Postvaricocele Embolization Pain Syndrome: A Case Series Report and Review of Current Treatment Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Orchialgia is not an uncommon complaint among men with varicocele, but postvaricocele embolization-related testicular pain has not been widely investigated. This study evaluates the phenomenon of postvaricocele embolization pain (PVEP) syndrome and examines the current strategies to treat this unusual complication. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospectively collected database of patients with PVEP who presented to a tertiary center was analyzed between January 2011 and January 2020 following internal ethics approval. Patient demographics, including other complications related to embolization, analgesic requirements, and pain scores (on a 10-point visual analog score), treatment strategies, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score and overall satisfaction score (on a 5-point scale), were reviewed. All patients were reviewed for a minimum of 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 20 men with a mean age of 33.8 (18-45) years old, presented with PVEP over 10 years. Most men received embolization on an average of 26.6 (18-48) months. The reasons for varicocele embolization include either isolated or combined orchialgia (15 men), subfertility (5 men), and cosmesis (6 men). Eighteen (90%) men underwent microscopic spermatic cord denervation (MSCD) and 2 patients elected for conservative measures. The average pain scores pre-MSCD and post-MSCD were 6.9 (4-9) and 1.4 (0-4) (p<0.001) with a significant reduction in analgesia requirements. Immediate improvement in pain score was reported in all the patients and this persisted at the 12 months review. Most men reported a high satisfaction score (of 4/5) and only one patient reported no change in symptoms after MSCD. CONCLUSION: PVEP is a unique complication and patients should be counseled on the potential risk of persistent orchialgia following embolization for varicocele. The MSCD appears to be an effective treatment option with high success and satisfaction rates.

Large left varicocele in a patient with portal hypertension treated via transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement and both variceal and varicocele embolization.

BACKGROUND: Scrotal swelling from varicocele is a common complaint in adult men. Varicocele due to portosystemic collaterals is a rare presentation of portal hypertension. Imaging workup and intervention for varicocele in this case is more complex than varicocele due to absent or incompetent valves in the testicular veins and pampiniform plexus. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 53-year-old man with alcohol-related cirrhosis presented with persistent left scrotal heaviness, pain, and swelling found to have a large left varicocele. Given his history of cirrhosis, a contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis was obtained showing that the varices were supplied by a vessel arising from the splenic vein and draining into the left renal vein as well as gastric varices. Varicocele embolization alone is not sufficient in this case, and we treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, variceal and varicocele embolization. CONCLUSION: In patients presenting with a varicocele with a history of cirrhosis/portal hypertension, cross sectional imaging of the abdomen and pelvis should be obtained prior to treatment to evaluate for the presence of varices which may be pressured by varicocele embolization. If present, consideration should be given to referral to an interventional radiologist for possible concurrent variceal embolization and TIPS placement.

Treating varicocele in 2018: current knowledge and treatment options.

PURPOSE: Varicocele is defined as a state of varicosity and tortuosity of the pampiniform plexus around the testis caused by retrograde blood flow through the internal spermatic vein. The prevalence of clinically relevant varicocele ranges from 5 to 20% in the male population and is often associated with infertility and reduction of sperm quality. In this review, the pathophysiology and clinical aspects of varicocele are reviewed along with therapeutic options and treatment effects on sperm parameters and fertility both in adult and in pediatric/adolescent subjects. METHODS: We conducted a Medline and a PubMed search from 1965 to 2018 to identify publications related to varicocele clinical aspects, treatment procedures and treatment outcomes. Keywords used for the search were: "varicocele", "varicocelectomy", "sclerotherapy", "male infertility", "subfertility", and "semen abnormalities". RESULTS: Data from a large number of studies in adolescent and adult males indicate that varicocele correction improves semen parameters in the majority of patients, reducing oxidative stress and improving sperm nuclear DNA integrity either with surgical or percutaneous approach. CONCLUSIONS: Varicocele repair seems to represent a cost-effective therapeutic option for all males (both adolescent and adults) with a clinical varicocele in the presence of testicular hypotrophy, worsening sperm alterations or infertility. On the other hand, some investigators questioned the role of varicocelectomy in the era of assisted reproduction. Thus, a better understanding of the pathophysiology of varicocele-associated male subfertility is of paramount importance to elucidating the deleterious effects of varicocele on spermatogenesis and possibly formulating new treatment strategies.

