Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 56(5): 533-7, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492860

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the pharmacy density in rural and urban communities with hospitals and to examine its association with readmission rates. DESIGN: Ecologic study. SETTING: Forty-eight rural and urban primary care service areas (PCSAs) in the state of Oregon. PARTICIPANTS: All hospitals in the state of Oregon. INTERVENTION: Pharmacy data were obtained from the Oregon Board of Pharmacy based on active licensure. Pharmacy density was calculated by determining the cumulative number of outpatient pharmacy hours in a PCSA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oregon hospital 30-day all-cause readmission rates were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and were determined with the use of claims data of patients 65 years of age or older who were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days from July 2012 to June 2013. RESULTS: Readmission rates for Oregon hospitals ranged from 13.5% to 16.5%. The cumulative number of pharmacy hours in PCSAs containing a hospital ranged from 54 to 3821 hours. As pharmacy density increased, the readmission rates decreased, asymptotically approaching a predicted 14.7% readmission rate for areas with high pharmacy density. CONCLUSION: Urban hospitals were in communities likely to have more pharmacy access compared with rural hospitals. Future research should determine if increasing pharmacy access affects readmission rates, especially in rural communities.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/provisão & distribuição , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Idoso , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Oregon , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/organização & administração
2.
Malar J ; 9: 50, 2010 Feb 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20149246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In many low-income countries, the retail sector plays an important role in the treatment of malaria and is increasingly being considered as a channel for improving medicine availability. Retailers are the last link in a distribution chain and their supply sources are likely to have an important influence on the availability, quality and price of malaria treatment. This article presents the findings of a systematic literature review on the retail sector distribution chain for malaria treatment in low and middle-income countries. METHODS: Publication databases were searched using key terms relevant to the distribution chain serving all types of anti-malarial retailers. Organizations involved in malaria treatment and distribution chain related activities were contacted to identify unpublished studies. RESULTS: A total of 32 references distributed across 12 developing countries were identified. The distribution chain had a pyramid shape with numerous suppliers at the bottom and fewer at the top. The chain supplying rural and less-formal outlets was made of more levels than that serving urban and more formal outlets. Wholesale markets tended to be relatively concentrated, especially at the top of the chain where few importers accounted for most of the anti-malarial volumes sold. Wholesale price mark-ups varied across chain levels, ranging from 27% to 99% at the top of the chain, 8% at intermediate level (one study only) and 2% to 67% at the level supplying retailers directly. Retail mark-ups tended to be higher, and varied across outlet types, ranging from 3% to 566% in pharmacies, 29% to 669% in drug shops and 100% to 233% in general shops. Information on pricing determinants was very limited. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the distribution chain for retail sector malaria treatment was mainly descriptive and lacked representative data on a national scale. These are important limitations in the advent of the Affordable Medicine Facility for Malaria, which aims to increase consumer access to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), through a subsidy introduced at the top of the distribution chain. This review calls for rigorous distribution chain analysis, notably on the factors that influence ACT availability and prices in order to contribute to efforts towards improved access to effective malaria treatment.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/provisão & distribuição , Comércio/métodos , Custos de Medicamentos , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Antimaláricos/economia , Comércio/economia , Comércio/organização & administração , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Humanos , Marketing de Serviços de Saúde/economia
3.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 84(10): ajpe7889, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33149327

RESUMO

The annual number of Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) graduates is projected to exceed the number of annual pharmacist job openings over the next 10 years. Loss of retail sector jobs will be partially offset by projected gains in several other sectors; however, oversupply will persist until the number of graduates is more reflective of job market capacity. Large-scale practice transformation will not happen overnight; consequently, schools and colleges of pharmacy must immediately change their perspective from producing graduates to fill pharmacist roles, to producing graduates who are prepared with expertise and professional skills to excel in many types of well-paying positions. Students need career advice including to convince potential employers how a PharmD education has prepared them with transferable high-level skills that are applicable beyond traditional pharmacist roles. Better communicating the value of pharmacy skills to students and employers may also have a positive impact on admission numbers as prospective applicants become more aware of the breadth of pharmacy career opportunities.


Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Educação em Farmácia , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Farmacêuticos/provisão & distribuição , Estudantes de Farmácia , Mobilidade Ocupacional , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/tendências , Mão de Obra em Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Descrição de Cargo , Farmacêuticos/tendências , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Isr J Health Policy Res ; 7(1): 59, 2018 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30501624

RESUMO

The community pharmacy setting is a venue that is readily accessible to the public. In addition, it is staffed by a pharmacist, who is a healthcare provider, trained and capable of delivering comprehensive pharmaceutical care. As such, community pharmacists have a colossal opportunity to serve as key contributors to patients' health by ensuring appropriate use of medications, preventing medication misadventures, identifying drug-therapy needs, as well as by being involved in disease management, screening, and prevention programs. This unique position gives the pharmacist the privilege and duty to serve patients in roles other than solely that of the stereotypical drug dispenser.Worldwide, as well as in Israel, pharmacists already offer a variety of pharmaceutical services and tend to patients' and the healthcare system's needs. This article provides examples of professional, clinical or other specialty services offered by community pharmacists around the world and in Israel and describes these interventions as well as the evidence for their efficacy. Examples of such activities which were recently introduced to the Israeli pharmacy landscape due to legislative changes which expanded the pharmacist's scope of practice include emergency supply of medications, pharmacists prescribing, and influenza vaccination. Despite the progress already made, further expansion of these opportunities is warranted but challenging. Independent prescribing, as practiced in the United Kingdom or collaborative drug therapy management programs, as practiced in the United States, expansion of vaccination programs, or wide-spread recognition and reimbursement for medication therapy management (MTM) programs are unrealized opportunities. Obstacles such as time constraints, lack of financial incentives, inadequate facilities and technology, and lack of professional buy-in, and suggested means for overcoming these challenges are also discussed.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Israel , Papel Profissional , Mecanismo de Reembolso
5.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 74(10): 653-668, 2017 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28377378

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Results of a study to determine if disparities in drug pricing, pharmacy services, and community pharmacy access exist in a Tennessee county with a predominantly minority population are reported. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of community pharmacies in Shelby County, a jurisdiction with a total population more than 60% composed of racial and ethnic minority groups, was conducted. Data collection included "out-of-pocket" (i.e., cash purchase) prices for generic levothyroxine, methylphenidate, and hydrocodone-acetaminophen; pharmacy hours of operation; availability of selected pharmacy services; and ZIP code-level data on demographics and crime risk. Analysis of variance, chi-square testing, correlational analysis, and data mapping were performed. RESULTS: Survey data were obtained from 90 pharmacies in 25 of the county's 33 residential ZIP code areas. Areas with fewer pharmacies per 10,000 residents tended to have a higher percentage of minority residents (p = 0.031). Methylphenidate pricing was typically lower in areas with lower employment rates (p = 0.027). Availability of home medication delivery service correlated with income level (p = 0.015), employment rate (p = 0.022), and crime risk (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: A survey of community pharmacies in Shelby County, Tennessee, found that areas with a high percentage of minority residents had lower pharmacy density than areas with a high percentage of white residents. Pharmacies located in communities with low average income levels, low employment rates, and high scores for personal crime risk were less likely to offer home medication delivery services.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmácias/provisão & distribuição , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Acetaminofen/economia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Crime/estatística & dados numéricos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Hidrocodona/economia , Metilfenidato/economia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Tennessee , Tiroxina/economia
6.
Rev Saude Publica ; 50: 74, 2016 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28099664

