Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 120
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(1): 5-11.e1, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348000

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Creating a diverse workforce is paramount to the success of the surgical field. A diverse workforce allows us to meet the health needs of an increasingly diverse population and to bring new ideas to spur technical innovation. The purpose of this study was to assess trends in workforce diversity within vascular surgery (VS) and general surgery (GS) as compared with orthopedic surgery (OS)-a specialty that instituted a formal diversity initiative over a decade ago. METHODS: Data on the trainee pool for VS (fellowships and integrated residencies), GS, and OS were obtained from the U.S. Graduate Medical Education reports for 1999 through 2017. Medical student demographic data were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges U.S. medical school enrollment reports. The representation of surgical trainee populations (female, Hispanic, and black) was normalized by their representation in medical school. We also performed the χ2 test to compare proportions of residents over dichotomized time periods (1999-2005 and 2013-2017) as well as a more sensitive trend of proportions test. RESULTS: The proportion of female trainees increased significantly between the time periods for the three surgical disciplines examined (P < .001). Hispanic trainees also represented an increasing proportion of all three disciplines (P ≤ .001). The proportion of black trainees did not significantly change in any discipline between the two periods. Relative to their proportion in medical school, Hispanic trainees were well represented in all surgical specialties studied (normalized ratio [NR], 0.95-1.52: 0.95 OS, 1.00 GS, 1.53 VS fellowship, and 1.23 VS residency). Compared with their representation in medical school, women were under-represented as surgical trainees (NR: 0.32 OS, 0.82 GS, 0.56 VS fellowship, and 0.78 VS residency) as were black trainees (NR: 0.63 OS, 0.90 GS, 0.99 VS fellowship, and 0.81 VS residency). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were significant increases in the number of women and Hispanic trainees in these three surgical disciplines, only Hispanic trainees enter the surgical field at a rate higher than their proportion in medical school. The lack of an increase in black trainees across all specialties was particularly discouraging. Women and black trainees were under-represented in all specialties as compared with their representation in medical school. The data presented suggest potential problems with recruitment at multiple levels of the pipeline. Particular attention should be paid to increasing the pool of minority medical school graduates who are both interested in and competitive for surgical specialties.


Assuntos
Competência Cultural , Diversidade Cultural , Equidade de Gênero , Cirurgia Geral/tendências , Médicas/tendências , Racismo/prevenção & controle , Sexismo/prevenção & controle , Cirurgiões/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Competência Cultural/organização & administração , Feminino , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/tendências , Masculino , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/tendências , Seleção de Pessoal/tendências , Médicas/organização & administração , Estudantes de Medicina , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/organização & administração , Fatores de Tempo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/organização & administração
2.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 71(Suppl 1)(1): S49-S55, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33582723

RESUMO

The catastrophic effects of the coronavirus disease-2019 global pandemic have revolutionised human society. The unprecedented impact on surgical training needs to be analysed in detail to achieve an understanding of how to deal with similar situations arising in the foreseeable future. The challenges faced by the surgical community initiated with the suspension of clinical activities and elective practice, and included the lack of appropriate personal protective equipment, and the self-isolation of trainees and reassignment to coronavirus patient-care regions. Together, all these elements had deleterious effects on the psychological health of the professionals. Surgical training irrespective of specialty is equally affected globally by the pandemic. However, the global crisis inadvertently has led to a few constructive adaptations in healthcare systems, including the development of tele-clinics, virtual academic sessions and conferences, and increased usage of simulation. The current review article was planned to highlight the impact of corona virus disease on surgical training and institutions' response to the situation in order to continue surgical training, and lessons learnt from the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Cirurgia Geral , Pandemias , Cirurgiões , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Cirurgia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Distanciamento Físico , SARS-CoV-2 , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Surg Res ; 247: 115-120, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31812338

