperative complication rate and a 6% vs 5% 30-day readmission rate in early vs delayed ICR groups, respectively. Overall median follow-up time was 14.3 months (IQR 1.2, 24.1) with no difference in the rate of subsequent CD-related intestinal resection (4% vs 5%) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary series, at a high-volume tertiary referral center, a "cool off" delayed resectional approach was not found to reduce perioperative complications in patients undergoing ICR for complicated ileal Crohn's disease. Laparoscopic ICR can be performed within one week of diagnosis with low rates of conversion and postoperative complications.

Needle aspiration treatment vs. incision of acute simple perianal abscess: randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: Needle aspiration of an acute simple perianal abscess may be an alternative to conventional incision drainage with potential advantages in wound healing, functional outcome, and quality of life. The aim and objectives of the study are to compare the outcome of needle aspiration and postoperative antibiotics with that of conventional surgical incision drainage of acute perianal abscess. The primary outcome was abscess recurrence. Secondary outcomes were fistula formation, wound healing, quality of life, and fecal continence. METHODS: This is a three-center randomized controlled trial, including adults with acute perianal abscess. The needle aspiration group received clindamycin for one week postoperatively. All included patients were scheduled for a follow-up at 2, 12, and 52 weeks postoperatively including physical examination, quality of life assessment (SF 36 questionnaire), and fecal continence (Wexner score). RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included. The recurrence rate was 41% in needle aspiration and 15% in incision drainage, with HR of 3.033 (p = 0.014). Fistula formation was 15% without significant difference between the groups. There was no significant difference in wound healing, quality of life, or fecal incontinence scores. CONCLUSION: Needle aspiration with postoperative antibiotics cannot be recommended as an alternative for surgical incision in the treatment of acute perianal abscess. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.org with identification number NCT02585141, initial release on 15 October 2015.

Transcervical drainage of abdominal-pelvic abscess after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Abdominopelvic abscess is a serious, but infrequent, postoperative complication of sacrocolpopexy, which a priori requires a second surgery to debride the affected tissue and dry out the infected mesh in addition to a prolonged broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. METHODS: We present two cases of post-surgical abdominopelvic abscesses, treated with conservative management using ultrasound-guided transcervical drainage and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Both patients underwent a favorable evolution without needing the removal of the mesh. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the search for new alternatives to avoid mesh removal and the comorbidity associated with a second surgery, transcervical drainage is a treatment to be considered in selected cases.

Tumescent Local Anesthesia in Parotid Abscess - Novel Application of Old Technique.

Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) is a regional anesthetic technique in which the diluted local anesthetic drug (commonly lidocaine) and epinephrine solution in large volume is injected subcutaneously around the site of incision. The main advantages of TLA are excellent bloodless field and longer duration of analgesia because of addition of epinephrine. Although TLA was used in various surgical procedures, there is no literature to date that has reported its use in the parotid region. Hence, we present an interesting case where this old technique found a novel application in avoiding general anesthesia and its sequelae. We also believe that it provides valuable information to doctors of various categories such as surgeons, Anesthesiologists and general practitioners/family physicians.

Perianal Crohn's Disease.

CASE SUMMARY: A 22-year-old man presents to your office with a perianal abscess and occasional mild crampy abdominal pain. You take him to the operating room for an examination under anesthesia (EUA) with incision and drainage of the abscess and note a transphincteric fistula tract through which you place a seton and 2 large skin tags. The anal canal and rectum are without ulceration, but there are mild proctitis and nonprolapsing internal hemorrhoids. Because of a concern for Crohn's disease (CD), he undergoes magnetic resonance enterography and colonoscopy. The magnetic resonance enterography shows inflammation in 20 cm of the distal terminal ileum, and colonoscopy reveals approximately 10 ulcers <5 mm in the terminal ileum without significant narrowing. He is seen in consultation for the initiation of a monoclonal antibody and returns to see you in the office after his first 3 infusions. He is feeling well, has significantly decreased drainage from the perianal fistula, but would really like his seton and skin tags removed while you are there.

Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: SICCR position statement.

Perianal sepsis is a common condition ranging from acute abscess to chronic anal fistula. In most cases, the source is considered to be a non-specific cryptoglandular infection starting from the intersphincteric space. Surgery is the main treatment and several procedures have been developed, but the risks of recurrence and of impairment of continence still seem to be an unresolved issue. This statement reviews the pertinent literature and provides evidence-based recommendations to improve individualized management of patients.

Relapsing retroperitoenal abscess secondary to juvenile dermatomyositis: Complexity in management.

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a systemic autoimmune condition with myopathy. Gastrointestinal and pulmonary manifestations are rare presentation of JDM. Gastrointestinal perforation incidence in JDM is associated with vasculopathy and ischaemia. There are only few reported case of management of JDM with gastrointestinal complication. Management of such condition is challenging. We present a 21-year-old man with spontaneous descending colon perforation undergoing Hartmann's procedure. He subsequently presented with recurrent retroperitoneal abscess at five and 30 months following the initial presentation which was treated with percutaneous drainage. A high index of suspicion is necessary in JDM patients presenting with acute abdomen.

Cricoarytenoid joint abscess associated with rheumatoid arthritis.

Cricoarytenoid joint arthritis is an uncommon manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis. We encountered a 68-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis who presented with odynophagia, dysphagia, and progressive shortness of breath. Examination findings showed diminished mobility of the left vocal cord and right arytenoid swelling associated with an immobile right vocal cord. Computed tomography (CT) imaging identified a ring-enhancing lesion of the right lateral cricoarytenoid joint. Microdirect laryngoscopy with drainage of the cricoarytenoid abscess and tracheotomy were performed. Development of a laterally based cricoarytenoid joint abscess is identified as a complication of chronic rheumatoid arthritis with successful management described.

Secondary Aortoenteric Erosion Followed by Recurrent Lower Extremity Abscesses.

A secondary aortoenteric fistula (SAEF) is a relatively rare complication of aortoiliac reconstructive surgery, often involving relatively fixed duodenal third portion and a vascular anastomosis. We observed a 52-year-old man with a recurrent right lower leg abscess following the erosion between ipsilateral bifurcated prosthetic graft limb and nonfixed jejunum. In situ graft-sparing surgical treatment with aggressive debridement was successfully performed. A SAEF may occur even at a nonvascular anastomosis site, or in nonfixed small bowel, and may become a source of a septic embolus. A high index of suspicion for SAEF is required for early diagnosis and treatment of this life-threatening complication.

Ultrasound-guided axillary nerve block for ED incision and drainage of deltoid abscess.

Deltoid abscesses are common and painful, often a consequence of injection drug use and seen frequently in emergency departments (EDs). The required incision and drainage can be completed successfully with effective pain relief using a peripheral nerve block. The brachial plexus nerve block works well, however it is technically complex with a low, but potentially serious, risk of complications such as phrenic nerve paralysis. Selective blockade of the axillary nerve eliminates the risks associated with a brachial plexus block, while providing more specific anesthesia for the deltoid region. Our initial experience suggests that the axillary nerve block (ANB) is a technically simple, safe, and effective way to manage the pain of deltoid abscesses and the necessary incision and drainage (I&D). The block involves using ultrasound guidance to inject a 20mL bolus of local anesthetic into the quadrangular space surrounding the axillary nerve (inferior to the posterolateral aspect of the acromion, near the overlap of the long head of triceps brachii and teres minor). Once injected the local will anesthetize the axillary nerve resulting in analgesia of the cutaneous area of the lateral shoulder and the deeper tissues including the deltoid muscle. Further research will clarify questions about the volume and concentration of local anesthetic, the role of injected adjuncts, and expected duration of analgesia and anesthesia. Herein we present a description of an axillary nerve block successfully used for deltoid abscess I&D in the ED.

[Seminal Vesicle Abscess Associated with Zinner Syndrome].

We report a case of seminal vesicle abscess associated with Zinner syndrome. A 26-year-old male was admitted to our hospital because of fever and right scrotal swelling. Ultrasound showed an enlarged epididymis and color Doppler ultrasound showed increased vascularity in the epididymis. We diagnosed the case as acute epididymitis and started intravenous antibiotic therapy. Four days after admission, remittent fever persisted and blood culture was positive for Staphylococcus aureus. We performed computed tomography, which showed a right seminal vesicle cyst abscess and right renal agenesis. Our diagnosis was an abscess associated with Zinner syndrome. Transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal drainage was performed 30 days after admission because seminal vesicle abscess could not be controlled by conservative treatment. Eight days after the procedure, the patient was discharged. One year after the procedure, recurrence of seminal vesicle abscess has not been observed.

Packing versus non-packing outcomes for abscesses after incision and drainage.

CLINICAL QUESTION: In non-diabetic, non-immunocompromised individuals with skin abscesses, does packing after incision and drainage (I&D) reduce the risk of recurrence or reintervention compared with not packing? ANSWER: No. If the abscess is less than 5 cm, packing does not affect outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE FOR THE ANSWER: B. DATE SEARCH WAS CONDUCTED: November 2014. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Published RCTs and meta-analysis studies. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Abscess greater than 5 cm, abscess in diabetics, abscess in immunocompromised.