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the costs of public pharmaceutical services compared to Farmácia Popular Program (Popular Pharmacy Program). METHODS: Comparison between prices paid by Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program (Farmácia Popular is available here) with the full costs of medicine provision by the Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro. The comparison comprised 25 medicines supplied by both the municipal pharmaceutical service and Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program. Calculating the cost per pharmaceutical unit of each medicine included expenditure by Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro with procurement (price), logistics, and local dispensation. The reference price of medicines paid by Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular was taken from the Brazilian Ministry of Health standard in force in 2012. Comparisons included full reference price; reference price minus 10.0% copayment by users; and maximum reference paid by the Ministry of Health (minus copayment and taxes). Simulations were carried out of the differences between the costs of Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro with the common medicines and those potentially incurred based on the reference price of Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. RESULTS: The Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro spent R$28,526,526.57 with 25 medicines of the common list in 2012; 58.7% accounted for direct procurement costs. The estimated costs of the Health Department were generally lower than the reference prices of the Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program for 20 medicines, regardless of reference prices. The potential costs incurred by Health Department if expenditure of its consumption pattern were based on the reference prices of Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular would be R$124,170,777.76, considering the best scenario of payment by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (90.0% of the reference price, minus taxes). CONCLUSIONS: The difference in costs between public provision by Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro and Farmácia Popular Program indicates that some reference prices could be reviewed aiming at their reduction. OBJETIVO: Analisar custos da assistência farmacêutica pública frente ao Programa Farmácia Popular. MÉTODOS: Comparação entre os valores pagos pelo Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular com os custos integrais relativos à provisão de medicamentos pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro. A comparação compreendeu 25 medicamentos, comuns tanto à provisão pela assistência farmacêutica pública municipal quanto pelo Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. O cálculo do custo unitário por unidade farmacotécnica de cada medicamento envolveu os gastos da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde com custos de aquisição (preço), logísticos e com a dispensação em nível local. O valor de referência dos medicamentos pago pelo Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular foi extraído da norma ministerial em vigor em 2012. As comparações envolveram o valor de referência pleno; valor de referência com desconto dos 10,0% pagos de contrapartida pelos usuários; e valor de referência máximo pago pelo Ministério da Saúde (descontados contrapartida e sem impostos).Foram realizadas simulações das diferenças entre os gastos da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro com os medicamentos do elenco comum e os que seriam incorridos se esses tivessem sido executados com base no valor de referência do Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. RESULTADOS: A Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro gastou R$28.526.526,57 com 25 medicamentos do rol comum em 2012; 58,7% corresponderam a custos diretos com a aquisição dos produtos. Os custos estimados da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro foram, em geral, menores que os valores de referência do Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular em 20 medicamentos, independentemente dos valores de referência. Os custos que seriam incorridos pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro, caso seu padrão de consumo tivesse como valor de pagamento os valores de referência do Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular seriam de R$124.170.777,76 considerando a melhor situação de pagamento pelo Ministério da Saúde (90,0% do valor de referência, com impostos descontados). CONCLUSÕES: A diferença de custos entre a provisão pública pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro e o Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular sinaliza que alguns valores de referência poderiam ser objetos de exame para sua redução.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Medicamentos Essenciais/provisão & distribuição , Assistência Farmacêutica/economia , Brasil , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Custos e Análise de Custo , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Assistência Farmacêutica/provisão & distribuição , Setor Público
7.
Health Policy ; 119(5): 628-39, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25747809

RESUMO

Community pharmacists are the third largest healthcare professional group in the world after physicians and nurses. Despite their considerable training, community pharmacists are the only health professionals who are not primarily rewarded for delivering health care and hence are under-utilized as public health professionals. An emerging consensus among academics, professional organizations, and policymakers is that community pharmacists, who work outside of hospital settings, should adopt an expanded role in order to contribute to the safe, effective, and efficient use of drugs-particularly when caring for people with multiple chronic conditions. Community pharmacists could help to improve health by reducing drug-related adverse events and promoting better medication adherence, which in turn may help in reducing unnecessary provider visits, hospitalizations, and readmissions while strengthening integrated primary care delivery across the health system. This paper reviews recent strategies to expand the role of community pharmacists in Australia, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Scotland, and the United States. The developments achieved or under way in these countries carry lessons for policymakers world-wide, where progress thus far in expanding the role of community pharmacists has been more limited. Future policies should focus on effectively integrating community pharmacists into primary care; developing a shared vision for different levels of pharmacist services; and devising new incentive mechanisms for improving quality and outcomes.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Gerenciamento Clínico , Farmacêuticos , Papel Profissional , Austrália , Atenção à Saúde , Europa (Continente) , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Motivação , América do Norte
8.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 27(3): 300-9, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14705286

