Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for spinal cord ischemia after complex aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) with paraplegia or paraparesis is a devastating complication of complex aortic repair (CAR). Treatment includes cerebrospinal fluid drainage, maintenance of hemoglobin concentration (>10 g/L), and elevating mean arterial blood pressure. Animal and human case series have reported improvements in SCI outcomes with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). We reviewed our center's experience with HBOT as a rescue treatment for spinal cord ischemia post-CAR in addition to standard treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of the University Health Network's Hyperbaric Medicine Unit treatment database identified HBOT sessions for patients with SCI post-CAR between January 2013 and June 2021. Mean estimates of overall motor function scores were determined for postoperative, pre-HBOT, post-HBOT (within 4 hours of the final HBOT session), and at the final assessment (last available in-hospital evaluation) using a linear mixed model. A subgroup analysis compared the mean estimates of overall motor function scores between improvement and non-improvement groups at given timepoints. Improvement of motor function was defined as either a ≥2 point increase in overall muscle function score in patients with paraparesis or an upward change in motor deficit categorization (para/monoplegia, paraparesis, and no deficit). Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying by improvement or non-improvement of motor function from pre-HBOT to final evaluation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated for SCI. Pre-HBOT, the motor deficit categorization was 10 paraplegia, three monoplegia, 16 paraparesis, and one unable to assess. At the final assessment, 14 patients demonstrated variable degrees of motor function improvement; eight patients demonstrated full motor function recovery. Seven of the 10 patients with paraplegia remained paraplegic despite HBOT. The estimated mean of overall muscle function score for pre-HBOT was 16.6 ± 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-22.3) and for final assessment was 23.4 ± 2.9 (95% CI, 17.7-29.1). The estimated mean difference between pre-HBOT and final assessment overall muscle function score was 6.7 ± 3.1 (95% CI, 0.6-16.1). The estimated mean difference of the overall muscle function score between pre-HBOT and final assessment for the improved group was 16.6 ± 3.5 (95% CI, 7.5-25.7) vs -4.9 ± 4.2 (95% CI, -16.0 to 6.2) for the non-improved group. CONCLUSIONS: HBOT, in addition to standard treatment, may potentially improve recovery in spinal cord function following SCI post-CAR. However, the potential benefits of HBOT are not equally distributed among subgroups.

Chimney Technique and Single-Branched Stent Graft for the Left Subclavian Artery Preservation During Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Acute Aortic Syndromes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair assisted by the chimney technique or single-branched stent graft for the preservation of the left subclavian artery, and summarize our single-center experience with the techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2017 to June 2020, 137 patients who underwent left subclavian artery revascularization during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair were enrolled. Patients had acute type B aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcer associated with intramural hematoma. The chimney technique was performed in 68 patients (group A), and single-branched stent graft was deployed in 69 patients (group B). All procedures were performed during the acute phase. Primary technical success, immediate postoperative endoleak, neurologic complications (stroke or spinal cord ischemia), 30-day mortality, 1-year technical success, all-cause mortality, patency of the left subclavian artery, and reintervention were analyzed. Comparing the occurrence of the Bird-Beak Configuration, defined as a gap between the aortic wall and the sent graft with stent protrusion into the aortic lumen more than 5 mm, was also performed. RESULTS: Primary technique success was achieved in 66 and 67 patients in groups A and B, respectively. The incidence of immediate postoperative endoleak, neurologic complications (stroke or spinal cord ischemia), and 30-day mortality were 5.9%, 1.5%, and 4.4% in group A, and 2.9%, 2.9%, and 2.9% in group B, respectively. During follow-up, the 1-year technical success rate was similar in both groups. All-cause mortality was similar in both groups (3.1% in group A and 4.5% in group B). The patency of the left subclavian artery was not significantly different between the 2 groups with 2 and 3 occlusions in groups A and B, respectively. The rate of reintervention was higher in group B (3.1% vs 1.6%, p=0.536), with a non-significant difference. Bird-Beak Configuration was more prominent in group B with the incidence of 59.42%. CONCLUSIONS: Acting as minimally invasive alternatives, both techniques are feasible for left subclavian artery preservation during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B acute aortic syndromes with encouraging mid-term outcomes. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm these findings.

