RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' and nurses' views of potential facilitators, barriers, and prospective acceptability of implementing a communication board in Sri Lankan intensive care units. DESIGN: A qualitative, descriptive study. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: Eight patients who received mechanical ventilation and nine nurses who worked in adult medical and surgical intensive care units were purposively selected. Data were collected via audio-taped, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews in January/February 2023. Interview guide questions were informed by the knowledge-to-action framework and the theoretical framework of acceptability. Data were analysed using inductive and deductive content analysis. The 32-item checklist of the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was used to ensure the quality of reporting. SETTING: A 3,000 bed Sri Lankan teaching hospital with 18 intensive care units. FINDINGS: Four categories reflecting patients' and nurses' anticipated use of the board were found. The first category described patients' and nurses' 'readiness to use the communication board' and their positive attitudes towards it. The second category focused on the 'potential benefits of the communication board', while the third category emphasised the 'individual patient characteristics' that should be taken into consideration when implementing communication boards. The final category described practical aspects related to 'integrating communication boards into routine practice'. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates communication boards may improve communication between ventilated patients and nurses, and they are acceptable to end users. Adopting these tools may be a pivotal step to enhancing patient-centred care in demanding intensive care settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: An inability to communicate effectively with ventilated intensive care patients creates negative experiences for both patients and nurses. Communication boards may act as a medium to better understand patients' needs during mechanical ventilation.Understanding patients' and nurses' views is beneficial when designing patient-centred communication interventions in intensive care units.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Sri Lanka , Masculino , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to understand the extent and type of evidence on augmentative and alternative communication tools used with mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. REVIEW METHOD USED: This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, followed by PAGER (Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations) framework to provide a structured approach to analysis of reviews. DATA SOURCES: In December 2021, six electronic databases-CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, Medline (Ebscohost), PyscINFO, and Web of Science-were searched. Searches were supplemented with hand searching of reference lists of included studies. REVIEW METHODS: Studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full-text review was completed by two independent authors, with any disagreement resolved by consensus or with consultation with a third reviewer. A table was developed to extract key information from the eligible studies. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and Supporting the Use of Research Evidence checklist were used to quality appraise the selected primary research and reviews, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies (19 primary studies and four reviews) were included in the review. Findings highlighted five main patterns: (i) Co-designing of the augmentative and alternative communication tools; (ii) Patients' and healthcare professionals' training needs on augmentative and alternative communication tools; (iii) Implementation of validated communication assessment algorithms; (iv) Amalgamate several communication methods/approaches; (v) Technical competency required for high-technology augmentative and alternative communication tools. CONCLUSION: Both low- and high-technology augmentative and alternative communication tools are widely used for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units, but there is a need for systematically assessing the communication needs and implementing communication interventions to promote meaningful patient-centred clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Respiración Artificial , Humanos , Comunicación , Personal de SaludRESUMEN
Abstract: Bone marrow failure (BMF) in children can be idiopathic (70-80%) or inherited. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only cure for both causes. Allogeneic HSCT requires a suitable donor. Many children will not have a HLA matched sibling or unrelated donor. A haploidentical donor is available for all children as eaazch parent will have at minimum a 50% HLA match. This report of a 7-year old girl with BMF treated with a haplo-HSCT, the first in Sri Lanka, highlights the importance of developing a haploidentical HSCT programme as a potential cure for a disease with a dismal outcome.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Sri Lanka , Trastornos de Fallo de la Médula Ósea/terapiaRESUMEN
Lack of investment in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in systems capturing continuous information regarding care of the acutely unwell patient is hindering global efforts to address inequalities, both at facility and national level. Furthermore, this of lack of data is disempowering frontline staff and those seeking to support them, from progressing setting-relevant research and quality improvement. In contrast to high-income country (HIC) settings, where electronic surveillance has boosted the capability of governments, clinicians and researchers to engage in service-wide healthcare evaluation, healthcare information in resource-limited settings remains almost exclusively paper based. In this practice paper, we describe the efforts of a collaboration of clinicians, administrators, researchers and healthcare informaticians working in South Asia, in addressing the inequality in access to patient information in acute care. Harnessing a clinician-led collaborative approach to design and evaluation, we have implemented a national acute care information platform in Sri Lanka that is tailored to priorities of frontline staff. Iterative adaptation has ensured the platform has the flexibility to integrate with legacy paper systems, support junior team members in advocating for acutely unwell patients and has made information captured accessible to diverse stakeholders to improve service delivery. The same platform is now empowering clinicians to participate in international research and drive forwards improvements in care. During this journey, we have also gained insights on how to overcome well-described barriers to implementation of digital information tools in LMIC. We anticipate that this north-south collaborative approach to addressing the challenges of health system implementation in acute care may provide learning and inspiration to other partnerships seeking to engage in similar work.
RESUMEN
The International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia were developed on behalf of the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WFSA), a nonprofit organization representing anesthesiologists in 150 countries, and the World Health Organization (WHO). The recommendations have been approved by WHO and the membership of WFSA. These Standards are applicable to all anesthesia providers throughout the world. They are intended to provide guidance and assistance to anesthesia providers, their professional organizations, hospital and facility administrators, and governments for maintaining and improving the quality and safety of anesthesia care. The Standards cover professional aspects; facilities and equipment; medications and intravenous fluids; monitoring; and the conduct of anesthesia. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED standards, the functional equivalent of mandatory standards, include (amongst other things): the continuous presence of a trained and vigilant anesthesia provider; continuous monitoring of tissue oxygenation and perfusion by clinical observation and a pulse oximeter; intermittent monitoring of blood pressure; confirmation of correct placement of an endotracheal tube (if used) by auscultation and carbon dioxide detection; the use of the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist; and a system for transfer of care at the end of an anesthetic. The International Standards represent minimum standards and the goal should always be to practice to the highest possible standards, preferably exceeding the standards outlined in this document.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia/normas , Anestesiólogos/normas , Atención a la Salud/normas , Internacionalidad , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Anestesia/métodos , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidance on managing the nutritional requirements of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been issued by several international bodies. While these guidelines are consulted in ICUs across the Asia-Pacific and Middle East regions, there is little guidance available that is tailored to the unique healthcare environments and demographics across these regions. Furthermore, the lack of consistent data from randomized controlled clinical trials, reliance on expert consensus, and differing recommendations in international guidelines necessitate further expert guidance on regional best practice when providing nutrition therapy for critically ill patients in ICUs in Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. METHODS: The Asia-Pacific and Middle East Working Group on Nutrition in the ICU has identified major areas of uncertainty in clinical practice for healthcare professionals providing nutrition therapy in Asia-Pacific and the Middle East and developed a series of consensus statements to guide nutrition therapy in the ICU in these regions. RESULTS: Accordingly, consensus statements have been provided on nutrition risk assessment and parenteral and enteral feeding strategies in the ICU, monitoring adequacy of, and tolerance to, nutrition in the ICU and institutional processes for nutrition therapy in the ICU. Furthermore, the Working Group has noted areas requiring additional research, including the most appropriate use of hypocaloric feeding in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: The objective of the Working Group in formulating these statements is to guide healthcare professionals in practicing appropriate clinical nutrition in the ICU, with a focus on improving quality of care, which will translate into improved patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Evaluación Nutricional , Apoyo Nutricional/métodos , Asia/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/rehabilitación , Humanos , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Necesidades Nutricionales , Apoyo Nutricional/normas , Islas del Pacífico/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Mejoramiento de la CalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Retention of junior doctors in specialties such as critical care is difficult, especially in resource-limited settings. This study describes the profile of junior doctors in adult state intensive care units in Sri Lanka, a lower middle-income country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a national cross-sectional survey using an anonymous self-administered electronic questionnaire. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-nine doctors in 93 Intensive Care Units (ICUs) were contacted, generating 207 responses. Just under half of the respondents (93, 47%) work exclusively in ICUs. Most junior doctors (150, 75.8%) had no previous exposure to anesthesia and 134 (67.7%) had no previous ICU experience while 116 (60.7%) ICU doctors wished to specialize in critical care. However, only a few (12, 6.3%) doctors had completed a critical care diploma course. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between the self-assessed confidence of anesthetic background junior doctors and non-anesthetists. The overall median competency for doctors improves with the length of ICU experience and is statistically significant (P < 0.05). ICU postings were less happy and more stressful compared to the last non-ICU posting (P < 0.05 for both). The vast majority, i.e., 173 (88.2%) of doctors felt the care provided for patients in their ICUs was good, very good, or excellent while 71 doctors (36.2%) would be happy to recommend the ICU where they work to a relative with the highest possible score of 10. CONCLUSION: Measures to improve training opportunities for these doctors and strategies to improve their retention in ICUs need to be addressed.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the utility of APACHE II in a low-and middle-income (LMIC) setting and the implications of missing data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients meeting APACHE II inclusion criteria admitted to 18 ICUs in Sri Lanka over three consecutive months had data necessary for the calculation of APACHE II, probabilities prospectively extracted from case notes. APACHE II physiology score (APS), probabilities, Standardised (ICU) Mortality Ratio (SMR), discrimination (AUROC), and calibration (C-statistic) were calculated, both by imputing missing measurements with normal values and by Multiple Imputation using Chained Equations (MICE). RESULTS: From a total of 995 patients admitted during the study period, 736 had APACHE II probabilities calculated. Data availability for APS calculation ranged from 70.6% to 88.4% for bedside observations and 18.7% to 63.4% for invasive measurements. SMR (95% CI) was 1.27 (1.17, 1.40) and 0.46 (0.44, 0.49), AUROC (95% CI) was 0.70 (0.65, 0.76) and 0.74 (0.68, 0.80), and C-statistic was 68.8 and 156.6 for normal value imputation and MICE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An incomplete dataset confounds interpretation of prognostic model performance in LMICs, wherein imputation using normal values is not a suitable strategy. Improving data availability, researching imputation methods and developing setting-adapted and simpler prognostic models are warranted.
Asunto(s)
APACHE , Cuidados Críticos , Anciano , Calibración , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sri LankaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aberrant R/subclavian artery is a rare congenital anomaly involving aortic arch. Oesophageal carcinoma with associated aberrant R/subclavian artery is very rare and only few cases has been reported in literature. If unrecognized and injured during oesophageal surgery, it can lead to disastrous complications. When associated with oesophageal carcinoma, it can cause diagnostic confusion as the symptoms are similar. CASE PRESENTATION: A 60 year old previously healthy female presented with intermittent dysphagia, odynophagia and loss of weight of 3 months duration. She was found to have a oesophageal carcinoma with incidentally co-existing aberrant R/subclavian artery. CONCLUSION: Although rare this entity should be considered as a differential diagnosis in a patient with dysphagia. In addition, pre-operative identification is important to prevent intra operative vascular complications. The diagnosis and treatment of this rare condition is discussed in this article.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Anomalías Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Arteria Subclavia/anomalías , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/complicaciones , Trastornos de Deglución/complicaciones , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones , Esofagectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Toracotomía/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: During preoperative preparation, patients undergo investigations to detect asymptomatic diseases. The probability of finding significant abnormalities on such routine investigations is small, and these investigations unnecessarily increase costs of perioperative care. We evaluated current practices, compliance with national guidelines and costs of preoperative investigations at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing elective surgery at the general surgical units of the NHSL from June to August 2010 were included in this study. The National Guidelines on Preoperative Investigations were the standard of assessment. Data on preoperative investigations were collected using an expert-validated pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Sample size was 2,061 patients. Mean age of the patients was 46.7±15.8 years; males constituted 54.2% of the study population. Majority of the patients were ASA-I (68.5%) and surgical grade II (62.0%). Request for chest X-ray and prothrombin time / international normalized ratio least conformed to the guidelines. Only fasting blood sugar / random blood sugar demonstrated 'good' compliance (>70%) to the guidelines. An 'acceptable' compliance (50%-70%) was seen for electrocardiogram, blood grouping and full blood count. All other investigations demonstrated 'poor' compliance (<50%) with the guidelines. The total excess cost incurred due to non-recommended investigations during the study period of 3 months was Sri Lankan Rupees (LKR.) 1,324,860 to 2,044,210 (per patient LKR. 642.82-991.85). Intern house officers (IHOs) were involved in the planning of preoperative investigations in 2,001 patients (97.1%), followed by medical officeranesthesia / registrar-anesthesia (n=1,625; 78.8%), surgical registrars (n=190; 9.2%), consultant (n=70; 3.4%), senior registrar (n=46; 2.2%) and senior house officers (n=22; 1.1%). Non-recommended investigations were requested mostly by the IHOs and medical officer-anesthesia / registrar-anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Unnecessary preoperative investigations are common at our institution, leading to substantially excessive costs. There is ample opportunity to rationalize practices and reduce expenditure.