Who Ever Said It Would Be Easy? Reflecting on Two Clinical Trials Targeting α-Synuclein.

Two recent, high-profile manuscripts reported negative results with two parallel approaches of passive immunization targeting α-synuclein in a population of patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD). These phase II studies failed to show a bona fide disease-modifying neuroprotective effect on PD progression, despite the evidence that these antibodies effectively bind native α-synuclein in human serum. Here, we discuss the possible reasons that could help explain the lack of clinical efficacy. In particular, we highlight (1) the wealth of evidence supporting the notion of α-synuclein as a valid therapeutic target; (2) the lack of evidence of target engagement in the aforementioned studies, especially of the elusive oligomeric species, the likely culprits in disease pathogenesis and/or its propagation; (3) the limitations, especially in terms of timing passive immunization, of preclinical models, where the same α-synuclein antibodies succeeded in mitigating disease manifestations; (4) the consideration of possibly intervening at an even earlier stage of disease in future trials; and (5) the multitude of strategies beyond passive immunization that could be used to combat α-synuclein-mediated neurodegeneration, if in the end the current approach is not fruitful. Overall, our perception is that converging developments in the field, among them novel bioassays and biomarkers, improved cellular and animal models and objective measurements of motor activities integrated into clinical trials, if further optimized, will gradually move the momentum of the field forward. This, to better test the concept of whether α-synuclein-targeting therapies can indeed deliver the "holy grail" of neuroprotection to the benefit of the PD community. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Appropriate Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologic Agents for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is widely available for biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We reviewed current data and provided expert opinion regarding the clinical utility of TDM for biologic therapies in IBD. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi method to establish consensus. A comprehensive literature review was performed regarding the use of TDM of biologic therapy in IBD and presented to international IBD specialists. Subsequently, 28 statements on the application of TDM in clinical practice were rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = strongly disagree and 10 = strongly agree) by each of the panellists. Statements were accepted if 80% or more of the participants agreed with a score ≥7. The remaining statements were discussed and revised based on the available evidence followed by a second round of voting. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 24 (86%) statements. For anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies, proactive TDM was found to be appropriate after induction and at least once during maintenance therapy, but this was not the case for the other biologics. Reactive TDM was appropriate for all agents both for primary non-response and secondary loss of response. The panellists also agreed on several statements regarding TDM and appropriate drug and anti-drug antibody (ADA) concentration thresholds for biologics in specific clinical scenarios. CONCLUSION: Consensus was achieved towards the utility of TDM of biologics in IBD, particularly anti-TNF therapies. More data are needed especially on non-anti-TNF biologics to further define optimal drug concentration and ADA thresholds as these can vary depending on the therapeutic outcomes assessed.

A therapeutic human antibody against the domain 4 of the Bacillus anthracis protective antigen shows protective efficacy in a mouse model.

Since Bacillus anthracis is a high-risk pathogen and a potential tool for bioterrorism, numerous therapeutic methods including passive immunization have been actively developed. Using a human monoclonal antibody phage display library, we screened new therapeutic antibodies for anthrax infection against protective antigen (PA) of B. anthracis. Among 5 selected clones of antibodies based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results, 7B1 showed neutralizing activity to anthrax lethal toxin (LT) by inhibiting binding of the domain 4 of PA (PD4) to its cellular receptors. Through light chain shuffling process, we improved the productivity of 7B1 up to 25 folds. The light chain shuffled 7B1 antibody showed protective activity against LT both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the antibody also conferred protection of mice from 3 × LD50 challenges of fully virulent anthrax spores. Our result expands the possibility of developing a new therapeutic antibody for anthrax cure.

Acquired neuromyotonia in children with CASPR2 and LGI1 antibodies.

