Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 566
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet ; 399(10332): 1336-1346, 2022 04 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35367004

RESUMO

Rubella is an acute illness caused by rubella virus and characterised by fever and rash. Although rubella is a clinically mild illness, primary rubella virus infection in early pregnancy can result in congenital rubella syndrome, which has serious medical and public health consequences. WHO estimates that approximately 100 000 congenital rubella syndrome cases occur per year. Rubella virus is transmitted through respiratory droplets and direct contact. 25-50% of people infected with rubella virus are asymptomatic. Clinical disease often results in mild, self-limited illness characterised by fever, a generalised erythematous maculopapular rash, and lymphadenopathy. Complications include arthralgia, arthritis, thrombocytopenic purpura, and encephalitis. Common presenting signs and symptoms of congenital rubella syndrome include cataracts, sensorineural hearing impairment, congenital heart disease, jaundice, purpura, hepatosplenomegaly, and microcephaly. Rubella and congenital rubella syndrome can be prevented by rubella-containing vaccines, which are commonly administered in combination with measles vaccine. Although global rubella vaccine coverage reached only 70% in 2020 global rubella eradiation remains an ambitious but achievable goal.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Feminino , Humanos , Vacina contra Sarampo , Gravidez , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/diagnóstico , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/epidemiologia , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Rubéola , Vírus da Rubéola
2.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 58(4): 360-367, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36222610

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although live-attenuated vaccines are contraindicated under immunosuppression, the immune status of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been fully assessed prior to immunosuppressive therapy. AIMS: To investigate antiviral serostatus against viruses requiring live vaccines for prevention in IBD patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: This multicenter study included IBD patients who were aged <40 years and were treated with thiopurine monotherapy, molecular-targeted monotherapy, or combination therapy. Gender- and age-matched healthy subjects (HS) living in the same areas were included as control group. Antibody titers against measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: A total of 437 IBD patients (163 ulcerative colitis [UC] and 274 Crohn's disease [CD]) and 225 HS were included in the final analysis. Compared with HS, IBD patients had lower seropositivity rates for measles (IBD vs. HS = 83.91% vs. 85.33%), rubella (77.55% vs. 84.89%), mumps (37.50% vs. 37.78%), and varicella (91.26% vs. 96.44%). Gender- and age-adjusted seropositivity rates were lower in UC patients than in both CD patients and HS for measles (UC, CD, and HS = 81.60%, 85.29%, and 85.33%), rubella (76.40%, 78.23%, and 84.89%), mumps (27.16%, 43.70%, and 37.78%), and varicella (90.80%, 91.54%, and 96.44%); the difference was significant for all viruses except measles. Divided by the degree of immunosuppression, there were no significant differences in seropositivity rates among IBD patients. CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients, especially those with UC, exhibit reduced seropositivity rates and may benefit from screening prior to the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy.


Assuntos
Varicela , Colite Ulcerativa , Doença de Crohn , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Humanos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 165, 2023 Mar 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36932346

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In yellow fever (YF) endemic areas, measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), and YF vaccines are often co-administered in childhood vaccination schedules. Because these are live vaccines, we assessed potential immune interference that could result from co-administration. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomized non-inferiority trial among healthy 1-year-olds in Misiones Province, Argentina. Children were randomized to one of three groups (1:1:1): Co-administration of MMR and YF vaccines (MMR1YF1), MMR followed by YF vaccine four weeks later (MMR1YF2), or YF followed by MMR vaccine four weeks later (YF1MMR2). Blood samples obtained pre-vaccination and 28 days post-vaccination were tested for immunoglobulin G antibodies against measles, mumps, and rubella, and for YF virus-specific neutralizing antibodies. Non-inferiority in seroconversion was assessed using a -5% non-inferiority margin. Antibody concentrations were compared with Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Of 851 randomized children, 738 were correctly vaccinated, had ≥ 1 follow-up sample, and were included in the intention-to-treat population. Non-inferior seroconversion was observed for all antigens (measles seroconversion: 97.9% in the MMR1YF1 group versus 96.3% in the MMR1YF2 group, a difference of 1.6% [90% CI -1.5, 4.7]; rubella: 97.9% MMR1YF1 versus 94.7% MMR1YF2, a difference of 3.3% [-0.1, 6.7]; mumps: 96.7% MMR1YF1 versus 97.9% MMR1YF2, a difference of -1.3% [-4.1, 1.5]; and YF: 96.3% MMR1YF1 versus 97.5% YF1MMR2, a difference of -1.2% [-4.2, 1.7]). Rubella antibody concentrations and YF titers were significantly lower following co-administration; measles and mumps concentrations were not impacted. CONCLUSION: Effective seroconversion was achieved and was not impacted by the co-administration, although antibody levels for two antigens were lower. The impact of lower antibody levels needs to be weighed against missed opportunities for vaccination to determine optimal timing for MMR and YF vaccine administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03368495) on 11/12/2017.


