The effect of Modic changes on the fusion rates of posterior interbody fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND: Modic changes have been correlated to low back pain, spinal instability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Modic changes on the fusion rates of instrumented posterior interbody fusion surgery (PLIF). METHODS: The study included patients who underwent PLIF surgery between 2015-2019.The patients were separated into four groups according to Modic changes detected in the preoperative MRI. Fusion, subsidence were evaluated with postoperative CT and X-ray. Body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the patients were also evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 137 operated discs of 86 patients. There was no statistical difference between groups regarding age, gender, follow-up period, BMI, and BMD. There were 70 levels with no Modic changes (M0), 26 levels with Modic type 1 (M1), 21 levels with Modic type 2 (M2), and 16 with Modic type 3 (MC3) change. The rate of successful fusion was 92.9% in M0, 92.3% in M1, 93% in M2, and 93.7% in M3. The rate of high-grade subsidence was 28.5% in M0, 26.8% in M1, 27.5% in M2, and 24.9% in M3. There was no statistically difference between the patients regarding subsidence grade or fusion rate. CONCLUSIONS: Modic changes were not observed to be directly correlated to the radiological outcomes of instrumented posterior interbody fusion. The fusion rate demonstrated homogenous distribution between the Modic groups and the subsidence rate was slightly higher in MC1 and MC2 than in MC3 and MC0.

A new measurement method in Graf technique: prediction of future acetabular development is possible in physiologically immature hips.

BACKGROUND: Universal ultrasound screening has led to overtreatment and higher follow-up rates than are found with clinical examination alone because of high incidence of physiologically immature hips (type IIa) in the first weeks of life. The ability to predict future acetabular development in physiologically immature hips (type IIa) would therefore help to reduce overtreatment and unnecessary follow-up. METHODS: We described the γ-angle to assess the femoral head coverage by the acetabular roof, which is measured between the baseline defined by Graf and the cartilaginous edge line connecting the inferior point of the iliac bone (lower limb) to the medial corner of the acetabular labrum. We retrospectively analyzed ultrasonographic findings of infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed in our hospital and infants with normal hips screened in our hospital. Group 1 (35 hips) consists of type IIa hips at initial examination and went on to develop into dysplastic hips at follow-up. Group 2 (279 hips) consists of type IIa hips at initial examination and went on to develop into normal hips (type I) at follow-up. RESULTS: The γ-angles of type IIa hips that developed into type I hip at follow-up ranged between 77 and 82. The γ-angles of type IIa hips that developed into hip dysplasia ranged between 72 and 78. All type IIa hips that had γ-angles >78 degrees developed into normal hips. We also observed that all type IIa hips that had γ-angles <77 degrees developed into dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of cartilage mass covering the femoral head, which is a part of the acetabular roof, can therefore provide information about future acetabular development. This paper describes a new method of measurement (the γ-angle) that assesses the extent of the cartilage coverage of the femoral head, which can predict acetabular development. Its use would decrease the rates of unnecessary follow-up and treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II (development of diagnostic criteria on the basis of consecutive patients).