Chyle Leak Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Rare Complication of a Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap.

BACKGROUND: While complications of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps are known and well documented, a thorough literature review revealed no other reports of a patient developing a chyle leak following the use of the internal mammary vessels for recipient vessels in autologous breast reconstruction. CASE: A 55-year-old woman underwent free autologous breast reconstruction. She developed a chyle leak during the postoperative period. This was verified through a computed tomography scan and fluid analysis demonstrating a high triglyceride count and the presence of chylomicrons. The leak resolved with conservative measures including compression and a low-fat, high-protein diet. DISCUSSION: The presence of chyle leak following dissection of the internal mammary vessels is a unique complication of autologous breast reconstruction. There have been reports of lymph leaks following mastectomy, but these are mostly reported in the axilla. A history of radiation to the contralateral breast and aberrant anatomy may have contributed to the complication. Treatment of chyle leaks ranges from conservative management to the use of total parenteral nutrition and somatostatin analogs to surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: While altering practice patterns based on a single case is not usually suggested, this complication does intimate that dealing with lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes in the chest should be done deliberately to prevent lymphatic leaks.

Endoscopic treatment of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using MEGA esophageal covered stents.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy has become one of the main bariatric procedures over the last few years. This can be explained by the relative simplicity and high effectiveness of this method. Yet, it causes complications as any other method. Staple line leaks are the most frequent ones. According to different sources, this complication may occur with 0-7% frequency. Until 2013, surgery was the only effective treatment method for this complication. However, reoperations considerably increased treatment cost and patient morbidity. The aim of this study is to present the possibilities of endoscopic treatment of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. METHODS: From 2014 to 2016 14, cases of leaks following sleeve gastrectomy were diagnosed in our Department in Lódz. All of them were treated with MEGA stent in order to cover the leak site. Due to severe peritonitis, 3 patients had to undergo surgery prior to implantation of the prosthesis. Another patient underwent an unsuccessful attempt of leak closing via OTSC method prior to implantation of the prosthesis. Patients were nourished from the 3rd day after the surgery. On average, prostheses were removed on the 34th day after the implantation. RESULTS: The leak was fully sealed in 13 out of 14 cases. In 10 cases the leak was fully healed. There were 2 cases of patients' deaths: the result of a multi-organ failure in one case and early esophageal perforation in the other one. The overall success rate was 90.9%. CONCLUSION: Sealing leaks occurring after sleeve gastrectomy with MEGA stents represent an effective method and should become the technique of choice.

[Anastomotic Leakage in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Surgical Versus Nonoperative Management]. / Gastrointestinale Anastomoseninsuffizienz: operatives vs. konservatives Vorgehen.

Most procedures in gastrointestinal (GI) surgery require reconstruction with an anastomosis. Depending on the location within the GI tract, the perfusion and comorbidities of the patients there is a risk for anastomotic leakage. In case of peritonitis with sepsis usually a surgical treatment is required. A stable patient can be treated nonoperatively. In the following overview different treatment options of anastomotic leakage after surgery of the GI tract are described. In case of a leakage of an esophagojejunal or esophagogastric anastomosis after resection of the esophagus or stomach endoscopic treatment can be successful using either clip or stent or negative pressure therapy (NPT). After surgery of the rectum the use of endoluminal NPT has shown good results in case of anastomotic leakage. Nonoperative management of anastomotic leakage can be successful in a stable patient and requires intensive cooperation in an interdisciplinary team with experts in surgery, endoscopy, radiology and intensive care.

The role of stents in the management of colorectal complications: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Complications in colorectal surgery include a wide range of clinical conditions, which increase mortality, morbidity, hospital stay and costs. In some cases, the placement of a self-expanding metal stent may represent a possible therapeutic strategy, avoiding further surgery. METHODS: In order to verify the feasibility and safety of the technique, we reviewed the medical literature, between January 1997 and 2015, selecting 32 studies. Inclusion criteria were based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. RESULTS: The estimated rate of early success was 73.3% (95% CI 66.3-79.3), raising from 25 to 68% in the time frame 1997-2007. The rate of early complications was 31.4% (95% CI 25.3-38.3%), progressively decreasing from 75 to 43% up to 2009. The rate of surgery for acute complication was 9.3% (95% CI 6.0-14.2%), reduced on time course from 25 to 9%. The rate of closure of dehiscence was 74.5% (95% CI 62.8-83.5%), while the rate of long-lasting success was 57.3% (95% CI 50.3-64.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stenting in the early postoperative management of anastomotic complications after colorectal surgery should be considered in patients with minimal risk for sepsis, as a safe and often effective alternative to surgery. However, in order to establish the safety and efficacy of this technique, prospective studies involving a larger cohort of patients are required.

[Intraoperative Prevention and Postoperative Treatment of Air Leakage in Lung Surgery].

The intraoperative and postoperative air leakages in lung surgery are caused by factors related to patients as well as the surgical technique employed. Prevention and management of air leakage caused by these varied factors are essential for thoracic surgeons. The factors related to patients, such as severe emphysema, smoking history, and insufficient lobulation, should be evaluated before surgery. Although time-consuming, careful and reliable surgical techniques are required. After the lung surgery, management of drain is essential for controlling air leakage. Rethoracotomy is one of the treatment options that can be employed when conservative treatment does not improve the air leakage. At present, complete way of management of air leakage has not been established;therefore, thoracic surgeons should work toward developing a definite intraoperative and postoperative air leakage management in lung surgery.

Endovascular embolization for managing anastomotic bleeding after stapled digestive tract anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic bleeding is an infrequent but life-threatening complication after stapled digestive tract anastomosis. Endovascular embolization is one of the available treatments, but precise clinical outcomes are yet to be evaluated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular embolization for managing anastomotic bleeding after stapled digestive tract anastomosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with anastomotic bleeding after stapled digestive tract anastomosis by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Curative effect was summed for analysis. RESULTS: All bleeding arteries were located in the stoma and were identified by contrast agent spillover by DSA. The offending arteries were superselectively catheterized and embolized with microcoils and/or gelatin sponge particles. Laboratory examinations showed normal hemoglobin and red blood cell counts when the patients' abdominal cavity drainage tubes stopped draining blood. The follow-up period was 3.2-84.7 months (median, 19.7 months). Four patients died during this time, of which two had cholangiocarcinoma, one had gastric cancer with tumor recurrence and multiple organ failure, and the final patient had a subarachnoid hemorrhage 4 months after embolization. In the surviving patients, no rebleeding occurred after embolization and no additional intervention or surgery was required. CONCLUSION: Endovascular embolization is safe and effective for managing anastomotic bleeding after stapled digestive tract anastomosis.

Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy or gastrectomy for carcinoma with self-expanding removable stents.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anastomotic leakage is a feared complication after gastrectomy and esophagectomy. We report our experience in the treatment with endoscopic stent placement. METHODOLOGY: Seventeen patients with anastomotic leakage after resection of a malignant tumor of the stomach or the distal esophagus have been long-term followed-up. RESULTS: In 10 patients the implanted stent did successfully close the leakage in the first attempt. In 3 out of 7 patients with unsuccessfully sealed leakage a stent-in-stent-manoeuvre did successfully seal the leakage. We had no major complications upon implantation of the stents. We did have no recurrence of a once sealed leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stent placement is a safe procedure in the treatment of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy and esophagectomy. It should be performed in any clinically relevant leakage if possible. In cases where stent placement is not successful at first, correction of position, stent replacement or a stent-in-stent manoeuvre can be performed, with promising results.

Endoscopic management of surgical complications.

While the endoscopic management of surgical complications like leaks, fistulas, and perforations is rapidly evolving, its core principles revolve around closure, drainage, and containment. Effectively managing these conditions relies on several factors, such as the underlying cause, chronicity of the lesion, tissue viability, co-morbidities, availability of devices, and expertise required to perform the endoscopy. In contrast to acute perforation, fistulas and leaks often demand a multimodal approach requiring more than one session to achieve the required results. Although the ultimate goal is complete resolution, these endoscopic interventions can provide clinical stability, enabling enteral feeding to lead to early hospital discharge or elective surgery. In this discussion, we emphasize the current state of knowledge and the prospective role of endoscopic interventions in managing surgical complications.

Management of complications following pancreatic resection: an evidence-based approach.

Despite significant improvements in operative mortality, morbidity remains a significant problem following pancreatectomy. Management of postpancreatectomy complications, namely pancreatic fistula, begins with a clear understanding of how these events are defined. There are now several unifying definitions for complications following pancreatectomy which have led to improved reporting of operative outcomes across institutions. Several randomized controlled trials have been performed in recent years that may lead to continued improvement in operative outcomes.

Personalized management of anastomotic leak after surgery for esophageal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the management of anastomotic leak following surgery for esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: The medical records of the patients developing digestive tract leak after surgery for esophageal carcinoma in our hospital from January 2003 to March 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included, in whom 13 developed cervical anastomotic leak, 18 had intra-thoracic anastomotic leak, and 5 had intra-thoracic gastric necrosis. Of these patients, 7 were treated with resurgery, 6 with esophageal stent implantation, and 23 with conservative treatment. Treatment lasted for 5 to 181 days, averagely 47.0 +/- 31.9 days. After management, 9 patients died (25.0%). Among seven patients with resurgery, four had deceased, two were cured, and one developed leak again and was switched to conservative treatment until discharged. All the 6 patients treated with stent implantation were cured. Of the 24 patients receiving conservative treatment (including one switched from resurgery), 18 (75.0%) were cured and 1 was not cured but survived. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic leak following surgery for esophageal carcinoma should be treated individually based on the onset time, location, size, and extent of the leakage. Conservative treatment is still a safe and effective method. The efficacy of stent implantation needs further investigation to confirm.

The role of interventional radiology in the management of surgical complications after pancreatoduodenectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the role of interventional radiology (IR) in the management of postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients were reviewed to identify IR procedures performed for early complications after PD. RESULTS: Findings showed that 24 patients (20.0%) required urgent radiological or surgical re-intervention for early complications, including 11 instances of post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH), six intra-abdominal abscesses, two bile leaks, one pancreatic fistula and one bowel ischaemia. Three of 24 complications were managed by surgery and 21 were managed by IR. Two of 11 PPHs involved intraluminal haemorrhage (ILH) and nine involved intra-abdominal haemorrhage (IAH). One ILH was managed conservatively and one required surgical intervention. In eight of nine patients with IAH, the bleeding site was identified on computed tomography angiography, and endovascular stenting or coil embolization were performed. No patient required a re-look laparotomy following IR for haemorrhage or intra-abdominal abscess. Overall, three of 120 patients required an urgent re-look laparotomy for early complications. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of major morbidity after PD remain high. However, many significant complications (PPH, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess) can be managed by IR, reducing the need for reoperation. Re-look surgery is still required in a small percentage (2.5%) of patients.

Management and outcome of colorectal anastomotic leaks.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak is a devastating complication of an intestinal anastomosis. Optimal management and outcome is not routinely described, and much of our knowledge relies upon historical data. We wished to examine the management and outcome of anastomotic leaks on a colorectal surgery unit in the twenty-first century. METHOD: A retrospective audit of all patients who had a colorectal anastomotic leak between January 2002 and December 2008 in a large university teaching hospital. Data collected included patient characteristics, primary diagnosis, mode of diagnosis and time to diagnosis of anastomotic leak, inpatient management, morbidity and mortality, permanent stoma rate, use of hospital resources. RESULTS: Thirty patients (16 male, 14 female), with a median age of 60 years (range 25-84 years), had an anastomotic leak. The median time to presentation of clinically suspected leaks was 12 days (range 3-56 days). Fourteen patients required reoperation, with ten needing the anastomosis take down. Average hospital stay was 40 days. The permanent stoma rate following a rectal anastomotic leak was 27% and 57.1% from a colonic leak. Overall mortality in this series was 27%. Mortality was higher after leak from a colonic anastomosis than after leak from a rectal anastomosis (43.8% vs. 7.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic leaks are not detected until late in the post-operative period and are associated with a high mortality. Demand on hospital resources is high. In this series, patients who leaked after a colonic anastomosis had a higher mortality and permanent stoma rate than after leaks from a rectal anastomosis.

Fibrin glue in the endoscopic treatment of fistulae and anastomotic leakages of the gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND: Fistulae or leakages of anastomotic junctions of the gastrointestinal tract used to be an indication for surgery. However, patients often are severely ill and endoscopic therapeutic options have been suggested to avoid surgical intervention. PURPOSE: This is a retrospective analysis of fibrin glue application in the treatment of gastrointestinal fistulae or anastomotic leakages. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of fibrin glue in the treatment of gastrointestinal fistulae and leakages. METHODS: From September 1996 to November 2002, 52 patients with gastrointestinal fistulae or insufficiencies have been treated endoscopically including the use of fibrin glue (Tissucol Duo S®, Baxter, Unterschleissheim, Germany). Clinical data comprising concomitant therapies and results were analysed by chart review. RESULTS: Twenty-six lesions were located in the oesophagus or gastroesophageal junction, 4 in the stomach, 7 in the small intestine, 13 colorectal and 2 in the pancreas. The duration of treatment ranged from 12 to 1,765 days. Two to 81 ml fibrin glue (median 8.5) was used in 1-40 sessions (median 4). All patients received antibiotics; additional endoscopic options were frequently applied. Endoscopic therapy cured 55.7% patients (n = 29); 36.5% (n = 19) were cured with fibrin glue as sole endoscopic option. In 23.1% (n = 12), surgical intervention became necessary. Patients without major infectious complications tended to have a higher cure rate without surgery (87.5% vs. 50%). Eleven patients died (21.1%). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic therapy is a valuable option in the treatment of fistulae and anastomotic insufficiencies of the gastrointestinal tract. It usually is applied repeatedly. Fibrin glue is a mainstay of this procedure. Major infectious complications seem to define a subgroup of patients with poorer outcome.

Evidence of negative pressure therapy for anastomotic leak: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a devastating complication. Several new treatment options are available, endoluminal negative pressure therapy is one. The aims of this systematic review are; to report success rates and stoma closure rates following endoluminal negative pressure therapy in colorectal AL patients. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases from inception to June 2018. Search limits were; English language, humans, sample >5 and >18 years. Search terms were Endospong* OR Endo-spong* OR Endo spong* OR Endoluminal negative pressure OR Endoluninal vac* OR Vacuum assisted OR negative pressure. Combined with colon OR rectum OR colorect* AND anastomotic leak OR leak*. RESULTS: Twenty articles met inclusion criteria. There were 334 patients. Reported success rates ranged from 60% to 100%. However, success definition varied considerably. The most widely used definition was endoscopic assessment of residual cavity size, but this also varied from 0.5 cm to 3 cm. Stoma closure rates were only reported in 11 studies and ranged from 31% to 100%. Complication rates were reported in 13 studies (65%). The most common was on-going sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Included studies suggest that 60-100% of ALs heal with endoluminal negative pressure therapy. However, results from this review need to be interpreted with caution because of the variable definition of success. A more objective assessment of success may be stoma closure but this is only reported in 60% of studies. Further studies are needed to assess the benefit of negative pressure therapy in anastomotic leaks.

Italian multi-society modified Delphi consensus on the definition and management of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of anastomotic leak (AL) has not decreased over the past decades and some important grey areas remain in its definition, prevention, and management. The aim of this study was to reach a national consensus on the definition of AL and to identify key points to be applied in clinical practice. METHODS: A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Ten representative members of the major Italian surgical scientific societies with proven colorectal expertise were selected after a call to action. After a comprehensive literature search, each expert drew a list of evidence-based statements which were voted in round one by the scientific board. Panel members were asked to mark "totally disagree", "partially agree" or "totally agree" for each statement and provide comments. The same voting method was used for round 2. Round 3 consisted of a final face-to-face meeting. RESULTS: Thirty-three statements (clustered into 14 topics) were included in round 1. Following the third voting round, a final list of 16 items was formulated, which encompass the following 9 topics: AL definition, patient- and operative-related risk factors, prevention measures, bowel preparation, surgical technique, intraoperative assessment, early diagnosis, radiological diagnosis and management of specific patterns of AL. The overall response rate was 100% for all items in all the three rounds. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi survey identified items that expert colorectal surgeons agreed were important to be applied in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of AL. This represents the first consensus involving all relevant national scientific societies, defining important and shared concepts in the diagnosis and management of AL.

Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the treatment of oesophageal anastomotic leaks.

Persisting suture dehiscence with oesophageal anastomotic leaks after thoracic surgery is a difficult complication, especially when a surgical repair fails. We report here endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy as a novel endoscopic treatment for the management of oesophageal anastomotic leaks. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy is a minimally invasive method to treat anastomotic leakage by positioning an open-pored polyurethane sponge and a suction tube connected to a wound drainage system into the opening of the wound cavity. This multidisciplinary endoscopic and surgical approach is a successful therapy for the management of suture dehiscence with oesophageal anastomotic leaks after thoracic surgery or oesophageal perforations.