Assuntos
Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Vacina contra Febre Amarela , Febre Amarela , Humanos , Criança , Lactente , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Argentina , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Anticorpos Antivirais , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Imunidade , Vacinas Combinadas
4.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 59(11): 1217-1222, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37664891

RESUMO

AIM: Australian and New Zealand guidelines recommend that live vaccines be postponed for 11 months after treatment of Kawasaki disease (KD) with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). We aimed to describe patterns of live-vaccine administration after KD treatment, focusing on the measles-mumps-rubella/measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMR/MMRV) vaccines, and to compare real-world practice with current recommendations. METHODS: We combined data from inpatient Electronic Health Records and the Australian Immunisation Register for all children who received IVIG for the treatment of KD under the age of 5 years at two Australian tertiary children's hospitals over a 12-year period. Children who received IVIG <11 months before a scheduled MMR/MMRV were deemed 'at risk' of breaching the guidelines, and those whose subsequent vaccination occurred <11 months after the IVIG were deemed to have 'breached' the guidelines. RESULTS: Of those at risk, three-quarters (76%) breached the guidelines for their first MMR/MMRV. Findings were similar (50%-80%) for the second MMR/MMRV dose. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Australian children treated for KD with IVIG may not be optimally protected by MMRV vaccination. Immunisation systems should address this avoidable risk.


Assuntos
Varicela , Sarampo , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos/tratamento farmacológico , Austrália , Vacina contra Varicela , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle
5.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 57(12): 2134-2139, 2023 Dec 06.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38186167

RESUMO

A study was conducted on rural women of childbearing age aged 20-49 who underwent the National Free Preconception Health Examination Project (NFPHEP)in Yunnan Province from 2013 to 2019. Descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the negative rate of IgG antibodies against the rubella virus and its differences among various socio-demographic characteristics. Among the 1 511 203 study subjects, the negative rate of IgG antibodies against the rubella virus was 24.36%. Only 2.64% of the population had received rubella virus vaccine. The negative rate of IgG antibodies among rural childbearing-age women in the preconception period in Yunnan Province decreased with age and educational level (Ptrend<0.001). The negative rate of IgG antibodies in ethnic minority women of childbearing age in the preconception period (25.19%) was higher than that of Han women (23.88%). Among the 22 ethnic groups with over 1 000 participants, the negative rates of IgG antibodies in women of childbearing age from the Blang (32.85%), Bouyei (31.03%), Zhuang (31.01%), and Miao (30.70%) ethnic groups were higher than those of women from other ethnic groups. Among the 16 states (cities) in Yunnan Province, the negative rate of IgG antibodies in pregnant women of childbearing age in Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture (38.06%) and Lincang City (32.63%) was higher than that in other states (cities). The negative rate of serum IgG antibodies in women who reported having received rubella virus vaccine (18.60%) was lower than that in other non-vaccinated populations (24.52%). The proportion of rural women of childbearing age in Yunnan Province who were susceptible to the rubella virus before pregnancy was still high. It is necessary to promote rubella vaccination among people susceptible to rubella, especially pregnant women, to prevent rubella virus infection and reduce the incidence rate and disease burden of rubella people.


