Reversal agents for current and forthcoming direct oral anticoagulants.

Over the past 20 years, there has been a shift from vitamin K antagonists to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which include the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Although DOACs are associated with less serious bleeding than vitamin K antagonists, bleeding still occurs with DOACs, particularly in the elderly and in those with comorbidities. Reversal of the anticoagulant effects of the DOACs may be needed in patients with serious bleeding and in those requiring urgent surgery or intervention. Reversal can be effected with specific agents, such as idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet alfa for apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, or with non-specific agents, such as prothrombin complex concentrates, activated prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant activated factor VII. This paper (i) provides an update on when and how to reverse the DOACs, (ii) describes new reversal agents under development, and (iii) provides a strategic framework for the reversal of the factor XI inhibitors currently under investigation in phase three clinical trials.

Rivaroxaban versus no anticoagulation for post-discharge thromboprophylaxis after hospitalisation for COVID-19 (MICHELLE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalised with COVID-19 are at risk for thrombotic events after discharge; the role of extended thromboprophylaxis in this population is unknown. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, randomised trial conducted at 14 centres in Brazil, patients hospitalised with COVID-19 at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism [IMPROVE] venous thromboembolism [VTE] score of ≥4 or 2-3 with a D-dimer >500 ng/mL) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive, at hospital discharge, rivaroxaban 10 mg/day or no anticoagulation for 35 days. The primary efficacy outcome in an intention-to-treat analysis was a composite of symptomatic or fatal venous thromboembolism, asymptomatic venous thromboembolism on bilateral lower-limb venous ultrasound and CT pulmonary angiogram, symptomatic arterial thromboembolism, and cardiovascular death at day 35. Adjudication was blinded. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary and safety analyses were carried out in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04662684. FINDINGS: From Oct 8, 2020, to June 29, 2021, 997 patients were screened. Of these patients, 677 did not meet eligibility criteria; the remaining 320 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (n=160 [50%]) or no anticoagulation (n=160 [50%]). All patients received thromboprophylaxis with standard doses of heparin during hospitalisation. 165 (52%) patients were in the intensive care unit while hospitalised. 197 (62%) patients had an IMPROVE score of 2-3 and elevated D-dimer levels and 121 (38%) had a score of 4 or more. Two patients (one in each group) were lost to follow-up due to withdrawal of consent and not included in the intention-to-treat primary analysis. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in five (3%) of 159 patients assigned to rivaroxaban and 15 (9%) of 159 patients assigned to no anticoagulation (relative risk 0·33, 95% CI 0·12-0·90; p=0·0293). No major bleeding occurred in either study group. Allergic reactions occurred in two (1%) patients in the rivaroxaban group. INTERPRETATION: In patients at high risk discharged after hospitalisation due to COVID-19, thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg/day for 35 days improved clinical outcomes compared with no extended thromboprophylaxis. FUNDING: Bayer.

When and How to Use Reversal Agents for Direct Oral Anticoagulants?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our objective is to describe currently available reversal agents for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), their target population, the available clinical practice recommendations and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Specific (idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet alfa for direct factor Xa inhibitors) and non-specific (prothrombin complex concentrates) reversal agents are effective in neutralizing the anticoagulant effect of DOACs. New investigational antidotes such as ciraparantag and VMX-C001 offer an alternative to andexanet alfa in reversing the anticoagulant activity of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors, but more clinical data are needed before they could be licensed for use. Specific reversal agents are recommended for use in clinical situations within their licensed indications (i.e.: reversal of DOACs in patients with severe uncontrolled or life-threatening bleeding or in need of emergency surgery or other invasive procedures), while non-specific reversal agents may be used when specific antidotes are not available or indicated.

Rivaroxaban Reduces Arterial Thrombosis by Inhibition of FXa-Driven Platelet Activation via Protease Activated Receptor-1.

