The collateral fallout of COVID19 lockdown on patients with head injury from north-west India.

BACKGROUND: The COVID19 lockdown has altered the dynamics of living. Its collateral fallout on head injury care has not been studied in detail, especially from low- and middle-income countries, possibly overwhelmed more than developed nations. Here, we analyze the effects of COVID19 restrictions on head injury patients in a high-volume Indian referral trauma center. METHODS: From the prospective trauma registry, clinico-epidemiological and radiological parameters of patients managed during 190 days before and 190 days during COVID19 phases were studied. As an indicator of care, the inpatient mortality of patients with severe HI was also compared with appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: Of the total 3372 patients, there were 83 head injury admissions per week before COVID19 restrictions, which decreased to 33 every week (60% drop) during the lock phases and stabilized at 46 per week during the unlock phases. COVID19 restrictions caused a significant increase in the proportion of patients arriving directly without resuscitation at peripheral centers and later than 6 h of injury. Though the most common mechanism was vehicular, a relative increase in the proportion of assaults was noted during COVID19. There was no change in the distribution of mild, moderate, and severe injuries. Despite a decrease in the percentage of patients with systemic illnesses, severe head injury mortality was significantly more during the lock phases than before COVID19 (59% vs. 47%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: COVID19 restrictions have amplified the already delayed admission among patients of head injury from north-west India. The severe head injury mortality was significantly greater during lock phases than before COVID19, highlighting the collateral fallout of lockdown. Pandemic control measures in the future should not ignore the concerns of trauma emergency care.

Age and the distribution of major injury across a national trauma system.

BACKGROUND: Trauma places a significant burden on healthcare services, and its management impacts greatly on the injured patient. The demographic of major trauma is changing as the population ages, increasingly unveiling gaps in processes of managing older patients. Key to improving patient care is the ability to characterise current patient distribution. OBJECTIVES: There is no contemporary evidence available to characterise how age impacts on trauma patient distribution at a national level. Through an analysis of the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database, we describe the nature of Major Trauma in England since the configuration of regional trauma networks, with focus on injury distribution, ultimate treating institution and any transfer in-between. METHODS: The TARN database was analysed for all patients presenting from April 2012 to the end of October 2017 in NHS England. RESULTS: About 307,307 patients were included, of which 63.8% presented directly to a non-specialist hospital (trauma unit (TU)). Fall from standing height in older patients, presenting and largely remaining in TUs, dominates the English trauma caseload. Contrary to perception, major trauma patients currently are being cared for in both specialist (major trauma centres (MTCs)) and non-specialist (TU) hospitals. Paediatric trauma accounts for <5% of trauma cases and is focussed on paediatric MTCs. CONCLUSIONS: Within adult major trauma patients in England, mechanism of injury is dominated by low level falls, particularly in older people. These patients are predominately cared for in TUs. This work illustrates the reality of current care pathways for major trauma patients in England in the recently configured regional trauma networks.

The Economic and Clinical Impact of an Early Mobility Program in the Trauma Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project.

Traumatic injury survivors often face a difficult recovery. Surgical and invasive procedures, prolonged monitoring in the intensive care unit (ICU), and constant preventive vigilance by medical staff guide standards of care to promote positive outcomes. Recently, patients with traumatic injuries have benefited from early mobilization, a multidisciplinary approach to increasing participation in upright activity and walking. The purpose of this project was to determine the impact of an early mobility program in the trauma ICU on length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, cost, functional milestones, and rehabilitation utilization. A quality improvement project compared outcomes and cost before and after the implementation of an early mobility program. The trauma team assigned daily mobility levels to trauma ICU patients. Nursing and rehabilitation staff collaborated to set daily goals and provide mobility-based interventions. Forty-four patients were included in the preintervention group and 43 patients in the early mobility group. Physical therapy and occupational therapy were initiated earlier in the early mobilization group (p = .044 and p = .026, respectively). Improvements in LOS, duration of mechanical ventilation, time to out-of-bed activity and walking, and discharge disposition were not significant. There were no adverse events related to the early mobility initiative. Activity intolerance resulted in termination of 7.1% of mobility sessions. The development and initiation of a trauma-specific early mobility program proved to be safe and reduce patient care costs. In addition, the program facilitated earlier initiation of physician and occupational therapies. Although not statistically significant, retrospective data abstraction provides evidence of fewer ICU and total hospital days, earlier extubations, and greater proactive participation in functional activities.