Transitional Urology for Male Adolescents: What Adult Urologists Should Know.

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in transitional urology, or how to best prepare patients with major congenital urologic diseases, such as bladder exstrophy and neuropathic bladder, to manage their own health care with adult urologists. However, common pediatric urologic conditions may be encountered by the adult urologist with more regularity. This review focuses on three relatively common conditions which may be identified in childhood, the consequences from which a patient may seek help from an adult urologist: cryptorchidism, varicocele, and Klinefelter syndrome.

The clinical findings in young adults with acute scrotal pain.

BACKGROUND: Acute scrotal pain (ASP) is a common symptom of young adults. Testicular torsion is the most important diagnosis in these cases. It is a medical emergency in which the diagnosis must be made rapidly to prevent testicular loss. This requires a high index of clinical suspicion and prompt surgical intervention. This study was conducted to examine the spectrum of diagnoses in young man with ASP in a prehospital setting, the frequency of significant diagnoses, and their outcomes. METHODS: The medical records of young adults in their obligatory military service presenting with ASP to primary care clinics from 2004 to 2014 were reviewed using the keywords: pain, testis, torsion, and orchialgia. Anamnestic data, physical findings, primary care physician decisions, and final outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 9922 medical visits were recorded. Idiopathic scrotal pain, varicocele, scrotal trauma, and genital tract infections were the most common diagnoses. In 3 visits (0.03%), testicular cancer was diagnosed. Testicular torsion was the etiology of ASP in only 12 (0.12%) visits, and 60% the testes were salvaged. The mean duration of symptoms in the salvaged group was 6.33 hours; and in the nonsalvaged group, 44 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Testicular torsion is the etiology of ASP in only 0.12% of the visits to the primary care clinic. Patient delay before attending the primary care is responsible for most of the testes lost. Patient education in addition to high index of suspicion of primary care physicians is needed for salvage of more testicles.

[Comparative effectiveness of Marmar technique and laparoscopic clipping of testicular vein in surgical treatment of varicocele in athletes].

INTRODUCTION: Varicocele is one of the most common diseases among men and a proven cause of male infertility, which is directly proportional to its clinical prominence. The aim To evaluate the immediate and long-term outcomes of different surgical methods to treat varicocele in athletes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 165 athletes were treated for varicocele. Of them, 82 patients (group 1) underwent varicocele surgery using Marmar technique and 83 patients (group 2) were treated by laparoscopic clipping of testicular vein (endoscopic analogue of Ivanissevitch open surgery). RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative complications and relapse at 6 months after surgery in groups 1 and 2 was 1.2% and 8.4%, and 4.9 and 14.5%, respectively. The study findings showed a statistically significant (p<0.05) improvement in the spermogram parameters in both groups compared with preoperative values. CONCLUSIONS: The length of hospital stay and postoperative rehabilitation period were shorter in patients after Marmars varicocelectomy than in patients of group 2. Besides, Marmar technique for varicocele was cost-effective and justified.

[Efficiency of surgical treatment of varicocele for restoration of reproductive function].

It was examined 206 patients with varicocele and infertility in infertile men aged from 25 to 45 years. Stightly best results were obtained after microsurgical operation. Surgical removal of a varicocele as a stage of infertility treatment should not be done as long as interviewed with sterile pair about absence warranty the success of this method of treatment.

Effect of varicocelectomy on fertility. Indications, techniques and results. / Efecto de la varicocelectomía en la fertilidad. Indicaciones, técnicas y resultados.