RATIONALE: A reduced rate of myocardial infarction has been reported in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with FXa (factor Xa) inhibitors including rivaroxaban compared with vitamin K antagonists. At the same time, low-dose rivaroxaban has been shown to reduce mortality and atherothrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease. Yet, the mechanisms underlying this reduction remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we hypothesized that rivaroxaban's antithrombotic potential is linked to a hitherto unknown rivaroxaban effect that impacts on platelet reactivity and arterial thrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we identified FXa as potent, direct agonist of the PAR-1 (protease-activated receptor 1), leading to platelet activation and thrombus formation, which can be inhibited by rivaroxaban. We found that rivaroxaban reduced arterial thrombus stability in a mouse model of arterial thrombosis using intravital microscopy. For in vitro studies, atrial fibrillation patients on permanent rivaroxaban treatment for stroke prevention, respective controls, and patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation before and after first intake of rivaroxaban (time series analysis) were recruited. Platelet aggregation responses, as well as thrombus formation under arterial flow conditions on collagen and atherosclerotic plaque material, were attenuated by rivaroxaban. We show that rivaroxaban's antiplatelet effect is plasma dependent but independent of thrombin and rivaroxaban's anticoagulatory capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we identified FXa as potent platelet agonist that acts through PAR-1. Therefore, rivaroxaban exerts an antiplatelet effect that together with its well-known potent anticoagulatory capacity might lead to reduced frequency of atherothrombotic events and improved outcome in patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants: evidence and unresolved issues.

Currently licenced direct oral anticoagulants selectively target thrombin (eg, dabigatran) or coagulation factor Xa (eg, apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban). Designed to be given in fixed doses without routine monitoring, direct oral anticoagulants have a lower propensity for food and drug interactions than do vitamin K antagonists, and in randomised controlled trials involving around 250 000 patients, they were at least as effective for prevention and treatment of thrombosis and were associated with a lower risk of life-threatening bleeding. The absolute benefits of direct oral anticoagulants over vitamin K antagonists are modest; however, guidelines recommend them in preference to vitamin K antagonists for most indications because of their ease of use and superior safety. The greatest benefits of direct oral anticoagulants are likely to be in patients who were previously deemed unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy. The emergence of generic preparations is expected to further increase the uptake of direct oral anticoagulants, particularly in countries where they are currently not widely used because of cost. Direct oral anticoagulants are contraindicated in patients with mechanical heart valves and should be used with caution or avoided in patients with advanced kidney or liver disease. In this Therapeutics paper, we review the pharmacology of direct oral anticoagulants, summarise the evidence that led to their approval and incorporation into treatment guidelines, and explore key unresolved issues. We also briefly discuss future perspectives for the development of oral anticoagulants.

Bleeding and Thrombosis With Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support: A Roadmap for Management, Research, and the Future From the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society: Part 2.

OBJECTIVES: To make recommendations on improving understanding of bleeding and thrombosis with pediatric extracorporeal life support including future research directions. DATA SOURCES: Evaluation of literature and consensus conferences of pediatric critical care and extracorporeal life support experts. STUDY SELECTION: A team of 10 experts with pediatric cardiac and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation experience and expertise met through the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society to review current knowledge and make recommendations for future research to establish "best practice" for anticoagulation management related to extracorporeal life support. DATA EXTRACTION/DATA SYNTHESIS: This white paper focuses on clinical understanding and limitations of current strategies to monitor anticoagulation. For each test of anticoagulation, limitations of current knowledge are addressed and future research directions suggested. CONCLUSIONS: No consensus on best practice for anticoagulation monitoring exists. Structured scientific evaluation to answer questions regarding anticoagulation monitoring and bleeding and thrombotic events should occur in multicenter studies using standardized approaches and well-defined endpoints. Outcomes related to need for component change, blood product administration, healthcare outcome, and economic assessment should be incorporated into studies. All centers should report data on patient receiving extracorporeal life support to a registry.

Efficacy and Safety of Antiplatelet Therapy Plus Xa Factor Inhibitors in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effect of oral Xa inhibitors plus antiplatelet therapy in the treatment of coronary artery disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about antiplatelet therapy plus Xa factor inhibitors for coronary artery disease from database inception to January 2019 were searched for and collected from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers extracted and analyzed the data independently. Additionally, RevMan 5.0 software was applied for meta-analysis. RESULTS Seven RCTs with 50 044 patients were included. The meta-analysis results showed that treatment with antiplatelet therapy plus Xa factor inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease could significantly reduce the risk of ischemic events (P<0.00001). Besides, risk of all-cause mortality (P=0.003), myocardial infarction (P=0.02) and ischemic stroke (P<0.0001) were also significantly reduced. However, risk of massive hemorrhage after TIMI (P<0.00001), minor hemorrhage after TIMI (P<0.00001), and intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.006) were significantly increased, respectively. Xa inhibition drugs also intended to increase risk of fatal bleeding, but there was no significant difference (P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS Antiplatelet therapy plus Xa factor inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease was effective, which could reduce the risk of ischemic composite endpoints, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. However, it could significantly increase risk of bleeding in terms of safety.

