Efficacy and safety of calcipotriol as a potential topical treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, controlled, triple blinded, split-face clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common skin problem that may result in significant scarring and systemic comorbidities. Adverse effects and increasing resistance to available treatments urge the development of new therapeutics. Topical vitamin D analogues have been successfully used in psoriasis; however, the efficacy and safety of calcipotriol as a potential topical treatment of acne is yet to be established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of calcipotriol in treating acne compared with adapalene and placebo. METHODS: Sixty patients with acne were included and randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Group I participants were treated by daily application of calcipotriol 0.005% cream on one facial side vs. placebo (petrolatum) over the other side. Group II were treated by daily application of adapalene 0.1% gel over one facial side vs. calcipotriol on the other. Therapeutic response was evaluated using the Japanese Acne Grading System (JAGS) and through photographic evaluation using Mean Improvement Score by Physician. RESULTS: Adapalene-treated skin gave the greatest improvement and the highest patient satisfaction compared with skin treated with calcipotriol or placebo (P = 0.001). Nonetheless, the calcipotriol-treated side showed a significantly greater reduction in post-treatment JAGS score and much greater satisfaction than placebo. As treatment continued, improved tolerability to calcipotriol was noted, with comparable side-effects between the three study arms. CONCLUSIONS: Calcipotriol seems to be a promising new safe topical therapeutic option for acne. However, adapalene is still superior in efficacy, tolerability and patient satisfaction.

Benefit of Topical Combination Therapy for Acne: Analyzing Effect Size Using Number Needed to Treat.

BACKGROUND: Topical acne trials often are confounded by high vehicle response rates and differing outcome measures, making it difficult to compare treatments. Number needed to treat (NNT) can be a simple, clinically meaningful way to indirectly compare treatment options without head-to-head data. NNT is the number of patients who need to be treated with an intervention to observe one additional patient successfully achieving a desired outcome versus vehicle/placebo. While treatment attributes such as adverse events may not be captured, lower NNT is a good indicator of a more effective treatment. METHODS: Following a search of combination topical treatments for acne vulgaris, all treatments that reported pivotal trial efficacy data consistent with the 2018 FDA definition of success were included in NNT analyses.  Results: Of 13 treatments, 7 reported 12-week treatment success rates in 11 phase 3 trials, with similar baseline demographics/disease severity. Treatment success ranged from 26.8% with tretinoin 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3% cream to 50% with triple-combination clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/BPO 3.1% gel. NNTs for the triple-combination gel were 4 and 5 (from 2 pivotal trials). Adapalene 0.3%/BPO 2.5% gel had an NNT of 5. Tretinoin/BPO had the largest range between trials, with NNTs of 4 and 9. The other 4 treatments had NNTs ranging from 6 to 8. CONCLUSION: A comparison of combination topical acne treatment trial data, using the same treatment outcome and similar patient populations, resulted in triple-combination clindamycin phosphate/adapalene/BPO gel and adapalene/BPO gel having the most favorable NNTs.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2):42-49.  doi:10.36849/JDD.7927.

Chemical peeling with 35% glycolic acid for the treatment of disseminated facial verruca plana: A randomized, split-face, evaluator-blinded trial.

Disseminated facial verruca plana is a chronic disorder that causes significant psychological distress. However, safe and effective treatment is lacking. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of 35% glycolic acid (GA) for the treatment of disseminated facial verruca plana. A split-face clinical trial was conducted to explore the efficacy and safety of using chemical peeling with 35% GA for the treatment of disseminated facial verruca plana. One side of the face was applied with 35% GA once every fortnight for a total of three times. Adapalene gel was applied every night to the other side of the face as the control. The clearance rate of lesions was evaluated at different time points. Between June 2020 and December 2020, 30 patients with disseminated verruca plana who visited the Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University were enrolled. After three chemical peelings with 35% GA that was applied at 2-week intervals, 15 (50%) patients achieved >70% lesion reduction. The same effective rate in the adapalene gel-treated side of the face was documented in eight patients. Subgroup analysis showed a higher clearance rate in patients with a shorter disease duration. Moreover, concurrent improvements in facial roughness were observed in the 35% GA-treated group. Adverse effects including mild erythema and desquamation were observed during chemical peeling with 35% GA. In conclusion, chemical peeling with 35% GA could be a safe and effective option for treating disseminated facial verruca plana, especially for those who desire skin improvement.

Adapalene gel 0.1% vs ketoconazole cream 2% and their combination in treatment of pityriasis versicolor: A randomized clinical study.

Pityriasis versicolor (PV) is a chronic superficial fungal infection. Management using azole drugs leads to drug resistance. The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcome of 0.1% adapalene gel vs 2% ketoconazole cream and their combination in PV. This randomized double-blinded study was conducted on 90 PV patients divided into three equal groups. GI was treated with topical ketoconazole 2% cream twice daily and placebo, GII was treated with topical 0.1% adapalene gel twice daily and placebo and GIII was treated with topical combination of 0.1% adapalene gel (at night) and ketoconazole 2% cream (in the morning). All patients received medications for 4 weeks. Evaluation was done at 2 and 4 weeks and included clinical assessment, laboratory assessment, and patient satisfaction. We found that after 4 weeks of treatment, all groups showed significant improvement. There was better response in GIII in terms of lower rate of positive potassium hydroxide staining, higher rate of significantly improved cases and higher rate of well-satisfied patients. However, the difference fell short of statistical significance. We concluded that a combination of adapalene gel and ketoconazole cream is very effective in treatment of PV with no or mild side effects.

First reported cases of actinic folliculitis treated successfully with topical retinoid.

Actinic folliculitis (AF) is a rare recurrent seasonal photodermatosis, relatively newly characterized by nonpruritic, monomorphic pustules and papules appearing 4-24 h after exposure to sunlight. Lesions usually affect the face but also appear on the upper chest and arms. Resolution normally occurs within 7-10 days with cessation of sunlight exposure. AF is resistant to standard treatments used for acne vulgaris and acne rosacea, with only oral retinoids previously being reported as effective. We report the first two cases, to our knowledge, of AF responding extremely effectively to a topical retinoid.

Efficacy and safety of 2% supramolecular salicylic acid compared with 5% benzoyl peroxide/0.1% adapalene in the acne treatment: a randomized, split-face, open-label, single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Topical drugs for mild to moderate acne include adapalene (ADA) and benzoyl peroxide(BPO). Supramolecular salicylic acid (SSA), a modified SA preparation, is considered as a new effective therapeutic scheme. OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of 2% supramolecular SA (2% SSA) with 0.01% adapalene plus 5% benzoyl peroxide (5%BPO +0.1%ADA) for treatment of facial acne. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, split face, randomized and single-centre clinical trial. Subjects with mild to moderate acne were enrolled. Two percent SSA cream were randomly applied on one side of the face while 5%BPO +0.1%ADA gel was applied on the opposite side for 28 days. The numbers of acne lesions, along with side effects of the targeted area were evaluated by the investigators at day 0, day 14, and day 28. Skin water content, TEWL and skin lightening indexes were measured at the same time. RESULTS: A total of 31 of acne patients completed the trial. Dates showed that 2% SSA had similar effects to 5%BPO +0.1%ADA in reducing papules/pustules (47.9% vs. 49.8%), non-inflammatory lesions (43.1% vs. 42.7%) and total lesions (44.1% vs. 45.6%; all p > 0.05) at day 28. The skin barrier (skin hydration value and TEWL value), skin brightness (L* value) and erythema (a* values) indicators showed no statistical differences in the left and right sides of the face (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that 2% SSA has a similar efficacy with 5%BPO +0.1%ADA in mild to moderate acne treatment. This might be a useful pilot study that could be used to support further larger clinical trials.

How Much Do We Know about Maintaining Treatment Response after Successful Acne Therapy? Systematic Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Acne Maintenance Therapy.

After cessation of successful initial acne therapy, patients often experience flares. Consecutive maintenance treatment after successful induction therapy is promoted by guidelines; however, little is known about the efficacy/safety of different maintenance regimens. A systematic review on acne maintenance treatments was conducted. We identified 5 randomized controlled trials [RCTs; adapalene vs. vehicle or vs. no treatment (3 RCTs), adapalene/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) vs. vehicle, combination/monotherapy of minocycline (systemic)/tazarotene/placebo] and 3 non-RCTs on systemic isotretinoin, adapalene/BPO and azelaic acid. The results of adapalene versus vehicle/no treatment varied depending on the reported outcome. The 'number of patients maintaining at least 50% improvement' counting inflammatory lesions/non-inflammatory lesions with adapalene was superior to vehicle (risk ratio, RR 1.24, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.08-1.43/RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.59). However, no significant differences were found in 2 of 3 RCTs for maintaining 'clear/almost clear' or 'mild acne' or on the global grading score. For the combination regimens of minocycline/tazarotene/placebo, no significant differences were found. Adapalene/BPO was superior to vehicle counting inflammatory lesions/non-inflammatory lesions (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.31-1.99; RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.44-2.26). Due to the scarcity of studies, few conclusions can be drawn. More homogeneous outcome measures and specific maintenance study designs may lead to more robust findings.

Topical retinoids for acne.

Topical retinoids are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acne vulgaris in nonpregnant, nonlactating patients 12 years of age and older. Their efficacy, safety, and tolerability are well documented for inflammatory and noninflammatory acne with studies repeatedly demonstrating a decrease in the number of lesions, significant improvement in acne severity, improvement in the cosmetic appearance of acne, and the prevention of acne lesions through microcomedone formation. There is some variability between prescription retinoid products regarding efficacy, safety, and tolerability; with erythema, peeling, and dryness being common, potential side effects. Due to their efficacious and safe profile, topical retinoids remain the first-line treatment for acne vulgaris.

Resolving acne with optimized adapalene microspongeal gel, in vivo and clinical evaluations.

In our pursuit of enhancing acne treatment while minimizing side effects, we developed tailored Adapalene microsponges (MS) optimized using a Box-Behnken design 33. The independent variables, Eudragit RS100 percentage in the polymer mixture, organic phase volume, and drug to polymer percentage, were explored. The optimized formulation exhibited remarkable characteristics, with a 98.3% ± 1.6 production yield, 97.3% ± 1.64 entrapment efficiency, and a particle size of 31.8 ± 1.1 µm. Notably, it achieved a 24 h cumulative drug release of 75.1% ± 1.4. To delve deeper into its efficacy, we evaluated the optimized microspongeal-gel in vitro, in vivo, and clinically. It demonstrated impressive retention in the pilosebaceous unit, a target for acne treatment. Comparative studies between our optimized Adapalene microspongeal gel and marketed Adapalene revealed superior performance. In vivo studies on Propionibacterium acnes-infected mice ears showed a remarkable 97% reduction in ear thickness, accompanied by a significant decrease in inflammatory signs and NF-κB levels, as confirmed by histopathological and histochemical examination. Moreover, in preliminary clinical evaluation, it demonstrated outstanding effectiveness in reducing comedonal lesions while causing fewer irritations. This not only indicates its potential for clinical application but also underscores its ability to enhance patient satisfaction, paving the way for future commercialization.

A dermocosmetic regimen is able to mitigate skin sensitivity induced by a retinoid-based fixed combination treatment for acne: Results of a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Topical retinoids cause retinoid-induced skin discomfort (RISD) mainly during the first weeks of use leading to noncompliance and premature treatment discontinuation. A dermocosmetic (DC) may help to reduce treatment-related signs and symptoms and improve adherence. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit of a DC regimen compared to a routine skin care regimen (RC) by reducing RISD signs and symptoms induced by a retinoid/benzoyl peroxide fixed-drug combination in subjects with acne. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, comparative study in subjects ≥16 years with mild to moderate acne candidates to a topical adapalene/BPO fixed drug combination (A/BPO). Evaluations took place at Day 0, 7, 14, 28, and 84 and included erythema, desquamation, burning, itching and stinging and RISD (SD, a composite score of local treatment-related signs and symptoms and acne severity. Subjects used daily the DC or RC together with the fixed combination for 84 days. RESULTS: Eighty-eight subjects were included, the mean age was 21 years; 84% were females. At Day 0 the SD score was 0.8 in both groups. A statistically significant difference in terms of skin sensitivity with DC compared to RC (1.6 points, vs. 2.4 points p < 0.05) was observed at Day 14. Clinical sign and symptom scores were more reduced with DC than with RC at all time points. Acne severity improved in both groups. CONCLUSION: DC significantly reduces A/BPO-related RISD compared to RC, especially during the first 14 days of treatment, without interfering with the clinical efficacy of the treatment, thus helping to maintain treatment adherence.

Managing acne vulgaris: an update.

Acne vulgaris is very common and can have significant negative impact on people. While sometimes a transient problem, acne may persist for many years and often leads to permanent scars or pigment changes. Guidelines unanimously advise topical treatments as first-line, although differ in recommending either topical benzoyl peroxide or topical retinoid (mainly adapalene) alone or in combination. Guidance published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advises counselling patients regarding avoidance of skin irritation when starting topical treatments and promoting adherence (treatments take 6-8 weeks to work). Oral antibiotics are currently overprescribed for acne but have a role when coprescribed with a non-antibiotic topical treatment. Hormonal treatments, such as the combined contraceptive pill, are also effective and there is growing evidence for the use of spironolactone for women with persistent acne. Recent guidance from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency regarding isotretinoin has implications for specialist prescribing and monitoring, and increasing public awareness of potential risks of mental health problems and sexual dysfunction. Although acne is associated with psychiatric disorder, the mental health effects of isotretinoin remain controversial.

From Breakouts to Bargains: Strategies for Patient-Centered, Cost-effective Acne Care.

A range of treatment options are available for both mild to moderate and moderate to severe acne, and these options vary widely in their clinical uses, effectiveness, and costs. With the continued rise of dermatologic drug prices and increased cost-sharing due to high-deductible health plans, the importance of cost-effective treatment continues to grow. Failure to consider cost-effective, patient-centered care may lead to increased financial toxicity, reduced adherence, and ultimately worse outcomes and patient satisfaction. Combination topical products offer improved efficacy and convenience, which are associated with better adherence and outcomes. Generic fixed-dose adapalene-benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and fixed-dose clindamycin-BPO can be highly cost-effective options for patients with mild to moderate acne. Hormonal agents such as combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and spironolactone are inexpensive and likely reflect a highly cost-effective option that could reduce reliance on oral antibiotics in patients with moderate to severe acne. Doxycycline and isotretinoin also are cost-effective options for more severe acne. Frequent laboratory monitoring for spironolactone and isotretinoin continues to be prevalent despite little evidence to support its clinical utility, and it is associated with a major cost burden to the patient and health care system. The reduction of laboratory monitoring is an opportunity to provide higher-value care.

Evaluation of the efficacy of maintenance therapy for acne vulgaris using adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel for 24 weeks and assessment of atrophic acne scars using three-dimensional image analysis.

Maintenance therapy after remission of inflammation is strongly recommended in the guideline for the treatment of acne vulgaris published by the Japanese Dermatological Association. One advantage of continuing maintenance therapy is the alleviation of atrophic scarring. This study investigated the efficacy of maintenance therapy using adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel, and its effects on atrophic scarring. Overall, 126 patients were randomized to the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide group (n = 40), benzoyl peroxide group (n = 44), and control group (without maintenance treatment drugs; n = 42), and 111 of these completed a trial lasting 24 weeks. As the primary endpoint, the treatment success rate (the percentage of patients in whom the number of inflammatory lesions was maintained at ≤10) was 89.2% in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide group, 87.5% in the benzoyl peroxide group, and 47.4% in the control group. Compared with the control group, the success rates were significantly higher in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide and benzoyl peroxide groups (P = 0.0006 for both). As one of the secondary endpoints, the rate of change in the number of atrophic scars showed significant improvement from the baseline in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide and benzoyl peroxide groups at week 24 (P = 0.0004 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Although the three-dimensional image analysis parameters did not change significantly from the baseline in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide and benzoyl peroxide groups at week 24, significant worsening was noted in the control group (P = 0.0276 for affected area, P = 0.0445 for volume, and P = 0.0182 for maximum depth). Adverse drug reactions were noted in three patients in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide group (7.5%) but not in the benzoyl peroxide group. These findings suggest that maintenance therapy using adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel is effective in preventing the worsening of scars in Japanese patients with acne vulgaris.

Roles of adapalene in the treatment of pityriasis versicolor.

BACKGROUND: Ketoconazole is a typical treatment available for pityriasis versicolor; tretinoin cream is effective, too. Adapalene gel is a tretinoin derivative and has a lower incidence of irritation compared with other topical retinoid products. However, there are no reports on adapalene gel for the treatment of pityriasis versicolor. OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of adapalene gel comparing the treatment with adapalene gel and 2% ketoconazole cream in pityriasis versicolor. METHODS: Eighty patients suffering from pityriasis versicolor were randomly divided into two groups; one group were treated with 2% ketoconazole cream topically twice daily for 2 weeks, adapalene gel was used for the other group in a similar fashion. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in efficacy between the two groups. No major side effects were noted in any of the groups either. CONCLUSION: Adapalene was the favorable option in the treatment of pityriasis versicolor. The probable therapeutic mechanism of adapalene is also discussed.

Safe and successful treatment of acne vulgaris with isotretinoin in a patient with chronic granulomatous disease.

Isotretinoin for acne vulgaris in the setting of chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a controversial therapeutic option. In this inherited immunodeficiency, inefficient tissue responses to bacteria and fungi lead to chronic and recurrent infections. Isotretinoin is known to be associated with several mucocutaneous side effects that could worsen the immune response in individuals with CGD. We report the fourth published case of acne vulgaris treated with isotretinoin in an individual with CGD, with a safe and successful outcome.

Comparison Of Topical 0.1% Adapalene Gel Versus Cryotherapy In Patients With Plantar Warts.

BACKGROUND: Plantar wart is a common viral infection of the plantar surface of the foot. Multiple treatment modalities are available but there is no definitive management option. The aim of this study is to compare topical adapalene gel 0.1% with cryotherapy in patients presenting with plantar warts in terms of time taken for complete clearance of the lesions. METHODS: The study was conducted at the Department of Dermatology, PNS Shifa Hospital, Karachi from 28th April to 28th October 2020. Eighty-four patients with plantar warts who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Approval from the institutional ethical review committee was sought and written informed consent was taken from all the patients. Patients were divided into two groups, A (Adapalene 0.1% gel) and B (Cryotherapy) of 42 patients each. Adapalene gel was applied twice daily under occlusion at home and cryotherapy was done at the clinic after every two weeks. Patients were followed weekly from the onset of treatment and days taken for complete clearance of plantar warts were noted. Both the groups were compared for the outcome, i.e., time taken for complete clearance of lesions. RESULTS: The mean time for complete clearance of plantar warts in group A was 35.619±3.154 days and in group B, it was 50.404±3.178 days. CONCLUSIONS: Adapalene gel 0.1% used for the treatment of plantar warts helped in complete clearance of lesions faster than cryotherapy.

Comparison Of Efficacy Of Topical Adapalene Plus Oral Azithromycin And Topical Adapalene Plus Oral Doxycycline In Treatment Of Acne Vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a commonly diagnosed dermatological condition characterised by pilosebaceous unit blockage or inflammation. It may manifest as inflammatory, non-inflammatory, or a combination of the two. The acne vulgaris mostly the face of individual and chest and back of individual is also affected sometime. The aim of my research is to compare the effectiveness of topical adapalene plus oral azithromycin versus topical adapalene plus oral doxycycline in treating acne. Acne is one of most common reason compelling a patient to see dermatological advice. Our goal is to find the most effective antibiotic to produce the best outcomes with the fewest possible unwanted effect (side effects) and a maximum level of patient satisfaction. METHODS: From May 1 to October 31, 2019, a randomised control trial was performed at Dermatology department MTI Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar. Using the lottery form, all of the patients were split into 2 groups. For 12 weeks, patients in Group A were given oral doxycycline 100 mg once daily and topical adapalene, while patients in Group B were given oral azithromycin 250 mg on alternating days and topical adapalene. All patients were followed at the end of 12 weeks after start of therapy to determine the efficacy in term of clearance of at least 60% of the number of lesions from baseline. RESULTS: In Group A, 22 (59.45%) patients expressed positive results whereas in Group B, only 9 (24.32%) patients expressed positive results. p value (0.0021.). CONCLUSIONS: My data suggest that oral doxycycline 100mg in combination with adapalene gave better results as compared to oral azithromycin which was also found well-tolerated option for treatment of acne on face.

Adapalene/benzoyl peroxide gel 0.3%/2.5% for acne vulgaris

Acne vulgaris is typically treated with a combination of a topical retinoid plus an antimicrobial agent, as recommended by national and international evidence-based guidelines around the globe. Adapalene, a synthetic topical retinoid, is available in two concentrations (0.1% and 0.3%) and in once-daily fixed-dose combinations with benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2.5%. Adapalene 0.3%/BPO 2.5% is approved for use for moderate-to-severe acne with proven efficacy, good safety and tolerability across a spectrum of patient variables (different ages, genders, and skin types) and disease severity. While some patients experience issues with transient tolerability during retinoid and BPO therapy, it is our clinical experience that good patient education to set expectations and provide strategies to minimize irritation can overcome the majority of issues. This article reviews the data supporting the use of adapalene 0.3%/2.5% in practice, including the complementary mechanism of action of adapalene and BPO, clinical data from a range of settings, and key aspects of patient education.

Influence of moisturizer containing licochalcone A, 1,2-decanediol, L-carnitine, and salicylic acid on facial skin lipidome among seborrhea participants.

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of skin lipidomics and its alteration under treatment administration might offer therapeutic solutions for seborrhea. AIMS: To quantitatively and qualitatively explore the lipid-modifying effect of the moisturizer containing licochalcone A, 1,2-decanediol, L-carnitine, and salicylic acid (LDCS) in seborrhea participants with and without acne vulgaris (AV). PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted an open-label explorative study on 20 seborrhea participants (10 AV and 10 non-AV). All participants applied LDCS for 8 weeks with the addition of benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in AV. Skin surface lipid (SSL) assessments were performed biweekly, using Sebumeter® and lipid-absorbent Sebutapes® to collect forehead SSL for profile analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). RESULTS: SSL amount significantly decreased since week 2 in AV (p-value = 0.0124) and week 6 in non-AV (p-value = 0.0098), respectively. Twenty-two important SSLs were annotated from GC-MS analysis, comprising 19 free fatty acids, cholesterol, squalene, and glycerol. There was a significant reduction in 5 and 13 lipid components in AV and non-AV groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: LDCS, either alone or with topical acne treatment, demonstrated substantial sebusuppressive and lipid-modifying effects among seborrhea participants.