Resveratrol isoforms and conjugates: A review from biosynthesis in plants to elimination from the human body.

The natural isomers of resveratrol, cis- and trans-resveratrol, are natural phenolic substances synthetized via the shikimate pathway and found in many sources, including grapes, peanuts, blackberries, pistachios, cacao, cranberries, and jackfruits. They have functional and pharmacological properties such as anticarcinogenic, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and cardioprotective activities. The aim of this article is to review the data published on resveratrol and its isomers, and their biosynthesis in plants, food sources, health and toxic effects, and the excretion of their metabolites. Due to its contribution to the promotion of human health, it is convenient to gather more knowledge about its functional properties, food sources, and the interactions with the human body during the processes of eating, digestion, absorption, biotransformation, and excretion, to combine this information to improve the understanding of these substances.

The protective effect of chemical and natural compounds against vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN).

Vincristine, an alkaloid extracted from Catharanthus rosea, is a class of chemotherapy drugs that act by altering the function of the microtubules and by inhibiting mitosis. Despite its widespread application, a major adverse effect of vincristine that limits treatment duration is the occurrence of peripheral neuropathy (PN). PN presents with several symptoms including numbness, painful sensation, tingling, and muscle weakness. Vincristine-induced PN involves impaired calcium homeostasis, an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and the upregulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß) expression. Several potential approaches to attenuate the vincristine-induced PN including the concomitant administration of chemicals with vincristine have been reported. These chemicals have a variety of pharmaceutical properties including anti-inflammation, antioxidant, and inhibition of calcium channels and calcineurin signaling pathways and increased expression of nerve growth factor (NGF). This review summarized several of these compounds and the mechanisms of action that could lead to effective options in improving vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN).

Phase I trial of Taxotere: five-day schedule.

BACKGROUND: Taxotere, a semisynthetic compound structurally related to taxol, has a broad spectrum of activity in murine transplantable tumors; in the B16 melanoma model, it caused a total log cell kill 2.5 times greater than that caused by taxol at equitoxic doses. PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I study of Taxotere (a) to determine its qualitative and quantitative toxic effects and a starting dose for phase II trials, (b) to investigate its clinical pharmacology, and (c) to document its antitumor activity. METHODS: Taxotere was given as a 1-hour infusion at a starting dose of 1 mg/m2 per day for 5 consecutive days. The 5-day course of therapy was repeated every 21 days. Thirty-nine cancer patients with advanced disease were entered in the study; at least three patients were entered at each dose level. Initial dose escalations were planned at 100% increments until biologic activity was observed; subsequent escalations were planned at 50% increments until grade 2 toxicity (the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria) occurred and then at 25% increments until the maximum tolerated dose was established. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were entered in the study. Successive dose levels used were 1, 4, 8, 16, 12, and 14 mg/m2 per day. The dose-limiting toxic effects were granulocytopenia and concurrent mucositis. Grade 4 granulocytopenia associated with grade 3 mucositis developed in six of 12 patients treated at a dose of 16 mg/m2 per day, two of 10 treated at 12 mg/m2 per day, and two of eight treated at 14 mg/m2 per day. Because these toxic effects occurred concurrently, all patients so affected developed neutropenic fevers and required hospitalization. Neither cardiac nor neurologic toxic effects were noted. Anti-tumor activity was observed in six patients with ovarian cancer and in one with breast carcinoma. Although pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent between day 1 and day 5 for individual patients, considerable variation existed among those treated at the same dose level. A relationship was observed between the area under the curve for plasma concentration of drug x time (AUC) on day 1 and the percentage decrease in absolute granulocyte counts. CONCLUSION: Granulocytopenia associated with oral mucositis is the dose-limiting toxicity of this schedule. We recommended a starting dose of 14 mg/m2 per day for phase II studies of this 5-day schedule. Dose modifications on days 2-5 based on the day-1 AUC may allow individualized dosing.

Tolerance of paclitaxel 3-hour infusion with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on a biweekly schedule.

The object of this study was to define the toxicity and maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) administered on a biweekly schedule, without and with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic carcinoma and had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen. Patients were treated with paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion. Entry dose level was 150/mg/m2. Subsequent dose levels were 175, 200, and 225 mg/m2. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was added at the two highest dose levels beginning on day 4, until absolute neutrophil count was above 10 x 10(9)/L. Forty-six patients were entered. Up to 175 mg/m2 could be safely administered every 2 weeks. Previously treated patients experienced severe dose-limiting neutropenia at 200 mg/m2, and at 225 mg/m2 all patients experienced treatment delays due to grade 3/4 neutropenia. Dose intensity was maintained in all patients due to the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Escalation to 250 mg/m2 does not appear desirable, due to neurotoxicity.

Early phase studies with paclitaxel/low-dose carboplatin in patients with solid tumors.

In preparation for the design of phase II studies in lung cancer, low-dose carboplatin, fixed at a target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 4.0 or 4.5 mg x min/mL, has been combined with escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in a series of studies to establish the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. In patients who had received prior chemotherapy, the maximum tolerated paclitaxel dose was 135 mg/m2 (carboplatin target AUC 4.0); the dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia. Without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in chemotherapy-naive patients (carboplatin target AUC 4.5), and with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in chemotherapy-pretreated patients, the current paclitaxel dose is 290 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose has not been defined. In a study in which paclitaxel was given by 1-hour infusion with carboplatin (target AUC 4.5), a 205 mg/m2 dose was poorly tolerated. No evidence of pharmacokinetic interactions between paclitaxel and carboplatin was found. Twenty-one evaluable patients with lung cancer have been treated to date. There have been two partial responses, one minor response, and 10 patients with stable disease at paclitaxel doses of 100 to 270 mg/m2.