A phase II study of guadecitabine combined with irinotecan vs regorafenib or TAS-102 in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) have demonstrated benefit in reversing resistance to systemic therapies for several cancer types. In a phase II trial of guadecitabine and irinotecan compared to regorafenib or TAS-102 in pts with advanced mCRC refractory to irinotecan. Patients with mCRC refractory to irinotecan were randomized 2:1 to guadecitabine and irinotecan (Arm A) vs standard of care regorafenib or TAS-102 (Arm B) on a 28-day cycle. Between January 15, 2016 and October 24, 2018, 104 pts were randomized at four international sites, with 96 pts undergoing treatment, 62 in Arm A and 34 in Arm B. Median overall survival was 7.15 months for Arm A and 7.66 months for Arm B (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.58-1.47, P = .75). The Kaplan-Meier rates of progression free survival at 4 months were 32% in Arm A and 26% in Arm B. Common ≥Grade 3 treatment related adverse events in Arm A were neutropenia (42%), anemia (18%), diarrhea (11%), compared to Arm B pts with neutropenia (12%), anemia (12%). Guadecitabine and irinotecan had similar OS compared to standard of care TAS-102 or regorafenib, with evidence of target modulation. Clinical trial information: NCT01896856.

A phase Ib/II study of eribulin in combination with cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that eribulin combined with cyclophosphamide (EC) would be an effective combination with tolerable toxicity for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable ABC with any number of prior lines of therapy were eligible to enroll. In the dose escalation cohort, dose level 0 was defined as eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, and dose level 1 was defined as eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Eribulin was given on days 1 and 8 and cyclophosphamide on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. In the dose expansion cohort, enrollment was expanded at dose level 1. The primary objective was clinical benefit rate (CBR), and secondary objectives were response rate (RR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were identified in the dose escalation cohort (n = 6). In the dose expansion cohort, an additional 38 patients were enrolled for a total of 44 patients, including 31 patients (70.4%) with hormone receptor-positive (HR +)/HER2- disease, 12 patients (27.3%) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and 1 patient (2.3%) with HR + /HER2 + disease. Patients had a median age of 56 years (range 33-82 years), 1 prior line of hormone therapy (range 0-6), and 2 prior lines of chemotherapy (range 0-7). CBR was 79.5% (35/44; 7 partial response, 28 stable disease) and the median DOR was 16.4 weeks (range 13.8-21.1 weeks). Median PFS was 16.4 weeks (95% CI: 13.8-21.1 weeks). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (47.7%, n = 21). Fourteen of 26 patients (53.8%) with circulating tumor cell (CTC) data were CTC-positive ([Formula: see text] 5 CTC/7.5 mL) at baseline. Median PFS was shorter in patients who were CTC-positive vs. negative (13.1 vs 30.6 weeks, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: In heavily pretreated patients with ABC, treatment with EC resulted in an encouraging CBR of 79.5% and PFS of 16.4 weeks, which compares favorably to single-agent eribulin. Dose reduction and delays were primarily due to neutropenia. The contribution of cyclophosphamide to eribulin remains unclear but warrants further evaluation. NCT01554371.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF after induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan society of clinical oncology.

Although granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the incidence, duration, and severity of neutropenia, its prophylactic use for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial due to a theoretically increased risk of relapse. The present study investigated the effects of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for AML with remission induction therapy. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of pooled data was conducted, and the risk ratio with corresponding confidence intervals was calculated in the meta-analysis and summarized. Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis, nine of which were examined in the meta-analysis. Although G-CSF significantly shortened the duration of neutropenia, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not correlate with infection-related mortality. Moreover, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not affect disease progression/recurrence, overall survival, or adverse events, such as musculoskeletal pain. However, evidence to support or discourage the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for adult AML patients with induction therapy remains limited. Therefore, the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis can be considered for adult AML patients with remission induction therapy who are at a high risk of infectious complications.

