Safety and efficacy of jaktinib (a novel JAK inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis who are relapsed or refractory to ruxolitinib: A single-arm, open-label, phase 2, multicenter study.

Ruxolitinib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). However, substantial number of patients may not respond after 3-6 months of treatment or develop resistance over time. In this phase 2 trial, patients with a current diagnosis of intermediate or high-risk MF who either had an inadequate splenic response or spleen regrowth after ruxolitinib treatment were enrolled. All patients received jaktinib 100 mg Bid. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR 35) at week 24. The secondary endpoints included change of MF-related symptoms, anemic response, and safety profile. From July 6, 2021, to January 24, 2022, 34 ruxolitinib-refractory or relapsed patients were enrolled, 52.9% (18 of 34) were DIPSS intermediate 2 or high risk. SVR 35 at week 24 was 32.4% (11 of 34, 95% CI 19.1%-49.2%) in all patients and 33.3% (6 of 18, 95% CI 16.3%-56.3%) in the intermediate 2 or high-risk group. A total of 50% (8 of 16) transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin (HGB) <100 g/L at baseline had HGB elevation ≥20 g/L within 24 weeks. Furthermore, 46.4% (13 of 28) of patients had a ≥ 50% decrease in the total symptom score (TSS 50) at week 24. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were thrombocytopenia (32.4%), anemia (32.4%), and leukocytosis (20.6%). In total, 13 (38.2%) of 34 patients had serious adverse events (SAE), of which drug-related SAEs were found in 5 patients (14.7%). These results indicate that jaktinib can be a promising treatment option for patients with MF who have either become refractory to or relapsed after ruxolitinib treatment.

Safety and efficacy of jaktinib (a novel JAK inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis who are intolerant to ruxolitinib: A single-arm, open-label, phase 2, multicenter study.

Although ruxolitinib improves splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), a substantial proportion of patients discontinue ruxolitinib because of intolerance. This phase 2 trial investigated the safety and efficacy of jaktinib, a novel JAK inhibitor in patients with ruxolitinib-intolerant MF. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR35) at week 24. The secondary endpoints included change of MF-related symptoms, anemic response, and safety profiles. Between December 18, 2019, and November 24, 2021, 51 patients were enrolled, 45 treated with jaktinib 100 mg bid (100 mg bid group) and six received non-100 mg bid doses (non-100 mg bid group). The SVR35 at week 24 in the 100 mg bid group was 43.2% (19/44, 95% CI 29.7%-57.8%). There were 41.9% (13/31) of transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin (HGB) ≤100 g/L who had HGB elevation ≥20 g/L within 24 weeks. The proportion of patients with a ≥50% decrease in the total symptom score (TSS 50) at week 24 was 61.8% (21/34). The most commonly reported grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the 100 mg bid group were anemia 31.1%, thrombocytopenia 22.2%, and infectious pneumonia 17.8%. A total of 16 (35.6%) in the 100 mg bid group had serious adverse events, and 4 (8.9%) were considered possibly drug related. These results indicate jaktinib can provide a treatment option for patients with MF who are intolerant to ruxolitinib.

Efficacy and drug retention of tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: from the nationwide Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics registry.

OBJECTIVES: Janus kinase inhibitors are expected to change the management patterns and prognosis of chronic rheumatic diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, drug retention, and adverse events of tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using a Korean nationwide database. METHODS: Data of patients with RA receiving tofacitinib were extracted from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics and Targeted Therapy registry, including clinical characteristics and disease activity markers for RA. Outcomes of clinical efficacy, drug survival rate, and safety profiles were compared between biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naive and -failure patients. Mann-Whitney U-test, logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test were used in data analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred patients with RA received tofacitinib therapy (16.3% male; mean age 55.4±11.9 years); 91 patients were bDMARD-naive. Baseline disease activity markers and proportions of patients who were taking conventional synthetic DMARDs were not different between bDMARD-naive and bDMARD-failure patients. American College of Rheumatology responses and disease activity score-28 did not differ between bDMARD-failure and -naive patients at the 1-year follow-up. The drug retention rate of tofacitinib did not differ between bDMARD-failure (155 per 2.4 years) and -naive patients (89 per 1.9 years) (log-rank test, p=0.202). In logistic regression, the positivity of RF and ACPA were associated with reduced drug retention (p=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Totally 83 (27.7%) of patients had adverse, and 14 (4.7%) patients had herpes zoster infection. CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide real-world data showed that tofacitinib therapy is effective in patients with RA independent of previous use of a bDMARD. The drug retention of tofacitinib did not differ between bDMARD-failure and -naive patients, and RF or ACPA positivity may be associated with reduced discontinuation of tofacitinib.