Assuntos
Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Vacinas , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Vírus da Rubéola , Imunoglobulina G , Etnicidade , Grupos Minoritários , China , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Antígenos Virais
6.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 56(8): 1095-1100, 2022 Aug 06.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922237

RESUMO

Objective: To determine IgG antibody levels of measles, rubella, mumps in healthy population in Shanghai from 2010 to 2020 and analyze the trend of antibody changes in different age groups. Methods: 10 828 healthy people without measles, rubella and mumps in Shanghai were included in the study from 2010 to 2020. Serum samples were collected from 12 age groups, and the serum IgG antibody of measles, rubella and mumps were detected by ELISA. The difference of antibody positive rates and antibody levels were analyzed. Results: The median age M (Q1, Q3) of 10 828 objects were 8 years old (9 months old, 20 years old). Males accounted for 48.34% (5 234/10 828) and females accounted for 50.92% (5 514/10 828). Unknown gender information accounted for 0.74% (80/10 828), and 27.03% (2 927/10 828) of participants had unknown MMR immunization history. The total positive rates of measles, rubella and mumps IgG antibody were 76.78%, 64.46% and 64.29% and their GMCs were 541.45 mIU/ml, 31.76 IU/ml and 133.73 U/ml respectively. There were significant differences in serum IgG antibody GMC of measles, rubella and mumps in each year (Fmeasles=180.74, P<0.001; Frubella=189.95, P<0.001; Fmumps=122.40, P<0.001). The positive rate of measles antibody was higher than that of rubella and mumps, and the difference was statistically significant (χ²=518.09, P<0.001). Conclusion: The level of measles IgG antibody in healthy people in Shanghai is higher, while the level of rubella and mumps IgG antibody is slightly lower.


Assuntos
Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , Criança , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Lactente , Masculino , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Caxumba/epidemiologia , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Vírus da Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Infect Dis ; 224(12 Suppl 2): S360-S366, 2021 09 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34590132

RESUMO

Rubella virus is the most teratogenic virus known to science and is capable of causing large epidemics. The RA 27/3 rubella vaccine, usually combined with measles vaccine, has eliminated rubella and congenital rubella syndrome from much of the world, notably from the Western Hemisphere. Except in immunosuppressed individuals, it is remarkably safe. Together with rubella vaccine strains used in China and Japan, eradication of the rubella virus is possible, indeed more feasible than eradication of measles or mumps.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Vírus da Rubéola/imunologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Anticorpos Antivirais , Erradicação de Doenças , Carga Global da Doença , Humanos , Lactente , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia
8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 11: CD004407, 2021 11 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34806766