Clinical characteristics and management of patients with fat embolism syndrome in level I Apex Trauma Centre.

PURPOSE: Fat embolism syndrome (FES) is systemic manifestation of fat emboli in the circulation seen mostly after long bone fractures. FES is considered a lethal complication of trauma. There are various case reports and series describing FES. Here we describe the clinical characteristics, management in ICU and outcome of these patients in level I trauma center in a span of 6 months. METHODS: In this prospective study, analysis of all the patients with FES admitted in our polytrauma intensive care unit (ICU) of level I trauma center over a period of 6 months (from August 2017 to January 2018) was done. Demographic data, clinical features, management in ICU and outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: We admitted 10 cases of FES. The mean age of patients was 31.2 years. The mean duration from time of injury to onset of symptoms was 56 h. All patients presented with hypoxemia and petechiae but central nervous system symptoms were present in 70% of patients. The mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 11.7 days and the mean length of ICU stay was 14.7 days. There was excellent recovery among patients with no neurological deficit. CONCLUSION: FES is considered a lethal complication of trauma but timely management can result in favorable outcome. FES can occur even after fixation of the fracture. Hypoxia is the most common and earliest feature of FES followed by CNS manifestations. Any patient presenting with such symptoms should raise the suspicion of FES and mandate early ICU referral.

Physician extenders on surgical services: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of resident duty hour restrictions and the resulting in-house trainee shortages, a long-term solution to ensure safe and efficient patient care is needed. One solution is the integration of nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) in a variety of health care settings. We sought to examine the use of NPs and PAs on surgical/trauma services and their effect on patient outcomes and resident workload. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included studies (all designs) examining the use of NPs and PAs on adult surgical and trauma services that reported the following outcomes: complications, length of stay, readmission rates, patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care, resident workload, resident work hours, resident sleep hours, resident satisfaction, resident perceived quality of care, other health care worker satisfaction and perceived quality of care, and economic impact assessments. We excluded studies assessing nonsurgical/trauma services or pediatrics and review articles. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. With the addition of NPs and PAs, patient length of stay decreased, and morbidity and mortality were unchanged. In addition, resident workload decreased, sleep time increased, and operating time improved. Patient and health care worker satisfaction rates were high. Several studies reported cost savings after the addition of NPs/PAs. CONCLUSION: The addition of NPs and PAs to surgical/trauma services appears to be a safe, cost-effective method to manage some of the challenges arising because of resident duty hour restrictions. More high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings and to further assess the economic impact of adding NPs and PAs to the surgical team.

CONTEXTE: Compte tenu de la réduction du nombre d'heures de travail des médecins résidents et de la pénurie de stagiaires qui en a résulté, une solution à long terme s'impose pour assurer la sécurité et l'efficacité des soins aux patients. Une solution consiste à intégrer des infirmières praticiennes (IP) et des adjoints aux médecins (AM) dans divers contextes de soins de santé. Nous avons voulu examiner l'incidence du recours aux IP et aux AM dans des services de chirurgie et de traumatologie et son effet sur la santé des patients et sur la charge de travail des médecins résidents. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une revue systématique des bases de données EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL et du Registre central Cochrane des essais contrôlés. Nous avons inclus les études (tous types de protocoles) ayant analysé le recours aux IP et aux AM dans des services de chirurgie et de traumatologie chez l'adulte ayant fait état des paramètres suivants : complications, durée des hospitalisations, taux de réadmission, satisfaction et perception quant à la qualité des soins chez les patients, charge de travail, heures de travail, heures de sommeil, satisfaction et perception quant à la qualité des soins chez les médecins résidents, satisfaction et perception quant à la qualité des soins chez les autres travailleurs de la santé et retombées économiques. Nous avons exclu les études qui évaluaient d'autres services que la chirurgie, la traumatologie ou la pédiatrie et les articles de synthèse. RÉSULTATS: Vingt-neuf articles répondaient aux critères d'inclusion. Avec l'intégration des IP et des AM, la durée des hospitalisations a diminué et la morbidité et la mortalité sont restées inchangées. En outre, la charge de travail des médecins résidents a diminué, leur temps de sommeil a augmenté et leur temps opératoire s'est amélioré. Les taux de satisfaction des patients et des travailleurs de la santé ont été élevés. Plusieurs études ont fait état d'économies après l'intégration des IP et des AM. CONCLUSION: L'intégration des IP et des AM aux services de chirurgie et de traumatologie semble être une méthode sécuritaire et rentable pour gérer certains des défis qui découlent de la réduction des heures de travail des médecins résidents. Il faudra procéder à d'autres recherches de grande qualité pour confirmer ces observations et évaluer plus en profondeur les retombées économiques de l'intégration des IP et des AM aux équipes de chirurgie.

[Endovascular treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries]. / Tompa trauma okozta mellkasi aortasérülések endovascularis ellátása.

INTRODUCTION: A new era has begun in the last two decades with the advent of endovascular methods in the therapy of blunt thoracic aorta injuries. Our experiences with the endovascular interventions of blunt aortic trauma in the Cardiovascular Center of Semmelweis University are summarised here. METHODS: We included those patients who underwent endovascular intervention due to blunt aortic trauma in a university hospital between 1998 and 2014. The statistical analysis was performed with the use of Excel. RESULTS: 41 patients were selected from our database. There were 34 males, the average age was 47 years (±17 years). Among the 41 patients 15 underwent an acute procedure (12 ruptures) and 26 patients received delayed treatment (in 4 cases due to growing of the pseudoaneurysm). There was only one early postoperative death. Late mortality was 22.5% and 7.5% was related to the aortic injury. CONCLUSION: Our late mortality and complication rates were similar to other studies, which reinforces international experiences. In the cases when delayed treatment is feasible, the patient can be stabilized and the CTA images can be analyzed for precise stentgraft planning. The treatment of blunt thoracic aorta injured patients should take place in specialized centers capable of such endovascular interventions.

Nationwide secondary overtriage in level 3 and level 4 trauma centers: are these transfers necessary?

BACKGROUND: Secondary overtriage (SO) refers to the interfacility transfer of trauma patients who are rapidly discharged home without surgical intervention by the receiving institution. SO imposes a financial hardship on patients and strains trauma center resources. Most studies on SO have been conducted from the perspective of the receiving hospital, which is usually a level 1 trauma center. Having previously studied SO from the referring rural hospital's perspective, we sought to identify variables contributing to SO at the national level. METHODS: Using data from the 2008-2012 National Trauma Data Bank, we isolated patients transferred to level 1 trauma centers who were: (1) discharged home within 48 h and (2) did not undergo any surgical procedure. This population was subsequently compared with similar patients treated at and discharged directly from level 3 and 4 centers. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to isolate variables that independently influenced a patient's risk of undergoing SO. Injury patterns were characterized by use of subspecialty consultants. RESULTS: A total of 99,114 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 13.2% were discharged directly from level 3 or 4 trauma centers, and 86.8% of them were transferred to a level 1 trauma center before discharge. The mean Injury Severity Score of the nontransfer and transfer groups was 5.4 ± 4.5 and 7.3 ± 5.7, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed that Injury Severity Score > 15, alcoholism, smoking, drug use, and certain injury patterns involving the head, vertebra, and face were associated with being transferred. In this minimally injured population, factors protective against transfers were: age > 65 y, female gender, systolic blood pressure <80, a head computed tomography scan and orthopedic injuries. CONCLUSIONS: SO results from the complex interplay of variables including patient demographics, facility characteristics, and injury type. The inability to exclude a potentially devastating neurologic injury seems to drive SO.

Hospitalized Traumatic Brain Injury: Low Trauma Center Utilization and High Interfacility Transfers among Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines suggest that Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) related hospitalizations are best treated at Level I or II trauma centers because of continuous neurosurgical care in these settings. This population-based study examines TBI hospitalization treatment paths by age groups. METHODS: Trauma center utilization and transfers by age groups were captured by examining the total number of TBI hospitalizations from National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the number of TBI hospitalizations and transfers in the Trauma Data Bank National Sample Population (NTDB-NSP). TBI cases were defined using diagnostic codes. RESULTS: Of the 351,555 TBI related hospitalizations in 2012, 47.9% (n = 168,317) were directly treated in a Level I or II trauma center, and an additional 20.3% (n = 71,286) were transferred to a Level I or II trauma center. The portion of the population treated at a trauma center (68.2%) was significantly lower than the portion of the U.S. population who has access to a major trauma center (90%). Further, nearly half of all transfers to a Level I or II trauma center were adults aged 55 and older (p < 0.001) and that 20.2% of pediatric patients arrive by non-ambulatory means. CONCLUSION: Utilization of trauma center resources for hospitalized TBIs may be low considering the established lower mortality rate associated with treatment at Level I or II trauma centers. The higher transfer rate for older adults may suggest rapid decline amid an unrecognized initial need for a trauma center care. A better understanding of hospital destination decision making is needed for patients with TBI.

Conservative versus operative management in stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: the experience of a Canadian level 1 trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: The goal of conservative management (CM) of penetrating abdominal trauma is to avoid nontherapeutic laparotomies while identifying injuries early. Factors that may predict CM failure are not well established, and the experience of CM has not been well described in the Canadian context. METHODS: We searched a Canadian level 1 trauma centre database for all penetrating abdominal traumas treated between 2004 and 2014. Hemodynamically stable patients without peritonitis and without clear indications for immediate surgery were considered potential candidates for CM, and were included in the study. We compared those who were managed with CM with those who underwent immediate operative management (OM). Outcomes included mortality and length of stay (LOS). Further analysis was performed to identify predictors of CM failure. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients with penetrating abdominal trauma were classified as potential candidates for CM. Ten patients were managed with OM, and 62 with CM, with 9 (14.5%) ultimately failing CM and requiring laparotomy. The OM and CM groups were similar in terms of age, sex, injury severity, mechanism and number of injuries. There were no deaths in either group. The LOS in the intensive care (ICU)/trauma unit was 4.8 ± 3.2 days in the OM group and 2.9 ± 2.6 days in the CM group (p = 0.039). The only predictor for CM failure was intra-abdominal fluid on computed tomography (CT) scan (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 1.01-28.19). CONCLUSION: In select patients with penetrating abdominal trauma, CM is safe and results in a reduced LOS in the ICU/trauma unit of 1.9 days. Fluid on CT scan is a predictor for failure.

CONTEXTE: L'objectif du traitement conservateur des traumatismes abdominaux pénétrants est d'éviter les laparotomies non thérapeutiques tout en ciblant rapidement les blessures. On n'a pas réussi à établir clairement des facteurs permettant de prédire la probabilité d'échec de ce type de traitement, ni bien décrit les paramètres d'utilisation de ce dernier dans le contexte canadien. MÉTHODES: Nous avons recensé dans la base de données d'un centre de traumatologie canadien de niveau 1 tous les cas de traumatismes abdominaux pénétrants traités entre 2004 et 2014. Les patients dont l'état hémodynamique était stable, qui ne souffraient pas de péritonite et qui ne nécessitaient pas manifestement une chirurgie immédiate ont été inclus dans l'étude en tant que candidats potentiels pour le traitement conservateur. Nous avons comparé les patients ayant reçu le traitement conservateur avec ceux ayant tout de suite été opérés. Nous avons entre autres évalué la mortalité et la durée de séjour. D'autres analyses ont été effectuées pour mettre en évidence des indicateurs de l'échec du traitement conservateur. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 72 patients affichant des traumatismes abdominaux pénétrants ont été classés comme des candidats potentiels pour le traitement conservateur. De ce nombre, 10 ont été opérés, et 62 ont reçu le traitement conservateur. Ce dernier a échoué chez 9 patients (14,5 %), qui ont dû subir une laparotomie. Les 2 groupes étaient semblables sur le plan de l'âge, du sexe, de la gravité des blessures et du mécanisme et du nombre de blessures. Aucun décès n'a été observé parmi les 2 groupes. La durée du séjour à l'unité de soins intensifs ou de traumatologie était de 4,8 ± 3,2 jours pour les patients ayant été opérés et de 2,9 ± 2,6 jours pour les patients ayant reçu le traitement conservateur (p = 0,039). Un seul indicateur de l'échec du traitement conservateur a été analysé, soit la présence de fluide intra-abdominal sur le tomodensitogramme (rapport de cotes 5,3; intervalle de confiance à 95 % 1,01-28,19). CONCLUSION: Chez un sous-groupe de patients souffrant de traumatismes abdominaux pénétrants, le traitement conservateur est sécuritaire et se traduit par une durée de séjour inférieure de 1,9 jour. La présence de fluide détectée par tomodensitographie est un indicateur de l'échec du traitement.