Preparing the spinal cord - priming or preconditioning? A systematic review of experimental studies.

Objectives. Paraplegia is devastating complication associated with thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vast evidence has been gathered on pre-, peri- and postoperative protective adjuncts aiming to minimize spinal cord ischemia. This review focuses on the pretreatment phase of open surgical or endovascular aortic procedures and gathers the experimental data on the interventional preconditioning and priming methods that increase the spinal cord ischemic tolerance. Design. By the start of March 2021, a systematic review was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science core collection to identify the articles that reported (i) either an ischemic preconditioning, remote ischemic preconditioning or priming method prior to (ii) experimental spinal cord ischemia performed in endovascular or open surgical fashion mimicking either thoracic, abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm procedures. (iii) The outcomes were reported via neurological, motor-evoked potential, somatosensory-evoked potential, histopathological, immunohistochemical, physiological analysis, or in different combinations of these measurements. Results. The search yielded 7802 articles, and 57 articles were included in the systematic review. The articles were assessed by the evaluated species, the utilized pretreatment, the measured protective effects, and the suggested underlying mechanisms. Conclusions. The reviewed articles showed several possible mechanisms in ischemic and remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of spinal cord ischemia. The main suggested method for priming was arteriogenetic stimulus. Future studies should confirm these hints of arteriogenetic stimulus with more precise quantification of the protective recruitment process.

Spinal cord protection in open and endovascular approaches to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Despite advancements in surgical and postoperative management, spinal cord injury has been a persistent complication of both open and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Spinal cord injury can be explained with an ischemia-infarction model which results in local edema of the spinal cord, damaging its structure and leading to reversible or irreversible loss of its function. Perfusion of the spinal cord during aortic procedures can be enhanced by several adjuncts which have been described with a broad variety of evidence in their support. These adjuncts include systemic hypothermia, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, extracorporeal circulation and distal aortic perfusion, segmental arteries reimplantation, left subclavian artery revascularization, and staged aortic repair. The Authors here reviewed and discussed the role of such adjuncts in preventing spinal cord injury from occurring, pinpointing current evidence and outlining future perspectives.

[The spinal catheter in aortic surgery : Implications for anesthesia]. / Der Spinalkatheter in der Aortenchirurgie : Implikationen für die Anästhesie.

During surgical repair of aortic pathologies (e.g. dissection, aneurysms), cross-clamping of the aorta or overstenting of critical segmental arteries can lead to ischemia- and edema-related spinal cord damage with subsequent paraplegia. By regulating cerebrospinal fluid pressure, the spinal catheter is an effective method for prophylaxis and treatment of spinal cord ischemia. Due to the high complication rate of the spinal catheter a detailed risk-benefit assessment is obligatory: besides cerebrospinal fluid leakage, postpuncture headaches and local infections, feared complications, such as intracranial bleeding, meningitis and neuraxial hematomas can also occur, sometimes with a significant latent period after termination of the procedure. Adequate training of personnel in the perioperative handling of spinal catheters and meticulous adherence to drainage parameters are important components for increasing procedural safety. This is particularly true since the clinical aspects of catheter-associated complications only slightly differ from that of ischemic spinal cord injury.

Paraplegia Due to Spinal Cord Ischemia after Endovascular Treatment of a Type II Endoleak.

Type II endoleaks are a common complication after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, with transarterial embolization using synthetic surgical glue being an established treatment option. We report a case of paraplegia due to spinal cord ischemia after lumbar arteries embolization by Glubran-lipiodol glue for a type II endoleak. Special attention must be given by interventional specialists when applying surgical diluted glues for the treatment of type II endoleaks to avoid distal embolization and subsequent spinal cord ischemia.

