Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 779
Filtrar
1.
4.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(20)2024 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39451589

RESUMEN

A 27-year-old female presented with persistent right medial plantar pain that developed over six months following an ankle sprain. The pain, described as sharp and radiating to the toes, progressively worsened, affecting her ability to walk. An initial ultrasound examination suggested medial plantar nerve compression by a lipoma, prompting her referral for ultrasound-guided hydrodissection. During the pre-procedure assessment, sono-palpation (palpation using the ultrasound transducer) localized the pain to the Master Knot of Henry-where the medial plantar nerve, artery, and flexor tendons intersect. No lipoma but a normal fat pad was observed. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with 5% dextrose mixed with lidocaine and saline was performed. After two sessions, her pain significantly decreased, with her visual analogue scale score dropping from 8 to 5 after the first session and to 2 after the second, allowing her to resume normal activities. This case highlights the value of ultrasound in accurately diagnosing and treating conditions involving the Master Knot of Henry.

6.
J Med Ultrasound ; 32(3): 281, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39310867
7.
J Med Ultrasound ; 32(3): 282-283, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39310855
12.
J Pain Res ; 17: 2873-2880, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39247174

RESUMEN

Background: Low back pain is a globally prevalent musculoskeletal issue. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is emerging as a promising modality for managing musculoskeletal pain, while ultrasound-guided lumbar facet/multifidus injections are a potential therapeutic option for low back pain. This study explores the feasibility of combining these two treatments for managing low back pain. Materials and Methods: Ultrasound-guided injections were administered using 5 mL of 50% dextrose and 5 mL of 1% lidocaine. Bilateral injections targeted the L4/L5 and L5/S1 facet joints with 1 mL at each site, and the remaining 8 mL was distributed over the multifidus muscles using peppering techniques. Following injections, rPMS therapy was conducted with the TESLA Stym® device, targeting the bilateral lumbosacral region over 12 sessions. Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and disability was assessed with the Oswestry disability index (ODI) at baseline, after six sessions, and after 12 sessions of rPMS. Results: Three participants were enrolled. Baseline VAS and ODI scores were 8.33 ± 0.29 cm and 49.63 ± 1.28%, respectively. After six rPMS sessions, VAS and ODI scores changed to 4.33 ± 3.75 cm and 21.48 ± 19.42%, respectively. After 12 sessions, VAS decreased to 0.83 ± 1.44 cm and ODI to 5.19 ± 8.98%. Significant differences were observed between baseline and final assessments. Conclusion: Combining ultrasound-guided lumbar facet/multifidus injections with rPMS shows promise for treating low back pain. However, long-term efficacy and comparison with conventional treatments require further investigation through prospective randomized controlled trials.

15.
J Clin Densitom ; 27(4): 101509, 2024 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39098172

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners provide different bone mineral density (BMD) values, there is not a gold standard DXA scanner. T-score is used to facilitate the interpretation of BMD, and osteoporosis (OP) is diagnosed based on T-scores. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the BMD and T-score differences between Lunar Prodigy and Hologic Horizon DXA scanners. METHODOLOGY: Data were collected for patients with previous BMD measurement on Lunar Prodigy and Hologic Horizon DXA scanners within one year in the same medical center. RESULTS: In a total of 55 patients, BMD values of femoral neck/total, and lumbar vertebrae were all lower at Hologic than Lunar (all p < 0.01). The mean T-score difference at the lumbar spine was 0.74 ±â€¯0.42 (p < 0.001). Of the 49 patients diagnosed as OP (T-score ≤-2.5) with the Hologic, the diagnoses were changed for 25 individuals (51.0 %) with Lunar (p < 0.001). Herewith, although the diagnoses of OP did not change by the repeat technique in other 24 patients (49 %), 13 of them (26.5 %) were categorized as having "high fracture risk" instead of "very high fracture risk" group (i.e., T-score <-3.0). We observed moderate-to-good reliabilities (with an intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] of 0.633-0.878 and 0.733-0.842 for BMD and T-scores, respectively) between measurements with the Lunar and Hologic scanners. Except for one measurement in L3, L4, L1-4 vertebrae, the Bland-Altman plot did not reveal any consistent bias between the measurements of the Lunar and Hologic scanners. CONCLUSIONS: The consistency between different DXA scanners (especially for Hologic vs. Lunar) is important for proper management, especially in patients with low T-scores and OP.

