The effect of inhaled corticosteroids in the outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia: ICCAP study (TURKCAP Database).

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), as well as to determine if ICS usage is exist among the risk factors for mortality in those patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional multicentre study, 1069 hospitalised CAP patients were investigated using CAP Database of Turkish Thoracic Society (TURKCAP Database). The patients were divided into two groups, depending on their ICS use. The data were analysed by appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: 172 (75.8%) of the 227 patients who were on ICS had COPD and 37 (16.3%) had asthma. There were fewer patients with fever among ICS-users compared to non-ICS users (P = 0.013), and less muscle pain (P = 0.015) and fewer GIS symptoms (P = 0.022). No statistically significant difference was found between ICS use/ type of ICS and the duration of hospitalisation (P = 0.286). The multivariate regression analysis showed that patients using ICS had lower body temperature and, less crackles/bronchial sound. In the multivariate logistic regression model lung cancer (OR: 6.75), glucose (OR: 1.01) and CURB-65 (OR: 1.72) were significantly associated with mortality in the CAP patients. ICS usage were not found to be associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: The use of ICS by the patients with CAP admitted to the hospital is not independently related with any radiological pattern, hospitalisation duration and mortality. ICS usage may diminish fever response and may suppress the findings of crackles and/or bronchial sounds. This needs further confirmation.

Antibiotic treatment outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia

Background/aim: The optimal empiric antibiotic regimen for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical cure rate, mortality, and length of stay among patients hospitalized with community- acquired pneumonia in nonintensive care unit (ICU) wards and treated with a ß-lactam, ß-lactam and macrolide combination, or a fluoroquinolone. Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study was performed using standardized web-based database sheets from January 2009 to September 2013 in nine tertiary care hospitals in Turkey. Results: Six hundred and twenty-one consecutive patients were enrolled. A pathogen was identified in 78 (12.6%) patients. The most frequently isolated bacteria were S. pneumoniae (21.8%) and P. aeruginosa (19.2%). The clinical cure rate and length of stay were not different among patients treated with ß-lactam, ß-lactam and macrolide combination, and fluoroquinolone. Forty-seven patients (9.2%) died during the hospitalization period. There was no difference in survival among the three treatment groups. Conclusion: In patients admitted to non-ICU hospital wards for CAP, there was no difference in clinical outcomes between ß-lactam, ß-lactam and macrolide combination, and fluoroquinolone regimens.

[A pharmacovigilance study in chest diseases outpatient clinic]. / Gögüs hastaliklari polikliniginde farmakovijilans çalismasi.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse drug reactions is an important healthcare issue, it causes excess morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the adverse drug reactions in patients who admitted to the outpatient clinic of respiratory diseases and to improve some clinical strategies if they are preventable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a prospective observational study which was performed to determine adverse drug reaction in patients who admitted to the outpatient clinic of respiratory diseases. RESULTS: During the 15 months of study period a total of 114 adverse reactions were reported in 92 out of 18.130 patients. Most of the adverse reactions were related with gastrointestinal system, central nervous system and cardiovascular system. The most of the adverse events were associated with fixed inhaled formoterol-budesonide combination and inhaled tiotropium. The most frequently reported reactions were hoarseness, xerostomia, headache and dizziness. Poliuri and cough were less frequently reported reactions. CONCLUSION: Most of the adverse reactions were of limited intensity but some of these side effects might effect patients compliance. Serious adverse events were not detected.