Clinical Outcomes and Associated Pathologies Following Pediatric Traumatic Hip Dislocations: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric traumatic hip dislocations are a rare condition that can have devastating short and/or long-term outcomes and associated pathologies (APs), including associated injuries (AIs) and long-term adverse events (LTAEs), with negative long-term sequelae. Currently, there are little data that exist on the rate of APs, with the most notable being avascular necrosis (AVN), for pediatric traumatic hip dislocations. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the outcome relative frequency of dislocation direction, reduction type, and rate of APs for traumatic hip dislocations in the pediatric population. METHODS: A systematic review on the topic of traumatic hip dislocations in the pediatric population was performed using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, CINAHL, and MEDLINE databases from database inception to March 30, 2023. Inclusion criteria was full-text English articles, addressed traumatic hip dislocations, and pediatric patients (<18 y old). RESULTS: A total of 24 articles (n=575 patients) met final inclusion criteria from a total of 219 articles retrieved from the initial search. For the average age of the included patients with reported age (n=433 patients), the frequency weighted mean was 9.50 years±1.75 years with a frequency weighted mean follow-up time of 74.05 months ±45.97 months (n=399 patients). The most common dislocation direction was posterior (86.4%), the most common treatment type was closed reduction (84.5%), AVN was the most common type of LTAEs (15.5% of APs), and labral/capsular injuries and acetabular fractures were the most common type of AIs (14.0% and 9.4% of APs, respectively). There were a combined total of 414 APs (72%) out of 575 total patients. CONCLUSION: Pediatric traumatic hip dislocations are associated with a high rate of AIs and LTAEs (72%, 414 APs out of 575 patients). AVN, labral/capsular injuries, and acetabular fractures are the most common APs after pediatric traumatic hip dislocations. Pediatric hip dislocations are usually posterior and commonly managed through closed reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Systematic Review.

Minimally invasive femoral head fracture fixation using three-dimensional navigation: a technical note.

Femoral head fractures are rare traumatic injuries that are usually associated with hip dislocations. Open reduction and internal fixation are performed when indicated, but can be associated with a higher risk of avascular necrosis. We report the case of a 24-year-old patient with a Pipkin type II fracture dislocation of the femoral head fixed via a minimally invasive three-dimensional navigated internal fixation technique. This technique minimizes deep soft tissue dissection to the hip capsule and associated vascularity and allows for accurate implant positioning.Level of evidence: Therapeutic case report Level IV.

Comparison of Dislocation and Outcome Between Piriformis-Sparing and Conventional Posterior Approach After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Over 60 Years.

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is a treatment option for femoral neck fractures in patients aged more than 60 years and postoperative dislocation after a posterior approach is not uncommon. The piriformis tendon is one of the structures providing posterior hip stability. However, evidence of piriformis-sparing approach in hemiarthroplasty is unclear regarding a reduced dislocation rate. METHODS: Between January 2017 and December 2019, 321 patients underwent a posterior approach in consecutive cohorts for a hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures with the minimum 24 months follow-up time (24-60 months). There were two cohorts: (1) 129 underwent the conventional posterior (CP) approach and (2) 192 underwent the piriformis-sparing (PS) approach. The differences in dislocation rate, postoperative Harris Hip Society at 1 and 2 years and other surgical complications were compared in both groups. RESULTS: There were 6 dislocations of 129 (4.7%) underwent the CP approach and 0 dislocation from 192 underwent the PS approach that had posterior hip dislocations (P = .004). In addition, the CP group had a significantly higher mortality rate (14.7% versus 7.3%, P = .031) and lower functional outcomes as assessed by mean Harris Hip Scores at 1 year (73 versus 78, P = .005) and 2 years postoperatively (73 versus 80, P < .001) relative to the PS group. CONCLUSION: PS hemiarthroplasty was associated with a lower dislocation and mortality rate. Moreover, this approach gained a superior early to the mid-term functional outcome than the conventional posterior approach in elderly femoral neck fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

Hip precautions after posterior-approach total hip arthroplasty among patients with primary hip osteoarthritis do not influence early recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies with 8,835 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hip precautions are routinely prescribed to patients with osteoarthritis to decrease dislocation rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a posterior approach. However, recommendations have been based on very low certainty of evidence. We updated the evidence on the influence of hip precautions on early recovery following THA by this systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed systematic searches for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and non-randomized (NRS) studies in MEDLINE, Embase, PEDro, and CINAHL published from 2016 to July 2022. 2 reviewers independently included studies comparing postoperative precautions with minimal or no precautions, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analyses were used to synthesize the results. The certainty of the evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment and Evaluation approach. The critical outcome was the risk of hip dislocations within 3 months of surgery. Other outcomes were long-term risk of dislocation and reoperation, self-reported and performance-based assessment of function, quality of life, pain, and time to return to work. RESULTS: 4 RCTs and 5 NRSs, including 8,835 participants, were included. There may be no or negligible difference in early hip dislocations (RCTs: risk ratio [RR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-5.2; NRS: RR 0.9, CI 0.3-2.5). Certainty in the evidence was low for RCTs and very low for NRSs. Finally, precautions may reduce the performance-based assessment of function slightly, but the evidence was very uncertain. For all other outcomes, no differences were found (moderate to very low certainty evidence). CONCLUSION: The current evidence does not support routinely prescribing hip precautions post-surgically for patients undergoing THA to prevent hip dislocations. However, the results might change with high-quality studies.

Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Does Not Result in Inferior Outcomes Compared With Outcomes in Patients Without Dysplasia: Do Not Fear.

The treatment of adult borderline hip dysplasia remains challenging and continues to be a subject of controversy. The preferred treatment for hip instability and acetabular undercoverage is periacetabular osteotomy. However, patients with painful hips and associated femoroacetebular impingement, microinstability, or no instability may benefit from arthroscopic surgery. Short-term studies have reported favorable clinical outcomes. Traditionally, the lateral center-edge angle was used to determine hip dysplasia. More recently the femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index was introduced as a measure for borderline dysplasia. In general, a FEAR index of less than 5° indicates hip instability. When using a FEAR index of more than 2° as a cut-off for hip instability and borderline dysplasia, arthroscopic hip surgery can achieve very similar clinical outcomes to patients with a FEAR index of less than 2°. However low and unequal sample sizes have potentially resulted in both type I and II errors, reducing internal study validity. Although this may be a step in the right direction, further high-quality studies are required to understand patients' characteristics on diagnosis, prognosis, outcomes of surgical interventions, and long-term disease progression for adult borderline hip dysplasia.

An Analysis of a National Administrative Dataset Demonstrating No Evidence of Increase in Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Rates When Postoperative Hip Precautions are Not Used.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a higher dislocation rate when postoperative hip precautions are not used for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A survey was conducted of the hip precautions used by orthopaedic departments in England performing elective primary THA. From the responses to the survey an interrupted time series analysis was performed using the hospital admissions data from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database during the period April 1, 2011 to December 31, 2019 and subsequent dislocations of these prostheses up to June 30, 2020. These were used to determine dislocations within 180 days of primary surgery and emergency readmissions within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: Records were reviewed from 229,057 patients receiving primary, elective THA across 114 hospitals. In total, 1,807 (0.8%) dislocations were recorded within 180 days of surgery. There were 12,416 (5.4%) emergency readmissions within 30 days of surgery. Within hospitals where hip precautions were stopped, the proportion of patients having a dislocation was 0.8% both before and after stopping precautions, with a significant postintervention trend towards fewer dislocations (P < .001). There was also a significant immediate change in median length of stay from 4 to 3 days (P < .001) but no significant trend in the proportion of emergency readmissions within 30 days. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence of an increase in early dislocation or 30-day readmission rates after stopping traditional postoperative hip precautions in primary THA. Potential reductions in length of stay will reduce the risks associated with an extended hospital admission, improve service efficiency, and reduce costs.

[Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome : Arthroscopy-mini-open-surgical hip dislocation]. / Auswahl des Operationsverfahrens beim Femoroazetabulären Impingement-Syndrom : Arthroskopie ­ "mini-open" ­ chirurgische Hüftluxation.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is one of the most common prearthritic hip deformities. Since FAIS is a mechanical pathology, surgical correction of the underlying deformity is the sole causal treatment. If surgery is indicated, a surgical technique that results in complete deformity correction with least morbidity should be selected. ARTHROSCOPY: Due to advancements in techniques and instruments, most pathologies in FAIS can nowadays be addressed arthroscopically. Hip arthroscopy can be successfully performed if the locations of the pathologies are anterior and lateral. MINI-OPEN APPROACH: In special cases and indications-like periarticular pathologies, pathologies of the hip capsule and large labral reconstructions and transplantations, a combination of arthroscopy with a mini-open approach is advantageous. Furthermore, the learning curve of hip arthroscopy can be improved with an additional open approach. SURGICAL HIP DISLOCATION: Global and circumferential pathologies still have to be addressed in surgical hip dislocation to avoid residual deformities. Finally, extraarticular osteotomies have to be considered in cases with significant rotational deformities.