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence of the effectiveness of various smoking cessation methods and appropriateness for use in Australian health care settings. METHODS: Cochrane and other existing reviews and meta-analyses of evidence were the basis for the review. Systematic literature searches were also conducted to identify relevant controlled trials published internationally between January 1999 and May 2002. The main inclusion criteria for studies were use of a controlled evaluation design and an outcome measure of continuous abstinence from smoking for at least five months. A three-tiered grading system for strength of evidence was used. RESULTS: Clinic and hospital systems to assess and document tobacco use and routine provision of cessation advice can double long-term quit rates. While brief intervention can achieve a significant effect at population level, at individual level there is a strong dose response between the number and length of sessions of tobacco cessation counselling and its effectiveness. Effective behavioural interventions can increase cessation rates by 50-100% compared with no intervention. Some pharmacotherapies are safe and also help to substantially increase cessation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Effective behavioural and pharmacological methods of tobacco cessation are available. IMPLICATIONS: Every smoker should be offered evidence-based advice and treatment to quit smoking. This includes pharmacotherapy, unless contra-indicated. Health professionals and health care settings can play a significant role in motivating and assisting smokers to quit.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Acupuntura , Austrália , Terapia Comportamental/educação , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Autocuidado , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia
9.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 31 Suppl 2: 172-5, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15645763

RESUMO

Today, as medical care specialization and medical fee system coverage are rapidly progressing, hospitals have no choice but to reduce the number of hospital-stay days for patients. As a result, patients are being placed in home for medical care. Home care entails the transfer of care to the home of patients who are highly dependent on medical care. Consequently, it is expected that the number of cases requiring medical treatment also will increase. To support this type of home care, pharmacies will promote the supply of not only oral drugs but also injectables for use in nutrient management and pain control as well, while pharmacists will promote an appropriate drug therapy for patients who are convalescing at home, by visiting patients and providing advice for drug management. However, the reality is far from that because there are fewer than 50 pharmacies in the nationwide scale that can supply injectables. Considering future home care development, it is urgent that a pharmacy network should be constructed and facilities be created for supplying drugs.


Assuntos
Redes Comunitárias , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia , Idoso , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar , Humanos , Nutrição Parenteral no Domicílio
10.
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 54(4): e00143, 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1001575

RESUMO

Although dispensing of medication has been addressed by theoretical models, studies that confirm the impact of this service are still needed. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a new model of medicine dispensing system on patients' medication knowledge, adherence to treatment and satisfaction. One hundred and four patients attending the dispensing service of a community pharmacy between 21 January 2013 and 20 April 2013 were included in this intervention study. The impact of the service on patients' medication knowledge, adherence to treatment and satisfaction was assessed by using validated questionnaires at two time points: at the moment of medication dispensing and 30 days thereafter by telephone contact. Statistical analysis was performed by McNemar's test, and a p<0.05 was set as statistically significant. The number of patients showing insufficient knowledge about medications decreased by 50% (p < 0.05), and the number of those showing sufficient knowledge was three times greater (p < 0.05) after medicine dispensing. A high level of satisfaction was observed. Improvement of medication adherence, however, was not observed. The proposed system model for drug dispensing improved patients' knowledge about medication and satisfaction


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Farmácias/classificação , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Boas Práticas de Dispensação , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição
11.
Rural Policy Brief ; (2012 5): 1-5, 2013 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25399456