[Open surgical treatment of aneurysms and dissection of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta]. / Otkrytoe khirurgicheskoe lechenie anevrizm i rassloeniia grudnoi i torakoabdominal'noi aorty.

Presented herein is experience in treating a total of 56 patients with pathology of the arch, descending and thoracoabdominal aorta from 1997 to 2017. Of these, 6 (11%) patients were diagnosed with a Crawford type I-II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA), 20 (35%) patients with Crawford type III-IV TAAA, 18 (32%) were diagnosed as having an aortic arch aneurysm (AAA) and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA), 12 (22%) had DeBakey type I and IIIb aortic dissection. To protect the visceral organs and spinal cord from ischaemia in 28 (50%) cases we used a temporal bypass from a synthetic vascular graft with zero porosity and measuring from 15 to 20 cm in diameter. RESULTS: Mortality within 30 days amounted to 14.3% (n=8), that after 30 days amounted to 10.7% (n=6): in elective operations - 12% (n=5) and 5.4% (n=3), in emergency operations - 21% (n=3) and 21.4% (n=3), respectively. The total in-hospital mortality amounted to 25% (n=14), equalling 19% (n=8) and 43% (n=6) for elective and emergency operations, respectively. Mortality in using temporal bypass in elective operation amounted to 9.5% (n=2) during 30 days and that without using this method to 14.3% (n=3), after 30 days being 9.5% (n=2) and 4.7% (n=1), respectively. Mortality for emergency cases with a temporal shunt during 30 days was 28.6% (n=2), without - 14.3% (n=1), after 30 days - 28.6% (n=2), without - 14.3% (n=1). In type I-II TAAA mortality within 30 days was 16.6% (n=1), after 30 days - 50% (n=2); type III-IV TAAA - 10% (n=2) and 15% (n=1); DTAA - 22.2% (n=4) and 33.3% (n=2); aortic dissection - 8.3% (n=1) and 16.6% (n=1). Acute renal failure (ARF) occurred in 6 (10.7%) patients and was more often observed in the group without temporal shunting. Events of spinal cord ischaemia with the development of spinal stroke occurred in 6 (10.7%) cases. Five-year survival amounted to 61%. CONCLUSION: Temporal bypass in surgery of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta may be used for prevention of ischaemia of visceral organs, kidneys and spinal cord in operations accompanied by cross-clamping of the descending thoracic aorta.

Extended Motor Evoked Potentials Monitoring Helps Prevent Delayed Paraplegia After Aortic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) monitoring can promptly detect spinal cord ischemia (SCI) from aortic clamping during open thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair (OTAAR) with distal aortic perfusion (DAP) and thus help decrease the risk of immediate postoperative SCI (IP-SCI). However, neither stable MEPs during aortic clamp interval (ACI) nor absence of IP-SCI eliminate the possibility of delayed postoperative SCI (DP-SCI). We hypothesized that extension of MEPs monitoring beyond ACI can also help decrease the risk of DP-SCI. METHODS: We identified 150 consecutive patients at our institution between April 2005 and October 2014 who underwent OTAAR with DAP and MEPs monitoring and had no IP-SCI. Using logistic regression analysis, we studied the independent effect of extended MEPs monitoring on the risk of developing DP-SCI. We used a propensity score analysis to adjust for potential confounders, such as poorly controlled hypertension, previous aneurysm surgery, splenectomy, acute aortic dissection, aneurysm type, older age, and history of diabetes and smoking. RESULTS: From the 150 patients, 129 (86%) remained neurologically intact whereas 21 (14%) developed DP-SCI. Nineteen of these twenty-one patients (90%) had no extended monitoring. Fifty-seven of fifty-nine (97%) patients who benefited from extended monitoring had no DP-SCI (p = 0.003). Extended MEPs monitoring was independently associated with decreased risk of DP-SCI (odds ratio = 0.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.03, 0.65; p = 0.01). INTERPRETATION: MEPs detect the lowest systemic blood pressure that ensures appropriate spinal cord perfusion in the postoperative period. Thus, they inform the hemodynamic management of patients post-OTAAR, particularly in the absence of a reliable neurological exam.