Bendamustine in the treatment of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma refractory or relapse to rituximab treatment: An open-label, single-agent, multicenter study in China.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for refractory or relapse (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) has not been fully identified. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of bendamustine hydrochloride developed in native Chinese corporation in the treatment of patients with R/R iNHL. METHODS: A total of 101 patients from 19 centers were enrolled in this study from July 2016 to February 2019. Bendamustine hydrochloride (120 mg/m2 ) was given on days 1 and 2 of each 21-day treatment cycle for six planned cycles or up to eight cycles if tolerated. Parameters of efficacy and safety were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 53.44 (range, 24.4-74.6) years old. A total of 56 (55.44%) patients completed at least six treatment cycles, and the relative dose intensity was 93.78%. The overall response rate was 72.28%, and the median duration of response was 15.84 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.77-27.48 months). Median progression-free survival was 16.52 months (95% CI, 14.72-23.41 months), and the median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (77.22%), thrombocytopenia (29.70%), and anemia (15.84%). The most frequent nonhematologic adverse events (any grade) included nausea, vomiting, fatigue, fever, decreased appetite, and weight loss. Seven patients died during the trial, and four cases may be related to the investigational drug. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that bendamustine hydrochloride is a feasible treatment option for the indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patient who has not remitted or relapsed after treatment with rituximab. All adverse events were predictable and manageable.

Long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with or without background csDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with/without conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs in RA. METHODS: The analyses evaluated two open-label extensions (OLEs): EXTEND and MONARCH OLE, which included patients from six randomized trials. Patients received sarilumab 200 mg once every 2 weeks (q2w) for at least 264 weeks up to 516 weeks (EXTEND: Sarilumab Monotherapy and Sarilumab + csDMARD groups) or for 276 weeks (MONARCH OLE: Continuation and Switch groups). Primary endpoints included safety, immunogenicity and changes in laboratory parameters. Secondary endpoints included clinical signs and symptoms along with health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires. RESULTS: The Sarilumab Monotherapy (n = 111), Continuation (n = 165) and Switch (n = 155) groups received sarilumab monotherapy, while the Sarilumab + csDMARD group (n = 1910) received sarilumab in combination with csDMARDs. Incidence of one or more treatment-emergent adverse events was 126 (Sarilumab Monotherapy group), 169 (Sarilumab + csDMARD group), 159 (Continuation group) and 159 (Switch group) events/100 patient-years. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event. Neutropenia was not associated with an increased incidence of infections. Most neutropenia cases normalized on-treatment. Adverse events of special interests, such as malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism and gastrointestinal perforations, were rare. Immunogenicity was low and not associated with hypersensitivity reactions or discontinuations due to lack or loss of efficacy. Improvements in clinical signs and symptoms and HRQOL, observed during the initial blinded trials, were maintained throughout the OLE assessment period. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term sarilumab treatment with/without csDMARDs in patients with RA revealed no new safety findings. Efficacy and HRQOL were maintained or further increased over the open-label assessment period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EXTEND, ClinicalTrials.gov, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01146652, NCT01146652; MONARCH OLE, ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02332590, NCT02332590.

A phase 1b study of venetoclax and azacitidine combination in patients with relapsed or refractory myelodysplastic syndromes.

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have a dismal median overall survival (OS) after failing hypomethylating agent (HMA) treatment. There is no standard of care for patients after HMA therapy failure; hence, there is a critical need for effective therapeutic strategies. Herein, we present the safety and efficacy of venetoclax + azacitidine in patients with R/R MDS. This phase 1b, open-label, multicenter study enrolled patients ≥18 years. Patients were treated with escalating doses of oral venetoclax: 100, 200, or 400 mg daily for 14 days every 28-day cycle. Azacitidine was administered on Days 1-7 every cycle at 75 mg/m2 /day intravenously/subcutaneously. Responses were assessed per modified 2006 International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Forty-four patients (male 86%, median age 74 years) received venetoclax + azacitidine treatment. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Hematological adverse events of Grade ≥ 3 included febrile neutropenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (32%), neutropenia (27%), and anemia (18%). Pneumonia (23%) was the most common Grade ≥ 3 infection. Marrow responses were seen including complete remission (CR, n = 3, 7%) and marrow CR (mCR, n = 14, 32%); 36% (16/44) achieved transfusion independence (TI) for RBCs and/or platelets, and 43% (6/14) with mCR achieved hematological improvement (HI). The median time to CR/mCR was 1.2 months, and the median duration of response for CR + mCR was 8.6 months. Median OS was 12.6 months. Venetoclax + azacitidine shows activity in patients with R/R MDS following prior HMA therapy failure and provides clinically meaningful benefits, including HI and TI, and encouraging OS.

Outcome of an elective readmission policy in patients receiving acute myeloid leukaemia consolidation therapy and implications for an outpatient management programme.

Safe outpatient management of acute leukaemia consolidation cycles may enable substantial savings in admission costs. Safety involves the prompt administration of antibiotics in patients with neutropenic fever. Our unit in a metropolitan tertiary referral hospital analysed a cohort of patients spanning a 10-year period, with two key observations: (i) a high proportion of patients living a substantial distance from hospital and (ii) the high incidence and generally prompt onset of fever after severe neutropenia, suggesting this broad applicability of this approach is unfeasible without addressing travel issues and potentially reducing and/or delaying neutropenic fever with prophylactic antibiotics.

Letermovir vs Valganciclovir for Prophylaxis of Cytomegalovirus in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Valganciclovir for 200 days is standard care for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in high-risk CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who receive an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor, but its use is limited by myelosuppression. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of letermovir with valganciclovir for prevention of CMV disease in CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who receive an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-masked, double-dummy, noninferiority, phase 3 trial in adult CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who received an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor at 94 participating sites between May 2018 and April 2021 (final follow-up in April 2022). Interventions: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio (stratified by receipt of lymphocyte-depleting induction immunosuppression) to receive letermovir, 480 mg, orally daily (with acyclovir) or valganciclovir, 900 mg, orally daily (adjusted for kidney function) for up to 200 days after transplant, with matching placebos. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CMV disease, confirmed by an independent masked adjudication committee, through posttransplant week 52 (prespecified noninferiority margin, 10%). CMV disease through week 28 and time to onset of CMV disease through week 52 were secondary outcomes. Exploratory outcomes included quantifiable CMV DNAemia and resistance. The rate of leukopenia or neutropenia through week 28 was a prespecified safety outcome. Results: Among 601 participants randomized, 589 received at least 1 dose of the study drug (mean age, 49.6 years; 422 [71.6%] men). Letermovir (n = 289) was noninferior to valganciclovir (n = 297) for prevention of CMV disease through week 52 (10.4% vs 11.8% of participants with committee-confirmed CMV disease; stratum-adjusted difference -1.4% [95% CI, -6.5% to 3.8%]). No participants who received letermovir vs 5 participants (1.7%) who received valganciclovir developed CMV disease through week 28. Time to onset of CMV disease was comparable between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.56-1.47]). Quantifiable CMV DNAemia was detected in 2.1% of participants in the letermovir group vs 8.8% in the valganciclovir group by week 28. Of participants evaluated for suspected CMV disease or CMV DNAemia, none (0/52) who received letermovir and 12.1% (8/66) who received valganciclovir had resistance-associated substitutions. The rate of leukopenia or neutropenia through week 28 was lower with letermovir vs valganciclovir (26% vs 64%; difference, -37.9% [95% CI, -45.1% to -30.3%]; P < .001). Fewer participants in the letermovir group than the valganciclovir group discontinued prophylaxis due to adverse events (4.1% vs 13.5%) or drug-related adverse events (2.7% vs 8.8%). Conclusion and Relevance: Among adult CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who received an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor, letermovir was noninferior to valganciclovir for prophylaxis of CMV disease over 52 weeks, with lower rates of leukopenia or neutropenia, supporting its use for this indication. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03443869; EudraCT: 2017-001055-30.

[Consensus on clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in China (2023 edition)].

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a common hematological adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities of chemotherapy. CIN may lead to dose reduction and delay of chemotherapeutic agents, febrile neutropenia and severe infection, which results in increased treatment cost, reduced efficacy of chemotherapy, and even life-threatening morbidities. Assessment of risk of CIN, early detection of FN and infection, and proper prevention and treatment play a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of CIN-related morbidities, improving patient treatment safety and anticancer efficacy. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the expert committee of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association issued "the consensus on diagnosis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in China (2023 edition)", which is an update version of the 2019 edition, aiming to provide reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CIN for Chinese oncologists.

[GEM plus CDDP Combination Therapy for Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer-A Single Institution Experience].

