Microfracture of Acetabular Chondral Lesions Is Not Superior to Other Cartilage Repair Techniques in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review to compare clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy patients undergoing microfracture (MFx) versus other cartilage repair procedures for chondral lesions of the acetabulum. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify comparative studies that directly compared outcomes between MFx and other cartilage repair procedures for full-thickness chondral lesions of the acetabulum identified during hip arthroscopy. The search phrase used was: hip AND arthroscopy AND microfracture. Patients were evaluated based on reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Six studies (all Level III evidence) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 202 patients undergoing microfracture (group A) and 327 patients undergoing another cartilage repair procedure (group B). Mean patient age ranged from 35.0 to 45.0 years. Mean follow-up time ranged from 12.0 to 72.0 months. Significantly better patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were found in patients undergoing treatment with bone marrow aspirate concentrate, microfragmented adipose tissue concentrate, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis, and a combination of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and bone marrow aspirate concentrate compared with MFx. No studies found significantly better postoperative PROs in group A. The reoperation rate ranged from 0% to 34.6% in group A and 0% to 15.9% in group B. Three of 5 studies reporting on reoperation rate found a significantly greater reoperation rate in group A, with no difference in the other 2 studies. CONCLUSIONS: The literature on MFx of acetabular chondral lesions is limited and heterogeneous. Based on the available data, MFx alone results in a greater or equivalent reoperation rate and inferior or equivalent PROs compared with other cartilage repair procedures for acetabular chondral lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of level III studies.

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) versus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects of the knee: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Chondral defects of the knee are common and their treatment is challenging. SOURCE OF DATA: PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Scopus databases. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Both autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and membrane-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) have been used to manage chondral defects of the knee. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: It is debated whether AMIC and mACI provide equivalent outcomes for the management of chondral defects in the knee at midterm follow-up. Despite the large number of clinical studies, the optimal treatment is still controversial. GROWING POINTS: To investigate whether AMIC provide superior outcomes than mACI at midterm follow-up. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: AMIC may provide better outcomes than mACI for chondral defects of the knee. Further studies are required to verify these results in a clinical setting.

Good healing potential of patellar chondral defects after all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroids: a second-look arthroscopic assessment.

PURPOSE: To report second-look arthroscopic assessment after all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for articular cartilage defects at the patella. METHODS: A second-look arthroscopy after all-arthroscopic ACI using chondrospheres® (ACT3D) was performed in 30 patients with 30 full-thickness retropatellar cartilage defects. The mean time from ACI to second-look arthroscopy was 14.9 ± 16.3 (6-71) months. The quality of cartilage regeneration was evaluated by the International Cartilage-Repair Score (ICRS)-Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA). RESULTS: Eleven lesions (36.7%) were classified as CRA grade I (normal) and 19 lesions (63.3%) as grade II (nearly normal). Concerning the degree of defect repair, 25 lesions (83.3%) were repaired up to the height of the surrounding articular retropatellar cartilage. Five lesions (16.7%) showed 75% repair of defect depth. The border zone was completely integrated into the surrounding articular cartilage shoulder in 28 lesions (93.3%) and demarcated within 1 mm in 2 lesions (6.7%). Macroscopically and by probing, 12 lesions (40%) had intact smooth surface, 17 lesions (56.7%) had fibrillated surface and 1 lesion (3.3%) had small, scattered fissures. A negative correlation was found between the overall repair assessment score and the defect size (r2 = - 0.430, p = 0.046) and between integration into border zone and defect size (r2 = - 0.340, p = 0.045). A positive correlation was found between macroscopic appearance and age (r2 = + 0.384, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: All-arthroscopic ACI using chondrospheres® (ACT3D) for full-thickness retropatellar articular cartilage defects proved to be reproducible and reliable. The advantage of the procedure is that it is minimal invasive. Arthroscopic second-look demonstrated a high grade of normal or nearly normal cartilage regeneration. Although statistically significant differences were not observed, larger defect size and younger age may compromise the result of overall repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Fixation of platelet-rich plasma and fibrin gels on knee cartilage defects after microfracture with arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: An investigation of arthroscopic surgery combined with coverage of the microfractured wound surface with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and fibrin gels (FG) to treat knee cartilage defects. METHODS: Between February 2017 and February 2020, 145 patients with knee cartilage defects were treated. Only isolated full-thickness cartilage defects were included, and 28 patients (12 men and 16 women) were included in this study. They were all treated with arthroscopic surgery on subchondral bones, filled with PRP and thrombin, and sealed with FG. The knee pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were measured after the patients climbed ten stairs up and down, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index and the area of cartilage defects were measured through the pre-operative and post-operative follow-up. The complication incidences were also observed. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for ten to 15 months (median 12 months). The knee pain VAS scores decreased from 6.57 ± 1.07 pre-operatively to 2.09 ± 1.35 at the last follow-up. The WOMAC osteoarthritis index decreased from 44.32 ± 3.95 (mean ± sd) pre-operatively to 16.57 ± 2.20 by the last follow-up. The cartilage defect decreased from 2.93 ± 0.65 cm2 pre-operatively to 1.09 ± 0.69 cm2 at the last follow-up. All scores showed statistically significant improvements after surgery (p < 0.05). No complications were observed. CONCLUSION: The combination therapy of arthroscopic surgery and covering the microfractured wound surface with PRP and FG can repair knee cartilage defects, relieve pain, and improve function, and is a safe and effective treatment.