We define varicocele as the dilation of the veins that make up the pampiniform plexus, which is made up of three branches, the internal spermatic, deferential and external spermatic. The World Health Organization (WHO) has determined that varicocele is an important cause of male infertility. This has been acknowledged by several studies that have shown this cause-effect relationship. Varicocele does not always generate infertility. In fact, many patients with varicocele are fertile, decreasing their percentage in the progression of the pathology and the association with other factors such as tobacco, marijuana or endocrine disorders (diabetes or hypothyroidism). Infertility is a disease of the reproductive system defined by the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse (WHO). SURGICAL THERAPEUTICS: Surgery is indicated in cases of grade 3 varicocele (when seen through the scrotal skin and palpable as a 'bag of worms' without Valsalva maneuver), cases of atrophy or growth arrest with volume differences of more than 2cm3 between testes, when accompanied by pain and alterations in the spermiogram in young patients. CONCLUSION: The presence of varicocele determines the performance of varicocelectomy, with the inguinal approach in its three branches being the approach of preference. The laparoscopic approach will be used in specific cases.

L-carnitine as primary or adjuvant treatment in infertile patients with varicocele. A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Varicocele has been found to impair the function of the epididymis resulting in subfertility whereas the varicocelectomy can resolve the phenomenon. L-carnitine is regarded as a biomarker for the function of the epididymis and has been found in reduced concentrations in infertile patients of various causes, including infertile men with varicocele. It seems that Lcarnitine and varicocele share clinical significance and the area of research looks promising. OBJECTIVE: To identify the role of L-carnitine in the treatment of varicocele. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in Pubmed/Medline with the terms (L-carnitine) and (varicocele) and (L-carnitine) and (varicocelectomy). Inclusion criteria were studies reported outcomes of L-carnitine administration alone or in duet, as primary or adjuvant treatment to varicocele. Exclusion criteria were non-English language and animal studies. Studies using L-carnitine as part of a panel of therapeutic agents were avoided. RESULTS: Only four suitable studies were identified for discussion. In one randomized study, the combination of L-carnitine and cinnoxicam improved semen parameters in patients with non-high-grade varicocele compared to L-carnitine alone and had a favourable effect on pregnancy rates but the effect of grade is unknown. In another study, as an adjuvant treatment to varicocelectomy, L-carnitine showed no clear benefit. Finally, in comparison to surgery, the results are inconclusive; two studies showed some benefit might be expected in low-grade or subclinical varicocele, but surgery appears superior. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence regarding the role of L-carnitine as a primary or adjuvant treatment of varicocele is sparse. The pathophysiological significance of L-carnitine implicates a potential role of the molecule in the management of varicocele, but the evidence so far is controversial for any recommendations. L-carnitine might be taken into consideration in selected cases; however, further search is needed in order the optimal role of L-carnitine in infertile patients with varicocele to be clarified.

Introduction: Varicoceles: a contemporary perspective.

In this Views and Reviews section, four groups of authors address the timely and highly relevant issue of varicoceles across the male life spectrum. Varicoceles are very prevalent among men presenting for an infertility workup. While reduction in bulk semen parameters (including sperm concentration, motility, and morphology) has long been recognized as a deficit caused by varicoceles, in recent years a number of investigators have shown that varicoceles can have broader, multi-faceted effects on male reproductive health. Sperm DNA integrity and other aspects of sperm function appear to be impacted by the presence of varicoceles, and varicocele correction can result in significant improvement in not only semen parameters, but also fertilization and pregnancy rates.

Treatment of varicoceles: techniques and outcomes.

Varicoceles, a dilation of veins within the pampiniform plexus, are present in ∼15% of the general male population. This paper reviews the indications for treatment of varicoceles, post-intervention outcomes following treatment, and the various techniques for treatment of varicoceles. The aim of this review is to describe and compare complications associated with each approach to varicocele treatment.

Prognostic factors for a favorable outcome after varicocele repair in adolescents and adults.

The effect of varicocele repair on male fertility remains controversial. It would be helpful to determined which men would benefit most from varicocele repair, and target repair efforts at those individuals. A detailed review of the literature on prognostic factors for varicocele repair was performed using the PubMed NLM database. We found that the best predictor of postvaricocelectomy semen parameters is the preoperative semen parameters. The greatest improvements in semen parameters were found in men with larger varicoceles. While there is controversy, higher testosterone, younger age and larger testis size, in some studies predict for improvements in semen parameters postvaricocelectomy. A nomogram has been developed to predict the postvaricocelectomy semen parameters based on the preoperative semen parameters, varicocele grade and the age of the man (www.fertilitytreatmentresults.com). Limited data consistently demonstrates the greatest improvements in DNA fragmentation rates in men with higher baseline DNA fragmentation rates. With respect to reproductive outcomes, higher baseline sperm density consistently predicts for natural pregnancy or assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates. In addition, varicocele repair does seem to reduce the need for more invasive modalities of ART. In conclusion, we can now start to use specific parameters such as baseline semen quality, varicocele grade and patient age to predict post-repair semen quality and fertility potential following varicocelectomy.

