De-escalation from Dose-Intensified Anti-TNF Therapy Is Successful in the Majority of IBD Patients at 12 Months.

BACKGROUND: Data on outcomes following de-escalation of intensified anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited and concerns about relapse limit willingness to de-escalate. AIMS: To evaluate rates of successful de-escalation at 12 months and to determine factors that may predict success. METHODS: Single-centre experience of IBD patients that were de-escalated following deep remission on dose-intensified infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) for secondary loss of response. Patients were classified as 'successes' if remaining on reduced anti-TNF or 'failures' if requiring re-escalation, steroids, surgery or enrolment into a clinical trial at 12 months. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, biomarkers (faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, albumin) and anti-TNF drug levels were collected 6-monthly. RESULTS: Of 25 patients (20 CD, 5 UC), 16 (64%) were successes 12 months post-de-escalation. Median time to failure was 6 months. Six of the nine failures required anti-TNF re-escalation and three entered a clinical trial. Re-escalation recaptured response in all six patients. There was no significant difference in baseline biomarker activity between the two groups. There was no difference in infliximab levels between successes and failures at the time of de-escalation (5.5 vs. 5.3, p = 0.63) as well as 6 months (3.1 vs. 4.6, p = 0.95) and 12 months (3.2 vs. 4.5, p = 0.58) post-de-escalation. CONCLUSION: Nearly two-thirds of patients remained on reduced anti-TNF dosing 12 months after de-escalation. All patients who failed de-escalation were recaptured after dose re-escalation. De-escalation with close monitoring may be considered in patients on intensified anti-TNF therapy in sustained remission.

Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is reported to be below par. Non-adherence may result in loss-of-response and increased hospitalization. We analyzed the effect of an electronic needle container (ENC) on adherence to adalimumab. METHODS: In this multicenter, 12-months observational study, we included adalimumab treated IBD patients. All patients were invited to receive an ENC. Patients who declined or did not complete the registration for an ENC served as controls. Primary endpoint was whether an ENC increased adherence, calculated from pharmacy refills as proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, including loss-of-response, identification of predictors of adherence and correlation between different modalities for measuring adherence. Loss-of-response was defined as a disease flare, dose-escalation or IBD-related hospitalization or surgery. RESULTS: The pharmacies' records identified 198 eligible patients, of whom 32 were excluded. The ENC was supplied to 69 patients, the remaining 97 patient formed the control group. Median baseline PDC (98.4% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.047) and the proportion of adherent (PDC ≥ 86%) patients (87.0% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.045) was higher for the ENC group. The ENC did not improve the adherence of patients during follow-up (odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.55-2.86). During follow-up, five (7.2%) patients in the ENC group and 13 (13.4%) in the control group discontinued adalimumab (log-rank p = 0.22). Loss-of-response occurred in 12 (17.4%) and 14 (14.4%) patients, respectively (log-rank p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show no beneficial effect of a reminder-based intervention on adherence or treatment outcomes.

Sustained discontinuation of infliximab with a raising-dose strategy after obtaining remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the RRRR study, a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine whether the 'programmed' infliximab (IFX) treatment strategy (for which the dose of IFX was adjusted based on the baseline serum tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α)) is beneficial to induction of clinical remission after 54 weeks and sustained discontinuation of IFX for 1 year. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised trial, patients with IFX-naïve rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate were randomised to two groups; patients in programmed treatment group received 3 mg/kg IFX until week 6 and after 14 weeks the dose of IFX was adjusted based on the baseline levels of serum TNF-α until week 54; patients in the standard treatment group received 3 mg/kg of IFX. Patients who achieved a simplified disease activity index (SDAI) ≤3.3 at week 54 discontinued IFX. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who sustained discontinuation of IFX at week 106. RESULTS: A total of 337 patients were randomised. At week 54, 39.4% (67/170) in the programmed group and 32.3% (54/167) in the standard group attained remission (SDAI ≤3.3). At week 106, the 1-year sustained discontinuation rate was not significantly different between two groups; the programmed group 23.5% (40/170) and the standard group 21.6% (36/167), respectively (2.2% difference, 95% CI -6.6% to 11.0%; p=0.631). Baseline SDAI <26.0 was a statistically significant predictor of the successfully sustained discontinuation of IFX at week 106. CONCLUSION: Programmed treatment strategy did not statistically increase the sustained remission rate after 1 year discontinuation of IFX treatment.

Comparative Efficacy of Anti-TNF Therapies For The Prevention of Postoperative Recurrence of Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of studies on the optimal anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent for postoperative prophylaxis of Crohn's disease (CD) recurrence. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) of prospective trials to compare the efficacy of anti-TNF agents in the prevention of postoperative endoscopic and clinical recurrence of CD following ileocolonic resection. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and recent American gastroenterology association (AGA) meeting abstracts through August 2017. We selected prospective studies comparing anti-TNF agents among each other or to other agents in the setting of postoperative prevention of CD recurrence. We performed a NMA using a frequentist approach with generalized pairwise modeling and inverse variance heterogeneity method. RESULTS: We identified 9 studies, including 571 patients and 5 treatment agents, among which 2 anti-TNF drugs (adalimumab and infliximab). Compared with infliximab, our NMA yielded the following results for endoscopic recurrence: adalimumab [odds ratio (OR), 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18-4.75], thiopurines (OR, 4.11; 95% CI, 0.68-24.78), placebo (OR, 4.39; 95% CI, 0.70-27.68), and Mesalamine (OR, 37.84; 95% CI, 3.77-379.42). For clinical recurrence: adalimumab (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.17-6.03), thiopurines (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.20-10.02), placebo (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.01-3.10), and mesalamine (OR, 16.54; 95% CI, 1.55-176.24). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a NMA combining direct and indirect evidence either adalimumab or infliximab may be used in the postoperative prophylaxis of CD recurrence. There is currently a lack of evidence on the use of other anti-TNF agents in this setting.

A Population-Based Study of Combination vs Monotherapy of Anti-TNF in Persons With IBD.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist about the utilization of combination therapy (anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF] plus immunosuppressives) in clinical practice. We assessed the prevalence and predictors of combination therapy use vs anti-TNF monotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the Canadian province of Manitoba. METHODS: All 23 prescribers of anti-TNF medications for IBD in Manitoba facilitated chart review of their comprehensive lists of adult anti-TNF patients from 2005 to 2015. Subjects were stratified by year of first anti-TNF exposure. Patient, disease, and prescriber factors influencing combination therapy use were explored. RESULTS: A total of 774 patients met inclusion criteria. Seventy-one point one percent had Crohn's disease (CD), 28.3% had ulcerative colitis (UC), and 0.6% had IBD unclassified; 45.3% received combination therapy, with no difference between CD and UC. Crohn's disease subjects receiving combination therapy were more likely to have penetrating or perianal disease (56.9% vs 42.8%; P = 0.001) and less likely to have had previous IBD-related surgeries (36.2% vs 46.2%; P = 0.02). The median age at diagnosis and at anti-TNF initiation was lower among combination therapy users. Adalimumab users were as likely as infliximab users to receive combination therapy but persisted with treatment for a shorter time. The proportion of new anti-TNF users receiving combination therapy did not change over time (P = 0.43). There was substantial variation in combination therapy use between prescribers (P = 0.002). The most frequently encountered reasons for avoiding combination therapy were previous intolerance or ineffectiveness of immunosuppressive monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Use of combination therapy has remained unchanged over time despite the publication of high-quality data supporting its efficacy over anti-TNF monotherapy.

Early vs Late Use of Anti-TNFa Therapy in Adult Patients With Crohn Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: While anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFa) therapies for Crohn disease (CD) were initially introduced in 1998 for biologic therapies are often introduced after a minimum of 6 years after diagnosis. The benefit of anti-TNFa early in the course of CD is still controversial, with some studies showing better outcomes but others not. To determine whether earlier introduction of anti-TNFa therapy improves efficacy in clinical trials or clinical series, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing early vs late anti-TNFa use in the management of CD. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus was conducted from each database's inception to November 3, 2019. We included comparative studies of early vs late use of anti-TNFa therapy in adult patients with CD. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 2501 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the early use of anti-TNFa was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the need for surgery (relative risk [RR] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.69; I2 = 68%) and disease progression (RR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.75; I2 = 61%). Early use also showed an increase in early remission (RR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.54-2.46; I2 = 0%) and clinical response. There was no statistically significant difference in achieving late remission (RR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.94-2.05; I2 = 65%) or mucosal healing (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.63-1.91; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that using anti-TNFa earlier in the treatment of CD (within 3 years) may improve clinical outcomes compared to late administration in terms of achieving early clinical remission, clinical response, disease progression, and the need for surgery.

The Safety Profile of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Are TNF Inhibitors Safer Than We Thought?

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors significantly improved the treatment options for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Unfortunately, currently, there is no strategy for sustaining remission of the disease with TNF inhibitors; after discontinuation, a high percentage of patients experience flares in a short time. Therefore, up-to-date, long-term use of TNF inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis remains necessary. For this reason, the issue of the long-term safety of TNF inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis raises concerns. Although TNF inhibitors are well established in ankylosing spondylitis treatment, the majority of studies on TNF inhibitors' safety have been performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Until recently, there were very few studies of TNF inhibitors' safety in ankylosing spondylitis. Meanwhile, TNF inhibitors appear to have different safety profiles in ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. In this review, we describe available data on the occurrence of adverse events associated with TNF inhibitor treatment in ankylosing spondylitis, including serious adverse events, infections, serious infections, tuberculosis, opportunistic infections, hepatitis B reactivation, malignancies, laboratory test abnormalities, autoimmune diseases, paradoxical adverse events, and heart failure.