Remote and asynchronous training network: from a SAGES grant to an eight-country remote laparoscopic simulation training program.

BACKGROUND: Limitations in surgical simulation training include lack of access to validated training programs with continuous year-round training and lack of experts' ongoing availability for feedback. A model of simulation training was developed to address these limitations. It incorporated basic and advanced laparoscopic skills curricula from a previously validated program and provided instruction through a digital platform. The platform allowed for remote and asynchronous feedback from a few trained instructors. The instructors were continuously available and provided personalized feedback using a variety of different media. We describe the upscaling of this model to teach trainees at fourteen centers in eight countries. METHODS: Institutions with surgical programs lacking robust simulation curricula and needing instructors for ongoing education were identified. The simulation centers ("skills labs") at these sites were equipped with necessary simulation training hardware. A remote training-the-administrators (TTA) program was developed where personnel were trained in how to manage the skills lab, schedule trainees, set up training stations, and use the platform. A train-the-trainers (TTT) program was created to establish a network of trained instructors, who provided objective feedback through the platform remotely and asynchronously. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2022, seven institutions in Chile and one in each of the USA, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, El Salvador, México, and Perú implemented a digital platform-based remote simulation curriculum. Most administrators were not physicians (19/33). Eight Instructors were trained with the TTT program and became active proctors. The platform has been used by 369 learners, of whom 57% were general surgeons and general surgery residents. A total of 6729 videos, 28,711 feedback inputs, and 233.7 and 510.2 training hours in the basic and advanced programs, respectively, were registered. CONCLUSION: A remote and asynchronous method of giving instruction and feedback through a digital platform has been effectively employed in the creation of a robust network of continuous year-round simulation-based training in laparoscopy. Training centers were successfully run only with trained administrators to assist in logistics and setup, and no on-site instructors were necessary.

Residents Can Do It! A Training Program in Laparoscopic Liver Surgery for General Surgery Residents.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) constitute an area of surgery that has been kept away from residents in their hands-on training. The aim of our study is to assess the feasibility and the value of a didactic "step-by-step" program for LLR performed by residents using the swine training model. METHODS: From May 2018 to November 2019, three hands-on workshops were held. The protocol involved the performance of cholecystectomy, liver mobilization, minor and major hepatectomies. The participants' performance results in terms of operative time, blood loss, conversion, trainers' intervention, and intraoperative mortality, were recorded. The first workshop was comprised of 30 residents who previously participated in laparoscopic surgery workshops. In the second workshop, after six residents dropped out due to residency completion, the findings for the remaining 24 residents were compared to those for 24 junior-attending surgeons who did not follow the protocol and had not performed LLR previously, and to another 24 residents in a third workshop, who had not taken the training program before but followed the protocol. RESULTS: All residents fully completed the surgical procedures. Trained residents achieved better operative times and less blood loss compared to junior-attending surgeons (p < 0.017), however, the remaining parameters were comparable. When compared to non-trained residents, those who underwent training achieved significantly better results only in operative times (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A continuous LLR "step-by-step" training program on swine for residents is feasible and the "step-by-step" protocol is a valuable tool for a proper surgical education.

The Successful Implementation of a Laparoscopic Simulation Training Program in the Dominican Republic.

INTRODUCTION: Mount Sinai Hospital in New York introduced a laparoscopic surgery simulation center to a public hospital in Santiago, Dominican Republic to determine the feasibility of training programs in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). METHODS: In August 2018, recruitment and preliminary data were collected at the Hospital Jose Maria Cabral y Báez in Santiago, Dominican Republic. The simulation room consists of three simulation stations. Residents were required to practice 1 h/wk guided by a general surgery postgraduate year 3 (PGY3) Mount Sinai resident. Number of hours practiced was self-reported and follow-up data was collected in June 2019. The study endpoints include times on three simulated laparoscopic tasks including peg-transfer, precision cutting, and intracorporeal knot tying. Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The partnership between hospitals allowed for successful integration into the Dominican general surgery training. Over 10 mo, residents averaged 25 h of practice (range: 8-35 h; SD 9.95 h). In total, 85% of the residents participated in the study (5 postgraduate year 1 [PGY1], 2 postgraduate year 2 [PGY2], and 4 postgraduate year 3 [PGY3]). Resident median simulation times significantly improved for precision cutting (3:49 min versus 2:09 min, P = 0.002) and intracorporeal knot tying (5:20 min versus 2:47 min, P = 0.037). There was neither significant difference in peg-transfer times nor performance between resident years (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the successful integration of a laparoscopic simulation program into an LMIC surgical resident training program. With commitment from local institutions and external resources, establishing laparoscopic simulation centers are feasible and expandable, thereby allowing general surgery residents in other LMICs, the opportunity to improve their laparoscopic skills.

[Structured Implementation and Modular In-house Training as Key Success Factors in Robotically Assisted Surgery - Evaluation Using the Example of Colorectal Surgery]. / Strukturierte Implementierung und modulares inhouse Training als zentrale Erfolgsfaktoren in der robotisch assistierten Chirurgie ­ Evaluation am Beispiel der kolorektalen Chirurgie.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the applicability of structured implementation of robotic assisted surgery (RAS) and to evaluate a modular training procedure during the implementation phase in in-house mentoring. METHOD: Execution of a self-defined PDCA (PDCA: Plan-Do-Check-Act) implementation cycle accompanied by prospective data collection of patient characteristics, operation times, complications, conversion rates and postoperative length of stay of a modularly defined training operation (robotic assisted rectosigmoid resection - RARSR). RESULTS: Evaluation of 100 consecutive cases distributed among 3 trainees and an in-house mentor as internal control group. Presentation of qualitatively safe and successful implementation with a short learning curve of the training operation with balanced patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Structured implementation enables the safe introduction of RAS in visceral surgery. In this context, modular training operations can facilitate the adoption of RAS by users under everyday conditions. For the first time, we demonstrate this within an in-house mentoring approach.

Which Knots Are Recommended in Laparoscopic Surgery and How to Avoid Insecure Knots.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate why security of identical knot sequences is variable and how to avoid occasionally insecure knots. DESIGN: A factorial design was used to assess factors affecting the security of half knot (H) and half-hitch (S) knot combinations. The effect of tying forces and the risk factors to transform H knots into S knots were investigated. The risk factors evaluated were as follows: starting with an H1 or H2 instead of an H3 knot, inexperience, short sutures, and monomanual knot tying. Security of transformed knots, S2S1 and S2S2 knots, and their recuperation with 2 additional half hitches, SSb or SbSb, were evaluated. SETTING: Training center for laparoscopic suturing. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Security of knots was evaluated in vitro. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The forces that caused knot combinations to open before breaking of the suture were used to calculate the risk of opening with low forces. Tying more strongly increased the security of half knots (H2H1sH1s) (p <.02) and half hitches (p <.001). The forces needed to transform an H3 into an S3 are higher than those for an H2 (p <.001), and the risk increases when the surgeon is inexperienced (p <.001), when sutures are short (p <.001), and when monomanual knot tying (p <.001) is used. Inadvertently made S2S1 and S2S2 knots are dangerous, with the exception of the symmetric S2S2, which is stable. Unstable knots such as S2S1a and S2S2a knot combinations improve with 2 additional blocking half hitches (SbSb), but S2S2aSbSb remains occasionally insecure. CONCLUSION: To reduce the risk of accidentally transforming a first H into an S knot, it is recommended to start with an H3, tie with force, avoid short sutures, and use bimanual suturing. This permits the recommendation to use preferentially H3H2 knots or 5 half hitches (SSSbSbSb). When in doubt, half knot combinations should be secured with at least 2 blocking half hitches.

Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Uterine Leiomyomas: Clinical Outcomes during Early Adoption into Surgical Practice.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess surgical outcomes, clinical effectiveness, and gynecologist experience of introducing laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of leiomyomas into surgical practice. DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical trial. SETTING: Five academic medical centers across California. PATIENTS: Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas, uterus size ≤16 weeks size, and all leiomyomas ≤10 cm with no more than 6 total leiomyomas. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic RFA of leiomyomas. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed intraoperative complications, blood loss, operative time, and adverse events. Gynecologists reported the operative difficulty and need for further training after each case. Participants reported leiomyoma symptoms preoperatively and at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. We analyzed all outcome data from the first case performed by gynecologists with no previous RFA experience. Patient demand for RFA was high, but poor insurance authorization prevented 74% of eligible women from trial participation; 26 women underwent surgery and were enrolled. The mean age of the participants was 41.5 ± 4.9 years. The mean operating time was 153 ± 51 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 24 ± 40 cc. There were no intraoperative complications and no major adverse events. Menstrual bleeding, sexual function, and quality of life symptoms improved significantly from baseline to 12 weeks, with a 25 ± 18-point, or 47%, decrease in the Leiomyoma Symptom Severity Score. After the first procedure, the mean difficulty score was 6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4-7.5) on a 10-point scale, and 89% of surgeons felt "very or somewhat" confident in performing laparoscopic RFA. The difficulty score decreased to 4.25 (95% CI, 1.2-6) after the fourth procedure, with all gynecologists reporting surgical confidence. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic RFA of leiomyomas can be introduced into surgical practice with good clinical outcomes for patients. Gynecologists with no previous experience are able to gain confidence and skill with the procedure in fewer than 5 cases.

The superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique improves intraoperative outcomes and facilitates learning laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study between the superior and inferior approach.

PURPOSE: We introduced a superior approach and a unique technique to retract the stomach, called the "stomach roll-up technique", to standardize laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and increase educational effectiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of these procedures. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy by surgeons-in-training between January 2015 and December 2018 were included. Twenty laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies were performed using the inferior approach, and 25 procedures were performed using the superior approach. The stomach roll-up technique was used in all cases. The perioperative outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with the inferior approach, the superior approach was associated with a significantly shorter operation time (p < 0.001) and lower estimated blood loss (p = 0.011), and these differences were not affected by the exclusion of cases with conversion or concomitant procedures. In the univariate analysis adjusted for other covariates, a lower body mass index (p = 0.045), pancreatic tail tumor (p = 0.0178) and the superior approach (p = 0.0176) were significantly associated with a shorter operation time. CONCLUSION: The superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique is simple and will aid in educating surgeons on performing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.

PURPOSE: Improved cancer control with increasing surgical experience (the learning curve) has been demonstrated for open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. We assessed the relationship between surgical experience and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of 1,827 patients in whom prostate cancer was treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Surgical experience was coded as the total number of robotic prostatectomies performed by the surgeon before the patient operation. We evaluated the relationship of prior surgeon experience to the probability of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in regression models adjusting for stage, grade and prostate specific antigen. RESULTS: After adjusting for case mix, greater surgeon experience was associated with a lower probability of positive surgical margins (p = 0.035). The risk of positive margins decreased from 16.7% to 9.6% in patients treated by a surgeon with 10 and 250 prior procedures, respectively (risk difference 7.1%, 95% CI 1.7-12.2). In patients with nonorgan confined disease the predicted probability of positive margins was 38.4% in those treated by surgeons with 10 prior operations and 24.9% in those treated by surgeons with 250 prior operations (absolute risk reduction 13.5%, 95% CI -3.4-22.5). The relationship between surgical experience and the risk of biochemical recurrence after surgery was not significant (p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Specific techniques used by experienced surgeons which are associated with improved margin rates need further research. The impact of experience on cancer control after robotic prostatectomy differed from that in the prior literature on open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and should be investigated in larger multi-institutional studies.

Evolution of the surgical technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: description according to the IDEAL framework.

Totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (Ivor Lewis TMIE) is a technically challenging procedure and is associated with a learning curve. Refinement of surgical technique is an important part of this learning curve. However, detailed descriptions of these refinements according to the idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term follow-up (IDEAL) framework are lacking and this study was undertaken to fill this knowledge gap. From 2010 until 2016, all consecutive patients (n = 164) were included from the first patient undergoing Ivor Lewis TMIE. Surgical reports were analyzed and surgeons were interviewed to determine surgical refinements. These data were used to describe the transition of the surgical technique from IDEAL stage IIB to stage III. The main findings were that four refinements were made to the surgical procedure in IDEAL stage IIB: (1) At case 9, the use of the 25 mm OrVil was abandoned, exchanged for a 28 mm EEA stapler and a large omental wrap around the anastomosis was introduced; (2) at case 27, the omental wrap was reduced in volume; (3) at case 60, the omental wrap was refined to cover the full 360° of the anastomosis and (4) at case 77, the fixation of the anvil with the Endostitch was replaced by fixation with two Endoloops®. During the transition from IDEAL stage IIB to stage III, the incidence of anastomotic leakage decreased from 26.0% to 4.6% (P < 0.001) and the incidence of textbook outcome increased from 31.2% to 47.1% (P = 0.039). In conclusion, this study describes the surgical refinements that were made during the progression of Ivor Lewis TMIE from IDEAL stage IIB to IDEAL stage III. During IDEAL stage IIB, postoperative outcome improved as surgical proficiency was gained and the technique was refined.

A structured, extended training program to facilitate adoption of new techniques for practicing surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been shown to have significant benefits when compared to open inguinal hernia repair, yet remains underutilized in the United States. The traditional model of short, hands-on, cognitive courses to enhance the adoption of new techniques fails to lead to significant levels of practice implementation for most surgeons. We hypothesized that a comprehensive program would facilitate the adoption of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP) for practicing surgeons. METHODS: A team of experts in simulation, coaching, and hernia care created a comprehensive training program to facilitate the adoption of TEP. Three surgeons who routinely performed open inguinal hernia repair with greater than 50 cases annually were recruited to participate in the program. Coaches were selected based on their procedural expertise and underwent formal training in surgical coaching. Participants were required to evaluate all aspects of the educational program and were surveyed out to one year following completion of the program to assess for sustained adoption of TEP. RESULTS: All three participants successfully completed the first three steps of the seven-step program. Two participants completed the full course, while the third dropped out of the program due to time constraints and low case volume. Participant surgeons rated Orientation (4.7/5), GlovesOn training (5/5), and Preceptored Cases (5/5) as highly important training activities that contributed to advancing their knowledge and technical performance of the TEP procedure. At one year, both participants were performing TEPs for "most of their cases" and were confident in their ability to perform the procedure. The total cost of the program including all travel, personal coaching, and simulation was $8638.60 per participant. DISCUSSION: Our comprehensive educational program led to full and sustained adoption of TEP for those who completed the course. Time constraints, travel costs, and case volume are major considerations for successful completion; however, the program is feasible, acceptable, and affordable.

Video review program enhances resident training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia: a randomized blinded controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to determine if a standardized video review program for residents improves operative performance. METHODS: Participation was offered to surgical residents rotating on a minimally invasive service. Residents were randomized to either the video review group or no video review group. Every participant in the video review group underwent video reviews with an attending surgeon for 30 min once weekly during their 1-month rotation. A blinded surgeon evaluated performance in the operating room using validated assessment tools. The amount of time the resident spent as primary surgeon was recorded. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the video and no video review groups. Differences were considered statistically significant for p values < 0.05. RESULTS: Sixteen residents were randomized to the video review group (n = 8) or the no video review group (n = 8). Residents in the video review cohort significantly improved in creating a working space (p = 0.04), hernia sac reduction (p = 0.01), mesh placement (p = 0.01), knowledge of the procedure (p = 0.01), and overall competence (p = 0.02). Residents in the no video review group did not significantly improve in five of seven categories. The video review group significantly increased the time spent as primary surgeon (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Video review with a coach proved to be beneficial for residents when learning laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. We conclude that systematic video review is a good supplemental tool in resident surgical training.

The effect of a performance-based intra-procedural checklist on a simulated emergency laparoscopic task in novice surgeons.

Surgical checklists are in use as means to reduce errors. Checklists are infrequently applied during emergency situations in surgery. We aimed to study the effect of a simple self-administered performance-based checklist on the laparoscopic task when applied during an emergency-simulated scenario. The aviation checklist for unexpected situations is commonly used for simulated training of pilots to handle emergency during flights. This checklist was adopted for use as a standardised-performance-based checklist during emergency surgical tasks. Thirty consented laparoscopic novices were exposed unexpectedly to a bleeding vessel in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator as an emergency scenario. The task consisted of using laparoscopic clips to achieve haemostasis. Subjects were randomly allocated into two equal groups; those using the checklist that was applied once every 20 s (checklist group) and those without (control group). The checklist group performed significantly better in 5 out of 7 technical factors when compared to the control group: right instrument path length (m), median (IQR) 1.44 [1.22] versus 2.06 [1.70] (p = 0.029), right instrument angular path (degree) 312.10 (269.44 versus 541.80 [455.16] (p = 0.014), left instrument path length (m) 1.20 [0.60] versus 2.08 [2.02] (p = 0.004), and left instrument angular path (degree) 277.62 [132.11] versus 385.88 [428.42] (p = 0.017). The checklist group committed significantly fewer number of errors in the application of haemostatic clips, 3 versus 28 (p = 0.006). Although statistically not significant, total blood loss (lit) decreased in the checklist group from 0.83 [1.23] to 0.78 [0.28] (p = 0.724) and total time (sec) from 186.51 [145.69] to 125.14 [101.46] (p = 0.165). The performance-based intra-procedural checklist significantly enhanced the surgical task performance of novices in an emergency-simulated scenario.

The role of simulation and warm-up in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the review is to update the reader on the current literature and recent studies evaluating the role of simulation and warm-up as part of surgical education and training, and maintenance of surgical skills. RECENT FINDINGS: Laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulation may improve psychomotor skills, particularly for early-stage learners. However, data are mixed as to whether simulation education is directly transferable to surgical skill. Data are insufficient to determine if simulation can improve clinical outcomes. Similarly, performance of surgical warm-up exercises can improve performance of novice and expert surgeons in a simulated environment, but the extent to which this is transferable to intraoperative performance is unknown. Surgical coaching, however, can facilitate improvements in performance that are directly reflected in operative outcomes. SUMMARY: Simulation-based curricula may be a useful adjunct to residency training, whereas warm-up and surgical coaching may allow for maintenance of skill throughout a surgeon's career. These experiences may represent a strategy for maintaining quality and value in a lower volume surgical setting.

Training in Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resections: a paradigm shift away from "See one, Do one, Teach one".

BACKGROUND: Increased incorporation of minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPR) has emerged into hepato-pancreato-biliary practice, however, no standardization exists for its safe adoption. Novel strategies are presented for dissemination of safe MIPR. METHODS: An international State-of-the-Art conference evaluating multiple aspects of MIPR was conducted by a panel of pancreas experts in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 20, 2016. Training and education issues were discussed regarding the introduction of novel strategies for safe dissemination of MIPR. RESULTS: The low volume of pancreatic resections per institution poses a challenge for surgeons to overcome their MIPR learning curve without deliberate training. A mastery-based simulation and biotissue curriculum can improve technical proficiency and allow for training of surgeons before the operating room. Video-based platforms allow for performance reporting and feedback necessary for coaching and surgical quality improvement. Centers of excellence with training involving a standardized approach and proctorship are important concepts that can be utilized in various formats internationally. DISCUSSION: Surgical volume is not sufficient to ensure quality and patient safety in MIPR. Safe adoption of these complex procedures should consider innovative mastery-based training outside of the operating room, novel video based coaching techniques and prospective reporting of patient data and outcomes using standardized definitions.