Anticoagulation: Updated Guidelines for Outpatient Management.

Anticoagulation therapy is recommended for preventing, treating, and reducing the recurrence of venous thromboembolism, and preventing stroke in persons with atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants are first-line agents for eligible patients for treating venous thromboembolism and preventing stroke in those with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists are recommended for patients with mechanical valves and valvular atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists inhibit the production of vitamin K-related factors and require a minimum of five days overlap with parenteral anticoagulants, whereas direct oral anticoagulants directly inhibit factor II or factor Xa, providing more immediate anticoagulation. The immediate effect of direct oral anticoagulants permits select patients at low risk to initiate treatment in the outpatient setting for venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism. Low-molecular-weight heparin continues to be recommended as a first-line treatment for patients with venous thromboembolism and active cancer, although there is growing evidence of effectiveness for the use of direct oral anticoagulants in this patient population. Validated bleeding risk assessments such as HAS-BLED should be performed at each visit and modifiable factors should be addressed. Major bleeding should be treated with vitamin K and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for patients already being treated with a vitamin K antagonist. Idarucizumab has been effective for reversing the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, and andexanet alfa has been effective for reversing the effects of rivaroxaban and apixaban.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of rivaroxaban in obese patients prior to and after bariatric surgery.

AIMS: Venous thromboembolism is an important cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in bariatric surgery. Studies of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not available in this surgical field. The objective of this phase 1 clinical trial was to investigate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters of rivaroxaban in bariatric patients. METHODS: In this single-centre study, obese patients received single oral doses of rivaroxaban (10 mg) 1 day prior to and 3 days after bariatric surgery. PK and PD parameters were assessed at baseline and during 24 h after drug ingestion. RESULTS: Six Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients and six sleeve gastrectomy patients completed the study. Mean rivaroxaban area under plasma concentration-time curve, peak plasma concentration, time to peak plasma concentration and terminal half-life were 971.9 µg·h l-1 (coefficient of variation: 10.6), 135.3 µg l-1 (26.7), 1.5 h and 13.1 h (34.1) prior to and 1165.8 (21.9), 170.0 (15.9), 1.5 and 8.9 (44.6) postsurgery for SG patients and 933.7 µg·h l-1 (22.3), 136.5 µg l-1 (10.7), 1.5 h und 13.8 h (46.6) prior to and 1029.4 (7.4), 110.8 (31.8), 2.5 and 15 (60.0) postsurgery for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients, respectively. Prothrombin fragments (F1 + 2) decreased during the first 12 hours and increased thereafter in the pre- and the postbariatric setting. Thrombin-antithrombin complexes dropped within 1-3 h in the prebariatric setting and remained low after surgery until they increased at 24 h postdose. Rivaroxaban was well tolerated and no relevant safety issues were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery does not appear to alter PK of rivaroxaban in a clinically relevant way. Effective prophylactic postbariatric anticoagulation is supported by changes in PD.

Use of fondaparinux for thromboprophylaxis in an unfractionated heparin-intolerant pregnant woman with thrombotic predisposition.

A 34-year-old primigravida who had undergone thrombectomy for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in her leg and exhibited low protein S activity, indicating predisposition to thrombosis, developed DVT of the leg. No pulmonary embolism was detected. After anticoagulant therapy with unfractionated heparin was discontinued because of liver dysfunction, danaparoid treatment was administered in hospital. The patient had a normal delivery after 39 weeks' gestation with no recurrence of thrombosis. During her second pregnancy four years later, she gave herself fondaparinux injections. She delivered normally after 38 weeks' gestation without experiencing DVT. Fondaparinux may be a useful anticoagulant for heparin-intolerant pregnant women.