Widening of the popliteal hiatus on magnetic resonance imaging leads to recurrent subluxation of the lateral meniscus.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to elucidate the clinical significance of widening of the popliteal hiatus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to document the clinical results and technical aspects of arthroscopic repair of this finding. METHODS: Included are 82 knees after arthroscopic surgery, divided according to arthroscopic diagnosis into group A, hypermobility of lateral meniscus, 8 knees; group B, tear of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, 32 knees; and group C, no abnormality of the lateral meniscus, 36 knees with medial meniscal tears and 6 with other conditions. Popliteal hiatus diameter was measured and the popliteal hiatus/lateral tibial plateau (LTP) ratio was calculated on preoperative sagittal and coronal MRI. At arthroscopy, the widened popliteal hiatus in group A was tightened anteriorly by outside-in or all-inside suture and posteriorly with all-inside suture. Outcomes were evaluated with MRI, Lysholm, Tegner and VAS scores. RESULTS: The preoperative diameter of the popliteal hiatus and the popliteal hiatus/LTP ratio were significantly larger in group A than in groups B and C (p < 0.05) on both views. Threshold popliteal hiatus/LTP values of 0.16 and 0.18 on the sagittal and coronal views demonstrated diagnostic discrimination, and these values were significantly reduced after arthroscopy in Group A. Lysholm and Tegner scores were improved after tightening of the popliteal hiatus, while VAS scores reduced (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Widening of the popliteal hiatus on MRI may lead to recurrent subluxation of the lateral meniscus. Arthroscopic anterior and posterior tightening of the popliteal hiatus was a safe and effective treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Clinical outcome and success rates of ACI for cartilage defects of the patella: a subgroup analysis from a controlled randomized clinical phase II trial (CODIS study).

AIM: Cartilage defects of the patella are considered as a problematic entity. Purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for cartilage defects of the patella in comparison to patient with defects of the femoral condyles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 73 patients with a follow-up of 5 years have been included in this subgroup analysis of the randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT). In dependence of defect location, patients were divided into two groups [patella defects (n = 45) and femoral condyle defects (n = 28)]. Clinical outcome was evaluated by the means of the KOOS score at baseline and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months following ACI. RESULTS: "Responder rate" at 60 months (improvement from baseline of > 7 points in the KOOS score) in patients with patella defects was 86.2%. All scores showed a significant improvement from baseline. While overall KOOS score at 60 months was 81.9 (SD 18.6) points in femoral condyle defects, a mean of 82.6 (SD 14.0) was observed in patella defects (p = 0.2483). CONCLUSION: ACI seems an appropriate surgical treatment for cartilage defects of the patella leading to a high success rate. In this study, the clinical outcome in patients with patellar defects was even better than the already excellent results in patients with defects of the femoral condyle even though the study included relatively large defect sizes for both groups (mean defect size 6.0 ± 1.7 and 5.4 ± 1.6 for femur and patella, respectively).

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Surgery for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus in Athletes.

Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) continue to be a challenge for the treating surgeon, especially when lesions are refractory to marrow stimulation techniques. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of lesions treated with osteochondral allograft transplantation. A review was performed of 30 athletes with 31 OLTs that were refractory to marrow stimulation or predicted to be refractory based on size and location of the lesion. Results were evaluated in terms of occupational outcomes and numeric pain scales. Lesions treated had a mean area of 1.37 (range 0.36 to 3.3) cm2. Overall excellent outcomes were achieved in 11 (35%) ankles. Nineteen (61%) ankles achieved good or excellent occupational outcomes, and 12 (39%) ankles demonstrated poor occupational outcomes and the patients were unable to continue their previous active occupations. Patients were found to have a mean pain scale score of 3 (range 0 to 7) of 10 at a mean of 21 (range 10 to 24) months after operative management. Osteochondral allograft transplantation is an option for the treatment of selected athletes with large OLTs, as well as lesions that are refractory to marrow stimulation techniques. The results of this study may help active young patients and their surgeons to better understand outcomes and options in their shared decision-making process.

No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic literature review is to detect the most effective treatment option for primary talar osteochondral defects in adults. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify studies published from January 1996 to February 2017 using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CDSR, DARE, and CENTRAL. Two authors separately and independently screened the search results and conducted the quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subsequently, success rates per separate study were calculated. Studies methodologically eligible for a simplified pooling method were combined. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies with 1236 primary talar osteochondral defects were included of which forty-one studies were retrospective and eleven prospective. Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Heterogeneity concerning methodological nature was observed, and there was variety in reported success rates. A simplified pooling method performed for eleven retrospective case series including 317 ankles in the bone marrow stimulation group yielded a success rate of 82% [CI 78-86%]. For seven retrospective case series investigating an osteochondral autograft transfer system or an osteoperiosteal cylinder graft insertion with in total 78 included ankles the pooled success rate was calculated to be 77% [CI 66-85%]. CONCLUSIONS: For primary talar osteochondral defects, none of the treatment options showed any superiority over others. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

No superior surgical treatment for secondary osteochondral defects of the talus.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the most effective surgical treatment for talar osteochondral defects after failed primary surgery. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to find studies published from January 1996 till July 2016 using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CDSR, DARE and CENTRAL. Two authors screened the search results separately and conducted quality assessment independently using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Weighted success rates were calculated. Studies eligible for pooling were combined. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies with a total of 299 patients with 301 talar OCDs that failed primary surgery were investigated. Eight studies were retrospective case series, twelve were prospective case series and there was one randomized controlled trial. Calculated success percentages varied widely and ranged from 17 to 100%. Because of the low level of evidence and the scarce number of patients, no methodologically proper meta-analysis could be performed. A simplified pooling method resulted in a calculated mean success rate of 90% [CI 82-95%] for the osteochondral autograft transfer procedure, 65% [CI 46-81%] for mosaicplasty and 55% [CI 40-70%] for the osteochondral allograft transfer procedure. There was no significant difference between classic autologous chondrocyte implantation (success rate of 59% [CI 39-77%]) and matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation (success rate of 73% [CI 56-85%]). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple surgical treatments are used for talar OCDs after primary surgical failure. More invasive methods are administered in comparison with primary treatment. No methodologically proper meta-analysis could be performed because of the low level of evidence and the limited number of patients. It is therefore inappropriate to draw firm conclusions from the collected results. Besides an expected difference in outcome between the autograft transfer procedure and the more extensive procedures of mosaicplasty and the use of an allograft, neither a clear nor a significant difference between treatment options could be demonstrated. The need for sufficiently powered prospective investigations in a randomized comparative clinical setting remains high. This present systematic review can be used in order to inform patients about expected outcome of the different treatment methods used after failed primary surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Outcomes of cartilage repair techniques for chondral injury in the hip-a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE/PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the options of treatment and their related outcomes for chondral injuries in the hip based on the available evidence whilst highlighting new and innovative techniques. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature from PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Google Scholar, British Nursing Index (BNI), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) was undertaken from their inception to March 2017 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Clinical outcome studies, prospective/retrospective case series and case reports that described the outcome of cartilage repair technique for the chondral injury in the hip were included. Studies on total hip replacement, animal studies, basic studies, trial protocols and review articles were excluded. RESULTS: The systematic review found 21 relevant papers with 596 hips. Over 80% of the included studies were published in or after 2010. Most studies were case series or case reports (18 studies, 85.7%). Arthroscopy was used in 11 studies (52.4%). The minimum follow-up period was six months. Mean age of the participants was 37.2 years; 93.5% of patients had cartilage injuries of the acetabulum and 6.5% of them had injuries of the femoral head. Amongst the 11 techniques described in the systematic review, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis, osteochondral autograft transplantation and microfracture were the three frequently reported techniques. CONCLUSION: Over ten different techniques are available for cartilage repair in the hip, and most of them have good short- to medium-term outcomes. However, there are no robust comparative studies to assess superiority of one technique over another, and further research is required in this arena.

Preoperative Patellofemoral Chondromalacia is Not a Contraindication for Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral chondromalacia (PFCM) has historically been considered a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), but there is limited data assessing PFCM's impact on the results of fixed-bearing UKA. Our objective was to assess the impact of medial patellar and/or medial trochlear PFCM on overall and patellofemoral-specific 2-year outcomes after fixed-bearing medial UKA. METHODS: Intraoperative notes defined the presence and location of PFCM during fixed bearing medial UKA. Outcome measures included the New Knee Society Score (NKSS), Kneeling Ability Score (KAS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12). Thirty-one knees with PFCM (PFCM group), and 52 knees without PFCM (N-PFCM group) were included for analysis. Mann-Whitney U tests assessed the statistical significance of observed differences, and a Bonferroni correction was applied, adjusting threshold for significance to P = .005. RESULTS: At minimum follow-up of 2 years, no statistical differences were detected between the N-PFCM and PFCM groups in the postoperative NKSS (159 vs 157, P = .731), preoperative to postoperative NKSS change (P = .447), FJS-12 (70.5 vs 67.6, P = .471), or KAS (71% vs 65%, P = .217). Patients with isolated patellar chondromalacia (n = 13) demonstrated trends toward worse outcomes according to NKSS (147, P = .198), FJS-12 (58, P = .094), and KAS (46%, P = .018), but were statistically insignificant. No failures occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: Functional outcomes of fixed-bearing medial UKA are not adversely impacted by the presence of PFCM involving the medial patellar facet and/or medial or central trochlea. Further follow-up is needed to determine longer-term implications of fixed-bearing medial UKA in patients with PFCM.

Editorial Commentary: Microfracture for Focal Cartilage Defects: Is the Hip Like the Knee?

Reading about microfracture for focal cartilage defects of the hip, we ponder whether the hip resembles the knee with regard to focal cartilage defects. Minimally invasive microfracture has been a first-line therapy for focal cartilage defects. Microfracture results in fibrous cartilage and unpredictable repair volume, which could be better than absent cartilage, particularly if knee symptoms abate. However, of late, microfracture is not recommended because destruction of subchondral anatomy may result in subchondral cyst formation.

Indications and Outcomes for Microfracture as an Adjunct to Hip Arthroscopy for Treatment of Chondral Defects in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the indications, preoperative workup outcomes, and postoperative rehabilitation of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) receiving microfracture as an adjunct to hip arthroscopy for chondral defects. METHODS: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched and screened in duplicate for studies involving patients with FAI treated arthroscopically with microfracture of the hip for chondral defects either solely or as an adjunct to hip arthroscopy. Data regarding indications, investigations, outcomes, and postoperative rehabilitation were abstracted from eligible studies. The references of included studies were additionally searched, and descriptive statistics are provided. RESULTS: There were 12 studies included in this review, involving 267 patients. With the exception of a single, one-patient case report, 11 of the 12 studies reported positive outcomes after hip arthroscopy with microfracture. Only 0.7% of the total patients experienced a complication, and 1.1% required further surgery on the basis of outcomes evaluated at a mean follow-up of 29.5 (range, 4 to 60) months across the studies. Eight of 12 studies discussed the preoperative workup of these patients, with X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging being the most common preoperative imaging used. There was little reported on weight-bearing status during postoperative rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes reported in the literature after hip arthroscopy with microfracture for chondral defects are, in general, positive, with a very low percentage of patients requiring further surgery or experiencing complications. The most common indication used in the literature for microfracture is a full-thickness, focal chondral defect (Outerbridge grade IV). The vast majority of literature recommends limited weight bearing after microfracture; however, there was significant variation among the specific rehabilitation protocols used. More research is needed to explore what indications and postoperative rehabilitation result in the best outcomes for patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II, III, and IV studies.

Second-look assessment after all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroides at the knee joint.

PURPOSE: To report arthroscopic second look as well as clinical results after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for articular cartilage repair at the knee joint. METHODS: A second-look assessment after arthroscopic ACI using spheroides was performed in 41 patients with 57 full-size articular cartilage defects of the knee. The median time from ACI to second-look arthroscopy was 10 (6-72) months. The ACI was assessed macroscopically and by probing according to the International Cartilage Repair Score (ICRS)-Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA) to get information on the amount and quality of regeneration. Clinical follow-up with subjective outcome scores was performed an average of 34.5 ± 19.2 months after ACI. Twenty-seven (65.8 %) of ACI's were combined with additional procedures. RESULTS: The ICRS-CRA was rated "normal" or "nearly normal" in 52 of 57 (91.3 %) and "abnormal" in 5 (8.8 %) of all cartilage defects. At follow-up, evaluation of KOOS was an average of 81.0 ± 12.9 for pain, 76.8 ± 16.6 for symptoms, 85.1 ± 14.9 for activities of daily living, 55.3 ± 27.7 for sport and recreation and 50.6 ± 23.8 for quality of live. IKDC was 63.0 ± 18.8, Lysholm score was 79.0 ± 18.0, and Tegner score was 4 (1-6). Subjective assessment according to the VAS scale was an average of 7.4 ± 2.1 for overall satisfaction and 6.7 ± 2.5 satisfaction for the operated knee. Seven patients (22.6 %) showed low subjective outcome scores at last follow-up-of these, 2 patients showed a CRA 3 and 5 a CRA 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: At second-look arthroscopy, 52 (91.3 %) of all cartilage defects showed a normal or nearly normal macroscopic articular cartilage regeneration after arthroscopic ACI using spheroides. Twenty-four patients (77.4 %) showed good subjective clinical results. The high number of concomitant surgery reflexes the complex aetiology of cartilage lesions and complexity of treatment. Thus, a strict indication and surgical planing is necessary to avoid clinical failures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee by microfracture or autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review of the treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee by microfracture or autologous chondrocyte implantation to determine the differences in patient outcomes after these procedures. METHODS: We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases in the period from January 10 through January 20, 2013, and included 34 articles in our qualitative analysis. RESULTS: All studies showed improvement in outcome scores in comparison with baseline values, regardless of the treatment modality. The heterogeneity of the results presented in the studies precluded a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Microfracture appears to be effective in smaller lesions and is usually associated with a greater proportion of fibrocartilage production, which may have an effect on durability and eventual failure. Autologous chondrocyte implantation is an effective treatment that may result in a greater proportion of hyaline-like tissue at the repair site, which may in turn have a beneficial effect on durability and failure; it appears to be effective in larger lesions. Autologous chondrocyte implantation with periosteum has been shown to be associated with symptomatic cartilage hypertrophy more frequently than autologous chondrocyte implantation with collagen membrane. Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation is technically less challenging than the other techniques available, and in lesions greater than 4 cm(2), it has been shown to be more effective than microfracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Implantation of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte (MACI ®) grafts using carbon dioxide insufflation arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of a new arthroscopic Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implant (MACI) technique with carbon dioxide insufflation utilized to improve visualization during the dry phase of the scaffold implant. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, thirty patients were treated for symptomatic focal chondral lesions of the medial femoral condyle. All patients were monitored during surgery for gas embolism signs and symptoms and were evaluated preoperatively and at a median follow-up of 70.5 months (range 48-93 months) using the KOOS subjective evaluation score, the Lysholm function score, the Tegner activity scale for the knee, and the IKDC objective score. RESULTS: No cases of intraoperative or postoperative symptoms or signs related to gas embolism or persistent subcutaneous emphysema were registered. Each subscale of the KOOS subjective score improved from preoperative to follow-up. The median Lysholm score was 50 (range 15-66) at baseline and 87.5 (range 54-100) at follow-up (p < 0.05). The median Tegner score was 2 (range 1-4) at baseline to 5 (range 2-7) at follow-up (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: No complications registered, and the satisfactory clinical results achieved in this series suggest that carbon dioxide insufflation during arthroscopic MACI is a safe and accessible option to improve visualization during the dry phase of the scaffold implant on medial femoral condyles.

Improved outcomes with combined autologous chondrocyte implantation and patellofemoral osteotomy versus isolated autologous chondrocyte implantation.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing isolated patellofemoral autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and ACI combined with patellofemoral realignment. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by use of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines/checklist. We searched PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), SportDiscus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 1946 through February 2012 to determine whether a difference exists in outcomes of combined ACI and osteotomy versus isolated ACI (minimum 2 years' follow-up). Studies were included only if outcomes were reported separately for both isolated ACI and combined ACI and osteotomy. All ACI generations were eligible for inclusion. Patellofemoral osteotomies eligible for inclusion were anteriorization, medialization, or anteromedialization. All patient-, limb-, and defect-specific characteristics were assessed. All reported clinical scores, radiographic and histologic outcomes, and complications/reoperations were analyzed. Risk of bias was assessed within all studies. RESULTS: Eleven studies (10 Level III or IV evidence) (366 subjects) were included. Of the defects treated, 78% were located on the patella and 22% on the trochlea. The mean subject age was 33.3 years. Twenty-three percent of subjects underwent concomitant osteotomy. The mean length of follow-up was 4.2 years. Significant (P < .05) improvements in patients undergoing both isolated ACI and combined ACI and osteotomy for patellofemoral chondral defects were observed in all studies. Three studies directly compared isolated ACI and combined ACI and osteotomy, with significantly (P < .05) greater improvements shown in patients undergoing combined osteotomy and ACI (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner score, modified Cincinnati score, Short Form 12 score, and Short Form 36 score). There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of postoperative complications overall. CONCLUSIONS: This review showed statistically significant improvements in patients undergoing both isolated ACI and ACI combined with osteotomy for patellofemoral chondral defects in all studies. When individual studies compared these 2 groups (3 studies), significantly greater improvements in multiple clinical outcomes in subjects undergoing ACI combined with osteotomy were observed. There was no significant difference in the rate of total complications between groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of studies with minimum Level IV evidence, retrospective case series.