Trainee participation and perioperative complications in benign hysterectomy: the effect of route of surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative trainee involvement in hysterectomy is common. However, the effect of intraoperative trainee involvement on perioperative complications depending on surgical approach is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of intraoperative trainee involvement on perioperative complication after vaginal, laparoscopic, and abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic, vaginal, or abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease from 2010 to 2012 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients with and without trainee involvement were compared with regard to perioperative complications. Complications that occurred from the start of surgery to 30-days postoperatively were included. Perioperative complications were defined via the use of the validated Clavien-Dindo scale with ≥grade 3 complications defined as major and ≤grade 2 complications defined as minor. Major complications included myocardial infarction, pneumonia, venous thromboembolism, deep or organ space surgical-site infection, stroke, fascial dehiscence, unplanned return to the operating room, renal failure, cardiopulmonary arrest, sepsis, intubation greater than 48 hours, and death. Minor complications included urinary tract infection, blood transfusion, and superficial wound infection. To estimate the effect of trainee involvement depending on route of surgery, a stratified analysis was performed. Bivariable analysis and adjusted multivariable logistic regression were used. RESULTS: We identified 22,499 patients, of whom 42.1% had trainee participation. Surgical approaches were vaginal (22.7%), abdominal (47.1%), and laparoscopic (30.2%). The rate of major complication was 3.2%, and minor complication was 7.2%. In bivariable analysis, trainee involvement was associated with major complications in vaginal hysterectomy (3.3% vs 2.3%, P = .03), but not laparoscopic (3.0% vs 2.9%, P = .78) or abdominal hysterectomy (4.4% vs 3.6%, P = .07). Trainee involvement was also associated with minor complication in vaginal (7.3% vs 5.4%, P = .007), laparoscopic (5.9% vs 4.3%, P < .001), and abdominal hysterectomy (14.1% vs 9.2%, P < .001). In a multivariable analysis in which we adjusted for age, body mass index, medical comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and surgical complexity, the association between trainee involvement in vaginal hysterectomy and major complication persisted (adjusted odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.03-2.04); however, when operative time was added to the model, there was no longer an association between trainee involvement and major complication (adjusted odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.89-1.80). CONCLUSION: Surgical approach influences the relationship between trainee involvement and perioperative complication. Operative time is a key mediator of the relationship between trainee involvement and complication, and may be a modifiable risk factor.

Learning curve for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: role of training in a high-volume bariatric center.

BACKGROUND: Since the great diffusion of laparoscopic treatment of obesity, there is a growing interest concerning the learning process for those surgeons who undertake the bariatric activity. However, papers analyzing the learning curve (LC) for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are still scarce. This study aims to investigate whether the LC for SG of a novice bariatric surgeon might be positively influenced by the training in a high-volume bariatric center (HVBC). METHODS: Between October 2010 and January 2014, 128 patients underwent SG by the same young surgeon who previously attended a 2-year training in a HVBC. His LC has been divided into three consecutive periods: in the first period (1st-47th SGs) he operated in the HVBC, while in the second (48th-88th SGs) and third period (89th-128th SGs) he moved to a novel department where surgical and ancillary staff were initially not confident with bariatric procedures but progressively owned the proper experience. Preoperative characteristics, operative data, complications and postoperative results of the three periods were compared. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 1 year. Preoperative patients' characteristics were homogeneous. No significant differences have been registered among the three periods concerning operative data, mortality, intra- and post-operative complications, weight loss outcomes and comorbidities' resolution. Post-operative follow-up rates at 6 and 12 months were 98.4 and 92.1 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Long-lasting fellowship in a HVBC might allow the novel bariatric surgeon to safely and proficiently overcome the LC for SG, even in a new established bariatric setting.

Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy offers some evidence of benefit compared to open rectal surgery. Robotic rectal surgery is evolving into an accepted approach. The objective was to analyze and compare laparoscopic and robotic rectal surgery learning curves with respect to operative times and perioperative outcomes for a novice minimally invasive colorectal surgeon. METHODS: One hundred and six laparoscopic and 92 robotic LAR rectal surgery cases were analyzed. All surgeries were performed by a surgeon who was primarily trained in open rectal surgery. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Operative time and CUSUM plots were used for evaluating the learning curve for laparoscopic versus robotic LAR. RESULTS: Laparoscopic versus robotic LAR outcomes feature initial group operative times of 308 (291-325) min versus 397 (373-420) min and last group times of 220 (212-229) min versus 204 (196-211) min-reversed in favor of robotics; major complications of 4.7 versus 6.5 % (NS), resection margin involvement of 2.8 versus 4.4 % (NS), conversion rate of 3.8 versus 1.1 (NS), lymph node harvest of 16.3 versus 17.2 (NS), and estimated blood loss of 231 versus 201 cc (NS). Due to faster learning curves for extracorporeal phase and total mesorectal excision phase, the robotic surgery was observed to be faster than laparoscopic surgery after the initial 41 cases. CUSUM plots demonstrate acceptable perioperative surgical outcomes from the beginning of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Initial robotic operative times improved with practice rapidly and eventually became faster than those for laparoscopy. Developing both laparoscopic and robotic skills simultaneously can provide acceptable perioperative outcomes in rectal surgery. It might be suggested that in the current milieu of clashing interests between evolving technology and economic constrains, there might be advantages in embracing both approaches.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy--10-year experience at a teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive adrenalectomy has been adopted as the treatment of choice for benign adrenal tumors. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed over a 10-year period at a teaching hospital. METHODS: All laparoscopic adrenalectomies carried out between 1 April 2000 and 31 March 2010 were evaluated with respect to perioperative management, complications, conversion rate, learning curve, tumor size, and surgically relevant characteristics of different adrenal pathologies. RESULTS: Over a period of 10 years, 215 laparoscopic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomies were carried out for Conn's syndrome (n = 90), Cushing's syndrome (n = 72), pheochromocytoma (n = 30), metastatic disease (n = 8), incidentalomas (n = 10), and other rare adrenal pathologies (n = 5). Morbidity, mortality, and conversion rate were 7.0, 0.9, and 4.2 %, respectively. Patients with Cushing's disease and bilateral adrenalectomy showed a higher complication rate. In retrospect, the indication for a laparoscopic approach was at least questionable in five cases. During these 10 years, four surgeons unfamiliar with the technique received intensive training to a defined plan. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy represents a safe operating technique associated with few complications and a low conversion rate. Patients with severe Cushing's disease are prone to complications and require intensive monitoring postoperatively. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is associated with a learning curve, and particular emphasis should be given to surgical training.

Pre-Operative Education Classes Prior to Robotic Prostatectomy Benefit Both Patients and Clinicians.

As part of a process improvement initiative, we designed, implemented, and assessed the impact of pre-surgical education classes for patients scheduled to undergo robotic prostatectomy. Our aim was to both enhance patient access to important procedural information related to their surgery, and also limit the need for the repeated dissemination of information during patient calls to the office.

Impact of Simulation Exercises on Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: As resources into gynecological surgical simulation training increase, research showing an association with improved clinical outcomes is needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between surgical simulation training for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and rates of intraoperative vascular/visceral injury (primary outcome) and operative time. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline OVID, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases from the inception of each database to April 5, 2022. Selection Critera: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of any size published in English prior to April 4, 2022. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The summary measures were reported as relative risks (RR) or as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. A Higgins I2 >0% was used to identify heterogeneity. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 (for RCTs) and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (for cohort studies). MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of simulation training on the rates of vessel/visceral injury in patients undergoing TLH. Of 989 studies screened 3 (2 cohort studies, 1 randomized controlled trial) met the eligibility criteria for analysis. There was no difference in vessel/visceral injury (OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.53-5.69, p=0.36) and operative time (MD 13.28, 95% CI -6.26 to 32.82, p=0.18) when comparing before and after simulation training. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence that simulation improves clinical outcomes for patients undergoing TLH.