Failed reduction of posterior hip dislocation accompanied by femoral head fracture: causes and resolving strategy.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the causes of failure of the Allis manoeuvre for posterior hip dislocations with an associated Pipkin type I femoral head fractures. The effectiveness of a modified Allis manoeuvre was also evaluated. METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2016, we enrolled five patients with a posterior hip dislocation associated by a Pipkin type I femoral head fracture who were treated initially with the Allis manoeuvre that subsequently failed. Radiographic evaluations were performed to determine the cause of failure, and then a modified Allis manoeuvre was performed. During this procedure, the hip and knee joints of the injured lower limb were both flexed to 90°, and the leg was pulled posteriorly following an upward force to reduce the dislocation. Reduction was assessed by radiographic evaluation. RESULTS: In all patients, the fractured femoral head was incarcerated on the superior edge of the posterior rim of the acetabulum, resulting in failure of the conventional Allis manoeuvre. Satisfactory reduction was achieved with a modified Allis manoeuvre. The mean follow-up duration was 31 months. The femoral head fracture healed after four months on average. The mean Harris score was 91 at the final follow-up. Re-dislocation or femoral head necrosis was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: For posterior hip dislocations associated with a Pipkin type I femoral head fracture, failed reduction is often caused by incarceration of the fractured femoral head on the superior edge of the posterior rim of the acetabulum. The modified Allis manoeuvre can effectively reduce the combined injury in a closed fashion.

Editorial Commentary: At the Intersection of Borderline Dysplasia and Femoroacetabular Impingement-Which Way Should We Turn?

Borderline acetabular dysplasia remains a controversial topic in hip preservation, with poor current comparative literature to guide accurate diagnosis and treatment decision making. Borderline dysplasia represents a "transitional acetabular coverage" pattern between more classic acetabular dysplasia and normal coverage. Traditionally, borderline dysplasia has been defined by a lateral center-edge angle between 20° and 25°, whereas more recently, some authors have used 18° to 25°. Treatment decisions between isolated hip arthroscopy (addressing labral tears, femoroacetabular impingement morphology, and capsular laxity) and periacetabular osteotomy (improving joint stability, often combined with arthroscopy) remain challenging because the fundamental mechanical diagnosis (instability vs femoroacetabular impingement) can be difficult to determine clinically. Obtaining an accurate diagnosis to direct surgical treatment relies on comprehensive assessment of additional bony anatomy features (including femoral version) and patient characteristics (including sex, soft-tissue laxity, and range of motion). Future research efforts in borderline dysplasia should better characterize the role of disease- and patient-specific factors that will inform accurate diagnoses, leading to the development of optimal treatment strategies in distinct patient subgroups through comparison of treatment outcomes.

[Reconstruction of a fracture of the posterior acetabular wall with Pipkin fracture and lesion of the sciatic nerve after dorsal hip dislocation]. / Rekonstruktion einer Fraktur der hinteren Acetabulumwand mit Pipkin-Fraktur und Ischiadicusläsion nach dorsaler Hüftluxation.

A 50-year-old male suffered a crash landing while paragliding and sustained a posterior dislocation of the hip with a Pipkin fracture type 4 (fracture of the posterior acetabular wall and Pipkin fracture type 2) and a lesion of the sciatic nerve. After primary treatment in an external hospital, the patient was transferred to this hospital 4 days following the trauma. An operative stabilization of the acetabular fracture and the Pipkin fracture was performed using a trochanter flip osteotomy. Despite a large central defect of the femoral head it was decided to attempt a reconstruction. Following fixation of the Pipkin fragment an autologous bone graft harvested from the intertrochanteric region was used to fill the defect. Subsequently, a collagen matrix was applied onto the filled defect and a perineural adaptation of the sciatic nerve was performed.

A Single Approach to Arthroscopic Reduction and Debridement for Developmental Dislocation of the Hip in 12 Infants.

BACKGROUND Developmental dislocation of the hip (DDH) results in osteoarthritis in infants and children. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a single approach to arthroscopic reduction and debridement on clinical outcome in 12 infants with DDH. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twelve infants with irreducible DDH underwent single approach arthroscopic reduction and debridement followed by the use of a frog-leg position plaster cast with fixed flexion and abduction of the hips combined with external fixation for 6-8 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or plain X-ray images were analyzed. Intra-articular obstructive factors for reduction were evaluated. The safety angle, medialization rate of the femoral head, and the acetabular angle were measured before and after arthroscopic reduction. RESULTS Imaging showed that the signs of DDH were significantly improved following arthroscopic reduction. Obstructive factors included hypertrophy of the round ligament, fibrous tissue and fat in the acetabular base, arthrocapsular constriction, and varus deformity of the hip. The safety angle was significantly increased following arthroscopic reduction (53.5°) compared with the safety angle before treatment (18.5°) (p<0.05). Medialization of the femoral head was significantly increased (127%) compared with that before treatment (72%) (p<0.05). Arthroscopic reduction significantly reduced the acetabular angle (25°) compared with that before treatment (37.5°) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Single approach arthroscopic reduction and debridement was an effective method for treating DDH that significantly improved the medialization rate of the femoral head, acetabular angle, and the outcome of external fixation when a plaster cast was used with fixed flexion and abduction of the hips.

Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy in Dysplastic Hip Population? A Must, a Maybe, or a No Go?

Treating symptomatic patients with dysplasia involves a controversy in therapy. The question is whether to obtain osseous correction with the help of pelvic reorientation osteotomy or to address intra-articular pathology with an arthroscopic approach. Neither isolated therapy nor the other method seems to be sufficient, but conducting both treatment options simultaneously has also not proved to be superior and carries the risk of additional complications. Different treatment options have been presented on this topic over the years and should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Pelvic reorientation osteotomy in patients with moderate to severe acetabular dysplasia remains uncontested, but it lacks the ability to obtain visualization of the central hip compartment. The isolated arthroscopic approach seems to be favorable for treatment of intra-articular pathologies in patients with mild to borderline dysplasia, whereas collateral arthroscopy in pelvic reorientation osteotomy may achieve better clinical outcomes in patients with more complex cases.

Simplifying the Hip-Spine Relationship for Total Hip Arthroplasty: When Do I Use Dual-Mobility and Why Does It Work?

Recent data indicate that the contemporary prevalence of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty is up to 5- to 10-fold greater in those patients with spinal deformities that lead to stiffness and/or significant pelvic tilt. Moreover, the interplay between the hip and spine is complex, dynamic, and changes over the lifetime of a patient. Finally, the interplay is not fully understood. As such, consideration should be given to the use of dual-mobility constructs in this cohort of patients given the increased effective head size, combined with the dual articulation before hard impingement.

Early Reduction of Pediatric Traumatic Posterior Hip Dislocation Is Much More Important Than the Treatment Procedure.

Traumatic hip dislocations are very rare in the pediatric population, and they are real emergent cases that can occur with minimal trauma. If they are not diagnosed immediately and reduction is not performed as soon as possible, they may cause problems such as avascular necrosis and degenerative arthritis. Performing reduction within the first 6 hours is of vital importance.We aim to present the functional outcomes and radiographic results of 2 pediatric traumatic hip dislocation cases with 36 months of follow-up who were treated with abduction orthosis after the reduction. We want to emphasize the importance of reduction time in the outcome of posterior traumatic hip dislocations followed with abduction orthesis even if there is a trend and suggestion to treat these patients with spica cast with the review of the recent literature.

[The modified Dunn procedure to treat severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis]. / Die modifizierte Dunn-Operation zur Behandlung der schweren Epiphyseolysis capitis femoris.

The modified Dunn procedure enables restoration of the proximal femoral anatomy and normal hip function in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Surgery is indicated in severe SCFE and in hips with a moderate slip angle and impaired function. To prevent further dislocation of the femoral head, the authors recommend non-weightbearing until surgery, since an accurate evaluation of slip stability is not possible in the clinical setting. Only a well-trained orthopedic surgeon with a high level of expertise in hip preservation surgery should perform this procedure. Precise knowledge of the vascular anatomy of the proximal femur is essential to perform successful surgery with low rates of complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Surgical hip dislocation with osteotomy of the greater trochanter is the approach used. After arthrotomy, stability of the physis is checked. To prevent rupture of the retinacular vessels in hips with an unstable physis, these heads are prophylactically pinned before dislocation out of the socket. Blood supply to the femoral head as well as intraarticular damage can be judged in the dislocated position of the femoral head. The retinacular flap preserves epiphyseal perfusion while the femoral head is dislocated from the femoral neck. Resection of posteromedial callous formation from the femoral neck as well as removal of the remaining physis from the femoral head prevent stress on the retinacular vessels after reduction of the femoral head (epiphysis) on the neck.

[Challenges of primary hip arthroplasty with high hip dislocation]. / Herausforderungen der primären Hüftendoprothetik bei hoher Hüftluxation.

BACKGROUND: Endoprosthetic care of high hip dislocation is a surgical challenge. The hip anatomy is greatly altered in these patients, including a rather flat and small acetabulum with impaired bone quality and a relevant chance of a bony defect of the acetabular roof. Additionally, the front coverage and in some cases even the dorsal coverage of the hip are missing. The proximal femur is characterized with an increased antetorsion, a coxa valga position and an enlarged greater trochanter. The medullary cavity is narrowed, the offset is reduced, and the absolut leg length can be enlarged. Further anatomic variations can have been caused by previous surgeries. AIM OF THE TREATMENT: The goal of the endoprosthetic care is the re-creation of a hip with an anatomic center of rotation, an anatomic offset and equal leg length. TREATMENT: This can be achieved by a medial shift of the acetabular cup. An acetabular osteotomy including central cancellous bone graft or a bony graft to reinforce the acetabular roof might be necessary. In cases in which an anatomic acetabular cup placement is not possible, a more cranial placement can be done. Further strategies that are essential in several cases are shortening or re-orientation osteotomies of the femur, reaming of the medullary cavity and correct implant selection. Additionally, thorough soft tissue management is of main importance. Generally, the surgery should be well prepared preoperatively.

Evaluating and managing acetabular dysplasia in adolescents and young adults.

Hip dysplasia is a developmental deformity in which abnormal acetabular or proximal femoral growth causes structural instability of the hip joint due to inadequate bony coverage of the acetabulum over the femoral head. Skeletally mature adolescents or young adults with underlying acetabular dysplasia may present with activity-related groin or lateral hip pain and a limp. This article reviews the current understanding of the disease and better treatment options for correcting acetabular dysplasia in symptomatic adolescents and young adults before secondary osteoarthritis develops.

Evaluation of articular cartilage following rotational acetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia using T2 mapping MRI.

BACKGROUND: Rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) is one of the surgical treatments for acetabular dysplasia, and satisfactory results have been reported. We evaluated the postoperative changes of articular cartilage and whether the pre-operative condition of the articular cartilage influences the clinical results using T2 mapping MRI. METHODS: We reviewed 31 hips with early stage osteoarthritis in 31 patients (mean age, 39.6 years), including three men and 28 women who underwent RAO for hip dysplasia. Clinical evaluations including Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and Japanese Orthopedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), and radiographical evaluations on X-ray were performed. Longitudinal qualitative assessment of articular cartilage was also performed using 3.0-T MRI with T2 mapping technique preoperatively, 6 months, and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no case with progression of osteoarthritis. The mean JOA score improved from 70.1 to 93.4 points, the mean postoperative JHEQ score was 68.8 points, and radiographical data also improved postoperatively. We found that the T2 values of the cartilage at both femoral head and acetabulum increased at 6 months on coronal and sagittal views. However, they significantly decreased 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The T2 values of the center to anterolateral region of acetabulum negatively correlated with postoperative JHEQ score, particularly in pain score. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that biomechanical and anatomical changes could apparently cause decreased T2 values 1-2 years postoperatively compared with those preoperatively. Furthermore, preoperative T2 values of the acetabulum can be prognostic factors for the clinical results of RAO.

Should the Capsule Be Repaired or Plicated After Hip Arthroscopy for Labral Tears Associated With Femoroacetabular Impingement or Instability? A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To critically evaluate the existing literature on hip capsule biomechanics, clinical evidence of instability, and outcomes of capsular management to answer the following question: Should the capsule be repaired or plicated after hip arthroscopy for labral tears associated with femoroacetabular impingement or instability? METHODS: We used PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines to find articles using PubMed and Embase. Included studies were Level I through V studies and focused on hip capsule biomechanics, postarthroscopic instability, and clinical outcomes. Articles were excluded if they discussed treatment of the hip capsule during arthroplasty, dislocations without a history of arthroscopy, and pre-existing conditions. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessment of clinical outcome studies. RESULTS: A total of 34 articles were included: 15 biomechanical studies, 9 instability case reports, and 10 outcome studies. There is consensus from biomechanical studies that the capsule is an important stabilizer of the hip and repairing it provides better stability than when unrepaired. Case reports of instability have raised concerns about capsular management during the index procedure to decrease the complications associated with this problem. Furthermore, outcome studies suggest that there may be an advantage of capsular closure versus capsulotomy during hip arthroscopy for nonarthritic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term outcome studies suggest that capsular closure is safe and effective in nonarthritic patients undergoing hip arthroscopic procedures and may yield superior outcomes compared with unrepaired capsulotomy. Moreover, biomechanical evidence strongly supports the role of capsular repair in maintaining stability of the hip. In patients with stiffness or inflammatory hip disorders, a release may be appropriate. In patients who have signs and symptoms of instability, there is existing evidence that capsular plication may be associated with significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Although the multiple procedures performed in combination with capsular treatment present confounding variables, current evidence appears to support routine capsular closure in most cases and to support capsular plication in cases of instability or borderline dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II through IV studies.