RESUMO

Retail pharmacies provide essential services to residents of rural areas and serve many communities as the sole provider of pharmacist services. Losing the only retail pharmacy within a rural community (census designated city), and within a 10 mile radius based on driving distance ("sole community pharmacy"), may affect access to prescription and over-the-counter drugs and, in some cases, leave the community without proximate access to any clinical provider. This policy brief documents the closure of local retail pharmacies in which the pharmacist was the only clinical provider available in the community at the time the pharmacy closed. Characteristics of the community and the retail pharmacy are described. The findings may suggest future policy actions to minimize the risk or mitigate the negative consequences of pharmacy closures. Key Findings. (1) Between May 1, 2006, and October 31, 2010, 119 sole community pharmacies closed. (2) Of those 119 pharmacies, 31 were located in rural communities with no other health professionals or clinical providers. (3) In 16 states, at least 1 community lost a sole community retail pharmacy, and there was no other pharmacy within 10 miles (actual driving distance). (4) Of the 31 pharmacy closures in communities with no other providers, 17% were located in remote rural areas designated with a Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) score of 10 or higher. Such a score means that, on average, 60 minutes of travel time is required to reach an urbanized area, and 40 minutes is required to reach a large urban cluster of 20,000 population or more.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Farmacêutica/provisão & distribuição , Farmácias/provisão & distribuição , Serviços de Saúde Rural/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Medicare Part D/economia , Propriedade/economia , Características de Residência , População Rural , Estados Unidos
12.
Rural Policy Brief ; (2013 11): 1-4, 2013 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25399462

RESUMO

Local rural pharmacies provide essential pharmacy and clinical services to their communities. Pharmacists play a critical role in the continuum of care for rural residents, and the loss of a local pharmacy may impact access to prescription drugs and clinical care. This policy brief identifies factors that contributed to the closing of six pharmacies and describes how the affected communities adapted to losing locally based services. Key Findings. (1) Five out of the six pharmacies studied closed due to retirement and/or difficulties in recruiting a successor. (2) In five of the six communities, residents now either drive to the nearest pharmacy or use mail-order to receive their prescriptions and, in some instances, receive their prescriptions through a courier service from a pharmacy in a nearby town. (3) Access to pharmacy services in these communities is of most concern for individuals with limited mobility and those who lack a support system that can pick up and deliver their prescriptions (e.g., the elderly and people with acute conditions).


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Farmácias/provisão & distribuição , Serviços de Saúde Rural/provisão & distribuição , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Humanos , Farmácias/economia , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , Estados Unidos
13.
Rural Policy Brief ; (2013 15): 1-4, 2013 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25399463

RESUMO

Key Findings. Twenty-five counties lost their sole community pharmacy between May 2006 and December 2010. Among these: (1) The average population density is 10.4 persons per square mile, compared to 87.4 for the United States. (2) The average population decreased by 1.6% between 2000 and 2010. Excluding the largest county, the average decrease was 2.4%. (3) The population age 65 years and older increased 5.4% between 2000 and 2010. Excluding the largest county, the 65-and-older population increased 2.1%. (4) The average change in the percentage of persons in poverty increased by 0.6 points between 2000 and 2010, from 15.5% to 16.1%, compared to a 4.0 point increase (11.3% to 15.3%) for the United States. (5) The average percentage of people younger than 65 years without health insurance was 24.6% in 2010, compared to 16.2% for the United States. (6) Nineteen of the 25 counties were designated "whole county" Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), meaning there was a shortage of primary medical care physicians across the entire county. (7) The average number of active doctors per 1,000 persons was 0.44, compared to 2.86 for the United States. Six of the 25 counties (24%) had no active MDs or DOs in 2010.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/tendências , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Farmácias/provisão & distribuição , Farmácias/tendências , Serviços de Saúde Rural/provisão & distribuição , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/tendências , Demografia , Previsões , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/tendências , Farmácias/economia , Médicos/provisão & distribuição , Pobreza , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , Serviços de Saúde Rural/tendências , População Rural , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos
14.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 50: 74, 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-962230

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the costs of public pharmaceutical services compared to Farmácia Popular Program (Popular Pharmacy Program). METHODS Comparison between prices paid by Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program (Farmácia Popular is available here) with the full costs of medicine provision by the Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro. The comparison comprised 25 medicines supplied by both the municipal pharmaceutical service and Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program. Calculating the cost per pharmaceutical unit of each medicine included expenditure by Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro with procurement (price), logistics, and local dispensation. The reference price of medicines paid by Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular was taken from the Brazilian Ministry of Health standard in force in 2012. Comparisons included full reference price; reference price minus 10.0% copayment by users; and maximum reference paid by the Ministry of Health (minus copayment and taxes). Simulations were carried out of the differences between the costs of Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro with the common medicines and those potentially incurred based on the reference price of Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. RESULTS The Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro spent R$28,526,526.57 with 25 medicines of the common list in 2012; 58.7% accounted for direct procurement costs. The estimated costs of the Health Department were generally lower than the reference prices of the Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program for 20 medicines, regardless of reference prices. The potential costs incurred by Health Department if expenditure of its consumption pattern were based on the reference prices of Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular would be R$124,170,777.76, considering the best scenario of payment by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (90.0% of the reference price, minus taxes). CONCLUSIONS The difference in costs between public provision by Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro and Farmácia Popular Program indicates that some reference prices could be reviewed aiming at their reduction.


RESUMO OBJETIVO Analisar custos da assistência farmacêutica pública frente ao Programa Farmácia Popular. MÉTODOS Comparação entre os valores pagos pelo Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular com os custos integrais relativos à provisão de medicamentos pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro. A comparação compreendeu 25 medicamentos, comuns tanto à provisão pela assistência farmacêutica pública municipal quanto pelo Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. O cálculo do custo unitário por unidade farmacotécnica de cada medicamento envolveu os gastos da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde com custos de aquisição (preço), logísticos e com a dispensação em nível local. O valor de referência dos medicamentos pago pelo Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular foi extraído da norma ministerial em vigor em 2012. As comparações envolveram o valor de referência pleno; valor de referência com desconto dos 10,0% pagos de contrapartida pelos usuários; e valor de referência máximo pago pelo Ministério da Saúde (descontados contrapartida e sem impostos).Foram realizadas simulações das diferenças entre os gastos da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro com os medicamentos do elenco comum e os que seriam incorridos se esses tivessem sido executados com base no valor de referência do Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. RESULTADOS A Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro gastou R$28.526.526,57 com 25 medicamentos do rol comum em 2012; 58,7% corresponderam a custos diretos com a aquisição dos produtos. Os custos estimados da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro foram, em geral, menores que os valores de referência do Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular em 20 medicamentos, independentemente dos valores de referência. Os custos que seriam incorridos pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro, caso seu padrão de consumo tivesse como valor de pagamento os valores de referência do Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular seriam de R$124.170.777,76 considerando a melhor situação de pagamento pelo Ministério da Saúde (90,0% do valor de referência, com impostos descontados). CONCLUSÕES A diferença de custos entre a provisão pública pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro e o Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular sinaliza que alguns valores de referência poderiam ser objetos de exame para sua redução.


Assuntos
Humanos , Assistência Farmacêutica/economia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Medicamentos Essenciais/provisão & distribuição , Assistência Farmacêutica/provisão & distribuição , Brasil , Gastos em Saúde , Setor Público , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Custos e Análise de Custo , Programas Nacionais de Saúde
17.
Palliat Med ; 22(2): 185-9, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18372383

RESUMO

This study performed a systems analysis of the process by which patients under the care of a specialist palliative home care obtained medications, and highlighted factors that delay this process. Systems analysis is the science dealing with analysis of complex, large-scale systems and the interactions within those systems. This study used a mixed-methods approach of questionnaires of general practitioners, pharmacists and patients, and a prospective observational study of delays experienced by patients referred to the home care team over a three-month period. This study found the main factors causing delay to be: medications not being in stock in pharmacies, medications not being available on state reimbursed schemes and inability of patients and carers to courier medications.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Preparações Farmacêuticas/provisão & distribuição , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Assistência Terminal/normas , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/normas , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/organização & administração , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/normas , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/normas , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Análise de Sistemas , Assistência Terminal/organização & administração
18.
Health Policy Plan ; 22(6): 427-35, 2007 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17901065

