Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Telehealth Services for Substance Use Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Assessment of Intensive Outpatient Programming and Data Collection Practices.
Gliske, Kate; Welsh, Justine W; Braughton, Jacqueline E; Waller, Lance A; Ngo, Quyen M.
Afiliação
  • Gliske K; Butler Center for Research, Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, Center City, MN, United States.
  • Welsh JW; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Services, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Braughton JE; Butler Center for Research, Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, Center City, MN, United States.
  • Waller LA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Ngo QM; Butler Center for Research, Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, Center City, MN, United States.
JMIR Ment Health ; 9(3): e36263, 2022 Mar 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35285807
BACKGROUND: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid transition of many types of substance use disorder (SUD) treatments to telehealth formats, despite limited information about what makes treatment effective in this novel format. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of virtual intensive outpatient programming (IOP) treatment for SUD in the context of a global pandemic, while considering the unique challenges posed to data collection during an unprecedented public health crisis. METHODS: The study is based on a longitudinal study with a baseline sample of 3642 patients who enrolled in intensive outpatient addiction treatment (in-person, hybrid, or virtual care) from January 2020 to March 2021 at a large substance use treatment center in the United States. The analytical sample consisted of patients who completed the 3-month postdischarge outcome survey as part of routine outcome monitoring (n=1060, 29.1% response rate). RESULTS: No significant differences were detected by delivery format in continuous abstinence (χ22=0.4, P=.81), overall quality of life (F2,826=2.06, P=.13), financial well-being (F2,767=2.30, P=.10), psychological well-being (F2,918=0.72, P=.49), and confidence in one's ability to stay sober (F2,941=0.21, P=.81). Individuals in hybrid programming were more likely to report a higher level of general health than those in virtual IOP (F2,917=4.19, P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual outpatient care for the treatment of SUD is a feasible alternative to in-person-only programming, leading to similar self-reported outcomes at 3 months postdischarge. Given the many obstacles presented throughout data collection during a pandemic, further research is needed to better understand under what conditions telehealth is an acceptable alternative to in-person care.
Palavras-chave