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (chickenpox) are serious diseases that can lead to serious complications, disability, and death. However, public debate over the safety of the trivalent MMR vaccine and the resultant drop in vaccination coverage in several countries persists, despite its almost universal use and accepted effectiveness. This is an update of a review published in 2005 and updated in 2012. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness, safety, and long- and short-term adverse effects associated with the trivalent vaccine, containing measles, rubella, mumps strains (MMR), or concurrent administration of MMR vaccine and varicella vaccine (MMR+V), or tetravalent vaccine containing measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella strains (MMRV), given to children aged up to 15 years. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library 2019, Issue 5), which includes the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1966 to 2 May 2019), Embase (1974 to 2 May 2019), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (2 May 2019), and ClinicalTrials.gov (2 May 2019). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies (PCS/RCS), case-control studies (CCS), interrupted time-series (ITS) studies, case cross-over (CCO) studies, case-only ecological method (COEM) studies, self-controlled case series (SCCS) studies, person-time cohort (PTC) studies, and case-coverage design/screening methods (CCD/SM) studies, assessing any combined MMR or MMRV / MMR+V vaccine given in any dose, preparation or time schedule compared with no intervention or placebo, on healthy children up to 15 years of age. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. We grouped studies for quantitative analysis according to study design, vaccine type (MMR, MMRV, MMR+V), virus strain, and study settings. Outcomes of interest were cases of measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella, and harms. Certainty of evidence of was rated using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 138 studies (23,480,668 participants). Fifty-one studies (10,248,159 children) assessed vaccine effectiveness and 87 studies (13,232,509 children) assessed the association between vaccines and a variety of harms. We included 74 new studies to this 2019 version of the review. Effectiveness Vaccine effectiveness in preventing measles was 95% after one dose (relative risk (RR) 0.05, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.13; 7 cohort studies; 12,039 children; moderate certainty evidence) and 96% after two doses (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.28; 5 cohort studies; 21,604 children; moderate certainty evidence). The effectiveness in preventing cases among household contacts or preventing transmission to others the children were in contact with after one dose was 81% (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.89; 3 cohort studies; 151 children; low certainty evidence), after two doses 85% (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.75; 3 cohort studies; 378 children; low certainty evidence), and after three doses was 96% (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.23; 2 cohort studies; 151 children; low certainty evidence). The effectiveness (at least one dose) in preventing measles after exposure (post-exposure prophylaxis) was 74% (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.50; 2 cohort studies; 283 children; low certainty evidence). The effectiveness of Jeryl Lynn containing MMR vaccine in preventing mumps was 72% after one dose (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.76; 6 cohort studies; 9915 children; moderate certainty evidence), 86% after two doses (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.35; 5 cohort studies; 7792 children; moderate certainty evidence). Effectiveness in preventing cases among household contacts was 74% (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.49; 3 cohort studies; 1036 children; moderate certainty evidence).  Vaccine effectiveness against rubella, using a vaccine with the BRD2 strain which is only used in China, is 89% (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.42; 1 cohort study; 1621 children; moderate certainty evidence).  Vaccine effectiveness against varicella (any severity) after two doses in children aged 11 to 22 months is 95% in a 10 years follow-up (rate ratio (rr) 0.05, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.08; 1 RCT; 2279 children; high certainty evidence). Safety There is evidence supporting an association between aseptic meningitis and MMR vaccines containing Urabe and Leningrad-Zagreb mumps strains, but no evidence supporting this association for MMR vaccines containing Jeryl Lynn mumps strains (rr 1.30, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.56; low certainty evidence). The analyses provide evidence supporting an association between MMR/MMR+V/MMRV vaccines (Jeryl Lynn strain) and febrile seizures. Febrile seizures normally occur in 2% to 4% of healthy children at least once before the age of 5. The attributable risk febrile seizures vaccine-induced is estimated to be from 1 per 1700 to 1 per 1150 administered doses. The analyses provide evidence supporting an association between MMR vaccination and idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura (ITP). However, the risk of ITP after vaccination is smaller than after natural infection with these viruses. Natural infection of ITP occur in 5 cases per 100,000 (1 case per 20,000) per year. The attributable risk is estimated about 1 case of ITP per 40,000 administered MMR doses. There is no evidence of an association between MMR immunisation and encephalitis or encephalopathy (rate ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.61; 2 observational studies; 1,071,088 children; low certainty evidence), and autistic spectrum disorders (rate ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.01; 2 observational studies; 1,194,764 children; moderate certainty). There is insufficient evidence to determine the association between MMR immunisation and inflammatory bowel disease (odds ratio 1.42, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.16; 3 observational studies; 409 cases and 1416 controls; moderate certainty evidence). Additionally, there is no evidence supporting an association between MMR immunisation and cognitive delay, type 1 diabetes, asthma, dermatitis/eczema, hay fever, leukaemia, multiple sclerosis, gait disturbance, and bacterial or viral infections.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Existing evidence on the safety and effectiveness of MMR/MMRV vaccines support their use for mass immunisation. Campaigns aimed at global eradication should assess epidemiological and socioeconomic situations of the countries as well as the capacity to achieve high vaccination coverage. More evidence is needed to assess whether the protective effect of MMR/MMRV could wane with time since immunisation.


Assuntos
Varicela , Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/efeitos adversos , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle
10.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(24): 744-750, 2020 Jun 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32555136

RESUMO

Rubella is the leading vaccine-preventable cause of birth defects. Rubella typically manifests as a mild febrile rash illness; however, infection during pregnancy, particularly during the first trimester, can result in miscarriage, fetal death, or a constellation of malformations known as congenital rubella syndrome (CRS), commonly including one or more visual, auditory, or cardiac defects (1). In 2012, the Regional Committee of the World Health Organization (WHO) Western Pacific Region (WPR)* committed to accelerate rubella control, and in 2017, resolved that all countries or areas (countries) in WPR should aim for rubella elimination† as soon as possible (2,3). WPR countries are capitalizing on measles elimination activities, using a combined measles and rubella vaccine, case-based surveillance for febrile rash illness, and integrated diagnostic testing for measles and rubella. This report summarizes progress toward rubella elimination and CRS prevention in WPR during 2000-2019. Coverage with a first dose of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV1) increased from 11% in 2000 to 96% in 2019. During 1970-2019, approximately 84 million persons were vaccinated through 62 supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) conducted in 27 countries. Reported rubella incidence increased from 35.5 to 71.3 cases per million population among reporting countries during 2000-2008, decreased to 2.1 in 2017, and then increased to 18.4 in 2019 as a result of outbreaks in China and Japan. Strong sustainable immunization programs, closing of existing immunity gaps, and maintenance of high-quality surveillance to respond rapidly to and contain outbreaks are needed in every WPR country to achieve rubella elimination in the region.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças , Vacina contra Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Ásia/epidemiologia , Australásia/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
11.
Hong Kong Med J ; 26(2): 127-138, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32245914