Acquired neuromyotonia is a form of peripheral nerve hyperexcitability. In adults, pathogenic antibodies that target the extracellular domains of leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) and contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) have been reported. We describe three paediatric patients with acquired neuromyotonia and CASPR2 and LGI1 serum antibodies. They all presented with acute-onset myokymia and pain in the lower limbs; one patient also had muscle weakness. Electromyography was suggestive of peripheral nerve hyperexcitability. Two patients improved without immunotherapy; one treated patient remained immunotherapy-dependent. Although not fatal, acquired paediatric neuromyotonia can be disabling. It is amenable to symptomatic treatment or may undergo spontaneous recovery. More severe cases may require rational immunotherapy. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The symptoms of neuromyotonia may resolve spontaneously or may require sodium channel blockers. Patients with debilitating symptoms who are refractory to symptomatic therapy may require immunotherapy.

NEUROMIOTONÍA ADQUIRIDA EN NIÑOS CON ANTICUERPOS CASPR2 Y LGI1: La neuromiotonía adquirida es una forma de hiperexcitabilidad de los nervios periféricos. En algunos adultos, se han notificado anticuerpos patógenos que se dirigen a los dominios extracelulares de la proteína 1 inactivada por glioma rico en leucina (LGI1) y la proteína 2 asociada a contactina (CASPR2). Describimos tres pacientes pediátricos con neuromiotonía adquirida y anticuerpos séricos CASPR2 y LGI1. Todos presentaban mioquimia de inicio agudo y dolor en las extremidades inferiores; un paciente también tenía debilidad muscular. La electromiografía sugirió hiperexcitabilidad del nervio periférico. Dos pacientes mejoraron sin inmunoterapia; un paciente tratado permaneció dependiente de la inmunoterapia. Aunque no es fatal, la neuromiotonía pediátrica adquirida puede ser incapacitante. Es susceptible de tratamiento sintomático o puede sufrir una recuperación espontánea. Los casos más graves pueden requerir inmunoterapia racional.

NEUROMIOTONIA ADQUIRIDA EM CRIANÇAS COM ANTICORPOS PRCAS2 E GIL1: A neuromiotonia adquirida é uma forma de hiperexcitabilidade nervosa periférica. Em alguns adultos, anticorpos patogênicos que visam os domínios extracelulares da proteína glioma-inativada rica em leucina1 (GIL1) e da proteína contactina-associada 2 (PRCAS2) foram reportados. Descrevemos três pacientes pediátricos com neuromiotonia adquirida e anticorpos séricos PRCAS2 e GIL1 CASPR2. Todos apresentaram miocimia de início agudo e dor nos membros inferiores; um paciente também teve fraqueza muscular. A eletromiografia foi sugestiva de hiperexcitabilidade nervosa periférica. Dois pacientes melhoraram sem imunoterapia; um paciente tratado permaneceu imunoterapia-dependente. Embora não seja fatal, a neuromiotomia pediátrica aguda pode ser incapacitante. É responsiva a tratamento sintomático e pode apresentar recuperação espontânea. Casos mais severaos podem requerer imunoterapia racional.

Safety and immunogenicity of neoadjuvant treatment using WT1-immunotherapeutic in combination with standard therapy in patients with WT1-positive Stage II/III breast cancer: a randomized Phase I study.

PURPOSE: This Phase I, multicenter, randomized study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01220128) evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of recombinant Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) protein combined with the immunostimulant AS15 (WT1-immunotherapeutic) as neoadjuvant therapy administered concurrently with standard treatments in WT1-positive breast cancer patients. METHODS: Patients were treated in 4 cohorts according to neoadjuvant treatment (A: post-menopausal, hormone receptor [HR]-positive patients receiving aromatase inhibitors; B: patients receiving chemotherapy; C: HER2-overexpressing patients on trastuzumab-chemotherapy combination; D: HR-positive/HER2-negative patients on chemotherapy). Patients (cohorts A-C) were randomized (2:1) to receive 6 or 8 doses of WT1-immunotherapeutic or placebo together with standard neoadjuvant treatment in a double-blind manner; cohort D patients received WT1-immunotherapeutic in an open manner. Safety was assessed throughout the study. WT1-specific antibodies were assessed pre- and post-vaccination. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized; 60 received ≥ one dose of WT1-immunotherapeutic. Two severe toxicities were reported: diarrhea (cohort C; also reported as a grade 3 serious adverse event) and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (cohort B; also reported as a grade 2 adverse event). Post-dose 4 of WT1-immunotherapeutic, 10/10 patients from cohort A, 0/8 patients from cohort B, 6/11 patients from cohort C, and 2/3 patients from cohort D were humoral responders. The sponsor elected to close the trial prematurely. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent administration of WT1-immunotherapeutic and standard neoadjuvant therapy was well tolerated and induced WT1-specific antibodies in patients receiving neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitors. In patients on neoadjuvant chemotherapy or trastuzumab-chemotherapy combination, the humoral response was impaired or blunted, likely due to either co-administration of corticosteroids and/or the chemotherapies themselves.

Efficacy and safety of CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 and continuing CT-P13 in the PLANETRA extension study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of switching from the infliximab reference product (RP; Remicade) to its biosimilar CT-P13 (Remsima, Inflectra) or continuing CT-P13 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for an additional six infusions. METHODS: This open-label extension study recruited patients with RA who had completed the 54-week, randomised, parallel-group study comparing CT-P13 with RP (PLANETRA; NCT01217086). CT-P13 (3 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 8 weeks from weeks 62 to 102. All patients received concomitant methotrexate. Endpoints included American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response, ACR50, ACR70, immunogenicity and safety. Data were analysed for patients who received CT-P13 for 102 weeks (maintenance group) and for those who received RP for 54 weeks and then switched to CT-P13 (switch group). RESULTS: Overall, 302 of 455 patients who completed the PLANETRA study enrolled into the extension. Of these, 158 had received CT-P13 (maintenance group) and 144 RP (switch group). Response rates at week 102 for maintenance versus switch groups, respectively, were 71.7% vs 71.8% for ACR20, 48.0% vs 51.4% for ACR50 and 24.3% vs 26.1% for ACR70. The proportion of patients with antidrug antibodies was comparable between groups (week 102: 40.3% vs 44.8%, respectively). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in similar proportions of patients in the two groups during the extension study (53.5% and 53.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Comparable efficacy and tolerability were observed in patients who switched from RP to its biosimilar CT-P13 for an additional year and in those who had long-term CT-P13 treatment for 2 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01571219; Results.

Successful living-related renal transplantation in a patient with factor H antibody-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.

CFH-Ab-associated aHUS requires different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and then the genetically defined aHUS forms. The risk of post-transplant recurrence with graft dysfunction in CFH-Ab aHUS is not well documented. It is suggested that recurrence can be expected if a significant CFH-Ab load persists at the time of transplantation. A pretransplant procedure to reduce CFH-Ab titer seems reasonable, but accurate recommendations are lacking. Whether further prophylactic interventions after transplantation are necessary has to be decided on an individual basis. We report the case of a late diagnosed CFH-Ab HUS with initial ESRD and a successful living-related renal transplantation over a post-transplant period of four and a half years on the basis of a prophylactic pretransplant IVIG admission.

IgY antibodies in human nutrition for disease prevention.

Oral administration of preformed specific antibodies is an attractive approach against infections of the digestive system in humans and animals in times of increasing antibiotic resistances. Previous studies showed a positive effect of egg yolk IgY antibodies on bacterial intoxications in animals and humans. Immunization of chickens with specific antigens offers the possibility to create various forms of antibodies. Research shows that orally applied IgY's isolated from egg yolks can passively cure or prevent diseases of the digestive system. The use of these alternative therapeutic drugs provides further advantages: (1) The production of IgY's is a non-invasive alternative to current methods; (2) The keeping of chickens is inexpensive; (3) The animals are easy to handle; (4) It avoids repetitive bleeding of laboratory animals; (5) It is also very cost effective regarding the high IgY concentration within the egg yolk. Novel targets of these antigen specific antibodies are Helicobacter pylori and also molecules involved in signaling pathways in gastric cancer. Furthermore, also dental caries causing bacteria like Streptococcus mutans or opportunistic Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients are possible targets. Therefore, IgY's included in food for human consumption may be able to prevent or cure human diseases.

A preliminary algorithm introducing immunogenicity assessment in the management of patients with RA receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical remission is today the treatment goal for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which requires fast and assertive therapeutic decisions for a tight control of disease activity. Few objective parameters are available to guide clinical decisions, particularly in switcher patients. We designed a preliminary algorithm introducing immunogenicity assessment in the current approach to patients with RA receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between the new algorithm and current clinical practice, comparing the effectiveness of 'immunogenicity-based' versus 'empirical-based' switches in a cohort of patients with established RA receiving biologics. METHODS: EULAR therapeutic response was evaluated in 105 patients with RA (naive or switchers) over one year, through generalised estimation equation (GEE) analyses. Serum drug trough levels were assessed by ELISA and antidrug antibodies (ADAb) by Bridging ELISA. RESULTS: During follow-up, 48.6% of patients had therapeutic decisions concordant with the proposed algorithm (Group A), and 51.4% had discordant decisions (Group B). One year after the therapeutic decision, patients from Group A had a higher probability of achieving response (OR=7.91, p<0.001, 95% CI 3.27 to 19.13) and low disease activity (OR=9.77, p<0.001, 95% CI 4.69 to 20.37) than patients in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Immunogenicity assessment might help to optimise therapeutic decisions, leading to a better control of disease activity with significantly better clinical outcomes in patients with RA receiving TNFi.

Humoral theory of transplantation: some hot topics.

INTRODUCTION: Antibody is a major cause of allograft injury. However, it has not been routinely tested post-transplant. SOURCES OF DATA: A literature search was performed using PubMed on the topics of 'antibody monitoring', 'autoantibody and allograft dysfunction' and 'prevention and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)'. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Donor-specific antibody (DSA) monitoring not only helps to identify patients at risk of AMR, but also serves as a biomarker to personalize patient's maintenance immunosuppression. Development of autoantibody is a secondary response following primary tissue injury. Some autoantibodies are directly involved in allograft injury, while others only serve as biomarkers of tissue injury. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: It remains controversial whether DSA-positive patients without symptoms need to be treated. In addition, given the variation in study designs and patient's characteristics, there is discrepancy regarding which treatment regimens provide optimal clinical outcome in preventing/treating AMR. GROWING POINTS: Efficacy of B-cell and/or antibody-targeted therapies in treating or preventing AMR would be better measured by the incorporation of antibody monitoring into current functional and pathological assays. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Research in B-cell targeted therapies to prevent and treat AMR is rapidly growing, which includes monoclonal antibodies against B-cell markers CD20, CD40, CD19, BlyS, etc. It requires extensive clinical research to determine the best approach to inhibit or delete antibody and how to balance the drug efficacy with safety.

Early consideration of anti-NMDAR encephalitis in unexplained encephalopathy.

With the identification of anti-NMDAR (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor) antibody, the spectrum of anti-NMDAR encephalitis has been expanding. The condition is also increasingly recognised in children, though younger patients are less likely to have tumours, while behavioural and speech problems, seizures, and abnormal movements are common early presenting features. Here we present yet another case with subtle, non-specific clinical symptoms that responded promptly to intravenous immunoglobulin. We believe this illustrates the importance of considering this uncommon differential diagnosis in the management of unexplained neurological conditions.

Reduction of elevated plasma globotriaosylsphingosine in patients with classic Fabry disease following enzyme replacement therapy.

Fabry disease is treated by two-weekly infusions with α-galactosidase A, which is deficient in this X-linked globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) storage disorder. Elevated plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (lysoGb3) is a hallmark of classical Fabry disease. We investigated effects of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) on plasma levels of lysoGb3 and Gb3 in patients with classical Fabry disease treated with agalsidase alfa at 0.2mg/kg, agalsidase beta at 0.2mg/kg or at 1.0mg/kg bodyweight. Each treatment regimen led to prominent reductions of plasma lysoGb3 in Fabry males within 3 months (P=0.0313), followed by relative stability later on. Many males developed antibodies against α-galactosidase A, particularly those treated with agalsidase beta. Patients with antibodies tended towards smaller correction in plasma lysoGb3 concentration, whereas treatment with high dose agalsidase beta allowed a reduction comparable to patients without antibodies. Pre-treatment plasma lysoGb3 concentrations of Fabry females were relatively low. In all females and with each treatment regimen, ERT gave reduction or stabilisation of plasma lysoGb3. Our investigation revealed that ERT of Fabry patients reduces plasma lysoGb3, regardless of the recombinant enzyme used. This finding shows that ERT can correct a characteristic biochemical abnormality in Fabry patients.

Expression, immunogenicity, histopathology, and potency of a mosquito-based malaria transmission-blocking recombinant vaccine.

Vaccines have been at the forefront of global research efforts to combat malaria, yet despite several vaccine candidates, this goal has yet to be realized. A potentially effective approach to disrupting the spread of malaria is the use of transmission-blocking vaccines (TBV), which prevent the development of malarial parasites within their mosquito vector, thereby abrogating the cascade of secondary infections in humans. Since malaria is transmitted to human hosts by the bite of an obligate insect vector, mosquito species in the genus Anopheles, targeting mosquito midgut antigens that serve as ligands for Plasmodium parasites represents a promising approach to breaking the transmission cycle. The midgut-specific anopheline alanyl aminopeptidase N (AnAPN1) is highly conserved across Anopheles vectors and is a putative ligand for Plasmodium ookinete invasion. We have developed a scalable, high-yield Escherichia coli expression and purification platform for the recombinant AnAPN1 TBV antigen and report on its marked vaccine potency and immunogenicity, its capacity for eliciting transmission-blocking antibodies, and its apparent lack of immunization-associated histopathologies in a small-animal model.

Effects of tenoten on anxiety and depression disorders in patients with epilepsy.

The efficiency and safety of tenoten for anxiety and depression disorders in epileptics has been demonstrated. The drug does not change the incidence and severity of epileptic episodes, does not deteriorate the course of the underlying disease, and can be well combined with anticonvulsants. The results indicate the efficiency of tenoten used to arrest the anxio-depressive disorders in epilepsy.

[Role of antibodies in kidney transplant]. / Ruolo degli anticorpi nel trapianto di rene.

Rejection is one of the most frequent causes of graft loss after a kidney transplant. In this context, in the last few years the essential role of antibodies in the anti-graft immune response has become more evident. Antibody-mediated damage has been classified into four histological patterns: hyperacute rejection, caused by the presence of pre-existing donor-specific antibodies directed against HLA or non-HLA antigens; acute antibody-mediated rejection, usually due to antibodies elicited following transplantation; chronic antibody-mediated rejection, which can develop months or years after the first appearance of circulating antibodies; and Cd4 deposition without morphologic evidence of active rejection, previously described as ''accommodation''. In recent years, thanks to the development of specific desensitization protocols, it has become possible to transplant patients sensitized to donor HLA antigens. Recently, besides consolidated protocols which include immunoglobulin administration associated or not with plasmapheresis, novel approaches of therapeutic apheresis with specific removal of antibodies and bortezomib, an agent that can efficiently decrease donor-specific antibody levels, have been developed. As far as the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection is concerned, different immunosuppressive strategies have been used. These include the combination of immunoglobulin administration and plasmapheresis with or without the use of an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. More recently, an innovative therapy with eculizumab has proved to be very effective against acute antibody-mediated rejection. The debate regarding the cause-effect relationship between the development of an early post-transplant humoral immune response in patients with stable graft function and premature graft loss remains open to discussion. Clinical studies are underway to provide an adequate answer to this question. In conclusion, comprehension of the fundamental role of antibodies and the consolidation of desensitization techniques together with early treatment of antibody-mediated rejection remain important objectives to improve long-term allograft survival.

C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate in 1085 Hereditary Angioedema attacks--final results of the I.M.P.A.C.T.2 study.

