Impact of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Bundled Payment Model on Postoperative Utilization of Home Health and Outpatient Physical Therapy Services.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) bundled payment program on postoperative home health and outpatient physical therapy (PT) for total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort with national Medicare data (5% claims) using a difference-in-differences analysis comparing January 2013-September 2015 (before) versus October 2016-September 2019 (after). SETTING: Administrative claims from hospitals in 34 metropolitan statistical areas with mandatory CJR participation as of 2018 and 42 control metropolitan statistical areas. PARTICIPANTS: Episodes in fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries (5% claims) undergoing elective THA (n=6327) or TKA (n=10,764) with community discharge. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of CJR bundled payment program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Home health and outpatient PT, including any use and number of visits. RESULTS: Program implementation was associated with an increased percentage of THA episodes using home health PT (+8.0 percentage-point change; 95% CI, +3.5 to +12.6; P=.001) but a decreased per-episode number of home health PT visits for THA (-1.1; 95% CI, -1.6 to -0.6; P<.001) and TKA (-1.1; 95% CI, -1.4 to -0.7; P<.001). The program was also associated with an increased per-episode number of outpatient PT visits for TKA in the primary but not sensitivity analyses (+0.8; 95% CI, +0.1 to +1.4; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Findings of increased home health PT may reflect an intentional shift in care from the inpatient postacute setting to the community to decrease costs. Alternatively, the limited effect of CJR, particularly on outpatient PT, could reflect challenges with care coordination in a retrospective bundle spanning multiple care settings.

Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Programs in Elderly with Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Background: Lower limb osteoarthritis (OA) often generates musculoskeletal pain causing functional impairment and decreasing mobility, autonomy, and quality of life. Patients with OA are commonly prescribed specific care for total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA), when patients present symptoms that are refractory to nondrug treatments. Currently, when patients are discharged from orthopedic surgery, they are either referred to a rehabilitation department, or sent directly home with assistance such as remote monitoring by teleconsultation or a mobile application. In recent years, there has been an evolution in digital health and in particular telerehabilitation. To determine utility and effectiveness, the aim of this systematic review was to highlight and evaluate different telerehabilitation programs using new information and communication technologies. Methods: Five databases, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Google scholar, were searched until 30 June 30, 2023. All studies written in English and meeting our inclusion criteria were included. Databases were screened for "Total Hip Arthroplasty," "Total Knee Arthroplasty," "Total Hip Replacement," "Total Knee Replacement," "Rehabilitation," "Physical Activity," "Physiotherapy," "Telerehabilitation," "Telecommunication*," "Senior*," and "Elderly" in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guideline. Results: Fourteen articles were selected according to inclusion criteria. Telerehabilitation was offered in seven different ways (video call, applications smartphones, website, etc.). Assessments included were mainly quality of life questionnaires, perceived effort after exercises, field surveys on the tool experience, and physical tests to assess motor functions. Conclusion: This review highlights the importance and relevance of evaluating the contributions and limits of new health technologies to improve patient monitoring and thus enable better remote clinical care.