RESUMO

Trainee research collaborative networks have revolutionized how trainees participate in clinical research. Three North East of England trainee-led research groups, the Intensive Care and Anesthesia Research Network of North East Trainees (INCARNNET), the Northern Surgical Trainees Research Association (NOSTRA) in General Surgery and the Collaborative Orthopedic Research Network (CORNET) in Trauma and Orthopedics have joined, creating a multispecialty collaborative. This multispecialty collaborative undertook a two-phase research Delphi, between November 2017 and June 2018, to identify key research questions. This Delphi identified three high priority research questions common to the three specialties: what is the impact of diabetes control on perioperative outcomes, what factors affect theater efficiency, and how to prevent postoperative chest infection following emergency surgery? These research questions will be developed into collaborative projects. The Delphi also identified specialty-specific questions to be taken forward as research projects by each network.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Técnica Delphi , Colaboração Intersetorial , Anestesiologia/educação , Anestesiologia/organização & administração , Complicações do Diabetes/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Eficiência , Tratamento de Emergência/efeitos adversos , Inglaterra , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Humanos , Salas Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Ortopedia/educação , Ortopedia/organização & administração , Assistência Perioperatória , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos
4.
Can J Surg ; 63(5): E391-E392, 2020 08 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32856888

RESUMO

Summary: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on health care delivery and has resulted in a backlog of patients needing surgery. There is a lack of experience and guidance in dealing with this increased demand on an already overburdened health care system. We created an online tool (www.covidbacklog.com) that helps surgeons explore how resource allocation within their group will affect wait times for patients. After inputting a handful of readily available variables, the computer program generates a forecast of how long it will take to see the backlog of patients. This information could be used to allow surgical groups to run simulations to explore different resource allocation strategies in order to help prevent downstream consequences of delayed patient care.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Cirurgiões/normas , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Humanos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Can J Surg ; 63(3): E302-E305, 2020 05 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32449850

RESUMO

Summary: Surgical programs are facing major and fluctuating changes to the resident workforce because of decreased elective volumes and high exposure risk during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Rapid restructuring of a residency program to protect its workforce while maintaining educational value is imperative. We describe the experience of the Division of General Surgery at the University of Ottawa in Ontario, Canada. The residency program was restructured to feature alternating "on" and "off" weeks, maintaining a healthy resident cohort in case of exposure. Teams were restructured and subdivided to maximize physical distancing and minimize resident exposure to pathogens. Educational initiatives doubled, with virtual sessions targeting every resident year and incorporating intraoperative teaching. The divisional research day and oral exams proceeded uninterrupted, virtually. A small leadership team enabled fast and flexible restructuring of a system for patient care while prioritizing resident safety and maintaining a commitment to resident education in a pandemic.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Avaliação Educacional , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Cirurgia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Mão de Obra em Saúde/organização & administração , Mão de Obra em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Oncologia/educação , Oncologia/organização & administração , Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Segurança do Paciente , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/organização & administração , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Universidades/organização & administração , Universidades/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Can J Surg ; 62(4): 281-288, 2019 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31148441

RESUMO

Background: Dedicated emergency general surgery (EGS) service models were developed to improve efficiency of care and patient outcomes. The degree to which the EGS model delivers these benefits is debated. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify whether the EGS service model is associated with greater efficiency and improved outcomes compared to the traditional model. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science (Core Collection) databases from their earliest date of coverage through March 2017. Primary outcomes for efficiency of care were surgical response time, time to operation and total length of stay in hospital. The primary outcome for evaluating patient outcomes was total complication rate. Results: The EGS service model generally improved efficiency of care and patient outcomes, but the outcome variables reported in the literature varied. Conclusion: Development of standardized metrics and comprehensive EGS databases would support quality control and performance improvement in EGS systems.