Incidental occlusion of anterior spinal artery due to Onyx reflux in embolization of spinal type II arteriovenous malformation.

PURPOSE: Onyx embolization is one of the standard treatments for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and is a promising method for spinal AVMs as well. Its advantages have been emphasized, and few complications have been reported with Onyx embolization in spinal AVMs. Here, we report an incidental anterior spinal artery (ASA) occlusion due to Onyx reflux during embolization of a spinal type II AVM. METHODS: A 15-year-old boy presented with weakness in both upper and lower extremities. Magnetic resonance imaging and spinal angiogram revealed a spinal type II AVM with two feeders including the right vertebral artery (VA) and the right deep cervical artery. RESULTS: Onyx embolization was performed gradually from the VA to the deep cervical artery and an unexpected Onyx reflux to the ASA was observed during the latter stage deep cervical artery embolization. Post-operative quadriplegia and low cranial nerves (CN) dysfunction were observed. Rehabilitation treatment was performed and the patient showed marked improvement of neurologic deterioration at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Onyx is an effective treatment choice for spinal AVMs. However, due to the small vasculature of the spine compared to the brain, the nidus is rapidly packed with a small amount of Onyx, which allows Onyx reflux to unexpected vessels. Extreme caution is required and dual-lumen balloon catheter could be considered for Onyx embolization in spinal AVMs treatment.

[Significance of the level of implantation of the 'E-vita open plus' hybrid stent graft into the descending aorta in the development of spinal ischaemic complications]. / Znachenie urovnia implantatsii gibridnogo stent-grafta 'E-vita open plus' v niskhodiashchuiu aortu v razvitii spinal'nykh ishemicheskikh oslozhnenii.

Spinal ischaemia in patients after reconstruction of the thoracic aorta is referred to the category of the most severe postoperative complications, especially in hybrid interventions. The present study was aimed at assessing the risks for the development of spinal ischaemia in patients after implantation of the 'E-vita open plus' stent graft into the descending portion of the thoracic aorta during hybrid reconstruction. The 'E-vita open plus' hybrid stent graft (Jotec, Germany) was implanted to 18 patients presenting with various pathology of the thoracic aorta (dissection, aneurysms). All operations were carried out in the conditions of moderate hypothermia, circulatory arrest and antegrade perfusion of the brain through the brachiocephalic trunk. It was determined that the distal end of the stent graft was located at the level of Th7-Th12. In 12 (66.7%) cases the 'lower' edge of the stent graft was located at the level of thoracic vertebrae Th8-Th9. Before the operation the number of open pairs of intercostal arteries amounted to 10 [9, 11]. After the operation, the number of the open pairs of the segmental arteries amounted to 3 [1; 4], they were all in the lower thoracic portion; the above-located intercostal arteries were shut by the stent graft. In 17 (94.5%) cases in the early postoperative period there were no signs of spinal ischaemia. Only one (5.5%) patient was clinically diagnosed to have developed transient spinal ischaemia noted to disappear spontaneously within the first 24 hours. A conclusion was made that using the 'E-vita open plus' stent graft in the course of hybrid reconstruction of the thoracic aorta was accompanied by the minimal risk for spinal ischaemic complications. The level of the location of the distal edge of the stent graft is not the determining factor in the risks of spinal complications in of such similar operations.

Establishment and Validation of a Model for Fetal Neural Ischemia Using Necrotic Core-Free Human Spinal Cord Organoids.