RESUMO

Congenital infections refer to a group of perinatal infections that may have similar clinical presentations, including rash and ocular findings. TORCH is the acronym that covers these infections (toxoplasmosis, other [syphilis], rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus). There are, however, other important causes of intrauterine/perinatal infections, including enteroviruses, varicella zoster virus, Zika virus, and parvovirus B19. Intrauterine and perinatal infections are significant causes of fetal and neonatal mortality and important contributors to childhood morbidity. A high index of suspicion for congenital infections and awareness of the prominent features of the most common congenital infections can help to facilitate early diagnosis, tailor appropriate diagnostic evaluation, and if appropriate, initiate early treatments. In the absence of maternal laboratory results diagnostic of intrauterine infections, congenital infections should be suspected in newborns with certain clinical features or combinations of clinical features, including hydrops fetalis, microcephaly, seizures, cataract, hearing loss, congenital heart disease, hepatosplenomegaly, jaundice, or rash. Primary prevention of maternal infections during pregnancy is the cornerstone of prevention of congenital infection. Available resources should focus on the promotion of public health.


Assuntos
Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Varicela/diagnóstico , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/prevenção & controle , Eritema Infeccioso/diagnóstico , Eritema Infeccioso/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Herpes Simples/diagnóstico , Herpes Simples/prevenção & controle , Hong Kong , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/diagnóstico , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/prevenção & controle , Toxoplasmose/diagnóstico , Toxoplasmose/prevenção & controle
12.
J Infect Dis ; 220(12): 1870-1872, 2019 11 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30615164

RESUMO

There are compelling epidemiological, economic, and ethical arguments for setting a global measles eradication goal. The 6 chairpersons of Regional Verification Commissions for Measles and Rubella elimination advocate that the time for courageously accelerating efforts to ensure a world where no child dies of measles, is NOW!


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Saúde Global , Humanos , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle
13.
Rural Remote Health ; 19(3): 5261, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31529972

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: After a commendable achievement on polio-free status for the South-East Asian Region (SEAR), WHO is now focusing towards measles elimination, which is still a major contributor of under-five mortality in SEAR. India has introduced measles and rubella (MR) vaccination throughout the country through supplementary immunization activity, followed by introducing the same in the routine vaccination. Health indicators and public health system functioning in the southern states of India are good, so India introduced the MR campaign in the southern high-performing states as phase 1 on 5 April 2017. The aim of the campaign was to vaccinate more than 95% of eligible children (aged 9 months to 15 years). At the same time, rumors and negative campaigning about this initiative started in social media. This study aimed to measure the coverage of MR vaccination among the target population in South India. METHODS: Data was collected immediately after phase 1 of the MR vaccine campaign in April 2017. Data was collected based on the WHO-recommended 30/7 rapid monitoring method. Thirty villages around the Rural Health Training Centre of Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences were selected and seven children aged 9 months to 5 years and seven children aged 6 to 15 years from each village were included. Children were classified as 'vaccinated' or 'not vaccinated' based on the WHO 'card or history' method. RESULTS: Among the total sample of 420 children, 380 children (90.5% (range 87.4-93.0%)) were found to be vaccinated and 40 children (9.5% (range 7.0-12.6%)) were found to be unvaccinated. Most of the people came to know about the MR vaccination through auxiliary nurses and midwives, followed by school teachers. The main reasons for not getting vaccinated was fear of an adverse event following vaccination or fear of injection. Reasons for not getting vaccinated were significantly associated with usage of smartphone by at least one of the parents (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.1 (1.1-4.2)), better literacy level among mothers (adjusted OR 5.2 (1.1-24.8)) and poor literacy level among fathers (adjusted OR 3.6 (1.1-11.5)). CONCLUSION: Despite the negative propaganda by social media, the coverage of vaccination by the public healthcare providers was near optimal in phase 1, which shows the strength of the public health system in this rural area of southern India. In accordance with the modern technology, public health policymakers should think about and plan information education and communication activities.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Lactente , Masculino , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Rubéola/administração & dosagem
14.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 40(12): 1646-1656, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527073