Contexte: Des modèles dédiés de services de chirurgie générale d'urgence (CGU) ont été développés pour améliorer l'efficience des soins et les résultats chez les patients. On ne s'entend toutefois pas sur l'ampleur des bénéfices conférés par le modèle CGU. Nous avons procédé à une revue systématique de la littérature afin de vérifier si le modèle CGU est associé à une plus grande efficience et à de meilleurs résultats comparativement au modèle classique. Méthodes: Nous avons interrogé les bases de données MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus et Web of Science (collection centrale) depuis la plus ancienne couverture du sujet et jusqu'à mars 2017. Les paramètres principaux pour l'efficience des soins étaient le temps de réponse, le délai avant l'intervention et la durée totale du séjour hospitalier. Le paramètre principal pour l'évaluation des résultats chez les patients était le taux de complications total. Résultats: Le modèle de service CGU améliore généralement l'efficience des soins et les résultats chez les patients, mais dans la littérature, les paramètres mesurés varient. Conclusion: Le développement de paramètres standardisés et de bases de données globales sur la CGU appuierait le contrôle de la qualité et l'amélioration du rendement des systèmes CGU.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Apendicite/cirurgia , Colecistite/cirurgia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Healthc Q ; 21(3): 28-33, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30741152

RESUMO

The Mercy case study documents evidence of a clinically integrated supply chain strategy implemented in the peri-operative programs in three of the 46 hospitals in the Mercy system. Mercy became the first US health system to achieve "the perfect order," a supply chain industry standard with end-to-end integration of supply chain best practice in the Mercy system. To date, the Mercy strategy has demonstrated revenue growth of $8 billion, a 70% reduction in Never Events, a 33.3% reduction in supplies cost/case and a 29.5% reduction in labour costs/case in the perioperative programs in three hospitals.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Administração de Materiais no Hospital/organização & administração , Análise Custo-Benefício , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Equipamentos e Provisões Hospitalares/normas , Cirurgia Geral/métodos , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Administração de Materiais no Hospital/métodos , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Salas Cirúrgicas/economia , Salas Cirúrgicas/normas , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Estados Unidos
9.
Br J Surg ; 103(3): 165-9, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26663000

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgery has had low priority in global health planning, so the delivery of surgical care in low- and middle-income countries is often poorly resourced. A recent Lancet Commission on Global Surgery has highlighted the need for change. METHODS: A consensus view of the problems and solutions was identified by individual surgeons from high-income countries, familiar with surgical care in remote and poorer environments, based on recent publications related to global surgery. RESULTS: The major issues identified were: the perceived unimportance of surgery, shortage of personnel, lack of appropriate training and failure to establish surgical standards, failure to appreciate local needs and poor coordination of service delivery. CONCLUSION: Surgery deserves a higher priority in global health resource allocation. Lessons learned from participation in humanitarian crises should be considered in surgical developments.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Saúde Pública , Humanos
14.
World J Surg ; 39(1): 10-20, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24682278

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to propose a classification scheme for platforms of surgical delivery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and to review the literature documenting their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and role in training. Approximately 28 % of the global burden of disease is surgical. In LMICs, much of this burden is borne by a rapidly growing international charitable sector, in fragmented platforms ranging from short-term trips to specialized hospitals. Systematic reviews of these platforms, across regions and across disease conditions, have not been performed. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed from 1960 to 2013. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined a priori. Bibliographies of retrieved studies were searched by hand. Of the 8,854 publications retrieved, 104 were included. RESULTS: Surgery by international charitable organizations is delivered under two, specialized hospitals and temporary platforms. Among the latter, short-term surgical missions were the most common and appeared beneficial when no other option was available. Compared to other platforms, however, worse results and a lack of cost-effectiveness curtailed their role. Self-contained temporary platforms that did not rely on local infrastructure showed promise, based on very few studies. Specialized hospitals provided effective treatment and appeared sustainable; cost-effectiveness evidence was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Because the charitable sector delivers surgery in vastly divergent ways, systematic review of these platforms has been difficult. This paper provides a framework from which to study these platforms for surgery in LMICs. Given the available evidence, self-contained temporary platforms and specialized surgical centers appear to provide more effective and cost-effective care than short-term surgical mission trips, except when no other delivery platform exists.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Saúde Global , Cooperação Internacional , Análise Custo-Benefício , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Cirurgia Geral/economia , Humanos , Missões Médicas/economia , Missões Médicas/organização & administração , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Global Health ; 10: 1, 2014 Jan 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24393237