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether a 2002 pharmaceutical payment reform policy, which provided adverse incentives, fostered an increase in market share of 'gateway pharmacies' (G-pharmacies--pharmacies owned, operated and located by the same clinics that prescribe medicines); what the financial impact of G-pharmacies to the clinics is; and what factors determine whether a clinic decides to open a G-pharmacy. METHODS: Using the database of the National Health Research Institutes, we collected secondary data on all of Taiwan's National Health Insurance prescription claims from pharmacies and clinics between 1997 and 2003. A G-pharmacy was defined as a pharmacy in which more than 70% of the prescriptions it filled came from the same clinic, which prescribed at least 900 prescriptions monthly, more than 70% of which were released to the pharmacy. Trend plot and frequency were used to analyse the distribution of G-pharmacy data. Logistic regression was used to explore what factors determined whether a clinic decided to open a G-pharmacy. RESULTS: After the 2002 reform, the percentage of total prescriptions filled by G-pharmacies reached 78.71%, the increase in percentage (15.23%) was the highest ever and significant (P < 0.01). The reform's adverse payment incentives resulted in a loss of NT$1.86 billion New Taiwan dollars to all clinics and resulted in a reduction in Taiwan's 2003 fee schedules under the global budget payment system. The decision to establish a G-pharmacy was associated with a clinic's being located in less urbanized areas, being a group practice, having higher patient volumes, being a general practitioner, and being privately owned. CONCLUSION: The 2002 reform's adverse incentive fostered a significant increase in the market share of G-pharmacies, and reduced the earnings of clinics which did not own them. It is necessary to break the link between profits from pharmaceutical sales and physician prescribing behaviour to prevent the conflict of interest in how medicines are prescribed.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Propriedade , Médicos de Família , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Reembolso de Incentivo , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/classificação , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Taiwan
20.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 45(1): 76-81, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15730120

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the establishment of a community pharmacy-based patient medication assistance program to improve access to medications by indigent patients, lessen the burden placed on physicians in obtaining such medications, reduce the amount of money spent on such medications by area charitable organizations, and improve therapeutic outcomes by improving patient adherence with therapy. SETTING: Supermarket-based pharmacy in Ashland, Ohio. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Community pharmacy. PRACTICE INNOVATION: A partnership was developed among Buehler's Pharmacy #3, United Way of Ashland County, and United Way Affiliates to establish a community pharmacy-based medication assistance program to help indigent patients obtain needed medications through manufacturer assistance programs and discount card programs. INTERVENTIONS: Following initial screening by a United Way affiliate agency, patients are seen by appointment by a Certified Pharmacy Technician at the pharmacy. An electronic application is completed, printed, and sent to the patient's physician for signatures and medication orders. The paperwork is returned to the pharmacy, where it is completed, signed by the patient, and filed. The patient pays the United Way agency $10 and the pharmacy $15 for these services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of prescriptions dispensed cumulatively from April 1, 2003, to July 31, 2003, within the program, patients' cumulative savings, and community response. RESULTS: Between April 1, 2003, and July 31, 2003, a total of 123 patients and 47 physicians were served, and 512 medications valued at $112,139.00 were applied for and/or procured. The time lapse between filing of paperwork and receipt of medications varies from 1 to 6 weeks. While some manufacturers ship product to physicians or directly to patients, the process works better when the product is sent to the pharmacy, where it can be added to the patient's profile, screened for drug interactions and allergies, and dispensed with proper labels and counseling. CONCLUSION: Establishing a community pharmacy-based medication assistance program is an innovative spin on the traditional physician office, advocacy, or health-system setting and was found to be beneficial to the patients, physicians and other health care providers, and the community it served.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Medicare/economia , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Instituições de Caridade/economia , Instituições de Caridade/organização & administração , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/organização & administração , Ohio , Preparações Farmacêuticas/classificação , Preparações Farmacêuticas/provisão & distribuição , Saúde da População Rural/normas , Saúde da População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA