RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), often arising from deep vein thrombosis, remains a high-mortality condition despite diagnostic advancements. Prognostic models like Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and sPESI identify low-risk groups effectively. The Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet (HALP) score, reflecting nutritional status and systemic inflammation, shows prognostic value in cancers and cardiovascular diseases. This study examines the relationship between in-hospital mortality HALP score and simplified PESI (sPESI) in PTE patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with PTE in the emergency department of a tertiary medical faculty from 2018 to 2023. PTE diagnosis was confirmed via computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Data on transthoracic echocardiography, D-dimer levels, demographics, laboratory results, PESI, sPESI, and HALP scores, and in-hospital mortality were collected. RESULTS: In this study, clinical characteristics of 171 patients with PTE were analysed. The average age was 61.88 ± 19.94 years, and 53.2% were female. Mortality was observed in 19.3% of patients. PESI and sPESI scores were significant predictors of mortality, with area under the curve values of 0.938 and 0.879, respectively. PESI score > 175.50 indicated a significantly higher mortality risk (HR = 18.208; P < .001), while sPESI >2.50 was also a strong predictor (HR = 11.840; P < .001). No significant cut-off value for HALP in predicting mortality was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the reliability of sPESI and PESI scores in predicting in-hospital mortality in PTE patients. However, the prognostic value of the HALP score requires further investigation. Our findings highlight the need for developing risk stratification models. Key message What is already known on this topic? The PESI and sPESI scores are established prognostic models that effectively identify low-risk groups in patients with PTE. The HALP score, reflecting nutritional status and systemic inflammation, has shown prognostic value in cancer and cardiovascular diseases. What this study adds? This study demonstrates that while PESI and sPESI scores are significant predictors of in-hospital mortality in PTE patients, the HALP score does not have a significant cut-off value for predicting mortality. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy? The findings support the continued use of PESI and sPESI scores for risk stratification in clinical practice, potentially influencing guidelines and policies on managing PTE. Further research into the HALP score's role in other contexts may refine its prognostic utility.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In natural disasters like earthquakes, building collapses can trap individuals, causing crush syndrome and rhabdomyolysis. This life-threatening condition often leads to acute kidney injury. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of the McMahon score in predicting mortality due to rhabdomyolysis in patients affected by the earthquake. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. In this study, the clinical and laboratory data of patients who presented to the emergency department due to the earthquake were analyzed. The McMahon score was calculated by evaluating factors such as creatine kinase, serum creatinine levels, age, and gender. RESULTS: The study included 151 patients, of whom 74 (49.0%) were male and 77 (51.0%) were female. In the univariate model, significant (P < .05) effectiveness was observed in differentiating between patients with and without mortality for McMahon score and the risk of acute kidney injury. At a McMahon score cutoff of 6, significant effectiveness was also observed, with an area under the curve of 0.723. At this cutoff value, the sensitivity was 80.0% and the specificity was 64.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the McMahon score in emergency medicine and disaster management plays a crucial role in rapid decision-making processes due to its effectiveness in predicting mortality.