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Limited resources in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) drive tremendous innovation in medicine, as well as in other fields. It is not often recognized that several important surgical tools and methods, widely used in high-income countries, have their origins in LMICs. Surgical care around the world stands much to gain from these innovations. In this paper, we provide a short review of some of these successful innovations and their origins that have had an important impact in healthcare delivery worldwide. REVIEW: Examples of LMIC innovations that have been adapted in high-income countries include the Bogotá bag for temporary abdominal wound closure, the orthopaedic external fixator for complex fractures, a hydrocephalus fluid valve for normal pressure hydrocephalus, and intra-ocular lens and manual small incision cataract surgery. LMIC innovations that have had tremendous potential global impact include mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair, and a flutter valve for intercostal drainage of pneumothorax. CONCLUSION: Surgical innovations from LMICs have been shown to have comparable outcomes at a fraction of the cost of tools used in high-income countries. These innovations have the potential to revolutionize global surgical care. Advocates should actively seek out these innovations, campaign for the financial gains from these innovations to benefit their originators and their countries, and find ways to develop and distribute them locally as well as globally.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Difusão de Inovações , Cirurgia Geral/economia , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Saúde Global , Humanos
16.
J Surg Res ; 184(1): 66-70, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23582227

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The current research environment for academic surgeons demands that extramural funding be obtained. Financial support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is historically the gold standard for funding in the biomedical research community, with the R01 funding mechanism viewed as indicator of research independence. The NIH also supports a mentor-based career development mechanism (K-series awards) in order to support early-stage investigators. The goal of this study was to investigate the grants successfully awarded to pediatric surgeon-scientists and then determine the success of the K-series award recipients at achieving research independence. METHODS: In July 2012, all current members of the American Pediatric Surgery Association (APSA) were queried in the NIH database from 1988-2012 through the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools. The following factors were analyzed: type of grant, institution, amount of funding, and funding institute or center. RESULTS: Among current APSA members, there have been 83 independent investigators receiving grants, representing 13% of the current APSA membership, with 171 independent grants funded through various mechanisms. Six percent currently have active NIH funding, with $7.2 million distributed in 2012. There have been 28 K-series grants awarded. Of the recipients of expired K08 awards, 39% recipients were subsequently awarded an R01 grant. A total of 63% of these K-awarded investigators transitioned to an independent NIH award mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric surgeon-scientists successfully compete for NIH funding. Our data suggest that although the K-series funding mechanism is not the only path to research independence, over half of the pediatric surgeons who receive a K-award are successful in the transition to independent investigator.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Mentores , National Library of Medicine (U.S.)/economia , Pediatria/organização & administração , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Mobilidade Ocupacional , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , National Library of Medicine (U.S.)/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/organização & administração , Pesquisadores/organização & administração , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
17.
Can J Surg ; 56(3): E24-8, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23706854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Today's acute care surgery (ACS) service model requires multiple handovers to incoming attending surgeons and residents. Our objectives were to investigate current handover practices in Canadian hospitals that have an ACS service and assess the quality of handover practices in place. METHODS: We administered an electronic survey among ACS residents in 6 Canadian general surgery programs. RESULTS: Resident handover of patient care occurs frequently and often not under ideal circumstances. Most residents spend less than 5 minutes preparing handovers. Clinical uncertainty owing to inadequate handover is most likely to occur during overnight and weekend coverage. Almost one-third of surveyed residents rate the overall quality of the handovers they received as poor. CONCLUSION: Handover skills must be taught in a systematic fashion. Improved resident communication will likely decrease loss of patient information and therefore improve ACS patient safety.