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review the epidemiology, natural history, evaluation, and prevention of rubella infection during pregnancy. This will aid obstetric care providers in counseling their patients regarding potentially devastating effects on the developing fetus and the importance of vaccinating susceptible women as appropriate. OUTCOMES: Outcomes evaluated include fetal rubella infection, maternal seroconversion and response to rubella-containing vaccines. EVIDENCE: Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles in English on subjects related to rubella infection during pregnancy betweenn 1985 and 2017. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Other (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUATION METHODS: The quality of the evidence is rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). Recommendations for practice are ranked according to the method described in this Report. GUIDELINE UPDATE: The guideline will be reviewed 5 years after publication to decide if an update is required. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations SPONSOR: Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.


Assuntos
Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Ginecologia , Humanos , Obstetrícia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Sociedades Médicas
17.
J Infect Dis ; 216(suppl_1): S316-S323, 2017 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28838200

RESUMO

In 1988, the by the World Health Assembly established the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, which consisted of a partnership among the World Health Organization (WHO), Rotary International, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the United Nations Children's Fund. By 2016, the annual incidence of polio had decreased by >99.9%, compared with 1988, and at the time of writing, only 3 countries in which wild poliovirus circulation has never been interrupted remain: Afghanistan, Nigeria, and Pakistan. A key strategy for polio eradication has been the development of a skilled and deployable workforce to implement eradication activities across the globe. In 1999, the Stop Transmission of Polio (STOP) program was developed and initiated by the CDC, in collaboration with the WHO, to train and mobilize additional human resources to provide technical assistance to polio-endemic countries. STOP has also informed the development of other public health workforce capacity to support polio eradication efforts, including national STOP programs. In addition, the program has diversified to address measles and rubella elimination, data management and quality, and strengthening routine immunization programs. This article describes the STOP program and how it has contributed to polio eradication by building global public health workforce capacity.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças/organização & administração , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Poliomielite/prevenção & controle , Fortalecimento Institucional , Humanos , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle
18.
Ann Ig ; 30(4 Supple 1): 33-37, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30062378

RESUMO

Measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines have greatly reduced the incidence of these four childhood diseases, which in the past caused a considerable burden of morbidity and lethality to the population. Vaccines against MMR, varicella and a tetravalent MMRV vaccine are currently available on the market to provide immunization against measles-mumps-rubella and varicella. A recently passed Italian Law (L 119/2017) on vaccinations increased the number of free of charge but compulsory vaccinations from four to ten, including MMR and varicella, as a requirement for admission to nursery schools and kindergartens; fines may be levied for non compliance, in the attempt to increase vaccination coverage. The Italian National Immunization Program 2017-19 allows immunization to be administered either by: the trivalent anti-measles-mumps-rubella plus the monovalent anti-varicella vaccine, administered in different anatomic sites at the same session, or by a quadrivalent MMRV combined vaccine.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Programas Obrigatórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Cobertura Vacinal/legislação & jurisprudência , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Varicela/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Itália , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/imunologia , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Convulsões Febris/etiologia , Vacinas Combinadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Combinadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Combinadas/imunologia
20.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 73(5): 429-442, 2017.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29433130

RESUMO

Despite the WHO target for measles and rubella elimination in 2015, outbreaks still occur in all WHO Regions. After a description of the epidemiological situation of measles and rubella worldwide and especially in Europe, this paper aims to provide a detailed analysis of the current epidemiological context of Italy. The surge in the number of measles cases since the beginning of 2017, together with vaccination coverage still far from the 95% target, requires priority actions to be taken to achieve the elimination goals. Alongside the recently approved decree reintroducing compulsory vaccinations for school admissions, further measures are needed and should include the increase in the commitment of the 21 Regions; the implementation of supplemental immunization activities; improving the communication skills of health care workers; ensuring an effective communication with citizens; the enhancement of the surveillance network.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças , Vacina contra Sarampo , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Rubéola , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA