Implementing and Enhancing Social and Economic Needs Screening at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

BACKGROUND: Programs to screen for social and economic needs (SENs) are challenging to implement. AIM: To describe implementation of an SEN screening program for patients obtaining care at a federally qualified health center (FQHC). SETTING: Large Chicago-area FQHC where many patients are Hispanic/Latino and insured through Medicaid. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: In the program's phase 1 (beginning April 2020), a prescreening question asked about patients' interest in receiving community resources; staff then called interested patients. After several refinements (e.g., increased staffing, tailored reductions in screening frequency) to address challenges such as a large screening backlog, program phase 2 began in February 2021. In phase 2, a second prescreening question asked about patients' preferred modality to learn about community resources (text/email versus phone calls). PROGRAM EVALUATION: During phase 1, 8925 of 29,861 patients (30%) expressed interest in community resources. Only 40% of interested patients were successfully contacted and screened. In phase 2, 5781 of 21,737 patients (27%) expressed interest in resources; 84% of interested patients were successfully contacted by either text/email (43%) or phone (41%). DISCUSSION: Under one-third of patients obtaining care at an FQHC expressed interest in community resources for SENs. After program refinements, rates of follow-up with interested patients substantially increased.

Centering PrEP: utilizing ADAPT-ITT to inform group PrEP care for sex workers in Chicago.

BACKGROUND: Sex workers, those who trade sex for monetary or nonmonetary items, experience high rates of HIV transmission but have not been adequately included in HIV prevention and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence program development research. Community-empowered (C.E.) approaches have been the most successful at reducing HIV transmission among sex workers. Centering Healthcare (Centering) is a C.E. model proven to improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities in other populations, such as pregnant women, people with diabetes, and sickle cell disease. However, no research exists to determine if Centering can be adapted to meet the unique HIV prevention needs of sex workers. OBJECTIVE: We aim to explain the process by which we collaboratively and iteratively adapted Centering to meet the HIV prevention and PrEP retention needs of sex workers. METHODS: We utilized the Assessment, Decision, Adaptation, Production, Topical Experts, Integration, Training, Testing (ADAPT-ITT) framework, a model for adapting evidence-based interventions. We applied phases one through six of the ADAPT-ITT framework (Assessment, Decision, Adaptation, Production, Topical Experts, Integration) to the design to address the distinct HIV prevention needs of sex workers in Chicago. Study outcomes corresponded to each phase of the ADAPT-ITT framework. Data used for adaptation emerged from collaborative stakeholder meetings, individual interviews (n = 36) and focus groups (n = 8) with current and former sex workers, and individual interviews with care providers (n = 8). In collaboration with our community advisory board, we used a collaborative and iterative analytical process to co-produce a culturally adapted 3-session facilitator's guide for the Centering Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (C-PrEP +) group healthcare model. RESULTS: The ADAPT-ITT framework offered structure and facilitated this community-empowered innovative adaptation of Centering Healthcare. This process culminated with a facilitator's guide and associated materials ready for pilot testing. CONCLUSIONS: In direct alignment with community empowerment, we followed the ADAPT-ITT framework, phases 1-6, to iteratively adapt Centering Healthcare to suit the stated HIV Prevention and PrEP care needs of sex workers in Chicago. The study represents the first time the first time Centering has been adapted to suit the HIV prevention and PrEP care needs of sex workers. Addressing a gap in HIV prevention care for sex workers, Centering PrEP harnesses the power of community as it is an iteratively adapted model that can be piloted and replicated regionally, nationally, and internationally.