BACKGROUND: Since a randomized phase Ⅲ trial conducted in the UK in 2009 showed the superiority of gemcitabine (GEM)plus cisplatin(CDDP)combination therapy over GEM monotherapy, GEM plus CDDP combination therapy has been first-line chemotherapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer. METHODS: GEM plus CDDP combination therapy was administered to 29 patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer from 2016 to 2021. RESULTS: The mean age was 71.9 years, male/ female 19/10. The target of chemotherapy was below, local progression was 3 cases, first distant metastasis 7 cases, metastatic recurrence 19 cases. The type of cancer was below, intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma was 8 cases, hepatic hilar bile duct carcinoma 6 cases, gallbladder carcinoma 5 cases, cystic duct carcinoma 1 case, distal bile duct carcinoma 6 cases, and papilla Vater's cancer 3 cases. The dosing period was 23.1 weeks(range 2-52 weeks). The relative dose intensities of GEM and CDDP were 73.7% and 75.1%. The adverse events were below, the hematological toxicities of Grade 3 or higher were neutropenia(65.5%), leukopenia(3.4%), and thrombocytopenia(10.3%). Non-hematological toxicities of Grade 2 or higher were fatigue(13.7%)and skin rash(6.9%). There was no interstitial pneumonia. The disease control rate was 66.7 %(complete response, n=0; partial response, n=6; stable disease, n=10; progressive disease, n=8). CONCLUSION: GEM plus CDDP combination therapy was safe to perform and was an effective treatment for unresectable biliary tract cancer.

Pulmonary toxicity following administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during chemotherapy for breast cancer: a case report and literature review.

In this report, we aim to present a case of pulmonary toxicity in a patient that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for triple-negative breast cancer that was followed with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for prevention neutropenia, our patient presented with chest discomfort and dyspnea, with radiologic evidence of radiologic investigations showed acute respiratory distress syndrome, after investigation and follow up we came to the conclusion that it was G-CSF adverse effect.

Biweekly DoceAqualip in mCRPC patients beyond 20 cycles: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for up to 10 cycles is an accepted standard regimen in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We report our experience with >20 cycles of biweekly nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) treatment in patients with mCRPC. CASE REPORTS: Cases with long-term treatment of NDLS treatment in mCRPC patients were identified from the medical records of Jawaharlal Nehru Cancer Hospital & Research Centre Bhopal, India. A total of three cases with >20 cycles of NDLS are presented here. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES: Overall, the 3 patients received biweekly NDLS at a dose of 45 mg/m2 for 22, 36, and 40 cycles, respectively, except for one patient where NDLS was initiated at 50 mg/m2 and later reduced to 45 mg/m2. All the 3 patients reported prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (>50% decline in PSA levels from baseline). The time to treatment failure (TTF) was 14.8, 18.2, and 20.6 months in these 3 patients, respectively. PSA nadir occurred after 14, 6 and 13 cycles, respectively. The OS was 21.6, 22.2 and 25.8 months, respectively. Anemia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia were the most common adverse events. NDLS treatment was overall well-tolerated without any new safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly NDLS for >20 cycles was effective and well-tolerated in patients with mCRPC. NDLS can potentially be used for long-term management, which may be a requirement for most patients with mCRPC.

[Comparison of Adverse Events during EC or TC Therapy for Breast Cancer at the Kakogawa Central City Hospital].

Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) and epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) therapies are postoperative chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer. However, a previous study reported on the development of adverse events, such as neutropenia, in Asian patients. In this study, we examined the occurrence of neutropenia during chemotherapy, assessed the symptoms, and investigated the dose-reduction/discontinuation of chemotherapy or admission in patients undergoing postoperative EC or TC therapy following breast cancer surgery at our hospital between April 2018 and March 2020. EC and TC therapies were performed in 29 and 23 patients, respectively. We observed a significant difference in the incidence of neutropenia between the two therapies, although this observation might have been influenced by the frequent use of pegfilgrastim. In the TC therapy group, edema and pain were frequently observed. We observed no significant differences in the dose-reduction/discontinuation of chemotherapy or admission. However, in the TC therapy group, 5 patients required admission.

Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia prevention: A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach.

AIMS: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is frequently prescribed to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, but the administration schedule remains empirical in case of bimonthly chemotherapy such as FOLFIRINOX regimen. This pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study was performed to determine the effect of different G-CSF regimens on the incidence and duration of neutropenia following FOLFIRINOX administration in order to propose an optimal G-CSF dosing schedule. METHODS: A population PK/PD model was developed to describe individual neutrophil time course from absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) obtained in 40 advanced cancer patients receiving FOLFIRINOX regimen. The structural model considered ANC dynamics, neutropenic effect of cytotoxics and the stimulating effect of G-CSF on neutrophils. Final model estimates were used to simulate different G-CSF dosing schedules for 1000 virtual subjects. The incidence and duration of neutropenia were then calculated for different G-CSF dosing schedules. RESULTS: The final model successfully described the myelosuppressive effect induced by the 3 cytotoxics for all patients. Simulations showed that pegfilgrastim administration reduced the risk of severe neutropenia by 22.9% for subjects with low ANC at the start of chemotherapy. Median duration in this group was also shortened by 3.1 days when compared to absence of G-CSF. Delayed G-CSF administration was responsible for higher incidence and longer duration of neutropenia compared to absence of administration. CONCLUSION: The PK/PD model well described our population's ANC data. Simulations showed that pegylated-G-CSF administration 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy seems to be the optimal schedule to reduce FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia. We also underline the potential negative effect of G-CSF maladministration.

Neutropenic complications in the PANTHER phase III study of adjuvant tailored dose-dense chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

Introduction: Myelosuppresion is a common side effect of chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is often used to reduce the risk of neutropenic events. The purpose of this exploratory analysis was to investigate neutropenic complications in the phase III PANTHER trial of standard 3-weekly chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide plus docetaxel (FEC/D) versus bi-weekly tailored dose-dense EC/D adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Patients and methods: Febrile neutropenia, neutropenic infection and infection grade 3-4 according to CTC AE 3.0, were explored in relation to G-CSF use. Per cycle analysis was performed concerning dose reduction and dose delays in conjunction with G-CSF administration.Results: In the experimental group, 98.9% of patients received primary G-CSF support during EC and 97.4% during docetaxel, compared with 49.7% during FEC and 63.88% during docetaxel in the standard group. Overall, the use of G-CSF was associated with a lower risk for developing neutropenic events (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.55, p < .001). Chemotherapy delays due to neutropenia and leukopenia were significantly decreased among patients that received G-CSF (OR 0.098, 95% CI 0.06-0.15 and OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18-0.58, respectively).Discussion: In conclusion, G-CSF support reduces neutropenic events and permits increased relative dose intensity, which is essential for improved survival outcomes.

[Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factors as adjunctive therapy in patients with neutropenic fever]. / Facteurs de croissance granulocytaire dans le traitement curatif des neutropénies fébriles.

Chemotherapy induced neutropenic fever requires a hospitalization in 20-30 % of cases and is then associated with a mortality above 10 %. Hospitalized patients require strict isolation, which sometimes results in a substantial physical and psychological burden. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) are established in the primary and secondary prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. However, their role as adjunctive therapy in patients with neutropenic fever is less clear. This review resumes current best evidence in this area and discusses current recommendations.

La neutropénie fébrile secondaire à une chimiothérapie nécessite une hospitalisation dans 20 à 30 % des cas, et est alors associée à une mortalité supérieure à 10 %. Les patients hospitalisés pour une neutropénie fébrile nécessitent des mesures d'isolement strictes, avec parfois des répercussions non négligeables sur les plans physique et psychique. Les facteurs de croissance granulocytaire (G-CSF) tiennent une place bien établie dans les préventions primaire et secondaire de la neutropénie liée aux cycles de chimiothérapie. Cependant, la place des G-CSF dans le traitement curatif de la neutropénie fébrile postchimiothérapie semble moins claire. Cet article a pour but de résumer l'évidence et discuter des recommandations actuelles dans cette indication thérapeutique.

A Phase 2, International, Multicenter, Open-label Clinical Trial of Subcutaneous Tbo-Filgrastim in Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors Undergoing Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy.

This phase 2, multicenter, open-label trial investigated the safety and tolerability of tbo-filgrastim in pediatric patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In total, 50 patients 1 month to below 16 years of age with solid tumors without bone marrow involvement were stratified into 3 age groups (2 infants, 30 children, 18 adolescents) and prophylactically administered tbo-filgrastim 5 µg/kg body weight once daily subcutaneously. The administration started after the last chemotherapy treatment in week 1 of the first cycle and continued until the expected neutrophil nadir had passed, and the neutrophil count had recovered to 2.0×10/L. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of tbo-filgrastim; secondary endpoints included efficacy. The mean (SD) number of doses administered was 9.2 (2.83) in children and 7.3 (1.88) in adolescents. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 24% of patients; the most common were febrile neutropenia (FN) (12%), anemia (8%), and thrombocytopenia (8%). Nine patients (18%) experienced mild treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common were musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (8%). No deaths or withdrawals occurred. The incidence of severe neutropenia (SN) was 52% and the mean (SD) duration of SN was 1.8 (2.21) days; FN incidence was 26%. A daily dose of tbo-filgrastim 5 µg/kg body weight administered to pediatric patients demonstrated a safety profile consistent with the safety profile in adult patients. The incidence of FN was on the lower end of the range reported in the literature and the SN results provide supportive data on the efficacy of tbo-filgrastim in pediatric patients.

Pregabalin-induced urticarial rash and neutropenia in a renal transplant recipient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pregabalin is a medication used to treat epilepsy, neuropathic pain and generalised anxiety disorder. The most common side effects of pregabalin include dizziness, drowsiness, weight gain, ataxia and diplopia. On the other hand, neutropenia and rash are rare side effects of pregabalin, and at the time of writing, there are only two documented cases of neutropenia and one of rash in the literature, none of which involved renal transplant recipients. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 37-year-old renal transplant recipient who was admitted with lethargy, sore throat, urticarial rash and neutropenia after recently being commenced on pregabalin. On physical examination, he had erythematous urticarial rash near his renal transplant scar, on his right elbow, left knee and left wrist. Bacterial/viral serology and immunology were all negative. A blood film confirmed neutropenia and revealed reactive lymphocytes and neutrophil left shift, and those features were compatible with drug reaction. After cessation of the pregabalin, the neutropenia resolved. No other causes of neutropenia or urticarial rash were identified. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, we have described the first case of concomitant pregabalin-induced neutropenia and urticarial rash in a kidney transplant patient. This case report highlights the importance of close monitoring when starting any new medications, particularly in the immunosuppressed population, and is relevant because of the growing usage of pregabalin for treating neuropathic pain in such patients and the risk that a missed pregabalin-related neutropenia could lead to unnecessary modifications of the immunosuppressive treatment.

Invasive fungal consecutive infections in a patient with acute myeloid leukaemia.

A woman with AML who became febrile and neutropenic after chemotherapy. At the first, Aspergillus was isolated from a sinus biopsy. After 4 weeks, while she was taking voriconazole, another episode of fever combined with dry coughs was detected. Fungal culture and histopathology of sinus biopsy revealed mucormycosis.

Impact of unresolved neutropenia in patients with neutropenia and invasive aspergillosis: a post hoc analysis of the SECURE trial.

Background: Historically, baseline neutropenia and lack of neutrophil recovery have been associated with poor outcomes in invasive aspergillosis (IA). It is unclear how treatment with the new Aspergillus-active triazoles isavuconazole and voriconazole affects outcomes in neutropenic patients with IA. Methods: A post hoc analysis of the Phase 3 SECURE trial assessed patients with neutropenia (neutrophil count <0.5 × 109/L for >10 days at baseline) with IA (proven/probable) who had received either isavuconazole or voriconazole. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality (ACM) through day 42. ACM in patients with resolved versus unresolved neutropenia at day 7 and overall success at end of treatment (EOT) were also assessed. Results: One hundred and forty-two patients with neutropenia and IA were included (isavuconazole n = 78, voriconazole n = 64). ACM through day 42 (primary endpoint), day 7 and EOT were higher for patients with unresolved versus resolved neutropenia at each timepoint (day 42, unresolved: 45.0% isavuconazole, 45.2% voriconazole; resolved: 5.0% isavuconazole, 5.9% voriconazole; day 7, unresolved: 31.0% isavuconazole, 29.8% voriconazole; resolved: 5.0% isavuconazole, 5.9% voriconazole; EOT, unresolved: 48.6% isavuconazole, 36.4% voriconazole; resolved: 5.0% isavuconazole, 14.3% voriconazole). ACM was significantly higher for isavuconazole-treated patients with unresolved versus resolved neutropenia (day 7, P = 0.031; day 42, P < 0.001; EOT, P < 0.001). In voriconazole-treated patients, ACM was significantly higher among patients with unresolved versus resolved neutropenia at day 42 (P = 0.002) and numerically higher at day 7 and EOT (P > 0.05 for both). Conclusions: Isavuconazole had comparable efficacy and safety to voriconazole in neutropenic patients with IA. Resolution of neutropenia was associated with improved outcomes.