An update on the role of medical treatment including antioxidant therapy in varicocele.

Varicocele-associated male infertility has classically been managed using surgery or assisted reproductive techniques. With increasing evidence of oxidative stress as a pathophysiological factor in varicocele-associated infertility, medical therapy especially antioxidants might become a treatment option with lower risks. We reviewed the existing literature on the role of various medical agents in the management of male infertility attributed to varicoceles. Medical therapy is typically evaluated in three different situations such as (a) comparison of two drugs or one drug with placebo, (b) comparison of drugs versus surgery, and (c) comparison of drugs as adjuvant therapy with surgery versus drug therapy alone. Due to heterogeneity of data and lack of well-conducted studies, there is insufficient data to recommend routine use of medical therapy for men with varicocele-associated infertility and surgery remains the treatment of choice. Pregnancy and live birth rates are usually not reported in most studies and mere improvement in sperm parameters or antioxidant capacity is insufficient to support its routine use. Antioxidant therapy is a potential option due to its theoretical benefit, data from preclinical studies, and lack of major side effects. Adjuvant therapy with antioxidants after surgical repair of varicocele may improve the outcome and is a potential area for further research.

Clinical outcome and cost comparison of percutaneous embolization and surgical ligation of varicocele.

We reviewed the records of 81 consecutive subfertile men with oligospermia and/or asthenospermia, treated for varicocele with either percutaneous embolization or surgical ligation between 1987 and 1991, and compared the outcomes and costs of the two procedures. All men had presented with infertility of at least 6 months duration, and in most cases female factors had been previously evaluated and treated. Patients were offered a choice of embolization or ligation of the internal spermatic vein. Forty-five men (56%) underwent ligation, and 36 men (44%) opted for embolization. The mean age, serum follicle-stimulating hormone, pretreatment sperm density, motility, and concentration of motile sperm were similar for the two groups. Seminal quality improved in 65% of all patients after varicocele ablation (46 of 71). Improvements were seen in postoperative sperm density (P < 0.01), motility (P < 0.002), and concentration of motile sperm (P < 0.001). Thirty-nine percent of the assessable patients established pregnancies during the study interval (26 of 66). The two treatment groups did not differ significantly with regard to the likelihood of postoperative improvement in sperm density (P = 0.64), motility (P = 0.33), concentration of motile sperm (P = 0.11), or pregnancy rate (P = 0.83). Percutaneous embolization and surgical ligation of varicocele are equally effective in improving male infertility and cost about the same. Embolization offers the potential advantage of shorter recovery to full activity as compared to surgical ligation. Where experienced interventional radiologists are available, percutaneous embolization should be offered as an alternative to open ligation.

Prostate brachytherapy seed migration to a left varicocele.

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of seed migration to a left varicocele after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose iodine-125 ((125)I) seeds. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 73-year-old man presented with a serum prostate-specific antigen level of 5.21 ng/mL, Gleason score of 7 (3+4), and clinical T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The patient underwent transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds followed by external beam radiation therapy. Two weeks after seed implantation, a followup pelvic radiograph was obtained. One month after seed implantation, a pelvic computed tomography scan for postimplant dosimetric analysis was carried out. Subsequent ultrasound examination of the scrotum was undertaken. RESULTS: Two weeks after seed implantation, an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph showed that a migrated seed was overlapped by the scrotum. Postimplant pelvic computed tomography revealed that a seed had migrated to the left side of the scrotum. Subsequent ultrasound examination of the scrotum revealed that the patient had a left varicocele to which the seed had migrated. The patient had no symptoms related to the migrated seed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of seed migration to a left varicocele after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds. For the present case, we suggest that the seed moved from the prostate to the left varicocele through the pelvic veins, bypassing the systemic circulation.