Treatment of Rivaroxaban versus Aspirin for Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (TRACE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke represents the largest group of cerebrovascular disease, and those patients have a high risk of early recurrent stroke. Over decades, anticoagulation therapy has been used prudently in them for likely increasing the risk of intra-/extra-cranial hemorrhagic complications. However, recently rivaroxaban, a new oral anticoagulant, is proved to be as effective as traditional anticoagulants, while carrying significantly less risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Therefore, we assumed that patients may benefit from rivaroxaban if treated soon after TIA or minor stroke, and designed this adequately powered randomized study, TRACE. METHODS AND DESIGN: The Treatment of Rivaroxaban versus Aspirin in Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (TRACE) study is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial with a target enrollment of 4400 patients. A 14-days regimen of rivaroxaban 10 mg daily or a 14-days regimen of aspirin 100 mg daily will be administrated to randomized participants with acute TIA or minor stroke, defined as National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores ≤ 3. The primary efficacy end point is percentage of patients with any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhage) at 14 days. Study visits will be performed at the day of randomization, day 14 and day 90. DISCUSSION: Even though the new oral anticoagulants seem to be both safe and effective, few clinical trials have been carried out to test their effect on non-disabling cerebrovascular events. Treatment with rivaroxaban may prevent more cerebrovascular events with an acceptable risk profile after TIA or minor stroke, compared with aspirin, thus helping to improve the outcome of the disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No. NCT01923818.

Rivaroxaban 10mg/d in severe renal failure does not prevent ischemic events in premorbid neurologic disease.

BACKGRUND: The direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used for primary and secondary stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, although their use in patients with renal failure is problematic. CASE REPORT: In an 82-years old female with recurrent strokes and atrial fibrillation, the vitamin-K-antagonist was changed to rivaroxaban because of "unstable international normalized ratio (INR) values". Because of renal failure with a creatinine clearance of 32ml/min, a dosage of rivaroxaban 10mg/d was chosen. Eleven days after initiation of rivaroxaban, she was re-hospitalized because of acute onset of right-sided weakness of the upper and lower limbs. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of stroke, renal failure and inadequate anticoagulation it is not useful to change from vitamin-K-antagonists to "low dose" DOAC. Diligent investigations for the cause of INR-instability and continuation of vitamin-K-antagonist therapy seem to be more effective and safer since there is the opportunity of monitoring therapy and to avoid under- as well as over-dosage.

Reduced smoke-like echo and resolved thrombus in the left atrium with rivaroxaban therapy in an acute cardioembolic stroke patient.

We report a case of a nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patient with acute cardioembolic stroke in whom rivaroxaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, reduced a smoke-like echo in the left atrium and resolved a thrombus in the left atrial appendage. A 71-year-old man was admitted because of the sudden onset of right hemiplegia and aphasia and was diagnosed with acute cardioembolic stroke associated with NVAF. The patient had not been treated with warfarin before admission, and rivaroxaban therapy (15 mg once daily) was initiated. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed on day 8 and a mobile thrombus was found in the left atrial appendage, accompanied by a remarkable smoke-like echo in the left atrium. Notably, the thrombus was resolved and the smoke-like echo was reduced on day 40. No recurrent ischemic stroke occurred. We describe favorable effects of rivaroxaban on the reduction of a smoke-like echo and on the resolution of a thrombus in the left atrium in an NVAF patient with acute cardioembolic stroke.

Who may benefit from low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin? Practical implications for outpatients with cardiovascular disease.

Despite availability of effective preventive therapies based on guidelines, patients with vascular diseases continue to be at a high risk for recurrent ischemic events. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies are required to further reduce the residual risk present in these patients. Platelet aggregation and fibrin organization are involved in arterial thrombosis. Rivaroxaban is capable of targeting both processes and has a synergistic effect when used in combination with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), providing the so­called dual pathway inhibition (DPI). The COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial showed that the DPI (a combination of rivaroxaban at 2.5 mg twice daily [vascular dose] and ASA at 100 mg once daily) reduced cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction by 24% in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD). Subsequently, the VOYAGER PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD) trial confirmed the effectiveness of the vascular dose of rivaroxaban in patients with PAD after lower­extremity revascularization, as compared with ASA alone. Therefore, DPI is recommended in the patients with CAD (+/- PAD) or symptomatic PAD at a high risk of ischemia. The purpose of this review is to examine the clinical benefits and practical implications of DPI in the CAD and PAD patients.

Real-world oral anticoagulants for Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A PRISMA-compliant article.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of 4 non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in Asians with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in real-world practice through a network meta-analysis of observational studies. METHODS: We searched multiple comprehensive databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library) for studies published until August 2020. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for the pooled estimates. Efficacy outcomes included ischemic stroke (IS), stroke/systemic embolism (SSE), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality, and safety outcomes included major bleeding, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The P score was calculated for ranking probabilities. Subgroup analyses were separately performed in accordance with the dosage range of NOACs ("standard-" and "low-dose"). RESULTS: A total of 11, 6, and 8 studies were allocated to the total population, standard-dose group, and low-dose group, respectively. In the total study population, edoxaban ranked the best in terms of IS and ICH prevention and apixaban ranked the best for SSE, major bleeding, and GI bleeding. In the standard-dose regimen, apixaban ranked the best in terms of IS and SSE prevention. For major bleeding, GI bleeding, and ICH, edoxaban ranked the best. In the low-dose regimen, edoxaban ranked the best for IS, SSE, GI bleeding, and ICH prevention. For major bleeding prevention, apixaban ranked best. CONCLUSIONS: All 4 NOACs had different efficacy and safety outcomes according to their type and dosage. Apixaban and edoxaban might be relatively better and more well-balanced treatment for Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Does atorvastatin therapy change the anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with atrial fibrillation?

Atorvastatin and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (xabans) are frequently co-administrated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, no studies investigating the possibility of the pharmacologic interaction between these agents have been conducted. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the impact of atorvastatin therapy on anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF. We enrolled 115 AF patients on long-term rivaroxaban (52 patients) and long-term apixaban (63 patients) therapy. Long-term atorvastatin (40 mg once daily) was administrated to 28 rivaroxaban-treated patients and to 28 apixaban-treated patients. Trough and peak samples were tested for anti-Xa activity with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis. For rivaroxaban, there were no significant differences in trough activity (45.5 ± 39.5 ng/ml vs. 46.2 ± 30.1 ng/ml; p = .34) and peak anti-Xa activity (179.2 ± 108.8 ng/ml vs. 208.1 ± 104.1 ng/ml; p = .94) between atorvastatin-treated patients and those without atorvastatin. Similarly, atorvastatin did not impact the trough activity (127.7 ± 71.1 ng/ml vs. 100.8 ± 61.1 ng/ml; p = .12) or peak anti-Xa activity (213.8 ± 103.6 ng/ml vs. 179.3 ± 72.9 ng/ml; p = .14) among apixaban-treated patients with AF. This observational study did not show a significant impact of atorvastatin on trough and peak anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF.

Edoxaban and the Issue of Drug-Drug Interactions: From Pharmacology to Clinical Practice.

Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is the latest of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Despite being marketed later than other NOACs, its use is now spreading in current clinical practice, being indicated for both thromboprophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In patients with multiple conditions, the contemporary administration of several drugs can cause relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which can affect drugs' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Usually, all the NOACs are considered to have significantly fewer DDIs than vitamin K antagonists; notwithstanding, this is actually not true, all of them are affected by DDIs with drugs that can influence the activity (induction or inhibition) of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 3A4, both responsible for the disposition and metabolism of NOACs to a different extent. In this review/expert opinion, we focused on an extensive report of edoxaban DDIs. All the relevant drugs categories have been examined to report on significant DDIs, discussing the impact on edoxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and the evidence for dose adjustment. Our analysis found that, despite a restrained number of interactions, some strong inhibitors/inducers of P-gp and drug-metabolising enzymes can affect edoxaban concentration, just as it happens with other NOACs, implying the need for a dose adjustment. However, our analysis of edoxaban DDIs suggests that given the small propensity for interactions of this agent, its use represents an acceptable clinical decision. Still, DDIs can be significant in certain clinical situations and a careful evaluation is always needed when prescribing NOACs.

Review of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Guide for Effective Drug Utilization.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed as a viable and in some cases superior alternative to warfarin. These agents have overcome some of the limitations of warfarin, which has a narrow therapeutic window and many food and drug interactions. DOACs have been demonstrated to have a more predictable and reliable pharmacology and, unlike warfarin, do not require frequent monitoring of anticoagulant effect. For these reasons, the use of DOACs is increasing. Despite the many positive attributes of these agents, limitations and contraindications do exist. An understanding of the pharmacology, indications, and contraindications is therefore crucial for effective patient management. We review the available agents to aid in effective drug utilization.