A Review on the Use of Topical Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Vitiligo.

BACKGROUND: This article describes the clinical trial, safety, and efficacy of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or repigmentation in patients with vitiligo. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was done using ruxolitinib or Opzelura in MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE. CLINICALTRIALS: gov was used to identify ongoing or unpublished studies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies included were written in English and relevant to pharmacology, clinical trials, safety, and efficacy. DATA SYNTHESIS: In two 52-week phase 3 trials, 52.0% of subjects had at least 75% improvement in their Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI). RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Ruxolitinib is a topical Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor newly approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for repigmentation in patients with vitiligo. CONCLUSION: Topical ruxolitinib is the first medication approved for repigmentation in patients with vitiligo. It is a safe and effective treatment; however, cost may be a barrier to some patients when prescribing this medication. Trials to compare the efficacy and side effect profile of topical ruxolitinib with other topical treatments are still needed. Grossmann MC, Haidari W, Feldman SR. A Review on the use of topical ruxolitinib for the treatment of vitiligo. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(7):664-667. doi:10.36849/JDD.7268.

Maintenance of Remission With Tofacitinib Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with moderate to severe UC, up to 1 year, have been reported. We investigated maintenance of efficacy in patients in remission after 52 weeks of maintenance treatment in the pivotal phase 3 study (OCTAVE Sustain); these patients received open-label, long-term treatment with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe UC who completed a 52-week, phase 3 maintenance study (OCTAVE Sustain) were eligible to enroll into the ongoing, phase 3, multicenter, open-label, long-term extension (OCTAVE Open). We analyzed data from 142 patients who were in remission following tofacitinib treatment in OCTAVE Sustain who received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily during OCTAVE Open. We assessed efficacy (including remission [based on total Mayo score], endoscopic improvement, clinical response, and partial Mayo score up to month 36 of OCTAVE Open) and safety data. RESULTS: After 12 months of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily in OCTAVE Open, 68.3% of patients were in remission, 73.9% had endoscopic improvement, and 77.5% had a clinical response. At month 36, 50.4%, of the patients were in remission, 55.3% had endoscopic improvement, and 56.0% had a clinical response. The safety profile of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily revealed no new safety risks associated with long-term exposure up to 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy endpoints were maintained for up to 36 months, regardless of prior tofacitinib dose, including patients who reduced from tofacitinib 10 mg to 5 mg twice daily upon OCTAVE Open entry. No new safety risks were identified. ClinicalTrials.gov: OCTAVE Sustain (NCT01458574); OCTAVE Open (NCT01470612).

Emerging drugs for the treatment of alopecia areata.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia Areata (AA) is the second most common non-scarring hair loss disorder, with a prevalence of 1 in 1000 and a lifetime incidence of 2% worldwide. Data from a recent American study shows that from 68,121 patients with the diagnosis of AA, 37,995 (55.8%) were prescribed treatment for AA within a year of diagnosis, however there are still no therapies able to induce permanent remission, or treatments that guarantee hair regrowth/remissions in 100% of cases, especially in longstanding/severe AA. Recently, oral baricitinib has been approved for AA, being the first drug approved for this specific indication. AREAS COVERED: The current review will provide a summary of current pharmacological approaches and novel therapeutics in development. EXPERT OPINION: New and very effective drugs have become available for the treatment of severe AA, and many others are expected soon. However, even new, effective treatments are not effective in all patients and recurrence rates after treatment interruption are high. AA is a systemic disease with important impact on quality of life and should not be considered just as an aesthetic problem. Treatment of the disease should take in account and possibly also address treatment of comorbidities.

Safety and efficacy of jaktinib in the treatment of Janus kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: Results of a phase II trial.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is associated with several constitutional symptoms. Currently, there are few therapeutic options for MF. Jaktinib, a novel, small-molecule inhibitor of JAK, is currently being studied for its potential to treat MF. This phase 2 trial investigated efficacy and safety of jaktinib in the treatment of MF patients. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR35, proportion of patients with ≥35% reduction in spleen volume) at week 24. The secondary end points included improvement of anemia, rates of symptom response, and safety profile. Between January 8, 2019 and August 29, 2020, 118 patients were recruited and treated with either jaktinib 100 mg BID or 200 mg QD. At week 24, 54.8% (34/62) of patients in the 100 mg BID group and 31.3% (15/48) in the 200 mg QD group achieved SVR35 (p = .0199). Jaktinib treatment increased hemoglobin level to ≥20 g/L in 35.6% (21/59) of patients with hemoglobin ≤100 g/L at baseline. The proportion of patients who achieved a ≥50% improvement in total symptom score at week 24 was 69.6% (39/56) in the BID group and 57.5% (23/40) in the QD group. The most common ≥ grade 3 hematological treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; ≥ 10%) were anemia (100 mg BID: 24.2%, 200 mg QD: 28.8%), thrombocytopenia (16.7%, 11.5%), and neutropenia (3.0%, 11.5%). All non-hematological TEAEs were mild. These results indicate that jaktinib can shrink the spleen, improve anemia, and other clinical symptoms with good tolerability.

Phase 2 randomized, dose-ranging trial of CTP-543, a selective Janus Kinase inhibitor, in moderate-to-severe alopecia areata.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase (JAK) activation is suggested to have a pathological role in alopecia areata (AA). CTP-543, a deuterated compound that selectively inhibits JAK1 and JAK2, is being developed as an oral treatment for AA. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of a 24-week regimen of CTP-543 in patients with chronic, moderate-to-severe AA. METHODS: In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential-design trial, patients were randomized to receive CTP-543 (4 mg, 8 mg, or 12 mg) or placebo every 12 hours for 24 weeks. RESULTS: A dose-related increase was observed in the percentage of patients with ≥50% relative reduction in Severity of Alopecia Tool scores from baseline at week 24 (9% placebo, 21% 4 mg twice daily, 47% 8 mg twice daily, and 58% 12 mg twice daily), with statistical significance versus placebo (P < .001) observed for the 8-mg twice daily and 12-mg twice daily groups, with differences from placebo noted as early as 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profiles of JAK inhibitors. LIMITATIONS: These initial findings are from a relatively small controlled trial, and additional studies are needed to fully characterize the safety and efficacy of CTP-543 in adult patients with AA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with CTP-543 (8 or 12 mg, twice daily) had a significant reduction in the severity of AA.

Safety and efficacy of long-term tofacitinib treatment in East Asian patients with ulcerative colitis in OCTAVE Open.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We present safety and efficacy data from patients from East Asia (Japan, Korea, and Taiwan) in OCTAVE Open, an open-label, long-term extension study. METHODS: Patients in remission at OCTAVE Open baseline received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID); all others received tofacitinib 10 mg BID. Proportions and IRs (unique patients with events/100 patient-years) were calculated for adverse events (AEs) of special interest. Efficacy endpoints were evaluated up to 36 months. RESULTS: In OCTAVE Open, 105/944 patients were from East Asia (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, n = 22; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, n = 83). Overall, 87.6% and 24.8% of patients had AEs and serious AEs, respectively; IRs (95% CI) for AEs of special interest were herpes zoster (HZ; non-serious and serious), 6.07 (3.40-10.02); serious infections, 1.47 (0.40-3.76); opportunistic infections, 1.91 (0.62-4.45); major cardiovascular adverse events, 0.37 (0.01-2.04); malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]), 0.37 (0.01-2.04); and NMSC, 0.00 (0.00-1.35). No deaths, venous thromboembolic events, or gastrointestinal perforations occurred. At month 36, 68.2% and 54.2% of patients had a clinical response, 68.2% and 53.0% had endoscopic improvement, and 63.6% and 49.4% were in remission with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The HZ IR in East Asian patients was numerically higher versus the global study population; excluding HZ, tofacitinib safety and efficacy were consistent with the global study population.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Secukinumab in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and secukinumab have been demonstrated to be effective treatments for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there have been no head-to-head trials comparing the effectiveness and safety characteristics of JAK inhibitors with secukinumab. This study aimed to evaluate the relative effectiveness and safety of JAK inhibitors and secukinumab in patients with active AS. SUMMARY: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using direct and indirect data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 5 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and secukinumab 150 mg in patients with active AS who had a poor response or intolerance to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and were tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor-naïve. Data from six RCTs comprising 937 patients were analyzed. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20 (ASAS20) response rates were significantly higher in the JAK inhibitors and secukinumab groups than in the placebo group. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA)-based ranking probability based on the ASAS20 response rate suggested that tofacitinib 5 mg had the highest likelihood of being the best treatment for achieving the ASAS20 response rate, followed by filgotinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, secukinumab 150 mg, and placebo. The SUCRA-based ranking probability based on the ASAS20 response rate suggested that tofacitinib 5 mg had the highest likelihood of being the best treatment for achieving the ASAS40 response rate, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg, secukinumab 150 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and placebo. KEY MESSAGES: Tofacitinib 5 mg was the most effective treatment for AS, whereas JAK inhibitors and secukinumab 150 mg were effective treatments in patients with active AS who had a poor response or intolerance to NSAIDs and were TNF inhibitor-naïve.

Efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor baricitinib in the treatment of adults with alopecia areata: Phase 2 results from a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: There are no treatments approved by the Food and Drug Administration for alopecia areata. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with ≥50% scalp hair loss in a phase 2 study of adults with alopecia areata (BRAVE-AA1). METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo or baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg once daily. Two consecutive interim analyses were performed after all patients completed weeks 12 and 36 or had discontinued treatment prior to these time points. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20 at week 36. Logistic regression was used with nonresponder imputation for missing data. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were randomized (placebo, 28; baricitinib 1-mg, 28; 2-mg, 27; 4-mg, 27). The baricitinib 1-mg dose was dropped after the first interim analysis based on lower SALT30 response rate. At week 36, the proportion of patients achieving a SALT score of ≤20 was significantly greater in baricitinib 2-mg (33.3%, P = .016) and 4-mg (51.9%, P = .001) groups versus placebo (3.6%). Baricitinib was well tolerated with no new safety findings. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size limits generalizability of results. CONCLUSION: These results support the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with ≥50% scalp hair loss.

[Small molecules treatment in rheumatoid arthritis]. / Petites molécules dans la polyarthrite rhumatoïde.

If treatment target is not reached with a conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) such as methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis, it is recommended to use a biologic (bDMARD) or a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, small synthetic molecules recently developed. Oral administration and short half-life can favour the choice of JAK inhibitors, as well as the opportunity to use it in monotherapy, even though co-treatment with csDMARD is recommended. As yet long-term studies are lacking, little is known about adverse effects although risk of herpes virus infections is clearly higher with JAK inhibitors than bDMARD treatments.

Lors du contrôle insuffisant de l'activité de la polyarthrite rhumatoïde (PR) par traitement conventionnel (csDMARD) comme le méthotrexate, il est recommandé d'introduire un traitement biologique (bDMARD) ou un inhibiteur de Janus kinase (JAK). Ces derniers sont de petites molécules synthétiques récemment développées. La prise per os et une demi-vie courte peuvent favoriser le choix d'un inhibiteur de JAK. De plus, une utilisation en monothérapie est envisageable, bien qu'une association avec un csDMARD soit préférée. En raison d'un manque d'études à long terme, leurs effets indésirables sont peu connus, hormis les infections à virus herpétique qui sont plus élevées qu'avec les bDMARD.

Newer treatments of psoriasis regarding IL-23 inhibitors, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, and Janus kinase inhibitors.

The rapid progress of genetic engineering furthermore opens up new prospects in the therapy of this difficult-to-treat disease. IL-23 inhibitors, phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are currently encouraging further research. Two drugs which are IL-23 inhibitors are now in phase III of clinical trials. The aim of the action of both drugs is selective IL-23 inhibition by targeting the p19 subunit. Guselkumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody. Tildrakizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody, which also belongs to IgG class and is targeted to subunit p19 of interleukin 23 (IL-23). Phosphodiesterase inhibitors exert an anti-inflammatory action and their most common group is the PDE4 family. PDE4 inhibits cAMP, which reduces the inflammatory response of the pathway of Th helper lymphocytes, Th17, and type 1 interferon which modulates the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 interleukins. The Janus kinase (JAK) signaling pathway plays an important role in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. Tofacitinib suppresses the expression of IL-23, IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 receptors during the stimulation of lymphocytes. Ruxolitinib is a selective inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK2 kinases and the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. This article is a review of the aforementioned drugs as described in the latest available literature.

Cardiovascular and Venous Thromboembolic Risk With JAK Inhibitors in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Skin Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are an effective treatment option for patients with certain skin-related conditions, such as atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo, but there is a current US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) boxed warning label for oral and topical JAK inhibitors regarding increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), venous thromboembolism (VTE), serious infections, malignant neoplasm, and death. However, this boxed warning was precipitated by results of the Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance study, which only included patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and the same association may not be observed in dermatologic conditions. Objective: To determine the risk of all-cause mortality, MACE, and VTE with JAK inhibitors in patients with dermatologic conditions. Data Sources: PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from database inception to April 1, 2023. Study Selection: This review included phase 3 randomized clinical trials with a placebo/active comparator group of JAK inhibitors used for a dermatologic indication with FDA approval or pending approval or with European Union or Japanese approval. Studies without a comparison group, case reports, observational studies, and review articles were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Adverse events using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model and the DerSimonian-Laird method. Studies were screened, data abstracted, and quality assessed by 2 independent authors. The protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were a composite of adjudicated MACE and all-cause mortality, and VTE. Results: The analysis included 35 randomized clinical trials with 20 651 patients (mean [SD] age, 38.5 [10.1] years; male, 54%) and a mean (SD) follow-up time of 4.9 (2.68) months. Findings did not show a significant difference between JAK inhibitors and placebo/active comparator in composite MACE and all-cause mortality (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.44-1.57) or VTE (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26-1.04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, use of JAK inhibitors was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, MACE, and VTE compared to the placebo/active comparator groups. Additional trials with long-term follow-up are needed to better understand the safety risks of JAK inhibitors used for dermatologic indications.

Targeted Systemic Therapies for Adults with Atopic Dermatitis: Selecting from Biologics and JAK Inhibitors.

Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents-biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors-have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.

Upadacitinib Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationships in Ulcerative Colitis Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Upadacitinib, an oral selective and reversible Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The objective was to characterize upadacitinib pharmacokinetics in UC patients across Phase 2b and 3 trials and evaluate the relationships between upadacitinib plasma exposures and key efficacy or safety endpoints. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses were performed to characterize upadacitinib pharmacokinetics in UC patients and evaluate the relationships between plasma exposures and key efficacy or safety endpoints at the end of 8-week induction and 52-week maintenance periods. Data from 1234 UC patients from Phase 2 and 3 induction trials and 449 UC patients from a Phase 3 maintenance trial were used for these analyses. Additionally, data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, atopic dermatitis, Crohn's disease, and healthy volunteers were used in the pharmacokinetics analysis. Quartile plots and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the exposure-response relationships across upadacitinib doses of 7.5-45 mg once daily (QD) for induction and 15-30 mg QD for maintenance. RESULTS: Upadacitinib plasma exposures were dose-proportional in UC patients across the evaluated dose range. Upadacitinib pharmacokinetics in UC were consistent between the induction and maintenance periods, and with other patient populations. Upadacitinib plasma exposures associated with the 45 mg QD induction dose maximized efficacy for Week 8 clinical and endoscopic endpoints. Plasma exposures associated with upadacitinib 30 mg maintenance dose provided additional incremental benefit compared to 15 mg QD for Week 52 key clinical and endoscopic endpoints. No trends were observed in the evaluated safety events with increasing plasma exposures at the end of induction or maintenance periods. CONCLUSION: These analyses supported selection of upadacitinib UC induction and maintenance doses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Data from studies NCT02819635 and NCT03653026 were included in these analyses.

A phase 2a randomized vehicle-controlled multi-center study of the safety and efficacy of delgocitinib in subjects with moderate-to-severe alopecia areata.

Alopecia areata/AA is an autoimmune cause of nonscarring hair loss. The pathogenesis of AA involves many immune axes, including Th1/Th2 pathways. Delgocitinib is a pan-Janus kinase/JAK inhibitor that broadly blocks pro-inflammatory cytokines and has been effective in other inflammatory skin conditions. Recent human studies/reports have shown that use of some systemic JAK inhibitors led to hair regrowth, suggesting this medication class as a potential therapy for AA. However, topical treatment is desirable due to potential systemic side effects. To assess the efficacy and safety of topical delgocitinib in AA, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial in 31 moderate-to-severe AA patients that were randomized 2:1 to receive delgocitinib ointment 30 mg/g (n = 20) or ointment vehicle (n = 11) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in severity of Alopecia Tool/SALT score from baseline to week 12. The secondary endpoint included safety profile by reported adverse events. Twenty-three subjects completed the trial, with eight discontinuing mostly due to voluntary withdrawal. Ten patients receiving delgocitinib ointment and three patients receiving vehicle showed SALT score improvements after 12 weeks, but the mean percent SALT improvement at week 12 compared to baseline between the two arms was not significant (p = 0.92). Our study suggests that delgocitinib ointment is not effective in moderate-to-severe AA, likely due to its inability to penetrate sufficiently deeply into the dermis of the scalp, but larger studies are necessary to assess whether a different formulation of topical JAK inhibitors may be suitable to treat mild or more localized forms of AA.

Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been proven to be effective and safe in various autoimmune diseases. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive evidence regarding their efficacy and safety in systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus. METHODS: We searched for systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus patients who were treated with JAK inhibitors in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until February 28, 2023. The quality of clinical trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted when at least three studies had comparable measures of outcome. If meta-analysis was not feasible, a descriptive review was carried out. RESULTS: We included 30 studies, consisting of 10 randomized controlled trials and 20 case series or reports, with a total of 2,460 patients. JAK inhibitors were found to be more effective than placebo in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on the percentage of achieving SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 response (RR = 1.18; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.31; p = 0.001), British Isles Lupus Assessment Group -based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response (RR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.31; p = 0.02), Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) (RR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.54; p = 0.008), and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K) remission of arthritis or rash (RR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.18; p = 0.04), particularly in treating musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous involvement. However, the effect of JAK inhibitors on cutaneous lupus erythematosus was uncertain. JAK inhibitors and placebo had a similar incidence of adverse events (RR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.04; p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: JAK inhibitors could be a potential treatment option for systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus, particularly in treating cutaneous and musculoskeletal lesions of SLE. JAK inhibitors had a safe profile.

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of baricitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: New biologic and small molecule therapeutics have emerged for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), including oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as baricitinib. While JAK inhibitors are commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, these agents are relatively new in the field of dermatology. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we outline the efficacy and safety data of phase III randomized controlled trials investigating the use of baricitinib for moderate-to-severe AD. A literature search was performed using PubMed.gov to identify articles relevant to the topic published before August 2023. EXPERT OPINION: Oral JAK inhibitors in AD management are highly efficacious, whether used alone, in conjunction with topical corticosteroids, or in patients who have failed other conventional systemic medications for AD. JAK inhibitors appear to be well tolerated in the AD patient population with fewer major safety risks than what has been seen in other patient populations. Assessing patient risk factors for cardiovascular, thromboembolic, and oncologic diseases is now an important part of the office visit for patients in whom you may consider using a JAK inhibitor.