Physician Perspectives on Performing Newborn Circumcisions: Barriers and Opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: Over half of infant boys born in the United States undergo newborn circumcision. However, available data indicate that boys who are publicly insured, or Black/African American, have less access to desired newborn circumcision, thus concentrating riskier, more costly operative circumcision among these populations. This study ascertains perinatal physician perspectives about barriers and facilitators to providing newborn circumcisions, with a goal of informing future strategies to ensure more equitable access. METHODS: Qualitative interviews about newborn circumcision care were conducted from April-June 2020 at eleven Chicago-Area hospitals. Physicians that provide perinatal care (pediatricians, family medicine physicians, and obstetricians) participated in qualitative interviews about newborn circumcision. Inductive and deductive qualitative coding was performed to identify themes related to barriers and facilitators of newborn circumcision care. RESULTS: The 23 participating physicians (78% female, 74% white, median 16 years since medical school graduation [range 5-38 years], 52% hospital leadership role, 78% currently perform circumcisions) reported multiple barriers including difficulty with procedural logistics and inconsistent clinician availability and training; corresponding suggestions for operational improvements were also provided. Regarding newborn circumcision insurance coverage and reimbursement, physicians reported limited knowledge, but noted that some insurance reimbursement policies financially disincentivize clinicians and hospitals from offering inpatient newborn circumcision. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians identified logistical/operational, and reimbursement-related barriers to providing newborn circumcision for desirous families. Future studies and advocacy work should focus on developing clinical strategies and healthcare policies to ensure equitable access, and incentivize clinicians/hospitals to perform newborn circumcisions.

The ACHIEVE Program: Bringing Chicago Youth and Community Organizations Together to Impact Local Disparities.

To evaluate the Advancing Community Health and Individual leadership through a noVel Educational (ACHIEVE) program uniting Chicago high school and undergraduate students (scholars) and community organizations to empower youth to meaningfully impact communities while enhancing organizational capacity. Between 2020 and 2022, the ACHIEVE program engaged cohorts of youth in classroom-based learning and community-based projects targeting health and education disparities. Pre and post-program surveys were administered to scholars to assess knowledge about disparities, skills, and self-efficacy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community organization leaders to examine programmatic impact. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed. Across four cohorts (March 2020; September 2020-May 2021; September-November 2021; March-May 2022), 85 students participated in the ACHIEVE program. Scholars supported 19 community-based projects that increased awareness of local issues and resources and evaluated programs. Scholars reported advancement in their knowledge and skills as well as interest in sustaining their community engagement. Leaders shared several benefits at the organizational and community levels from collaborating with scholars. The ACHIEVE program enabled bidirectional learning between scholars and organizations. It also demonstrated that youth can contribute positively to addressing disparities while supporting local organizations and communities.

Collaborative Integration of Community Health Workers in Hospitals and Health Centers to Reduce Pediatric Asthma Disparities: A Quality Improvement Program Evaluation.

To address pediatric asthma disparities on the South Side of Chicago, a community health worker (CHW) home visiting intervention was implemented collaboratively by academic institutions and community based health centers. This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of this longitudinal quality improvement CHW intervention in reducing asthma morbidity and healthcare utilization. All patients aged 2-18 who met the high-risk clinical criteria in outpatient settings or those who visited the ED due to asthma were offered the program. A within-subject study design analyzed asthma morbidity and healthcare utilization at baseline and follow-up. Multivariable mixed-effects regression models, adjusted for baseline demographic and asthma characteristics, were used to assess changes over time. Among 123 patients, the average age was 8.8 (4.4) years, and 89.3% were non-Hispanic black. Significant reductions were observed in the average daytime symptoms days (baseline 4.1 days and follow-up 1.6 days), night-time symptoms days (3.0 days and 1.2 days), and days requiring rescue medication (4.1 days and 1.6 days) in the past two weeks (all p < 0.001). The average number of emergency department visits decreased from 0.92 one year before to 0.44 one year after program participation, a 52% reduction (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in hospital admissions. These results support the use of a collaborative approach to implement the CHW home visiting program as part of standard care for pediatric asthma patients in urban settings. This approach has the potential to reduce asthma disparities and underscores the valuable role of CHWs within the clinical care team.

An Academic-Community Partnership to Address Gun Violence in the Roseland Neighborhood of Chicago.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gun violence is the leading cause of death for youth. This study examined an academic-community partnership to address gun violence through a strength-based approach called Asset-Based Community Development. METHODS: We used a case study design. Participants were Black youth who encounter frequent gun violence (average age = 16.7 years; 72% male). Our partnership involved survey development/completion and semistructured discussions. We also interviewed community stakeholders to collect data on local assets. We interpreted data through a communitywide forum to guide social action to address gun violence. RESULTS: The majority of youth (76%) witnessed neighborhood violence in the last year. The top youth concerns related to gun violence included poverty, guns, and gangs. Community stakeholders saw local people and local organizations as primary community assets. A community forum to interpret these data led to social action in the form of an environmental strategy-cleaning up an unused commercial building for the development of a youth tech center. The majority of youth participants (89.5%) agreed or strongly agreed that they had a voice in the research process. CONCLUSION: Participatory research that takes an asset-based approach can enable relevant inquiry that engages youth and guides social action to address gun violence.

Data to Care Pilot Program in Chicago: Experience, Outcomes, and Direction for the Future.

CONTEXT: Data to Care (D2C) involves sharing HIV surveillance data between health care facilities and health departments to improve continuity of care for people living with HIV (PLWH). The Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) initiated a D2C pilot program at the University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) from June 2016 to September 2019. OBJECTIVES: To describe the proportion of patients reported by UCM as not in care who were able to be matched to CDPH enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System (eHARS) and to report the individual-level factors associated with matching and viral suppression. DESIGN: Retrospective program evaluation. SETTING: UCM, an academic health care center that provides HIV care to adults via a Ryan White clinic on the south side of Chicago. PARTICIPANTS: Adult PLWH who had received care at UCM but did not have current documented HIV care visit(s). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of matched patients; factors associated with matching and viral suppression. RESULTS: Overall, 72.4% (n = 813/1123) of patients reported by UCM were matched by CDPH to eHARS. Individuals aged 40 to 49 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-3.62), 50 to 59 years (OR = 2.47; 95% CI, 1.37-4.47), and 60 years or older (OR = 6.18; 95% CI, 3.18-12.32) were more likely to match in eHARS. People who lived outside of Chicago (OR = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05-0.15) or with unknown zip codes (OR = 0.08; 95% CI, 0.05-0.12) were less likely to match. Men who have sex with men and persons older than 50 years were more likely to be virally suppressed. CONCLUSIONS: D2C is an evidence-based strategy for reengagement of PLWH; however, program implementation relies on successful data matching. We found that a large proportion of patients from UCM were not matched, particularly those who were younger or lived outside of Chicago. Additional research is needed to understand ways to improve data matching to facilitate reengagement in HIV care.

COVID-19 Vaccine Policy Implementation and Differential Vaccine Uptake Trajectories in Chicago Communities.

BACKGROUND: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple public health interventions have been implemented to respond to the rapidly evolving pandemic and community needs. This article describes the scope, timing, and impact of coordinated strategies for COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Chicago for the first year of vaccine distribution. METHODS: Using a series of interviews with public health officials and leaders of community-based organizations (CBOs) who participated in the implementation of the citywide COVID-19 vaccine outreach initiatives, we constructed a timeline of vaccine outreach initiatives. The timeline was matched to the vaccine uptake rates to explore the impact of the vaccine outreach initiatives by community area. Finally, we discussed the nature of policy initiatives and the level of vaccine uptake in relation to community characteristics. RESULTS: The Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) implemented myriad vaccine outreach strategies, including mass vaccination sites, improved access, and community-level vaccine campaigns. Protect Chicago+ was the primary vaccine outreach effort initiated by the CDPH, which identified 15 highly vulnerable community areas. More than 2.7 million (67%) Chicagoans completed the vaccine regimen by December 2021. Black (51.3%) Chicagoans were considerably less likely to be vaccinated than Asian (77.6%), White (69.8%), and Hispanic (63.6%) Chicago residents. In addition, there were significant spatial differences in the rate of COVID-19 vaccine completion: predominantly White and Hispanic communities, compared with Black communities, had higher rates of vaccine completion. CONCLUSIONS: The community outreach efforts to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Chicago have shown the importance of community-engaged approaches in pandemic responses. Despite citywide efforts to build community infrastructure, Black communities had relatively lower levels of vaccine uptake than other communities. Broader social restructuring to mitigate disinvestment and residential segregation and to ameliorate medical mistrust will be needed to prepare for future pandemics and disasters.

SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Risk in Persons with HIV, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2020-2022.

Understanding if persons with HIV (PWH) have a higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection may help tailor future COVID-19 public health guidance. To determine whether HIV infection was associated with increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, we followed adult residents of Chicago, Illinois, USA, with SARS-CoV-2 longitudinally from their first reported infection through May 31, 2022. We matched SARS-CoV-2 laboratory data and COVID-19 vaccine administration data to Chicago's Enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System. Among 453,587 Chicago residents with SARS-CoV-2, a total of 5% experienced a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, including 192/2,886 (7%) PWH and 23,642/450,701 (5%) persons without HIV. We observed higher SARS-CoV-2 reinfection incidence rates among PWH (66 [95% CI 57-77] cases/1,000 person-years) than PWOH (50 [95% CI 49-51] cases/1,000 person-years). PWH had a higher adjusted rate of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection (1.46, 95% CI 1.27-1.68) than those without HIV. PWH should follow the recommended COVID-19 vaccine schedule, including booster doses.

Rates of Undiagnosed Cognitive Impairment and Performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Among Older Adults in Primary Care.

BACKGROUND: The number of adults in the USA with cognitive impairment is increasing; however, few studies report prevalence rates of undiagnosed cognitive impairment among older adults in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of undiagnosed cognitive impairment among adults ages 55 years and older in primary care settings and provide normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in this context. DESIGN: Single interview, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: English-speaking adults ages 55 years and older without diagnoses of cognitive impairment recruited from primary care practices in New York City, NY, and Chicago, IL (n = 872). MAIN MEASURES: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Undiagnosed cognitive impairment was defined by age and education adjusted z-scores more than 1.0 and 1.5 standard deviations below published norms, corresponding to mild or moderate to severe cognitive impairment, respectively. KEY RESULTS: The mean age was 66.8 (8.0) years, 44.7% were male, 32.9% were Black or African-American, and 29.1% were Latinx. Undiagnosed cognitive impairment was identified in 20.8% of subjects (mild impairment, 10.5%; moderate-severe impairment, 10.3%). Impairment at any level of severity was associated in bivariate analyses with several patient characteristics, most notably for race and ethnicity (White, non-Latinx, 6.9% vs. Black, non-Latinx, 26.8%, Latinx, 28.2%, other race, 21.9%; p < 0.0001), place of birth (US 17.5% vs. non-US 30.7%, p < 0.0001), depression (33.1% vs. no depression, 18.1%; p < 0.0001), and impairment in activities of daily living (≥ 1 ADL impairment, 34.0% vs. no ADL impairment, 18.2%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Undiagnosed cognitive impairment is common among urban dwelling older adults attending primary care practices, and was associated with several patient characteristics, including non-White race and ethnicity and depression. Normative data for the MoCA from this study may serve as a useful resource for studies of similar patient populations.

Assessing Changes in Insurance Status and Access to Care Among Patients Attending Chicago Sexually Transmitted Infection Specialty Clinics From 2013 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Public sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics are safety net providers for uninsured and underinsured individuals but are at risk for closure due to declining budgets and shifting priorities. This study sought to assess changes in insurance status and access to preventive care among public STI clinic patients after immediate and long-term implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). METHODS: Patients receiving care in STI clinics administered by Chicago Department of Public Health were asked to complete an anonymous survey in 2013, 2014, and 2019. We estimated the prevalence rate ratio (PRR) of (1) being insured and (2) having access to preventive care over time, adjusted for age, race, and gender/sexual orientation, and employment status. RESULTS: Among 1711 respondents, compared with 2013 patients, patients were 1.41 (adjusted PRR [aPRR]) times more likely to report being insured in 2014 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.77) and 1.24 (aPRR) times more likely to report being insured in 2019 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.55). After adjusting for other significant variables (age, sex and orientation, and insurance status), reported access to preventive care increased by 34% among respondents in 2019 as compared with 2013 (aPRR, 1.34). Unsurprisingly, being insured was associated with increased preventive care access (aPRR, 1.78). CONCLUSIONS: Even after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, a survey of public STI clinic patients in Chicago found a sizeable proportion of individuals without insurance, and many lacked access to preventive care, highlighting the continued need for these safety net clinics to provide STI care.