CONTEXTE: De nos jours, le modèle de service appliqué aux soins intensifs en chirurgie suppose de fréquents transferts de soins entre chirurgiens traitants et résidents. Nous avions pour objectifs d'analyser les pratiques actuelles en matière de transfert des soins dans les hôpitaux canadiens qui disposent de services de soins intensifs chirurgicaux et d'en évaluer la qualité. MÉTHODES: Nous avons administré un questionnaire électronique à des résidents en chirurgie (soins intensifs) inscrits à 6 programmes canadiens de chirurgie générale. RÉSULTANTS: Il y a souvent des transferts de soins entre résidents et dans bien des cas, ces transferts ne se déroulent pas dans des conditions idéales. La plupart des résidents consacrent moins de 5 minutes à préparer les transferts de soins. L'incertitude clinique associée à des transferts de soins inadéquats risque davantage de s'observer la nuit et la fin de semaine. Près du tiers des résidents interrogés ont déclaré que la qualité globale des transferts qu'ils recevaient était médiocre. CONCLUSIONS: Il faut adopter une approche systématique à l'enseignement des compétences nécessaires pour des transferts de soins cohérents. En améliorant la communication chez les résidents, on réduira probablement la perte de renseignements importants au sujet des patients et on améliorera par conséquent la sécurité des patients qui reçoivent des soins d'urgence en chirurgie.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Internato e Residência , Transferência da Responsabilidade pelo Paciente/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Canadá , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Hospitalização , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente
18.
Prehosp Disaster Med ; 26(6): 429-37, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22475370

RESUMO

The provision of surgery within humanitarian crises is complex, requiring coordination and cooperation among all stakeholders. During the 2011 Humanitarian Action Summit best practice guidelines were proposed to provide greater accountability and standardization in surgical humanitarian relief efforts. Surgical humanitarian relief planning should occur early and include team selection and preparation, appropriate disaster-specific anticipatory planning, needs assessment, and an awareness of local resources and limitations of cross-cultural project management. Accurate medical record keeping and timely follow-up is important for a transient surgical population. Integration with local health systems is essential and will help facilitate longer term surgical health system strengthening.


Assuntos
Desastres , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Altruísmo , Benchmarking , Congressos como Assunto , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Alta do Paciente
19.
Versicherungsmedizin ; 63(4): 180-5, 2011 Dec 01.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22486049

RESUMO

Medical advances in diagnosis and therapy, especially in medical technology, lead to differenciated and more complex strategies in therapy with higher risks. Patients show higher expectations concerning the results of a therapy and claim more often that a mistake in treatment has been made. This makes patients turn to arbitration boards more often. They may also want to bring civil action against physicians and hospitals, claiming for compensation and damages. Personal liability insurances have to pay more for damages. Medical insurances have more recourse demands due to mistake in treatment. Hospital and especially operative medicine do have high chances of risks and mistakes. The implementation of a modern risk management system in the hospitals is becoming more and more important, for patients as well as for the surgical departments. A structured reporting system of critical incidents can produce indicators of potential sources of mistakes, which appears to be a successful approach to reduce or avoid typical risks and mistakes in medical treatment. Risk management in medical treatment must be more than just a trendy word, because its roots are in the medical principles of "primum nihil nocere". It is a challenge to today's and tomorrow's medicine. This article is a general overview of current strategies for avoiding mistakes: It is meant to be the basis of a new culture of mistake avoidance as a part of a future quality competition.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração , Alemanha , Culpa , Vergonha
20.
Rev Med Suisse ; 7(287): 670-3, 2011 Mar 23.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21542383

RESUMO

Medical errors result in 44,000 to 98,000 deaths per year in the United States of America. Within the surgical specialties, half of these errors occur in the operating room. The origin of these errors is multifactorial, and is generally associated with problems in communication and teamwork. In order to improve safety in the operating room, many hospitals now propose to the medical staff "crew resource management" (CRM) training programs inspired by the aviation industry. This approach favors a better utilization of surgical checklists, improves efficiency during chirurgical interventions, and reduces patient mortality. In October 2009 we introduced a CRM course within the department of surgery at the Geneva University Hospitals. We are presenting this program as well as the first results following its application.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Aviação , Humanos , Indústrias , Suíça
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA