Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interventions to reduce gender-based violence among young people living with or affected by HIV/AIDS in low-income and middle-income countries.
Meinck, Franziska; Pantelic, Marija; Spreckelsen, Thees F; Orza, Luisa; Little, Madison T; Nittas, Vasileios; Picker, Vanessa; Bustamam, Amy A; Herrero Romero, Rocio; Diaz Mella, Eric P; Stöckl, Heidi.
Afiliação
  • Meinck F; aDepartment of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom bOptentia, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, South Africa cSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh dFrontline AIDS, Brighton, United Kingdom eEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Switzerland fDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Canada gEscuela de Psicología, Universida
AIDS ; 33(14): 2219-2236, 2019 11 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31373916
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE(S) This study explored the effectiveness of gender-based violence (GBV) interventions on young people living with or affected by HIV in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

DESIGN:

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS:

We pre-registered a protocol, then searched 13 databases and grey literature. We screened randomized and quasi-experimental studies (n = 2199) of young people (aged 10-24) living with or affected by HIV in LMICs. Outcomes were GBV and/or GBV-related attitudes. We appraised the data for risk of bias and quality of evidence. Narrative syntheses and multilevel random effects meta-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS:

We included 18 studies evaluating 21 interventions. Intervention arms were categorized as sexual health and social empowerment (SHSE; n = 7); SHSE combined with economic strengthening (n = 4); self-defence (n = 3); safer schools (n = 2); economic strengthening only (n = 2); GBV sensitization (n = 2) and safer schools and parenting (n = 1). Risk of bias was moderate/high and quality of evidence low. Narrative syntheses indicated promising effects on GBV exposure, but no or mixed effects on GBV perpetration and attitudes for self-defence and GBV sensitization interventions. Safer school interventions showed no effects. For SHSE interventions and SHSE combined with economic strengthening, meta-analyses showed a small reduction in GBV exposure but not perpetration. Economic-only interventions had no overall effect.

CONCLUSION:

SHSE, SHSE plus and self-defence and gender sensitization interventions may be effective for GBV exposure and GBV-related attitudes but not for GBV perpetration. However, the quality of evidence is poor. Future intervention research must include both boys and girls, adolescents living with HIV and key populations.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços de Saúde Escolar / Infecções por HIV / Países em Desenvolvimento / Violência de Gênero / Promoção da Saúde Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços de Saúde Escolar / Infecções por HIV / Países em Desenvolvimento / Violência de Gênero / Promoção da Saúde Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019