Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 341
Filtrar
1.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 42(1): 615-645, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941608

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic was caused by the recently emerged ß-coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 has had a catastrophic impact, resulting in nearly 7 million fatalities worldwide to date. The innate immune system is the first line of defense against infections, including the detection and response to SARS-CoV-2. Here, we discuss the innate immune mechanisms that sense coronaviruses, with a focus on SARS-CoV-2 infection and how these protective responses can become detrimental in severe cases of COVID-19, contributing to cytokine storm, inflammation, long-COVID, and other complications. We also highlight the complex cross talk among cytokines and the cellular components of the innate immune system, which can aid in viral clearance but also contribute to inflammatory cell death, cytokine storm, and organ damage in severe COVID-19 pathogenesis. Furthermore, we discuss how SARS-CoV-2 evades key protective innate immune mechanisms to enhance its virulence and pathogenicity, as well as how innate immunity can be therapeutically targeted as part of the vaccination and treatment strategy. Overall, we highlight how a comprehensive understanding of innate immune mechanisms has been crucial in the fight against SARS-CoV-2 infections and the development of novel host-directed immunotherapeutic strategies for various diseases.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Imunidade Inata , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/fisiologia , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/imunologia , Citocinas/metabolismo , Animais , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Evasão da Resposta Imune
3.
Cell ; 185(9): 1539-1548.e5, 2022 04 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35429436

RESUMO

Virus-like particle (VLP) and live virus assays were used to investigate neutralizing immunity against Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants in 259 samples from 128 vaccinated individuals. Following Delta breakthrough infection, titers against WT rose 57-fold and 3.1-fold compared with uninfected boosted and unboosted individuals, respectively, versus only a 5.8-fold increase and 3.1-fold decrease for Omicron breakthrough infection. Among immunocompetent, unboosted patients, Delta breakthrough infections induced 10.8-fold higher titers against WT compared with Omicron (p = 0.037). Decreased antibody responses in Omicron breakthrough infections relative to Delta were potentially related to a higher proportion of asymptomatic or mild breakthrough infections (55.0% versus 28.6%, respectively), which exhibited 12.3-fold lower titers against WT compared with moderate to severe infections (p = 0.020). Following either Delta or Omicron breakthrough infection, limited variant-specific cross-neutralizing immunity was observed. These results suggest that Omicron breakthrough infections are less immunogenic than Delta, thus providing reduced protection against reinfection or infection from future variants.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos
6.
N Engl J Med ; 389(17): 1590-1600, 2023 Oct 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37889107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Passive immunization with plasma collected from convalescent patients has been regularly used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Minimal data are available regarding the use of convalescent plasma in patients with Covid-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: In this open-label trial, we randomly assigned adult patients with Covid-19-induced ARDS who had been receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for less than 5 days in a 1:1 ratio to receive either convalescent plasma with a neutralizing antibody titer of at least 1:320 or standard care alone. Randomization was stratified according to the time from tracheal intubation to inclusion. The primary outcome was death by day 28. RESULTS: A total of 475 patients underwent randomization from September 2020 through March 2022. Overall, 237 patients were assigned to receive convalescent plasma and 238 to receive standard care. Owing to a shortage of convalescent plasma, a neutralizing antibody titer of 1:160 was administered to 17.7% of the patients in the convalescent-plasma group. Glucocorticoids were administered to 466 patients (98.1%). At day 28, mortality was 35.4% in the convalescent-plasma group and 45.0% in the standard-care group (P = 0.03). In a prespecified analysis, this effect was observed mainly in patients who underwent randomization 48 hours or less after the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Serious adverse events did not differ substantially between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of plasma collected from convalescent donors with a neutralizing antibody titer of at least 1:160 to patients with Covid-19-induced ARDS within 5 days after the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation significantly reduced mortality at day 28. This effect was mainly observed in patients who underwent randomization 48 hours or less after ventilation initiation. (Funded by the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04558476.).


Assuntos
Soroterapia para COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Adulto , Humanos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/terapia , Respiração Artificial , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/imunologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
N Engl J Med ; 386(23): 2201-2212, 2022 06 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35613036

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) provides natural immunity against reinfection. Recent studies have shown waning of the immunity provided by the BNT162b2 vaccine. The time course of natural and hybrid immunity is unknown. METHODS: Using the Israeli Ministry of Health database, we extracted data for August and September 2021, when the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant was predominant, on all persons who had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 or who had received coronavirus 2019 vaccine. We used Poisson regression with adjustment for confounding factors to compare the rates of infection as a function of time since the last immunity-conferring event. RESULTS: The number of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection per 100,000 person-days at risk (adjusted rate) increased with the time that had elapsed since vaccination with BNT162b2 or since previous infection. Among unvaccinated persons who had recovered from infection, this rate increased from 10.5 among those who had been infected 4 to less than 6 months previously to 30.2 among those who had been infected 1 year or more previously. Among persons who had received a single dose of vaccine after previous infection, the adjusted rate was low (3.7) among those who had been vaccinated less than 2 months previously but increased to 11.6 among those who had been vaccinated at least 6 months previously. Among previously uninfected persons who had received two doses of vaccine, the adjusted rate increased from 21.1 among those who had been vaccinated less than 2 months previously to 88.9 among those who had been vaccinated at least 6 months previously. CONCLUSIONS: Among persons who had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 (regardless of whether they had received any dose of vaccine or whether they had received one dose before or after infection), protection against reinfection decreased as the time increased since the last immunity-conferring event; however, this protection was higher than that conferred after the same time had elapsed since receipt of a second dose of vaccine among previously uninfected persons. A single dose of vaccine after infection reinforced protection against reinfection.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , Vacina BNT162/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunidade Inata , Reinfecção/imunologia , Reinfecção/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Fatores de Tempo , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Vacinas Virais/uso terapêutico
8.
Med Res Rev ; 44(4): 1768-1799, 2024 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323921

RESUMO

Adjuvants are of critical value in vaccine development as they act on enhancing immunogenicity of antigen and inducing long-lasting immunity. However, there are only a few adjuvants that have been approved for clinical use, which highlights the need for exploring and developing new adjuvants to meet the growing demand for vaccination. Recently, emerging evidence demonstrates that the cGAS-STING pathway orchestrates innate and adaptive immunity by generating type I interferon responses. Many cGAS-STING pathway agonists have been developed and tested in preclinical research for the treatment of cancer or infectious diseases with promising results. As adjuvants, cGAS-STING agonists have demonstrated their potential to activate robust defense immunity in various diseases, including COVID-19 infection. This review summarized the current developments in the field of cGAS-STING agonists with a special focus on the latest applications of cGAS-STING agonists as adjuvants in vaccination. Potential challenges were also discussed in the hope of sparking future research interests to further the development of cGAS-STING as vaccine adjuvants.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Membrana , Nucleotidiltransferases , Humanos , Nucleotidiltransferases/metabolismo , Proteínas de Membrana/agonistas , Proteínas de Membrana/imunologia , Proteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , Animais , Adjuvantes de Vacinas/farmacologia , Adjuvantes de Vacinas/química , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , Imunidade Inata/efeitos dos fármacos , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/farmacologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia
9.
Clin Immunol ; 263: 110220, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642783

RESUMO

As the number of vaccinated individuals has increased, there have been increasing reports of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. The main COVID-19 vaccines administered include messenger ribonucleic acid vaccines, non-replicating viral vector vaccines, inactivated whole-virus vaccines, and protein-based vaccines. These vaccines contain active components such as polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, aluminum, tromethamine, and disodium edetate dihydrate. Recent advances in understanding the coordination of inflammatory responses by specific subsets of lymphocytes have led to a new classification based on immune response patterns. We categorize these responses into four patterns: T helper (Th)1-, Th2-, Th17/22-, and Treg-polarized cutaneous inflammation after stimulation of COVID-19 vaccines. Although the association between COVID-19 vaccination and these cutaneous adverse reactions remains controversial, the occurrence of rare dermatoses and their short intervals suggest a possible relationship. Despite the potential adverse reactions, the administration of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial in the ongoing battle against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Toxidermias/etiologia , Toxidermias/imunologia
10.
Immunol Cell Biol ; 102(6): 467-473, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606730

RESUMO

Mentorship refers to the guidance given by a mentor to a less experienced individual to enhance their professional and personal development. For graduate research students, seeking independent mentors external to their institution offers the rewarding opportunity to obtain objective guidance on a variety of work, study and life matters. This article outlines the steps taken to develop a professional society-based, international mentoring program of over 70 participants. This 6-month program aimed to connect graduate research students with more senior academic scientists in response to the limited networking opportunities imposed by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Australia. Outlined here are the resources used to maximize the potential of this successful program, which include (1) an 'Introduction to Mentoring' workshop, (2) the use of a mentoring software or communication strategy to maintain program momentum and (3) the integration of in-person networking events. Overall, the program was a great success, with a high satisfaction rating (8.7/10) and a large number of participants reported that they would maintain their mentoring relationship. All participants stated that they would recommend the program to a peer, and thus reiterations of the program would likely be similarly well-received and beneficial to the Australasian immunology community.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia , COVID-19 , Tutoria , Mentores , Humanos , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Alergia e Imunologia/educação , Austrália , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Pandemias , Pesquisadores/educação
11.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 83(6): 687-695, 2024 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413167

RESUMO

Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines as a novel vaccine platform offer new tools to effectively combat both emerging and existing pathogens which were previously not possible. The 'plug and play' feature of mRNA vaccines enables swift design and production of vaccines targeting complex antigens and rapid incorporation of new vaccine constituents as needed. This feature makes them likely to be adopted for widespread clinical use in the future.Currently approved mRNA vaccines include only those against SARS-CoV-2 virus. These vaccines demonstrate robust immunogenicity and offer substantial protection against severe disease. Numerous mRNA vaccines against viral pathogens are in the early to late phase of development. Several mRNA vaccines for influenza are tested in clinical trials, with some already in phase 3 studies. Other vaccines in the early and late phases of development include those targeting Cytomegalovirus, varicella zoster virus, respiratory syncytial virus and Epstein-Barr virus. Many of these vaccines will likely be indicated for immunosuppressed populations including those with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD). This review focuses on the mechanism, safety and efficacy of mRNA in general and summarises the status of mRNA vaccines in development for common infectious diseases of particular interest for patients with AIIRD.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , Doenças Reumáticas , Vacinas de mRNA , Humanos , Doenças Reumáticas/imunologia , Doenças Autoimunes/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia
12.
J Med Virol ; 96(6): e29738, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884390

RESUMO

Immunocompromised individuals are at significantly elevated risk for severe courses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In addition to vaccination, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) have been applied throughout the pandemic, with time of treatment onset and potency against the currently prevailing virus variant identified as relevant factors for medical benefit. Using data from the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry, the present study evaluated COVID-19 cases in three groups of patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI; 981 agammaglobulinemia patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT); 8960 non-agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT; 14 428 patients without IGRT), and the neutralizing capacity of 1100 immunoglobulin lots against SARS-CoV-2 ("Wuhan" and Omicron strains), throughout 3 years. From the first (2020/2021) to the second (2021/2022) cold season, i.e., during the virus drift to the more contagious Omicron variants, an increase in case numbers was recorded that was comparable (~2- to 3-fold) for all three study groups. During the same period, immunoglobulin lots showed a profound nAb increase against the archetypal SARS-CoV-2 strain, yet only low levels of Omicron nAbs. Notably, shortly before the third (2022/2023) cold season, Omicron-neutralizing capacity of released immunoglobulin lots had plateaued at high levels. From the second to the third cold season, COVID-19 cases dropped markedly. While a ~6-fold case reduction was recorded for the groups of non-agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT and IEI patients not receiving IGRT, the decline was ~30-fold for the group of agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT. These findings suggest a substantial COVID-19-protective effect of IGRT, at least for distinct groups of antibody-deficient patients.


Assuntos
Agamaglobulinemia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Agamaglobulinemia/imunologia , Agamaglobulinemia/terapia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/terapia , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Feminino , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adolescente , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Resultado do Tratamento , Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulinas/imunologia
13.
Blood ; 139(10): 1439-1451, 2022 03 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34662390

RESUMO

Evidence regarding the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with impaired immunity is limited. Initial observations suggest a lower humoral response in these patients. We evaluated the relative effectiveness of the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with hematological neoplasms compared with matched controls. Data on patients with hematological neoplasms after 2 vaccine doses were extracted and matched 1:1 with vaccinated controls. Subpopulation analyses focused on patients receiving therapy for hematological neoplasm, patients without treatment who were only followed, and recipients of specific treatments. The analysis focused on COVID-19 outcomes from days 7 through 43 after the second vaccine dose in these areas: documented COVID-19 infection by polymerase chain reaction; symptomatic infection; hospitalizations; severe COVID-19 disease; and COVID-19-related death. In a population of 4.7 million insured people, 32 516 patients with hematological neoplasms were identified, of whom 5017 were receiving therapy for an active disease. Vaccinated patients with hematological neoplasms, compared with vaccinated matched controls, had an increased risk of documented infections (relative risk [RR] 1.60, 95% CI 1.12-2.37); symptomatic COVID-19 (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.05-2.85); COVID-19-related hospitalizations (RR 3.13, 95% CI 1.68-7.08); severe COVID-19 (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.18-5.19); and COVID-19-related death (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.72-4.47). Limiting the analysis to patients on hematological treatments showed a higher increased risk. This analysis shows that vaccinated patients with hematological neoplasms, in particular patients receiving treatment, suffer from COVID-19 outcomes more than vaccinated individuals with intact immune system. Ways to enhance COVID-19 immunity in this patient population, such as additional doses, should be explored.


Assuntos
Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Idoso , Vacina BNT162/administração & dosagem , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/imunologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
14.
J Rheumatol ; 51(9): 928-933, 2024 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950954

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Incidence and manifestations of postacute sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (PASC) are poorly defined among immunosuppressed populations. We reported, phenotyped, and assessed risk factors for PASC in adults with systemic autoimmune diseases. METHODS: Persons aged ≥ 18 years with systemic autoimmune diseases were recruited into a national, prospective observational cohort of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection between December 2020 and April 2021. Serial surveys assessed vaccination status, SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence, and disease flares. Participants reporting SARS-CoV-2 infection received a questionnaire assessing symptom duration, severity, and quality of life (QOL) effect; PASC was defined as ≥ 1 symptom persisting for > 12 weeks. PASC syndromes were mapped by overlapping symptom domains. Characteristics were compared between participants who did vs did not report PASC. RESULTS: Among 1615 participants, 590 (36.5%) reported SARS-CoV-2 infection and were sent PASC surveys, 299 (50.7%) of whom responded > 12 weeks following the reported infection. Respondents were 91.6% female, 91.2% White, median (IQR) age was 48 (40-60) years with median (IQR) 3 (2-3) vaccine doses at time of first infection. Common diagnoses included inflammatory arthritis (38.5%) and inflammatory bowel disease (14.4%). Eighty-nine of 299 (29.8%) reported PASC, with the most reported symptom domain being neurological/psychological (83.1%); 84% reported an effect on QOL. Participants with PASC reported lower number of preceding vaccines (median [IQR] 2 [2-3] vs 3 [2-3]; P < 0.001) and more reinfections (16.9% vs 5.7%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In a large, real-world cohort, 29.8% of persons with systemic autoimmune disease reported PASC, often affecting QOL. Preceding vaccination may reduce PASC, whereas multiple infections may increase risk, supporting ongoing booster vaccine campaigns and efforts to limit breakthrough infections.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , COVID-19 , Doenças Reumáticas , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Adulto , Doenças Reumáticas/epidemiologia , Doenças Autoimunes/epidemiologia , Doenças Autoimunes/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Idoso , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido
15.
Cell Commun Signal ; 22(1): 305, 2024 Jun 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831299

RESUMO

As a major component of innate immunity and a positive regulator of interferons, the Stimulator of interferon gene (STING) has an immunotherapy potential to govern a variety of infectious diseases. Despite the recent advances regarding vaccines against COVID-19, nontoxic novel adjuvants with the potential to enhance vaccine efficacy are urgently desired. In this connection, it has been well-documented that STING agonists are applied to combat COVID-19. This approach is of major significance for boosting immune responses most likely through an autophagy-dependent manner in susceptible individuals against infection induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus (SARS­CoV­2). Given that STING agonists exert substantial immunomodulatory impacts under a wide array of pathologic conditions, these agents could be considered novel adjuvants for enhancing immunogenicity against the SARS-related coronavirus. Here, we intend to discuss the recent advances in STING agonists' recruitment to boost innate immune responses upon vaccination against SARS-related coronavirus infections. In light of the primordial role of autophagy modulation, the potential of being an antiviral vaccine adjuvant was also explored.


Assuntos
Autofagia , COVID-19 , Proteínas de Membrana , SARS-CoV-2 , Autofagia/imunologia , Autofagia/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Proteínas de Membrana/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Animais , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Imunidade Inata/efeitos dos fármacos , Adjuvantes de Vacinas/uso terapêutico , Adjuvantes de Vacinas/farmacologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/farmacologia
16.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 519, 2024 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783176

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Targeting mucosal immunity of the gut, which is known to provide antigen processing, while avoiding excessive or unnecessary inflammation, was tested as a way to modulate COVID-19 severity. METHODS: Randomized open-label trial in 204 adults hospitalized with non-critical COVID-19 who received for 14 days in addition to standard of care (SOC) degalactosylated bovine glycoproteins formulations of either MAF capsules (MAF group) or M capsules (M group) or SOC only (control group). RESULTS: Median recovery time when patients did not require supplemental oxygen was 6 days in both study groups compared to 9 days in the control (MAF vs. control; P = 0.020 and M vs. control; P = 0.004). A greater reduction in mortality was seen in the MAF group compared to the control by day 14 (8.3% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.121) and by day 29 (15.3% vs. 3.2%; P = 0.020), and similarly in the M group by day 14 (8.3% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.276) and by day 29 (15.3% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.017). The proportion of those who had baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) lower than 0.8 × 109/L was 13/63 (20.6%), 17/69 (24.6%), and 18/72 (25.0%) of patients in MAF, M, and control group respectively. Day 29 mortality among these lymphopenic patients was three times higher than for the intent-to-treat population (21% vs. 7%) and consisted in above subgroups: 2/13 (15%), 2/17 (12%), and 6/18 (33%) of patients. The decreased mortality in both study subgroups correlated with greater ALC restoration above 0.8 × 109/L level seen on day 14 in 91% (11/12) and 87.5% (14/16) of survivors in MAF and M subgroups respectively compared to 53.3% (8/15) of survivors in control subgroup. Incidences of any ALC decrease below the baseline level on day 14 occurred in 25.4% of patients in the MAF group and 29.0% of patients in the M group compared to 45.8% in control and ALC depletion by ≥ 50% from the baseline level consisted of 7.9%, 5.8%, and 15.3% of cases in these groups respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that both study agents prevented ALC depletion and accelerated its restoration, which is believed to be one of the mechanisms of improved crucial clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered after the trial start in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04762628, registered 21/02/2021, https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT04762628 .


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Glicoproteínas , Linfopenia , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Idoso , Glicoproteínas/imunologia , Glicoproteínas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Bovinos , Animais , Adulto , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Cápsulas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA