Acute heart failure: current pharmacological treatment and perspectives.

Acute heart failure (AHF) represents the most frequent cause of unplanned hospital admission in patients older than 65 years. Symptoms and clinical signs of AHF (e.g. dyspnoea, orthopnoea, oedema, jugular vein distension, and variation of body weight) are mostly related to systemic venous congestion secondary to various mechanisms including extracellular fluids, increased ventricular filling pressures, and/or auto-transfusion of blood from the splanchnic into the pulmonary circulation. Thus, the initial management of AHF patients should be mostly based on decongestive therapies on admission followed, before discharge, by rapid implementation of guideline-directed oral medical therapies for heart failure. The therapeutic management of AHF requires the identification and rapid diagnosis of the disease, the diagnosis of the cause (or triggering factor), the evaluation of severity, the presence of comorbidities, and, finally, the initiation of a rapid treatment. The most recent guidelines from ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA have provided updated recommendations on AHF management. Recommended pharmacological treatment for AHF includes diuretic therapy aiming to relieve congestion and achieve optimal fluid status, early and rapid initiation of oral therapies before discharge combined with a close follow-up. Non-pharmacological AHF management requires risk stratification in the emergency department and non-invasive ventilation in case of respiratory failure. Vasodilators should be considered as initial therapy in AHF precipitated by hypertension. On the background of recent large randomized clinical trials and international guidelines, this state-of-the-art review describes current pharmacological treatments and potential directions for future research in AHF.

Investigating the effectiveness of self-management program based on 5A model on fatigue and dyspnea in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Some symptoms such as fatigue and dyspnea decrease the quality of life in patients with heart failure. The effectiveness of self-management programs on management of chronic conditions was discussed. So, this study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of self-management program based on 5A model on fatigue and dyspnea in patients with heart failure. METHODS: In this clinical trial study, 60 patients with heart failure were included. The intervention group underwent self-management program based on 5A model and the control group received routine care. All the enrolled patients were evaluated once at baseline and once after 3 months using fatigue severity and Borg dyspnea scales. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16 by descriptive statistics and independent t-test, covariance test, and paired sample t- test. The significance level was set at 0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean scores of fatigue and dyspnea at the beginning of the study between control and intervention groups (p > 0.05), but 3 months after intervention a significant difference was found in mean scores of fatigue and dyspnea between two groups, (p < 0.05). The difference between pre- and post-intervention scores in terms of the dyspnea and fatigue variables was significant based on the result of paired sample t-test (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, self-management program based on 5A Model can be used to reduce the severity of fatigue and dyspnea as well as improve the quality of life in patients with heart failure (Tab. 4, Fig. 1, Ref. 33).

[Kardiale Dyspnoe]. / Kardiale Dyspnoe.

INTRODUCTION: Often dyspnea is caused by cardiac disease which has a dismal prognosis if left untreated. This article is focused on primary care and provides an overview of the most important etiologies, evaluation algorithms and therapies.

Development and validation of a simple tool composed of items on dyspnea, respiration rates, and C-reactive protein for pneumonia prediction among acute febrile respiratory illness patients in primary care settings.

BACKGROUND: Acute febrile respiratory illness (AFRI) patients are susceptible to pneumonia and suffer from significant morbidity and mortality throughout the world. In primary care settings, the situation is worse. Limited by computerized tomography resources and physician experiences, AFRI patients in primary care settings may not be diagnosed appropriately, which would affect following treatment. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a simple prediction model to help physicians quickly identify AFRI patients of pneumonia risk in primary care settings. METHODS: A total of 1977 AFRI patients were enrolled at two fever clinics in Shanghai, China, and among them, 727 patients who underwent CT scans were included in the analysis. Acute alveolar or interstitial infiltrates found on CT images were diagnosed with pneumonia. Characteristics and blood parameters were compared between pneumonia and non-pneumonia patients. Then a multivariable model for pneumonia prediction was developed through logistic regression analysis. Its value for pneumonia prediction was prospectively assessed in an external multi-center population, which included 1299 AFRI patients in primary settings from 5 different provinces throughout China. RESULTS: In the model development population, pneumonia patients (n = 227) had a longer duration of fever; higher frequencies of purulent sputum, dyspnea, and thoracic pain; and higher levels of respiration rates and C-reactive protein (CRP) than non-pneumonia patients (n = 500). Logistic regression analysis worked out a model composed of items on dyspnea, respiration rates > 20/min, and CRP > 20 mg/l (DRC) for pneumonia prediction with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.8506. In the external validation population, the predictive accuracy of the DRC model was the highest when choosing at least one positive item (1 score) as a cut-off point with a sensitivity of 87.0% and specificity of 80.5%. DRC scores increased with pneumonia severity and lung lobe involvement and showed good performance for both bacterial and viral pneumonia. For viral pneumonia, dyspnea plus respiration rates > 20/min had good predictive capacity regardless of CRP concentration. CONCLUSIONS: DRC model is a simple tool that predicts pneumonia among AFRI patients, which would help physicians utilize medical resources rationally in primary care settings.

Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The clinical implications of SARS-CoV-2 infection are highly variable. Some people with SARS-CoV-2 infection remain asymptomatic, whilst the infection can cause mild to moderate COVID-19 and COVID-19 pneumonia in others. This can lead to some people requiring intensive care support and, in some cases, to death, especially in older adults. Symptoms such as fever, cough, or loss of smell or taste, and signs such as oxygen saturation are the first and most readily available diagnostic information. Such information could be used to either rule out COVID-19, or select patients for further testing. This is an update of this review, the first version of which published in July 2020. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of signs and symptoms to determine if a person presenting in primary care or to hospital outpatient settings, such as the emergency department or dedicated COVID-19 clinics, has COVID-19. SEARCH METHODS: For this review iteration we undertook electronic searches up to 15 July 2020 in the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register and the University of Bern living search database. In addition, we checked repositories of COVID-19 publications. We did not apply any language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were eligible if they included patients with clinically suspected COVID-19, or if they recruited known cases with COVID-19 and controls without COVID-19. Studies were eligible when they recruited patients presenting to primary care or hospital outpatient settings. Studies in hospitalised patients were only included if symptoms and signs were recorded on admission or at presentation. Studies including patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection while admitted to hospital were not eligible. The minimum eligible sample size of studies was 10 participants. All signs and symptoms were eligible for this review, including individual signs and symptoms or combinations. We accepted a range of reference standards. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pairs of review authors independently selected all studies, at both title and abstract stage and full-text stage. They resolved any disagreements by discussion with a third review author. Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved disagreements by discussion with a third review author. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias using the Quality Assessment tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. We presented sensitivity and specificity in paired forest plots, in receiver operating characteristic space and in dumbbell plots. We estimated summary parameters using a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis whenever five or more primary studies were available, and whenever heterogeneity across studies was deemed acceptable. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 44 studies including 26,884 participants in total. Prevalence of COVID-19 varied from 3% to 71% with a median of 21%. There were three studies from primary care settings (1824 participants), nine studies from outpatient testing centres (10,717 participants), 12 studies performed in hospital outpatient wards (5061 participants), seven studies in hospitalised patients (1048 participants), 10 studies in the emergency department (3173 participants), and three studies in which the setting was not specified (5061 participants). The studies did not clearly distinguish mild from severe COVID-19, so we present the results for all disease severities together. Fifteen studies had a high risk of bias for selection of participants because inclusion in the studies depended on the applicable testing and referral protocols, which included many of the signs and symptoms under study in this review. This may have especially influenced the sensitivity of those features used in referral protocols, such as fever and cough. Five studies only included participants with pneumonia on imaging, suggesting that this is a highly selected population. In an additional 12 studies, we were unable to assess the risk for selection bias. This makes it very difficult to judge the validity of the diagnostic accuracy of the signs and symptoms from these included studies. The applicability of the results of this review update improved in comparison with the original review. A greater proportion of studies included participants who presented to outpatient settings, which is where the majority of clinical assessments for COVID-19 take place. However, still none of the studies presented any data on children separately, and only one focused specifically on older adults. We found data on 84 signs and symptoms. Results were highly variable across studies. Most had very low sensitivity and high specificity. Only cough (25 studies) and fever (7 studies) had a pooled sensitivity of at least 50% but specificities were moderate to low. Cough had a sensitivity of 67.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 59.8% to 74.1%) and specificity of 35.0% (95% CI 28.7% to 41.9%). Fever had a sensitivity of 53.8% (95% CI 35.0% to 71.7%) and a specificity of 67.4% (95% CI 53.3% to 78.9%). The pooled positive likelihood ratio of cough was only 1.04 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.11) and that of fever 1.65 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.93). Anosmia alone (11 studies), ageusia alone (6 studies), and anosmia or ageusia (6 studies) had sensitivities below 50% but specificities over 90%. Anosmia had a pooled sensitivity of 28.0% (95% CI 17.7% to 41.3%) and a specificity of 93.4% (95% CI 88.3% to 96.4%). Ageusia had a pooled sensitivity of 24.8% (95% CI 12.4% to 43.5%) and a specificity of 91.4% (95% CI 81.3% to 96.3%). Anosmia or ageusia had a pooled sensitivity of 41.0% (95% CI 27.0% to 56.6%) and a specificity of 90.5% (95% CI 81.2% to 95.4%). The pooled positive likelihood ratios of anosmia alone and anosmia or ageusia were 4.25 (95% CI 3.17 to 5.71) and 4.31 (95% CI 3.00 to 6.18) respectively, which is just below our arbitrary definition of a 'red flag', that is, a positive likelihood ratio of at least 5. The pooled positive likelihood ratio of ageusia alone was only 2.88 (95% CI 2.02 to 4.09). Only two studies assessed combinations of different signs and symptoms, mostly combining fever and cough with other symptoms. These combinations had a specificity above 80%, but at the cost of very low sensitivity (< 30%). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The majority of individual signs and symptoms included in this review appear to have very poor diagnostic accuracy, although this should be interpreted in the context of selection bias and heterogeneity between studies. Based on currently available data, neither absence nor presence of signs or symptoms are accurate enough to rule in or rule out COVID-19. The presence of anosmia or ageusia may be useful as a red flag for COVID-19. The presence of fever or cough, given their high sensitivities, may also be useful to identify people for further testing. Prospective studies in an unselected population presenting to primary care or hospital outpatient settings, examining combinations of signs and symptoms to evaluate the syndromic presentation of COVID-19, are still urgently needed. Results from such studies could inform subsequent management decisions.

Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in children and adolescents: are we listening?

Exertional dyspnoea among children and adolescents is a common presenting complaint to general practitioners. Exertional dyspnoea is most commonly attributed to exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), but there are several other causes including hyperventilation syndrome, breathlessness associated with normal exercise limitation and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO). The symptoms of EILO include stridor, throat tightness and difficulty on inspiration. If these are mistaken for EIB, children will receive asthma therapy. The underlying mechanism of EILO includes closure of the larynx during high-intensity exercise, which causes a reduction in airflow and breathlessness. This phenomenon is often associated with a background of psychological stress. Historically, a diagnosis of EILO has been considered 'rare' though this may be a reflection of under-recognition. Direct visual observation via laryngoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis of EILO; however, this is rarely available even in specialised centres. Nevertheless, the diagnosis can usually be made by recognising the characteristic clinical pattern. Here we provide recommendations for appropriate investigations for the determination of EILO, together with suggested treatment.

Aortic Chordae Tendineae Strands with Significant Aortic Regurgitation.

The aortic chordae tendineae strands are suggested to be embryonic remnants of the cusp formation process. We herein describe a 70-year-old male who was admitted to our hospital for shortness of breath and chest tightness. During echocardiographic examination, severe aortic regurgitation with a ruptured fibrous strand was detected. Moreover, another fibrous strand was found by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). To our knowledge, this is the first literature review of aortic chordae tendineae strands, including diagnosis, management, and mechanisms of aortic regurgitation due to such informal strands.

First MDCT evidence of ruptured aberrant left subclavian artery aneurysm in right aortic arch, Kommerell's diverticulum and extrapleural hematoma treated by emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Spontaneous ruptured aneurysm involving an aberrant subclavian artery with a right-sided aortic arch and Kommerell's diverticulumis a rare life-threatening condition that can be treated successfully if promptly identified. Multidetector Computed Tomography angiography is the first line imaging modality of thoracic vascular anomalies diagnosis. We report the case of a 74-year-old man suffering from this emergency ondition with mediastinal hematoma mostly extending to the left-side extrapleural cavity. The patient underwent successful emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair and an Amplatzer vascular plug was placed into the first segment of the ALSA. Post-procedural imaging showed complete exclusion of the aneurysm. Emergency endovascular repair can be effective in such cases.

[Dyspnea : A challenging symptom in the primary care setting]. / Dyspnoe : Eine Herausforderung in der internistisch-hausärztlichen Praxis.

