Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, trust, and communication in Sarlahi District, Nepal.
Manandhar, Porcia; Katz, Joanne; Lama, Tsering Pema; Khatry, Subarna K; Moss, William J; Erchick, Daniel J.
Afiliação
  • Manandhar P; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: pmanand1@jhu.edu.
  • Katz J; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Lama TP; Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project-Sarlahi (NNIPS), Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Khatry SK; Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project-Sarlahi (NNIPS), Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Moss WJ; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Erchick DJ; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vaccine ; 2024 Jun 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862309
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Strategies to increase COVID-19 vaccine coverage require an understanding of the extent and drivers of vaccine hesitancy and trust in government related to COVID-19 vaccine programs, especially in low-resource communities.

METHODS:

We conducted a cross-sectional household survey post-COVID-19 vaccine introduction among adults (n = 362) in four municipalities in Sarlahi District, Nepal from August to December 2022. The survey included modules on participant demographics and socioeconomic factors and vaccine hesitancy, information seeking, and trust in authorities related to COVID-19 vaccination.

RESULTS:

Of the study participants, 38.4 % expressed hesitancy related to COVID-19 vaccination. The adjusted odds of being "vaccine hesitant" were significantly lower among the older adults (51+ years) relative to younger (<30 years) (aOR 0.49, CI 0.24-0.97) and among males relative to females (aOR 0.51, CI 0.26, 0.95). The study population highly trusted the government's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. While for most, self-reported access to vaccination opportunities was high (88.4 %), 70.4 % of participants did not know if vaccines were in stock at their local vaccination facility. Commonly reported statements of misinformation include the vaccine being developed in a rush or too fast (21.5 %), COVID-19 infection can be effectively treated with ayurvedic medicine(16.3 %) and obtaining immunity from natural infection is better than through vaccination (19.9 %). The primary sources of information on COVID-19 programs were family and friends (98.6 %), healthcare professionals (67.7 %), Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs) (61.9 %), television (56.4 %), and radio (43.1 %).

CONCLUSION:

Although many respondents expressed concerns about COVID-19 effectiveness and safety, a high proportion trusted COVID-19 information provided by healthcare workers and approved of the government's response to the pandemic. This study highlights an opportunity to design new evidence-based communication strategies to improve vaccine confidence delivered through frontline government healthcare workers. Approaches could be targeted to certain communities in the region shown to have higher vaccine hesitancy, including younger people and women.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024