BACKGROUND: The placebo-controlled study International Multicentre Prospective Angioedema C1-INH Trial 1 (I.M.P.A.C.T.1) demonstrated that 20 U/kg C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate (Berinert®; CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) is effective in treating acute abdominal and facial Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) attacks. METHODS: I.M.P.A.C.T.2 was an open-label extension study of I.M.P.A.C.T.1 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with 20 U/kg C1-INH for successive HAE attacks at any body location. Efficacy outcomes included patient-reported time to onset of symptom relief (primary) and time to complete resolution of all symptoms (secondary), analysed on a per-patient and per-attack basis. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, viral safety and anti-C1-INH antibodies. RESULTS: During a median study duration of 24 months, 1085 attacks were treated in 57 patients (10-53 years of age). In the per-patient analysis, the median time to onset of symptom relief was 0.46 h and was similar for all types of attacks (0.39-0.48 h); the median time to complete resolution of symptoms was 15.5 h (shortest for laryngeal attacks: 5.8 h; 12.8-26.6 h for abdominal, peripheral and facial attacks). Demographic factors, type of HAE, intensity of attacks, time to treatment, use of androgens and presence of anti-C1-INH antibodies had no clinically relevant effect on the efficacy outcomes. There were no treatment-related safety concerns. No inhibitory anti-C1-INH antibodies were detected in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of 20 U/kg C1-INH concentrate is safe and provides reliable efficacy in the long-term treatment of successive HAE attacks at any body location.

Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy after a CNS infection.

We report the first Greek case of autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy seropositive for antibodies against ganglionic acetylcholine receptors, unique for an antecedent viral cerebellitis and long, slowly progressive course, with improvement after treatment with pyridostigmine.

Development of an anti-endotoxin vaccine for sepsis.

Gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS, endotoxin) is an important initiator of sepsis, a clinical syndrome that is a leading cause of death in intensive care units. Vaccines directed against core LPS structures that are widely conserved among Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) have been developed for the treatment and/or prevention of sepsis. Killed whole bacterial vaccines (E. coli O111:B4, J5 [Rc chemotype] mutant and S. minnesota, Re chemotype) protected mice against experimental sepsis. Human J5 immune antisera reduced the mortality from GNB sepsis in a large controlled clinical trial; however, subsequent clinical studies with antiendotoxin antibodies did not demonstrate protective efficacy in sepsis. Multiple clinical studies have since demonstrated a correlation between the level of circulating antibodies to LPS core and morbidity and mortality in different clinical settings. We therefore developed a subunit vaccine by combining detoxified J5 LPS (J5 dLPS) with the outer membrane protein (OMP) from group B N. meningitidis. This vaccine was highly efficacious in experimental models of sepsis and progressed to phase 1 clinical trial. While well-tolerated, this vaccine induced only 3-4-fold increases in anti-J5 dLPS antibody. Addition of the TLR9 agonist, oligodeoxynucleotide with a CpG motif, as adjuvant to the vaccine increased antibody levels in mice and the vaccine/CpG combination will progress to phase 1 human study. Additional vaccines in which the core glycolipid was either conjugated to carrier protein or incorporated into liposomes have been developed, but have not progressed to clinical trial. Should an antiendotoxin vaccine become available, a new immunization strategy directed towards distinct populations at risk will be required.

How to Prevent and Mitigate Hypersensitivity Reactions to Biologicals Induced by Anti-Drug Antibodies?

Biologicals are widely used therapeutic agents for rheumatologic diseases, cancers, and other chronic inflammatory diseases. They are characterized by complex structures and content of variable amounts of foreign regions, which may lead to anti-drug antibodies (ADA) development. ADA onset may limit the clinical usage of biologicals because they may decrease their safety. In fact they are mainly associated with immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Development of ADAs is reduced by concomitant immunosuppressive treatment, while it is increased by longer intervals between drug administrations; thus, regular infusion regimens should be preferred to reduce HSRs. Once ADAs have formed, some procedures can be implemented to reduce the risk of HSRs. ADAs may belong to different isotype; the detection of IgE ADA is advisable to be assessed when high and early ADAs are detected, in order to reduce the risk of severe HRs. In patients who need to reintroduce the biological culprit, as alternative therapies are not available, drug desensitization (DD) may be applied. Desensitization should be conceptually dedicated to patients with an IgE-mediated HSR; however, it can be performed also in patients who had developed non-IgE-mediated HSRs. Although the underlying mechanisms behind successful DD has not been fully clarified, the DD procedure is associated with the inhibition of mast cell degranulation and cytokine production. Additionally, some data are emerging about the inhibition of drug-specific immune responses during DD.