16.
J Rehabil Med ; 56: jrm40679, 2024 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39185547

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This umbrella review synthesizes systematic reviews and meta-analyses to reach a conclusion concerning the overall effectiveness of ultrasound-guided vs landmark-guided injections for treating musculoskeletal pain. DESIGN: Umbrella review. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses from inception to March 2024. Critical appraisal, data extraction, and synthesis were performed in accordance with the criteria for conducting an umbrella review. RESULTS: Seventeen articles, comprising 4 systematic reviews and 13 meta-analyses, were included. Using the AMSTAR2 instrument for quality assessment, 3 articles were rated as high quality, 1 as moderate, 7 as low, and 6 as critically low. Generally, ultrasound-guided injections were found to be more accurate than landmark-guided injections, particularly in the shoulder joint, though the results for pain relief and functional outcomes varied. Ultrasound guidance was notably effective for injections into the bicipital groove, wrist, hip, and knee - yielding greater accuracy and improved pain management. Both ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided techniques showed low incidence of adverse effects. CONCLUSION: This umbrella review offers an in-depth analysis of the comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided injections across a range of musculoskeletal sites/conditions. The findings suggest that ultrasound-guided is a reliable method.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Musculoesquelético , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/métodos , Dolor Musculoesquelético/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
17.
Nutr J ; 23(1): 93, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39148075

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the foremost cause of mortality globally. Taurine, an amino acid, holds promise for cardiovascular health through mechanisms such as calcium regulation, blood pressure reduction, and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Despite these potential benefits, previous studies have yielded inconsistent results. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate the existing evidence on the quantitative effects of taurine on hemodynamic parameters and cardiac function grading, which are indicative of overall cardiovascular health and performance. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search across multiple databases, including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from their inception to January 2, 2024. Our analysis focused on key cardiovascular outcomes, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification. Meta-regression was applied to explore dose-dependent relationships based on the total taurine dose administered during the treatment period. A subgroup analysis, stratified according to the baseline disease status of patients, was also conducted. RESULTS: The analysis included a pooled sample of 808 participants from 20 randomized controlled trials. Taurine demonstrated a significant reduction in HR (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -3.579 bpm, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -6.044 to -1.114, p = 0.004), SBP (WMD = -3.999 mm Hg, 95% CI = -7.293 to -0.706, p = 0.017), DBP (WMD: -1.435 mm Hg, 95% CI: -2.484 to -0.386, p = 0.007), NYHA (WMD: -0.403, 95% CI: -0.522 to -0.283, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in LVEF (WMD: 4.981%, 95% CI: 1.556 to 8.407, p = 0.004). Meta-regression indicated a dose-dependent reduction in HR (coefficient = -0.0150 per g, p = 0.333), SBP (coefficient = -0.0239 per g, p = 0.113), DBP (coefficient = -0.0089 per g, p = 0.110), and NYHA (coefficient = -0.0016 per g, p = 0.111), and a positive correlation with LVEF (coefficient = 0.0285 per g, p = 0.308). No significant adverse effects were observed compared to controls. In subgroup analysis, taurine significantly improved HR in heart failure patients and healthy individuals. Taurine significantly reduced SBP in healthy individuals, heart failure patients, and those with other diseases, while significantly lowered DBP in hypertensive patients It notably increased LVEF in heart failure patients and improved NYHA functional class in both heart failure patients and those with other diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Taurine showed noteworthy effects in preventing hypertension and enhancing cardiac function. Individuals prone to CVDs may find it advantageous to include taurine in their daily regimen.


Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Taurina , Taurina/farmacología , Taurina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Función Ventricular Izquierda/efectos de los fármacos
19.
J Ultrasound Med ; 43(11): 2027-2038, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39136225

RESUMEN

Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is an umbrella medical term referring to pain and swelling on the posterior aspect of the calcaneus. High-resolution ultrasound imaging is commonly used in daily practice to assess the pathological changes of the Achilles tendon, cortical bone of the calcaneus, and soft tissues located inside the retrocalcaneal space to optimize the management of relevant patients. To the best of our knowledge, a standardized ultrasound protocol to evaluate the retrocalcaneal bursal complex is lacking in the pertinent literature. In this sense, our step-by-step sonographic approach is intended to be an easy and ready-to-use guide for sonographers/physicians in daily practice to assess this anatomical complex in patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Needless to say, the peculiar histological features of this V-shaped synovial/fibrocartilaginous bursa surrounding the posteroinferior wedge of the Kager's fat pad and the retrocalcaneal space make the examination challenging.


Asunto(s)
Tendón Calcáneo , Bolsa Sinovial , Calcáneo , Ultrasonografía , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Calcáneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Tendón Calcáneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Bolsa Sinovial/diagnóstico por imagen , Tendinopatía/diagnóstico por imagen
20.
Life (Basel) ; 14(7)2024 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39063585

RESUMEN

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is one of the most common etiologies of knee pain and might be relieved with lumbopelvic manipulation (LPM). This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of LPM on pain reduction in patients with PFPS. Electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of LPM on PFPS. The primary outcome was the change in visual analog or numeric rating scale scores assessing pain. Ten studies comprising 346 participants were included. Significant pain reduction was noted in the LPM group (Hedges' g = -0.706, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.197 to -0.214, p = 0.005, I2 = 79.624%) compared with the control group. Moreover, pain relief was more pronounced when LPM was combined with other physical therapies (Hedges' g = -0.701, 95% CI = -1.386 to -0.017, p = 0.045, I2 = 73.537%). No adverse events were reported during the LPM. The LPM appears to be a safe and effective adjuvant therapy for pain reduction in patients with PFPS. Clinicians should consider adding LPM to other physical therapies (e.g., quadriceps muscle strengthening) during the management of these patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...