PrEP Use and Adherence among Transgender Persons in Chicago, IL (SHIPP Study, 2014-2018, USA).

Few studies investigating daily oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) focus on transgender persons. The Sustainable Health Center Implementation PrEP Pilot (SHIPP) Study included a large observational cohort of transgender persons with implications for PrEP in the United States. We examined data from SHIPP's observational cohort and its Medication Adherence Substudy (MAS) to understand adherence among transgender participants in Chicago, IL. We assessed adherence by the proportion of days covered (PDC) for PrEP medication prescriptions, self-reported interview data, and concentrations of intracellular tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) in dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Between 2014 and 2018, there were 510 transgender participants, 349 (68.4%) transgender women and 152 (29.8%) transgender men. Forty-five of these participants were enrolled in the MAS, 31 (68.9%) transgender women and 9 (20.0%) transgender men. By the 3-month follow up, 100% of MAS participants who completed an interview reported taking 4 or more doses of PrEP in the previous week. At 6, 9, and 12 months, taking 4 or more doses in the past week was reported by 81.0%, 94.1%, and 83.3% of participants, respectively. Results from TFV-DP DBS indicated that fewer participants reached the same level of adherence (4 or more doses/week) at clinical visits compared to self-report and even fewer participants reached this level of adherence based on the calculated PDC. Among participants who remained on PrEP throughout the study, DBS adherence levels declined after the first three months. There remains a critical need to develop strategies to address barriers and interventions that support PrEP adherence among transgender people.

CHECK - multilevel real-world pediatric asthma care coordination: results and lessons learned.

OBJECTIVE: Because asthma health disparities in children remain common, innovative approaches to obtain asthma health equity are essential. Comprehensive care coordination programs may address the social determinants of health that influence these disparities. This analysis aims to ascertain if receipt of Coordination of Healthcare for Complex Kids (CHECK) program services was associated with changes in school absence, cost, healthcare utilization, and controller prescription in children with asthma. METHODS: The CHECK program ran from December 1, 2014 through August 31, 2017. Engagement with community health workers was rolling and targeted based on risk level (low, medium, or high determined by healthcare utilization). This analysis included school-aged children with asthma (n = 2,629) and sufficient Chicago Public Schools attendance data (n = 430). RESULTS: Children engaged in CHECK were more likely to be female (p = .046) and to identify as Black and/or Hispanic/Latino than enrolled-only children. School absence was not different between the groups. Average total cost for engaged children was 21.3% more than enrolled-only children the first year (p = .027) but did not differ by the second year (p = .948). At baseline, 68.1% of the cohort had at least one ED visit 12 months prior to CHECK, this reduced to 49.5% post-1 and 41.9% post-2. Engaged children were 21% more likely to visit an ED (p = .010) and 40% more likely to have a controller. CONCLUSIONS: CHECK program receipt was associated with improved healthcare utilization and controller prescriptions. School attendance did not change. The CHECK model offers potential pathways to support low-income children with asthma.

Health care and harm reduction provider perspectives on treating older adults who use non-medical opioids: a qualitative study set in Chicago.

BACKGROUND: Opioid overdose death rates are increasing for adults aged 55 and older, with especially high rates in large urban areas. In parallel, admissions to treatment programs for older adults using illicit substances are increasing as well. Despite these trends, there is a lack of information about older adults who use non-medical opioids (NMO) and even less knowledge about their health and service encounters. Conducted in Chicago, Illinois, this qualitative study explores the perspectives of health care and harm reduction service providers who work with older adults using non-medical opioids. METHODS: The study used snowball sampling to locate participants with expertise in working with older adults who use non-medical opioids. In total, we conducted 26 semi-structured interviews from September 2021-August 2022. We explored questions regarding participants' perceptions of older adult opioid use patterns, comorbidities, and involvement in harm reduction outreach and opioid use disorder treatment. RESULTS: Many of the providers we interviewed consider older adults who use NMO as a distinct population that employ unique use behaviors with the intent to protect them from opioid overdose. However, these same unique behaviors may potentiate their risk for overdose in today's climate. Providers report initial encounters that are not care seeking for opioid use and primarily oriented around health conditions. Older adults who use non-medical opioids are seen as complex patients due to the need to diagnostically untangle symptoms of substance use from co-morbidities and conditions associated with aging. Treatment for this population is also viewed as complicated due to the interactions between aging, comorbidities, and substance use. Providers also noted that older adults who use NMO have use behaviors that make them less visible to outreach and treatment service providers, potentially putting them at increased risk for overdose and health conditions associated with opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study are intended to inform future research on care provision for older adults who use non-medical opioids and may be especially applicable to large urban reas with histories of opioid use dating back to earlier drug epidemics of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s.

Evaluation of the Grow Your Groceries Home Gardening Program in Chicago, Illinois.

COVID-19 exacerbated existing disparities in food security in Chicago. Home gardening can improve food security but there are often barriers to participation and the benefits are understudied. Chicago Grows Food (CGF) formed in 2020 to address food insecurity during COVID-19, and created the Grow Your Groceries (GYG) program to provide home gardening kits to families at risk of food insecurity in Chicago. A participatory program evaluation was conducted to better understand the experiences of and benefits to individuals participating in GYG. Program participants shared feedback via focus groups (n = 6) and surveys (n = 72). Qualitative data were analyzed using an iterative coding process. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Most participants reported confidence in using a grow kit to grow food, increased healthy food consumption, easier access to healthy food, and high likelihood of growing food again. Additionally, participants described increased connections within their communities, increased interaction with their family, and personal growth as benefits of the program. These results demonstrate the benefits of a novel home gardening program that uses fabric grow bags to address food insecurity. A larger scale program evaluation is necessary to better understand the impacts of participating in this home gardening program.

Actualising power sharing in community-led initiatives: Insights from community-based organisation leaders in Chicago, USA.

There is an increasing call for a governmental organisations such as local health departments and federal health and human service agencies to partner with community based organisations (CBOs) for health promotion. There is a large body of literature suggesting that CBOs need capacity building or empowerment to do this work, but less literature about the necessary culture shift at governmental organisations who fund public health work. This study aimed to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of CBO leadership who do not want to partner with state funders, and understand which structures and practices demonstrate power-sharing in a community-led approach. We conducted six interviews with community-based organisation leaders and conducted a thematic analysis and a secondary, inductive discourse analysis of the transcripts to analyse why organisations chose not to apply for a government funded initiative and how they talked about power-sharing for community-led public health. Themes about the decision for CBOs to apply to the public health funding initiative: how it related to the CBO's scope of work, meeting the needs of the community, having the technical capacity, and cross-cutting themes of putting the community first and having a long-term positive impact. Organisations rejected the opportunity for this funding due to poor fit, even if they could fulfil the scope of work. A community-led approach was described as one that includes the government giving up control, creating spaces for meaningful participation and power-sharing, and systems demonstrating trust in CBOs. These findings reiterate that in order for public health to be community-led, there needs to be system-wide transformation and intentional investment that supports an infrastructure for community-led public health. State funders can learn from practices in trust-based philanthropy, such as flexible funding and reporting requirements. The results of this study can support the wider participation of CBOs in collaboration with state actors, maximising the transformative potential of collaboration, ultimately transforming power structures and advancing health equity.

Collaborative Care: Integrating Behavioral Health Into the Primary Care Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Integrated behavioral health is a model of health care that aims to meet the complex health care needs of patients in primary care settings. Collaborative Care (CC) is an evidence-based model incorporating an interdisciplinary team to improve outcomes for behavioral health disorders commonly seen by primary care providers. AIM: CC was implemented in a nurse-managed health center in a medically underserved community of Chicago with a team of family nurse practitioners, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, and a licensed clinical social worker. METHODS: Integration of the CC model required restructuring of the patient visit, the care team, and financial operations. Weekly team meetings were held for interdisciplinary case consultation and training for the primary care team by the psychiatric nurse practitioner. The model includes suggested goals of reducing patient scores of validated depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) screening tools to a score less than 5 points or to less than 50% of original score. RESULTS: During the initial year of implementation, 166 patients received care under the CC model, with 64 patients currently receiving active care. In this cohort, 22% reached suggested goals for depression and 47% for anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: CC has benefits for both patients and providers. Patients receive holistic treatment of both mental and physical health needs and access to psychiatric services for medication initiation and behavioral health modalities when necessary. We observed that the CC model improved collaboration with behavioral health specialists and the competence and confidence of family nurse practitioners.

Enjeux et controverses quant à la participation d'activistes intersexes au Consensus de Chicago (2005).

INTRODUCTION: For the first time, two intersex activists were invited to participate in an international medical conference in Chicago in 2005. As a result of this conference, recommendations for the medical management of intersex patients were updated. In addition, a new terminology has been adopted to refer to intersex people, namely disorders of sex development. PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: This qualitative research aims to understand the implication of patient expertise in the development of new models of care. The article takes as a case study a controversy between the Intersex Society of North America (ISNA) and the Organisation internationale des intersexes (OII), during the 2000's. RESULTS: The analysis of the controversy between ISNA and OII reveals that the participation of patients in the Chicago conference raises the epistemic injustice. That is, the knowledge of those affected is not given the same credibility as that of other participants. In addition, intersex people do not have access to the same information as health professionals, especially since the medical protocols used to recommend secrecy. It also reveals that the strategies adopted by some organizations may prove to be a failure or safeguard positions contrary to the interests of the people concerned. This paper calls for reflection on the strategies implemented, here in the dialogue with the medical profession. CONCLUSIONS: This research contributes more widely to the scientific debates on the epistemological and political stakes of a participation of the concerned persons in the development of healthcare policies.

Culturally Safe Nursing Care for Black Sex Workers in the Greater Chicago Area, 2020‒2021.

Complex structural and social factors have created health inequities for Black sex workers. Black people, including those engaged in transactional sex, report leaning on spiritual beliefs to guide health-related decision-making, including whether to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Public health nurses can improve the health of Black sex workers through culturally safe care, which may include a community-stated vision of spiritual support. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S3):S288-S291. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306836).

Gaps in Knowledge and Practice in Treating Tobacco Use Among Non-physician Healthcare Professionals and Lay Health Workers in Chicago, Illinois.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a needs assessment for lay health workers and non-physician healthcare professionals [i.e., community health workers (CHW) and lung health professionals who spend more time face-to-face with tobacco-related disparity populations] to describe current gaps in tobacco cessation practices and knowledge. METHODS: A 46-item needs assessment survey was developed to understand knowledge, practices, and confidence about tobacco cessation among non-physician health professionals in a large, urban city in the U.S. Participants, recruited from local community-based organizations and email listservs, completed the online or paper survey, which included a 10-item investigator-initiated tobacco knowledge questionnaire. RESULTS: About 61.5% of participants (N = 53) asked each client/patient about tobacco use at initial visit, 41.8% reported extreme likelihood of discussing tobacco during a visit, and 43.1% reported addressing tobacco use directly. Despite assisting with cessation, tobacco-related knowledge and confidence was low, with respondents scoring an average of 4.08 out of 10 (SD = 2.21) on the tobacco knowledge questionnaire. CONCLUSION: There was a clear lack of knowledge about tobacco cessation in the U.S. among non-physician healthcare professionals. These professionals could benefit from trainings that are relevant to their model of care and better equip them to assist the disparity populations that they serve.