Dyspnea is a very common symptom leading to visits to a general physician (GP). Correct differential diagnosis is the major challenge for the GP. There are no guidelines on dyspnea. This review provides an overview of the main causal diseases for dyspnea, presents methods for history taking and differential diagnosis, and specifies the role of GPs in the primary care setting in the case of dyspnea.

Dyspnea following thoracostomy closure after right pneumonectomy: An uncommon echocardiographic diagnosis and therapeutic approach.

Dyspnea and hypoxemia are common postoperative problems after pneumonectomy. One of the rarer causes of respiratory distress after right pneumonectomy is the development of a significant right-to-left shunt across a patent foramen ovale (PFO), which can evolve at a variable interval of time after the operation. We report here our experience with a patient who underwent right pneumonectomy, followed by several complications, and who presented severe dyspnea 7 months later, after the closure of a right thoracostomy. This report outlines the management of this challenging clinical condition; transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) provided a clear diagnosis and guided an effective percutaneous treatment.

Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome : Orthostatic dyspnea and possible pathophysiological substrates.

Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome (POS) is a rare disorder characterized by the emergence of a right-to-left shunt at the intracardiac or intrapulmonary level. The clinical picture is distinguished by shortness of breath that worsens on standing due to an accentuation of oxygen desaturation, and instead improves, at least partly, in the recumbent position. In this article we present a brief review of the pathophysiology of POS, as well as its clinical picture, diagnostic assessment, and preferential therapeutic options. Pathophysiological issues that are still not completely understood or much debated are outlined. The currently accepted pathophysiological concepts are presented and a summary of the main diagnostic and therapeutic tools is provided.

Assessment and management of refractory breathlessness in interstitial lung disease.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) refers to a cluster of fibroinflammatory conditions. There are limited treatment options and most patients have severe dyspnoea. The prognosis is poor. This study aims to evaluate current literature on the assessment and management of refractory breathlessness in ILD. Few tools are available to assess dyspnoea in advanced respiratory disease. Holistic assessment requires a combination of tools but there are few disease specific tools. The role of opioids is well established in the reduction of breathlessness, but there is insufficient evidence that benzodiazepines are beneficial. Non-pharmcolological breathlessness intervention services can give patients mastery of their disease, reduced distress due to breathlessness and were more cost effective. More research on holistic interventions for use in advanced disease needs to be done. Patient-reported outcome measures could elicit valuable evidence to describe the benefit of breathlessness management services in advanced respiratory disease.

[Dyspnea]. / Dyspnoe.

Dyspnea represents one of the most frequent cardinal symptoms in general practice and interdisciplinary emergency care across all sectors. Due to its subjective character, dyspnea is described by patients in many different ways, including "shortness of breath, difficulty of breathing, feeling of chest tightness, etc". The spectrum of differential diagnoses is broad, including in particular pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases. In addition to an evaluation of severity and an assessment of temporal, situation-related, and causal classification criteria, a structured process of multiple diagnostic steps in both primary and emergency care is a prerequisite for fast and correct diagnosis. In this context, it is of crucial importance to identify life-threatening diseases according to defined criteria and thus initiate adequate emergency measures. Further treatment options at the interface between primary and clinical care can be based on the German Appropriate Evaluation Protocol (G-AEP) criteria.

[Respiratory Muscle Training: State of the Art]. / Atemmuskeltraining: State-of-the-Art.

Specific respiratory muscle training (IMT) improves the function of the inspiratory muscles. According to literature and clinical experience, there are 3 established methods: 1.) resistive load 2.) threshold load and 3.) normocapnic hyperpnea. Each training method and the associated devices have specific characteristics. Setting up an IMT should start with specific diagnostics of respiratory muscle function and be followed by detailed individual introduction to training. The aim of this review is to take a closer look at the different training methods for the most relevant indications and to discuss these results in the context of current literature. The group of neuromuscular diseases includes muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, paralysis of the phrenic nerve, and injuries to the spinal cord. Furthermore, interstitial lung diseases, sarcoidosis, left ventricular heart failure, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), kyphoscoliosis and obesity are also discussed in this context. COPD, asthma, cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF-bronchiectasis are among the group of obstructive lung diseases. Last but not least, we summarize current knowledge on weaning from respirator in the context of physical activity.

[Dyspnea in airway and pulmonary diseases]. / Dyspnoe bei Atemwegs- und Lungenerkrankungen.

The subjective perception of pulmonary dyspnea varies based on behavioral and physiological responses. Acute pulmonary dyspnea is the most common symptom of diseases of the airways and the lungs and the differential diagnosis includes harmless causes, such as lack of training as well as acute life-threatening diseases, such as thromboembolism, obstruction of the upper or lower airway, pneumonia, pulmonary hemorrhage and pneumothorax. Most cases of chronic pulmonary dyspnea result from asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis and pleural disorders. Listening to the patient's "language of dyspnea" may already provide indications for the diagnosis. Initial testing includes chest radiography, spirometry, complete blood count and the basic metabolic panel. Measurement of brain natriuretic peptide levels may help to exclude heart failure in COPD and D-dimer testing may help rule out pulmonary embolisms. Computed tomography of the chest is the most appropriate imaging procedure for diagnosing pulmonary embolism and interstitial lung disease. To diagnose pulmonary arterial hypertension echocardiography and right heart catheterization may be necessary.

[Dyspnea. Profile of the most important diagnostic tests]. / Dyspnoe. Profile der wichtigsten diagnostischen Tests.

The diagnostic pathway for the evaluation of patients with dyspnea requires a thorough history taking and physical examination. Based on the results of these basic steps a broad variety of additional diagnostic tests are available. Each test can contribute valuable information when correctly indicated and performed. Among these are electrocardiography (ECG), laboratory parameters, X-ray examination, echocardiography, spirometry and whole body plethysmography and finally spiroergometry. This article presents a focused review of what each of these diagnostic modalities can contribute to the diagnostic process for dyspnea.

[Dyspnea in left-sided heart disease]. / Dyspnoe bei Linksherzerkrankungen.

Shortness of breath (dyspnea) is a common symptom in left-sided heart disease but clinically, patient symptoms show a high variability. Echocardiography is the mainstay for evaluating whether left-sided heart disease is the cause of dyspnea. If left-sided heart failure is diagnosed, this symptom complex must then be subjected to further etiological evaluation. Hypertensive, ischemic and valvular heart diseases are common, as well as atrial fibrillation. If the patient does not have angina pectoris, testing for ischemic heart disease should be done non-invasively by coronary computed tomography or testing for regional myocardial ischemia. Coronary revascularization is indicated only when a prognostically relevant ischemia of more than 10 % of the left ventricle is diagnosed. Diuretics are important for the relief of dyspnea but do not improve the prognosis of patients. In patients with reduced left ventricular function, combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta blockers and aldosterone antagonists improve the symptoms and prognosis. For treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction evidence-based measures are still lacking. In this case the recommended therapy consists of optimal treatment of comorbidities, regulation of heart rate and blood pressure and participation in structured exercise programs. Angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists can be given in patients with more severe symptoms even though the available data are very sparse.

[Rational approach and management of the dyspnoeic patient in general medical practice]. / Approche rationnelle et prise en charge du patient dyspnéique en médecine génerale.

Dyspnea represents 3-4 % of consultations at primary care medicine (general medicine, emergency medicine) and is found in 14 % of the interviewed general population. It is defined as an abnormal and uncomfortable breathing and can be classified according to the mode of appearance, the breathing pattern or the rhythm. Different classifications are used to specify the severity of the situation: visual analog scale, functional classification of the New York Heart Association, dyspnea modified scale from the Medical Research Council, ... Rare among young people, dyspnea often hides asthma; more prevalent among seniors, it is often secondary to chronic lung or heart disease. The rational approach is the same in general medicine and in the emergency room. The management starts with an assessment of the severity of the patient's clinical situation, via the early warning score. The critical patient requires to be managed according to the progressive and cyclical ABCDE approach. For non-critical patients, a traditional approach and a reasoned method are needed. In patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the use of the Anthonissen criteria allows to orient toward a pulmonary superinfection or another cause of worsening dyspnea (cardiac, ...). In case of suspected pulmonary embolism, the Geneva score and the modified Wells score help to separate low, intermediate or high probability cases of pulmonary embolism. D-dimers have a very good negative predictive value in the low and middle risk group and pulmonary CT angiography applies only to a smaller group of dyspnoeic patients with a high probability of pulmonary embolism. Echocardiography has a prominent role to assess the LV systolic function, the search for pulmonary artery hypertension, the vascular filling state, etc. We speak of psychogenic dyspnea after having excluded the potentially serious pathologies.