Outcomes of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were (1) to conduct a systematic review of clinical outcomes after osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee and (2) to identify patient-, defect-, and graft-specific prognostic factors. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies that evaluated clinical outcomes in adult patients after osteochondral allograft transplantation for chondral defects in the knee were included. Pooled analyses for pertinent continuous and dichotomous variables were performed where appropriate. RESULTS: There were 19 eligible studies resulting in a total of 644 knees with a mean follow-up of 58 months (range, 19 to 120 months). The overall follow-up rate was 93% (595 of 644). The mean age was 37 years (range, 20 to 62 years), and 303 patients (63%) were men. The methods of procurement and storage time included fresh (61%), prolonged fresh (24%), and fresh frozen (15%). With regard to etiology, the most common indications for transplantation included post-traumatic (38%), osteochondritis dissecans (30%), osteonecrosis from all causes (12%), and idiopathic (11%). Forty-six percent of patients had concomitant procedures, and the mean defect size across studies was 6.3 cm(2). The overall satisfaction rate was 86%. Sixty-five percent of patients (72 of 110) showed little to no arthritis at final follow-up. The reported short-term complication rate was 2.4%, and the overall failure rate was 18%. Heterogeneity in functional outcome measures precluded a meta-analysis; a qualitative synthesis allowed for the identification of several positive and negative prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Osteochondral allograft transplantation for focal and diffuse (single-compartment) chondral defects results in predictably favorable outcomes and high satisfaction rates at intermediate follow-up. Patients with osteochondritis dissecans and traumatic and idiopathic etiologies have more favorable outcomes, as do younger patients with unipolar lesions and short symptom duration. Future studies should include comparative control groups and use established outcome instruments that will allow for pooling of data across studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Glenohumeral chondrolysis: part II--results of treatment.

PURPOSE: The objective of this 2-part study is to report on the etiology and disease progression (part I) and results of treatment (part II) of glenohumeral chondrolysis. METHODS: Forty patients presented with glenohumeral chondrolysis after treatment elsewhere. Twenty patients have been followed since their initial presentation and before prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty (group 1), and 20 patients were referred either for management of complications arising after shoulder arthroplasty or for evaluation only (group 2). All patients underwent standardized clinical and radiographic examination and completed shoulder-specific self-assessment questionnaires at initial presentation and after prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty for patients in group 1. RESULTS: Thirty of 40 patients underwent subsequent arthroscopy for debridement, chondroplasty, capsular release, or a combination of these procedures. Of these, 23 patients (77%) required additional surgery, comprising 18 prosthetic shoulder arthroplasties performed at a mean 13 months of follow-up (range, 3 to 33 months), as well as 5 repeated arthroscopies. At most recent follow-up, 15 of 20 patients in group 1 had undergone shoulder arthroplasty, with improvements in active forward elevation from 92.6° to 140.0° (P < .0001), active abduction from 81.6° to 131.3° (P < .0001), active external rotation from 22.1° to 49.3° (P < .0001), and active internal rotation from the gluteal region to the T12 spinous process (P < .001). Pain scores improved from 6.4 to 3.4 (P < .01), and self-assessed outcome also improved significantly. Twelve patients in group 2 underwent shoulder arthroplasty, so overall 27 of 40 patients (68%) underwent prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty for chondrolysis at a mean of 32 months (range, 9 to 66 months) after the index procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Postarthroscopic glenohumeral chondrolysis is a devastating condition that strikes young patients, responds poorly to arthroscopic interventions, and often requires shoulder arthroplasty within a few years. Patients can expect improved range of motion and outcome after shoulder arthroplasty, but pain relief is often incomplete. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Surgical approach to a vulval-pubic cartilaginous cyst: A case report and review of published work.

Cartilaginous cyst of symphysis pubis is rare and to our knowledge 12 cases have been reported in the published work. Although cartilaginous cysts of the vulva and pubis are likely to present to a gynecologist as a vulval-pubic mass, their diagnosis and management warrants a multidisciplinary team approach because of their rarity and anatomical location. Non-invasive diagnosis includes magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound scan, while the invasive preoperative biopsy is reserved for cases with a high index of suspicion of malignancy. The surgical approach for the management of vulval-pubic cartilaginous cyst is not well established. The current case demonstrates a joint surgical approach involving a gynecologist and orthopedic surgeon in management of a degenerative cartilaginous cyst. As this condition is benign, every effort should be made to preserve the stability of the pubic symphysis. Symphyseal dysfunction from surgery remains a potential complication for which treatment is not straightforward.