Factors associated with trauma recidivism in young children.

BACKGROUND: Trauma recidivism is associated with future trauma-associated morbidity and mortality. Previous evidence suggests that socioeconomic factors predict trauma recidivism in older children (10-18 years); however, risk factors in US children 10 years and younger have not been studied. We sought to determine the factors associated with trauma recidivism in young children 10 years and younger. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric trauma patients 10 years and younger who presented to a single American College of Surgeons-verified Level I pediatric trauma center from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2021. All patients were evaluated for prior injury during trauma registry entry. Characteristics at the index injury were collected via chart review. Patients were geocoded to assess Social Vulnerability Index. Logistic regression examined factors associated with recidivism. Best subset selection was used to compare multivariable models and identify the most predictive and parsimonious model. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 3,518 patients who presented in the study period, 169 (4.8%) experienced a prior injury. Seventy-six percent (n = 128) had one prior injury presentation, 18% (n = 31) had two prior presentations, and 5.9% (n = 10) had three or more. Falls were the most common mechanism in recidivists (63% vs. 52%, p = 0.009). Child physical abuse occurred in 6.5% of patients, and 0.9% experienced penetrating injury. The majority (n = 137 [83%]) were discharged home from the emergency department. There was no significant difference in the frequency of penetrating injury and child physical abuse between recidivists and nonrecidivists. Following logistic regression, the most parsimonious model demonstrated that recidivism was associated with comorbidities, age, falls, injury location, nontransfer, and racialization. No significant associations were found with Social Vulnerability Index and insurance status. CONCLUSION: Medical comorbidities, young age, injury location, and falls were primarily associated with trauma recidivism. Support for parents of young children and those with special health care needs through injury prevention programs could reduce trauma recidivism in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Management of incidental findings in the trauma patient: is the trauma team a primary care provider as well?

BACKGROUND: Computed tomographic scanning and tertiary surveys have resulted in an increase of incidental findings (IFs) unrelated to the trauma. The goals were to (1) characterize the frequency and nature of IFs and (2) explore their management by a trauma nurse practitioner. METHODS: A prospective log of IFs and follow-up details was maintained by a trauma nurse practitioner. Supplemental data were obtained through hospital databases. RESULTS: A total of 404 trauma patients were screened for IFs over a 6-month period, and 68% had IFs of varying severity. CONCLUSION: IFs are frequent in trauma. Appropriate management and follow-up is a major commitment that can be well managed by a trauma nurse practitioner.

Increases in Violence and Changes in Trauma Admissions During the COVID Quarantine.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused an abrupt change to societal norms. We anecdotally noticed an increase in penetrating and violent trauma during the period of stay-at-home orders. Studying these changes will allow trauma centers to better prepare for future waves of COVID-19 or other global catastrophes. METHODS: We queried our institutional database for all level 1 and 2 trauma activations presenting from the scene within our local county from March 18 to May 21, 2020 and matched time periods from 2016 to 2019. Primary outcomes were overall trauma volume, rates of penetrating trauma, rates of violent trauma, and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: The number of penetrating and violent traumas at our trauma center during the period of societal quarantine for the COVID-19 pandemic was more than any historical total. During the COVID-19 time period, we saw 39 penetrating traumas, while the mean value for the same time period from 2016 to 2019 was 26 (P = .03). We saw 45 violent traumas during COVID; the mean value from 2016 to 2019 was 32 (P = .05). There was also a higher rate of trauma patients requiring transfusion in the COVID cohort (6.7% vs 12.2%). DISCUSSION: Societal quarantine increased the number of penetrating and violent traumas, with a concurrent increased percentage of patients transfused. Despite this, there was no change in outcomes. Given the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic, quarantine measures could be re-implemented. Data from this study can help guide expectations and utilization of hospital resources in the future.

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Workload of an Adult Major Trauma Centre in Northern Ireland.

INTRODUCTION: Based in Belfast, the Royal Victoria Hospital is the only Major Trauma Centre in Northern Ireland. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, on 23rd March 2020, Northern Ireland was placed into 'lockdown' with the majority of the population advised to "stay at home". The objective of this paper is to identify what effect the lockdown restrictions had on the workload of the Major Trauma Service at the Royal Victoria Hospital. METHOD: Patients were identified at the orthopaedic trauma meetings and from direct referral to the Major Trauma Service (MTS). Patients admitted and seen by the MTS from 23/03/20, the day lockdown was announced, to 29/05/20, when restrictions were partially lifted, were included in the analysis. Admissions data from this time period was then compared to admissions data from the same period in 2019 (23/03/19 - 29/05/19). RESULTS: When comparing pre-lockdown and lockdown groups there was an overall decrease of 26% in admissions to the MTS (n=57 vs n=42). Road Traffic Accidents were reduced by 53% (n=31 vs n=15) and falls from >2m were reduced by 29% (n=21 vs n=15). CONCLUSION: Overall the number of admissions to the major trauma service was reduced during the lockdown period. A significant proportion of the reduction may be a result of social restrictions that reduced volume of traffic on Northern Irelands roads. Further study of future lockdowns and including admissions data of other MTCs in the UK would allow us to draw more robust conclusions.

Impact of the COVID-19 shutdown on orthopedic trauma numbers and patterns in an academic Level I Trauma Center in Berlin, Germany.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the implementation of drastic shutdown measures worldwide. While quarantine, self-isolation and shutdown laws helped to effectively contain and control the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the impact of COVID-19 shutdowns on trauma care in emergency departments (EDs) remains elusive. METHODS: All ED patient records from the 35-day COVID-19 shutdown (SHUTDOWN) period were retrospectively compared to a calendar-matched control period in 2019 (CTRL) as well as to a pre (PRE)- and post (POST)-shutdown period in an academic Level I Trauma Center in Berlin, Germany. Total patient and orthopedic trauma cases and contacts as well as trauma causes and injury patterns were evaluated during respective periods regarding absolute numbers, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and risk ratios (RRs). FINDINGS: Daily total patient cases (SHUTDOWN vs. CTRL, 106.94 vs. 167.54) and orthopedic trauma cases (SHUTDOWN vs. CTRL, 30.91 vs. 52.06) decreased during the SHUTDOWN compared to the CTRL period with IRRs of 0.64 and 0.59. While absolute numbers decreased for most trauma causes during the SHUTDOWN period, we observed increased incidence proportions of household injuries and bicycle accidents with RRs of 1.31 and 1.68 respectively. An RR of 2.41 was observed for injuries due to domestic violence. We further recorded increased incidence proportions of acute and regular substance abuse during the SHUTDOWN period with RRs of 1.63 and 3.22, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While we observed a relevant decrease in total patient cases, relative proportions of specific trauma causes and injury patterns increased during the COVID-19 shutdown in Berlin, Germany. As government programs offered prompt financial aid during the pandemic to individuals and businesses, additional social support may be considered for vulnerable domestic environments.

Missed posterior shoulder fracture dislocations: a new protocol from a London major trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: A high incidence of missed posterior shoulder dislocations is widely recognised in the literature. Concern was raised by the upper limb multidisciplinary team at a London major trauma centre that these missed injuries were causing serious consequences due to the need for surgical intervention and poor functional outcome. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors contributing to missed diagnosis and propose solutions. METHODS: A local quality improvement report was performed investigating time from admission to diagnosis of simple posterior dislocations and fracture dislocations over a 5-year period. Factors contributing to a delayed diagnosis were analysed. RESULTS: The findings supported current evidence: a posterior shoulder dislocation was more often missed if there was concurrent fracture of the proximal humerus. Anteroposterior and scapular Y view radiographs were not always diagnostic for dislocation. Axial views were more reliable in assessment of the congruency of the joint and were associated with early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of the injury. DISCUSSION: As a result of these findings a new protocol was produced by the orthopaedic and radiology departments and distributed to our emergency department practitioners and radiography team. The protocol included routine axial or modified trauma axial view radiographs for all patients attending the emergency department with a shoulder injury, low clinical suspicion for dislocation and a low threshold for CT scan. Reaudit and ongoing data collection have shown significant increase in axial view radiographs and improved diagnosis.