Study on the Effect of Pain Programmed Care Based on the Concept of Prehabilitation on the Recovery of Joint Function and WHOQOL-BREF Score in Elderly Patients after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Objective: To assess the impact of pain-programmed care, utilizing the concept of prehabilitation, on the postoperative recovery of joint function and WHOQOL-BREF score in elderly patients following total hip arthroplasty. Methods: Ninety cases of elderly patients with total hip arthroplasty admitted to our hospital from January to December 2022 were selected as the observation sample, and the 90 elderly patients with total hip arthroplasty were divided into 45 control groups and 45 control groups by random number table method. The pain assessment, functional exercise compliance, hip joint function and quality of life of the two groups were compared after the intervention. Results: The nursing intervention led to a significant reduction in pain scores and improvement in quality of life for elderly patients undergoing total hip joint replacement. The observation group showed a greater reduction in resting pain scores (6.20 ± 0.63 vs. 3.78 ± 0.67, P < .05) and activity pain scores (8.78 ± 0.64 vs. 4.89 ± 0.68, P < .05) compared to the control group. Additionally, the observation group demonstrated significant improvements in physiology (55.73 ± 2.14 vs. 71.87 ± 21.59, P < .05), psychology (55.71 ± 2.13 vs. 72.60 ± 2.20, P < .05), social relations (55.73 ± 2.13 vs. 71.96 ± 1.57, P < .05), and environmental effect (55.60 ± 2.15 vs. 68.62 ± 1.51, P < .05) after care, whereas the control group exhibited lesser improvements in these areas (physiology: 55.60 ± 2.24 vs. 64.53±2.02, P < .05; psychology: 55.60 ± 2.22 vs. 66.33±1.99, P < .05; social relations: 55.82 ± 2.09 vs. 67.84 ± 1.73, P < .05; environmental effect: 55.89 ± 2.18 vs. 62.09 ± 51.49, P < .05). These findings demonstrate the significant impact of nursing intervention on pain reduction and improved quality of life for elderly patients undergoing total hip joint replacement. Conclusion: Pain programmed care based on the concept of prehabilitation for elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty has a significant positive impact on pain control, compliance with functional exercise, recovery of hip function, and improvement of quality of life. These findings highlight the benefits of implementing pain management strategies and rehabilitation programs in the field of total hip arthroplasty and elderly care.

Action Observation and Motor Imagery administered the day before surgery enhance functional recovery in patients after total hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Action Observation and Motor Imagery administered the day before surgery on functional recovery in patients after total hip arthroplasty. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty inpatients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty. INTERVENTIONS: All patients followed a standardized postoperative rehabilitation program. Experimental group (AO + MI) performed two 12-minute Action Observation and Motor Imagery sessions on the preoperative day, whereas control group underwent usual care consisting of education without any additional preoperative activity. OUTCOME MEASURES: A blinded physiotherapist assessed participants for functional mobility (Timed Up and Go - TUG) (primary outcome), maximum walking speed (10-Meter Walk Test - 10MWT), pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale - NPRS) and fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia - TSK) the day before and at four days after surgery. RESULTS: No between-group differences were found at baseline. Although TUG and 10MWT worsened in both groups (p < 0.001), better TUG was found for AO + MI group at four days (mean difference -5.8 s, 95% confidence interval from -11.3 to -0.3 s, p = 0.039). NPRS (p < 0.001) and TSK (p = 0.036 for AO + MI group, p = 0.003 for control group) improved after surgery without between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing Action Observation and Motor Imagery on the day before surgery showed less functional decline than control group in the first days after total hip arthroplasty. This intervention may contribute to a safer discharge with higher functional abilities in patients hospitalized for total hip arthroplasty.

Neural network models accurately predict discharge disposition after revision total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE: Based on the rising incidence of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), bundled payment models may be applied to revision TKA in the near future. Facility discharge represents a significant cost factor for those bundled payment models; however, accurately predicting discharge disposition remains a clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate artificial intelligence algorithms to predict discharge disposition following revision total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic patient records was conducted to identify patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty. Discharge disposition was defined as either home discharge or non-home discharge, which included rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities. Four artificial intelligence algorithms were developed to predict this outcome and were assessed by discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2228 patients underwent revision TKA, of which 1405 patients (63.1%) were discharged home, whereas 823 patients (36.9%) were discharged to a non-home facility. The strongest predictors for non-home discharge following revision TKA were American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score, Medicare insurance type and revision surgery for peri-prosthetic joint infection, non-white ethnicity and social status (living alone). The best performing artificial intelligence algorithm was the neural network model which achieved excellent performance across discrimination (AUC = 0.87), calibration and decision curve analysis. CONCLUSION: This study developed four artificial intelligence algorithms for the prediction of non-home discharge disposition for patients following revision total knee arthroplasty. The study findings show excellent performance on discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis for all four candidate algorithms. Therefore, these models have the potential to guide preoperative patient counselling and improve the value (clinical and functional outcomes divided by costs) of revision total knee arthroplasty patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Hip and Knee Replacement-Why and How It Should Be Implemented Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a reduction in hip and knee replacement surgery across healthcare systems. When regular operating returns, there will be a large volume of patients and an emphasis on a short hospital stay. Patients will be keen to return home, and capacity will need to maximised. Strategies to reduce the associated risks of surgery and to accelerate recovery will be needed, and so Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) should be promoted as the model of care. ERAS protocols are proven to reduce hospital stay safely; however, ERAS pathways may require adaption to ensure both patient and staff safety. The risk of exposure to possible sources of COVID-19 should be limited, and so hospital visits should be minimised. The use of technology such as smartphone apps to provide pre-operative education, wearable activity trackers to assist with rehabilitation, and the use of telemedicine to complete outpatient appointments may be utilised. Also, units should be reminded that ERAS protocols are multi-modal, and every component is vital to minimise the surgical stress response. The focus should be on providing better and not just faster care. Units should learn from the past in order to expedite the implementation of or adaption of existing ERAS protocols. Strong leadership will be required, along with a supportive organisational culture, an inter-professional approach, and a recognised QI method should be used to contextualize improvement efforts.

People living in nursing care facilities who are ambulant and fracture their hips: description of usual care and an alternative rehabilitation pathway.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about treatment provided to people living in nursing care facilities (NCFs) after hospital admission for hip fracture. In addition, there are no clinical guidelines for rehabilitation and recovery following hip fracture for nursing home residents. METHODS: As part of a randomised trial (SACRED trial), which investigated the efficacy of a four week in-reach rehabilitation program, data were collected which described routine care for 240 people living in 76 nursing care facilities in South Australia who fractured their hips. The in-reach rehabilitation provided to 119 intervention participants is described, including intensity, type and methods used to encourage participation in rehabilitation. Adverse events that occurred, in particular falls, are also reported. RESULTS: NCF records indicated that, over the four weeks following discharge from hospital after hip fracture, 76% of patients receiving usual care had a consultation with their general practitioner. Physiotherapy was provided to 79% of patients in usual care (median of 1.96 h over the 4 weeks, which is less than 30 min each week of physiotherapy). In-reach rehabilitation was provided by the hospital team for 13 h over the 4 weeks with almost full attendance at physiotherapy sessions (median of 1 missed session, range 0-7 with a median of 14 physiotherapy sessions attended by participants, range 1-18). Experienced therapists provided a flexible approach to the rehabilitation to account for patients' dementia and associated neuropsychiatric symptoms while providing dietetic support, mobility training and education to nursing home staff. The number of falls experienced by those in the intervention group was higher compared to those in usual care (Relative Risk 1.38 (95%CI 1.04-1.84, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation can be provided to people living in NCFs following hip fracture, even when they have moderate to severe dementia but the model needs to be flexible. Provision of rehabilitation may increase the rate of falls in this population. Further studies are required to establish the feasibility of the intervention in other long term care settings. (327 words). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12612000112864 registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR).

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions following total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To examine the reported clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions following total hip replacement (THR). A systematic review was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, Scopus, DARE, HTA, and NHS EED databases were searched for studies on clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy in adults with THR published up to March 2020. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified and key data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and a Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). Data were summarised and combined using random-effect meta-analysis. A total of 1263 studies related to the aim of the review were identified, from which 20 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. These studies were conducted in Australia (n = 3), Brazil (n = 1), United States of America (USA) (n = 2), France (n = 2), Italy (n = 2), Germany (n = 3), Ireland (n = 1), Norway (n = 2), Canada (n = 1), Japan (n = 1), Denmark (n = 1), and United Kingdom (UK) (n = 1). The duration of follow-up of the included studies was ranged from 2 weeks to 12 months. Physiotherapy interventions were found to be clinically effective for functional performance, hip muscle strength, pain, and range of motion flexion. From the National Health Service perspective, an accelerated physiotherapy programme following THR was cost-effective. The findings of the review suggest that physiotherapy interventions were clinically effective for people with THR. However, questions remain on the pooled cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions, and further research is required to examine this in patients with THR. Future studies are required to examine the cost-effectiveness of these interventions from patients, caregivers, and societal perspectives.Registration Prospero (ID: CRD42018096524).

The Impact of Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Bundled Payment Program on Care Delivery.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) is a Medicare initiative to test the impact of holding a hospital accountable for services provided during an episode of care for a lower extremity joint arthroplasty on costs and quality. This study examines whether hospital participation in CJR is associated with having programs focused on improving posthospitalization care or reducing costs using a survey of orthopedic surgeons. METHODS: Seventy-three (of 104) orthopedic surgeon members of the Hip Society, a national professional organization of hip surgeons, completed the survey. RESULTS: Surgeons practicing in CJR hospitals were more likely to report that their hospital had implemented programs focused on improving posthospitalization care or reducing costs. Surgeons in CJR hospitals were significantly more likely to report that the hospital had a narrow network of skilled nursing facilities to enhance care and limit length of stay in skilled nursing facilities (83% vs 47%, P < .01). Surgeons in CJR hospitals were also more likely to report the hospital provides incentives or some type of gainsharing. There were no statistically significant differences in implementation of having programs to reduce costs or improve care during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Participation in CJR is associated with higher utilization of hospital practices aimed at improving postdischarge care and higher utilization of linking surgeon compensation to cost and quality.

[Physical therapy in the rehabilitation of patients after endoprosthetic replacement of major joints in the lower extremities: a scientometric analysis of evidence-based studies]. / Fizicheskaia terapiia v reabilitatsii patsientov posle éndoprotezirovaniia krupnykh sustavov nizhnikh konechnostei: naukometricheskii analiz dokazatel'nykh issledovanii.

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, the volume of high-tech medical care in the field of orthopedics and traumatology, including endoprosthetic replacement of major joints (MJs) (the hip joint and/or the knee joint) in the lower extremities (LE) (LEMJ), has substantially increased. In this connection, there are an increasing number of patients in need of medical rehabilitation, to solve the problems of which needs the effective physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) techniques proven during researches to be introduced into practice. OBJECTIVE: To analyze evidence-based studies containing sound data on the use of PRM technologies in the rehabilitation of patients after endoprosthetic replacement of LEMJs, to identify the most effective PRM technologies and to formulate recommendations for their use for practitioners, which are based on the evidence obtained during the analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The paper is based on the scientometric analysis of 241 studies conducted in 2000 to 2018, which were devoted to the use of physical exercises and PRM technologies in the rehabilitation of patients after endoprosthetic replacement of LEMJs. RESULTS: Over the past decade, there has been a tangible rise in the number of studies on endoprosthetic replacement of LEMJs. Some of the most studied PRM technologies having the proven effect are physical exercises in combination with neuromuscular electrical stimulation, kinesiotherapy, cryotherapy, and pressure therapy that is effective in preventing thromboembolism after surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of PRM technologies in the rehabilitation of patients after endoprosthetic replacement of LEMJs should be based on the results of high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials, which serve as the basis for the development of clinical recommendations. The process of analyzing the data of studies should be regular.

Development of quality indicators for hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop quality indicators (QIs) reflecting the minimum acceptable standard of rehabilitation care before and after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Informed by high quality evidence and using a modified RAND-UCLA Delphi approach, an 18-member Canadian panel of clinicians, researchers and patients considered 81 proposed QIs (40 for THA, 42 for TKA) addressing rehabilitation before and after elective THA and TKA. Panelists rated QIs for their importance and validity on a 9-point Likert scale through two rounds of online rating interspersed with a moderated and anonymous online discussion forum. Those QIs with median ratings of ≥7 for importance and validity with no disagreement based on the inter-percentile range adjusted for symmetry were included in the final sets. RESULTS: Fifteen panelists from seven provinces and varied practice settings completed the Delphi process. Of the 81 plus one additional QIs (total of 82), 67 (82%) were rated as both important and valid (31 for THA, 36 for TKA). For THA, 14 pre-op, six acute and eight post-acute QIs were accepted. For TKA, 16 pre-op, 10 acute and eight post-acute indicators were accepted. Two of three 'across-continuum' QIs were rated appropriate for both procedures. CONCLUSION: This work represents the first QIs with which to measure, report and benchmark quality of care in patients receiving rehabilitation before and after THA/TKA surgery. The QIs will be further tested for reliability and feasibility before being widely disseminated in clinical settings and used to assess care gaps.

Motor Imagery during Action Observation of Locomotor Tasks Improves Rehabilitation Outcome in Older Adults after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

This study aimed at determining whether the combination of action observation and motor imagery (AO + MI) of locomotor tasks could positively affect rehabilitation outcome after hip replacement surgery. Of initially 405 screened participants, 21 were randomly split into intervention group (N = 10; mean age = 64 y; AO + MI of locomotor tasks: 30 min/day in the hospital, then 3×/week in their homes for two months) and control group (N = 11, mean age = 63 y, active controls). The functional outcomes (Timed Up and Go, TUG; Four Step Square Test, FSST; and single- and dual-task gait and postural control) were measured before (PRE) and 2 months after surgery (POST). Significant interactions indicated better rehabilitation outcome for the intervention group as compared to the control group: at POST, the intervention group revealed faster TUG (p = 0.042), FSST (p = 0.004), and dual-task fast-paced gait speed (p = 0.022), reduced swing-time variability (p = 0.005), and enhanced cognitive performance during dual tasks while walking or balancing (p < 0.05). In contrast, no changes were observed for body sway parameters (p ≥ 0.229). These results demonstrate that AO + MI is efficient to improve motor-cognitive performance after hip surgery. Moreover, only parameters associated with locomotor activities improved whereas balance skills that were not part of the AO + MI intervention were not affected, demonstrating the specificity of training intervention. Overall, utilizing AO + MI during rehabilitation is advised, especially when physical practice is limited.

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement in the Private Sector: A Win for Everyone.

BACKGROUND: To help slow the rising costs associated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative. The purpose of this study is to report our 1-year experience with BPCI in our 2 arthroplasty surgeon private practice. METHODS: In this series, a historical baseline group is compared with our first year under BPCI. We reviewed the cohorts with respect to hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, discharge disposition, postacute care LOS, and overall savings on a per episode basis. RESULTS: The baseline group included 582 episodes from July 2009 to June 2012. The BPCI study group included 332 episodes from July 2015 to September 2016. We witnessed a substantial learning curve over the course of our involvement in the initiative. The total reduction in cost per episode for TJA was 20.0% (P = .10). Hospital LOS decreased from 4.9 to 3.5 days (P = .02). All-cause 90-day readmission rates decreased from 14.5% to 8.2% (P = .0078). Overall, discharges to home increased from 11.6% to 49.8% (P = .005). CONCLUSION: Our small, private, 2 arthroplasty surgeon orthopedic practice has shown improvement in postoperative management for TJA patients in 1 year under the BPCI initiative, with increased discharges to home, decreased skilled nursing admissions, days in skilled nursing, and overall readmissions. Because BPCI includes fracture care arthroplasty, the model could be made more equitable if these patients were reimbursed a rate commensurate with their increased costs and risks.

Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement and Discharge to Institutional Postacute Care: Interim Analysis of the First Year of a 5-Year Randomized Trial.

Importance: Bundled payments are an increasingly common alternative payment model for Medicare, yet there is limited evidence regarding their effectiveness. Objective: To report interim outcomes from the first year of implementation of a bundled payment model for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR). Design, Setting, and Participants: As part of a 5-year, mandatory-participation randomized trial by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, eligible metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were randomized to the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) bundled payment model for LEJR episodes or to a control group. In the first performance year, hospitals received bonus payments if Medicare spending for LEJR episodes was below the target price and hospitals met quality standards. This interim analysis reports first-year data on LEJR episodes starting April 1, 2016, with data collection through December 31, 2016. Exposure: Randomization of MSAs into the CJR bundled payment model group (75 assigned; 67 included) or to the control group without the CJR model (121 assigned; 121 included). Instrumental variable analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between inclusion of MSAs in the CJR model and outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was share of LEJR admissions discharged to institutional postacute care. Secondary outcomes included the number of days in institutional postacute care, discharges to other locations, Medicare spending during the episode (overall and for institutional postacute care), net Medicare spending during the episode, LEJR patient volume and patient case mix, and quality-of-care measures. Results: Among the 196 MSAs and 1633 hospitals, 131 285 eligible LEJR procedures were performed during the study period (mean volume, 110 LEJR episodes per hospital) among 130 343 patients (mean age, 72.5 [SD, 0.91] years; 65% women; 90% white). The mean percentage of LEJR admissions discharged to institutional postacute care was 33.7% (SD, 11.2%) in the control group and was 2.9 percentage points lower (95% CI, -4.95 to -0.90 percentage points) in the CJR group. Mean Medicare spending for institutional postacute care per LEJR episode was $3871 (SD, $1394) in the control group and was $307 lower (95% CI, -$587 to -$27) in the CJR group. Mean overall Medicare spending per LEJR episode was $22 872 (SD, $3619) in the control group and was $453 lower (95% CI, -$909 to $3) in the CJR group, a statistically nonsignificant difference. None of the other secondary outcomes differed significantly between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this interim analysis of the first year of the CJR bundled payment model for LEJR among Medicare beneficiaries, MSAs covered by CJR, compared with those that were not, had a significantly lower percentage of discharges to institutional postacute care but no significant difference in total Medicare spending per LEJR episode. Further evaluation is needed as the program is more fully implemented. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03407885; American Economic Association Registry Identifier: AEARCTR-0002521.

Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The direct anterior approach to the hip for total joint arthroplasty has been suggested to have several advantages compared to other popular approaches through its use of a natural intramuscular and intra-nervous interval. Recent emphasis on tissue sparing and minimally invasive outpatient joint replacements has given rise to a significant increase in the utilization of direct anterior total hip arthroplasty (DAA). Proponents of this approach cite improved recovery times, lower pain levels, improved patient satisfaction as well as improved accuracy on both implant placement/alignment and leg length restoration. A number of variations of the procedure have been described and many authors have published their experiences and technical keys to successfully accomplishing this procedure. Described techniques have been performed using specifically designed instruments and specific fracture tables and intra-operative flouroscopy, however this approach may be performed using a regular table with standard arthroplasty tools with alternative patient positioning and without intraoperative imaging. This review summarizes several aspects of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty and its comparison to other popular approaches to modern hip replacement.

Description of load progression and pain response during progressive resistance training early after total hip arthroplasty: secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a progressive resistance training intervention implemented shortly after total hip arthroplasty, including a detailed description of load progression, pain response and adverse events to the training. DESIGN: Secondary analyses of data from the intervention group in a randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: This study reports data from the intervention group ( n = 37). INTERVENTIONS: The protocol described supervised progressive resistance training of the operated leg two days/week in addition to home-based exercise five days/week and for 10 weeks. The relative load progressed from 12 repetition maximum to 8 repetition maximum during 10 weeks for the exercises: knee extension, hip abduction, -flexion and -extension. MAIN MEASURES: Training load in kilograms (kg) for each exercise, hip pain during, before and after exercise using the Visual Analog Scale and adverse events during the initial four weeks of training. RESULTS: The majority of patients experienced only moderate hip pain during exercise (range in median across exercises and sessions: 5-35 mm Visual Analog Scale) and mild pain at rest (median: 1-18 mm Visual Analog Scale), both of which decreased over time ( p < 0.001), despite a substantial increase in absolute training load (67%-166 % across exercises, p < 0.001). Out of 152 training sessions, short term pain response (an increase >20 mm Visual Analog Scale) occurred in 13 patients in 24 training sessions. CONCLUSION: Progressive resistance training as described in the present study can be implemented shortly following total hip arthroplasty with substantial load progression and no overall exacerbation of postoperative pain. Some patients may experience a short term pain response. Trial Registration (primary trial): NCT01214954.