Fetal spinal cord ischemia is a serious medical condition that can result in significant neurological damage and adverse outcomes for the fetus. However, the lack of an appropriate experimental model has hindered the understanding of the pathology and the development of effective treatments. In our study, we established a system for screening drugs that affect fetal spinal cord ischemia using spinal cord organoids. Importantly, we produced necrotic core-free human spinal cord organoids (nf-hSCOs) by reducing the organoid size to avoid potential complications of spontaneous necrosis in large organoids. Exposing nf-hSCOs to CoCl2 as a hypoxia mimetic and hypoglycemic conditions resulted in significant neuronal damage, as assessed by multiple assay batteries. By utilizing this model, we tested chemicals that have been reported to exhibit beneficial effects in brain organoid-based ischemia models. Surprisingly, these chemicals did not provide sufficient benefit, and we discovered that rapamycin is a mild neuroprotective reagent for both axon degeneration and neuronal survival. We propose that nf-hSCO is suitable for large-scale screening of fetal neural ischemia due to its scalability, ease of ischemic induction, implementation of quantifiable assay batteries, and the absence of spontaneous necrosis.

Acute thrombosis of an abdominal aortic aneurysm presenting as cauda equina syndrome.

Acute aortic occlusion is an uncommon vascular emergency that can present with predominantly neurologic symptoms owing to spinal cord ischemia. We describe a 62-year-old woman who experienced acute thrombosis of an abdominal aortic aneurysm that initially presented as cauda equina syndrome. She was treated operatively with an axillary bifemoral bypass. Our case report is followed by a discussion of acute aortic occlusion.

Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta complicated by spinal cord ischemia.

We present an unusual case of spinal cord ischemia from an acute type B intramural hematoma that was successfully treated with blood pressure elevation and drainage of cerebral spinal fluid.

[The staged approach--an overview on a strategy to reduce spinal cord injury in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair]. / Das zweizeitige Vorgehen zur Reduktion der spinalen Ischämie bei der Ausschaltung thorakoabdomineller Aortenaneurysmen - eine Übersicht.

The spinal cord is particularly susceptible to ischaemic injury following repair of extensive descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). For the past decade, the Mount Sinai group in New York has intensively studied the anatomy of the extensive vascular network surrounding the spinal cord, as well as its dynamic morphology in response to decreased blood pressure and flow. Along with clinical data, experimental findings gave rise to the Collateral Network Concept, by which spinal cord injury in open TAAA repair can be significantly reduced. With the more recent widespread use of endovascular repair, strategies to prevent ischaemic spinal cord damage after extensive segmental artery sacrifice/occlusion are still evolving. The hypothesis that dividing extensive aneurysm repair into two steps may mitigate the impact of diminished blood flow to the collateral network has led to a recently conducted series of staged repair experiments. By exploiting the resources of the collateral network, spinal cord injury could be minimised in staged open, as well as in staged hybrid repair and seems equally adoptable for endovascular procedures. The contribution presented herein provides an overview of clinical and experimental studies on the staged approach. Furthermore, it briefly assesses the anatomic rationale for the collateral network concept.

Reappraisal of the role of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during open distal aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potentials have been applied to monitor spinal cord ischemia during repair. However, their predictive values remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials on spinal cord ischemia during open distal aortic repair. METHODS: Our group began routine use of both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials at the end of 2004. This study used a historical cohort design, using risk factor and outcome data from our department's prospective registry. Univariate and multivariable statistics for risk-adjusted effects of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials on neurologic outcome and model discrimination were assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials were measured in 822 patients undergoing open distal aortic repair between December 2004 and December 2019. Both motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials were intact for the duration of surgery in 348 patients (42%). Isolated motor evoked potential loss was observed in 283 patients (34%), isolated somatosensory evoked potential loss was observed in 18 patients (3%), and both motor evoked potential and somatosensory evoked potential loss were observed in 173 patients (21%). No spinal cord ischemia occurred in the 18 cases with isolated somatosensory evoked potential loss. When both signals were lost, signal loss happened in the order of motor evoked potentials and then somatosensory evoked potentials. Immediate spinal cord ischemia occurred in none of those without signal loss, 4 of 283 (1%) with isolated motor evoked potential loss, and 15 of 173 (9%) with motor evoked potential plus somatosensory evoked potential loss. Delayed spinal cord ischemia occurred in 12 of 348 patients (3%) with intact evoked potentials, 24 of 283 patients (8%) with isolated motor evoked potentials loss, and 27 of 173 patients (15%) with motor evoked potentials + somatosensory evoked potentials loss (P < .001). Motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials loss were each independently associated with spinal cord ischemia. For immediate spinal cord ischemia, no return of motor evoked potential signals at the conclusion of the surgery had the highest odds ratio of 15.87, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.936, whereas motor evoked potential loss had the highest odds ratio of 3.72 with an area under the curve of 0.638 for delayed spinal cord ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials are both important monitoring measures to predict and prevent spinal cord ischemia during and after open distal aortic repairs. Intraoperative motor evoked potential loss is a risk for immediate and delayed spinal cord ischemia after open distal aortic repair, and somatosensory evoked potential loss further adds predictive value to the motor evoked potential.

Our experience with 1000 recent thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs, including endovascular stenting.

OBJECTIVE: Managing patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysms is demanding yet fascinating, and requires a team effort. This invited talk presents lessons learned as our history with open and endovascular procedures evolved for 2578 descending and thoracoabdominal repairs over the past 20 years. METHODS: Beginning in 1985 with an analysis of 596 traumatic aortic ruptures and the risk of spinal cord ischemia, the evolution of research and procedures for thoracoabdominal aneurysms progressed. The focus of these studies, medication trials, and procedure adjustments was on lowering the risk of spinal cord ischemia. RESULTS: Between January 2002 and December 2021, 2578 aneurysm repairs were performed. The respective mortality rates were 6.8% and 4.0% for all patients treated. The permanent spinal cord ischemia rates were 1.3% for open descending thoracic aortas and 4.9% for open thoracoabdominal aneurysms. A detailed analysis of open and thoracoabdominal repairs showed better long-term outcomes with open repairs. CONCLUSIONS: Through multiple randomized trials and innovations with procedures and techniques, the risk of death and spinal cord ischemia have been reduced. Long-term survival has also been improved. The pursuit of reducing the risks of descending and ascending thoracoabdominal repairs is a fascinating endeavor that has resulted in better patient outcomes. Nevertheless, this is a journey, and there will always be more room to achieve even better results.

Acute Paraplegia Result from Spinal Ischemia Nine Years After Hybrid Total Arch Repair with Frozen Elephant Trunk: A Case Report.

Spinal cord ischemia due to decreased cord perfusion is a devastating complication in patients with thoracoabdominal dissection following frozen elephant trunk (FET) repair surgery. However, rare occurrence of spinal cord ischemia leading to paraplegia after long-term follow-up of FET repair has been reported. Here, we describe a case of spinal cord ischemia resulting in paraplegia nine years after hybrid total arch repair with FET. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and serial treatment were utilized to decrease intraspinal pressure and increase blood flow to the spinal cord. Three months after the onset of paraplegia and with treatment and rehabilitation, the patient recovered to walk.

A Novel Bypass Technique to Prevent Vexing Spinal Cord Ischemia in Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia remains a devastating complication when treating patients with complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. This approach is progressively deployed. However, to date, no strategy has been identified to reduce the feared risk of spinal cord ischemia. OBJECTIVE: To introduce a novel bypass technique using a customized composite graft to create a direct extra-anatomic revascularization before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair in patients with high-risk of spinal cord ischemia. METHODS: To demonstrate this novel concept, we present here a clinical case that reports the strategy of this novel concept in detail. An 83-year-old man with medical history of endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm and thoracic aorta presented with a type IA endoleak, located along the posterior superior aspect of the aortic stent graft adjacent to the lumbar arteries. A multidisciplinary plan was developed, which included a novel bypass from the profunda femoris to the left L1 radicular artery before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair to prevent spinal cord ischemia. RESULTS: The patient successfully receives the novel extra-anatomic revascularization bypass before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. During the first implementation of this strategy, no intraoperative difficulties and postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates a novel surgical technique before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for prevention of spinal cord ischemia. In addition, this concept provides a promising direction to not only complement the existing surgical techniques but also to generate more future innovations.