Effectiveness of Occupational Therapy Interventions for Lower-Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Lower-extremity (LE) musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) can have a major impact on the ability to carry out daily activities. The effectiveness of interventions must be examined to enable occupational therapy practitioners to deliver the most appropriate services. This systematic review examined the literature published between 1995 and July 2014 that investigated the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for LE MSDs. Forty-three articles met the criteria and were reviewed. Occupational therapy interventions varied on the basis of population subgroup: hip fracture, LE joint replacement, LE amputation or limb loss, and nonsurgical osteoarthritis and pain. The results indicate an overall strong role for occupational therapy in treating clients with LE MSDs. Activity pacing is an effective intervention for nonsurgical LE MSDs, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation is effective for LE joint replacement and amputation. Further research on specific occupational therapy interventions in this important area is needed.

[Rehabilitation of the patients following the endoprosthetic replacement of the joints of the lower extremities].

The present article is the analytical review of the literature pertaining to the problem of rehabilitation of the patients following the endoprosthetic replacement of joints of the lower extremities. The relevance of the problem of interest for medical rehabilitation is beyond any doubt. The traditional methods for the rehabilitation of the patients do not always lead to the desired results. The authors discuss in detail the need for and the contemporary approaches to the rehabilitation of the patients who had undergone reconstructive surgery and arthroplasty of the joints of the lower extremities. The pathogenetically-based three-stage algorithm for medical rehabilitation is proposed.

Postoperative Rehabilitation After Hip Resurfacing: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Hip-resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has become a popular procedure in the treatment of hip-joint arthritis in individuals under the age of 65 y. Although the body of literature examining operative procedures has grown, there is a lack of consistent reporting of the effectiveness of an HRA postoperative rehabilitation program. To date, no systematic reviews have evaluated the available evidence on postoperative rehabilitation programs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the available evidence on postoperative rehabilitation programs after HRA. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search of PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar was conducted in April 2014 using the following keywords alone and in combination: postoperative, postsurgical, rehabilitation, physical therapy, programs, hip resurfacing, arthroplasty, and metal-on-metal. The grading of studies was conducted using the PEDro and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine scales. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The authors identified 648 citations, 4 of which met the inclusion criteria. The qualifying studies yielded 1 randomized control trial, 2 case reports, and 1 case series, for a total of 90 patients. Patients were mostly male (n = 86), had a mean age of 48 ± 5.47 y, and had been physically active before HRA. Postoperative rehabilitation programs varied in length (range 8-24 wk) and consisted of at least 3 phases. The methodology to assess program effects varied, but all 4 studies did measure a combination of function, pain, and quality of life using written questionnaires, with follow-up ranging from 9 mo to 1 y. The most common questionnaire was the Harris Hip Score. CONCLUSION: This review found postoperative rehabilitation programs after HRA to be underinvestigated. Limited results indicate that postoperative rehabilitation programs may be effective in improving gait (stride length, velocity, and cadence), hip range of motion, and pain and function, as measured by questionnaires, but not hip strength.

[POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SEXUAL ACTIVITY FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT].

Total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis significantly reduces pain and enhances the quality of life (QoL). Sexual activity is an important component of QoL about which doctors rarely discuss with patients even though it is a matter of concern to many patients. In fact, patients who have previously had impaired sexual function due to preoperative hip pain and/or stiffness find that after surgery their hips are pain free and have better motion. After total hip arthroplasty range of hip motions is usually limited by surgeon's reccomendation in order to prevent dislocation of prosthesis. This creates limitations in activities of daily living, sport activities and also sexual activities. The aim of this paper is to give guidelines for safe sexual intercourse to patients following total hip replacement. During rehabilitation, patients should be educated on what positions are and are not recommended in the context of sexual activity.