Aquatic versus Land-Based Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Whether land- or aquatic-based rehabilitation is more effective in improving knee osteoarthritis (OA) is still unclear. This study assessed the effectiveness of aquatic-based treatments in patients with knee OA. Methods: The participants were divided into a land-based exercise group (G1, n=30) and a water-based exercise group (G2, n=30). The exercises were performed for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was a response to physical therapy, defined as a 20% decrease in the summed score for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities-Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale from T1 (before the start of the rehabilitation program) to T2 (8 weeks later). The secondary endpoints included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, WOMAC functional and stiffness subscales, Lequesne Index, and Medical Outcome Study Short Form (SF-12) for physical and mental health. Results: A 20% decrease in the summed WOMAC pain subscale score was noted in 33% of patients in G1 (n=10) and 93% in G2 (n=28) (P<0.001). VAS scores at walking decreased by 14% in G1 vs. 37% in G2 (P<0.001), WOMAC stiffness subscale decreased by 18% in G1 vs. 53% in G2 (P<0.001), and the Lequesne index decreased by 10% in G1 vs. 33% in G2 (P<0.001). Quality of life improvement was greater in G2 than in G1; SF-12 (physical) increased by 2.3 in G1 vs. 5.4 in G2 (P=0.023), and SF-12 (mental) increased by 6.3 in G1 vs. 10.9 in G2 (P=0.022). Conclusion: Both aquatic and land-based exercises improved pain intensity, functional impairment, degree of handicap, and quality of life impairment caused by OA. However, the improvement was more significant in the aquatic-based exercises group.

Reactive arthritis occurring after COVID-19 infection: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Reactive arthritis is acute aseptic arthritis occurring 1 to 4 weeks after a distant infection in a genetically predisposed individual. It may occur after COVID-19 infection. We summarize, in this article, the current findings of reactive arthritis following COVID-19 infection. METHODS: A literature search has been performed from December 2019 to December 2021. We included case reports of reactive arthritis occurring after COVID-19 infection. We collected demographic, clinical, and paraclinical data. RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were reviewed. There were 14 men and 11 women with a mean age of 44.96 + 17.47 years. Oligoarticular involvement of the lower limbs was the most frequent clinical presentation. The time between arthritis and COVID infection ranged from 6 to 48 days. The diagnosis was based on clinical and laboratory findings. The pharmacological management was based on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 20 cases. Systemic or local steroid therapy was indicated in 13 patients. Sulfasalazine was indicated in two cases. Alleviation of symptoms and recovery were noted in 22 cases. The mean duration of the clinical resolution was 16 + 57 days. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of reactive arthritis should be considered in patients with a new onset of arthritis following COVID-19 infection. Its mechanism is still unclear.

Rectal carcinoma revealed by isolated mixed bone metastases.

Isolated bone metastases secondary to rectal neoplasia are scarce. Radiographic findings may include lytic, sclerotic, or mixed lesions. We presented a case of rectal carcinoma revealed by isolated osseous metastases. We emphasize the radiological features of mixed bone metastases with the differential diagnoses that may be raised.

Rheumatoid arthritis occurring after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection: Case based review.

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multifactorial disease. Genetic predisposition and environmental triggers including infections are the major players of autoimmunity. We present a case of rheumatoid arthritis occurring after the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) infection. Case presentation: A 72-year-old woman with a medical history of hypertension and atrial fibrillation presented for a 2-month history of bilateral symmetric polyarthritis starting 2 weeks after asymptomatic COVID-19 infection. Physical examination showed swelling and tenderness of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints, wrists, and knees. She had increased inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein:108 mg/L, erythrocyte sedimentation rate: 95 mm, alpha-2 and gamma-globulins, interleukin 6: 16.5 pg/mL). Immunological tests revealed positive rheumatoid factor (128 UI/mL), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (200UI/mL), anti-nuclear antibodies (1:320), and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (12.24U/mL). She had the genotype: HLA-DRB1*04:11, HLA-DQB1*03:01, and HLA-DQB1* 03:02. Hands and feet radiographs did not show any erosion. Ultrasonography showed active synovitis and erosion of the 5th right metatarsal head. The diagnosis of RA was made. The patient received intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone (250 mg/day for 3 consecutive days) then oral corticosteroids (15 mg daily) and methotrexate (10 mg/week) were associated, leading to clinical and biological improvement. Conclusion: Despite its rarity, physicians should be aware of the possibility of the occurrence of RA after COVID-19 infection. This finding highlights the autoimmune property of this emerging virus and raises further questions about the pathogenesis of immunological alterations.

Hypercalcemia in a patient with a bowing femur.

Hypercalcemia in PDB is rare; its occurrence requires thorough investigations as it may reveal several diseases, such as primary hyperparathyroidism, malignant transformation, metastases, or myeloma.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 revealed by a hip pathologic fracture.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is a rare autosomal inherited syndrome that affects a variety of endocrine tissues such as the parathyroid, endocrine pancreas, and anterior pituitary. Osseous complications are often misdiagnosed. We presented a case of a 46-year-old woman with pathological fractures of the lower limb. She had a history of type 1 diabetes and galactorrhea. Laboratory examinations showed hypercalcemia and an increased level of parathyroid hormone related to hyperparathyroidism. Serum chromogranin A level was increased at 9369 ng/mL (N < 102). A somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (octreoscan) revealed pathological uptake in the gastric wall, later cave adenopathy, and liver. The diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 was made based on radiological and histological findings. The patient underwent a subtotal parathyroidectomy associated with somatostatin analog treatment leading to significant improvement. A literature review was conducted by searching PubMed using these following terms: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, hyperparathyroidism, fracture, menin, osteoporosis. We emphasized bone involvement related to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. This diagnosis should be considered when pathological fractures occur in young patients with a history of endocrine disorder. We highlighted the importance of imaging features in making the diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Early management of this disease is necessary. Treatment including parathyroidectomy and somatostatin analogs leads to bone preservation and functional improvement.

New Markers of Bone Fragility in Hemodialysis Patients: A Monocentric Study.

INTRODUCTION: Mechanisms underlying bone fragility in patients under dialysis are various. The assessment of bone disorder is not yet codified in these patients. Our study aimed to determine the relationship between the serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) level and bone fragility. We also aimed to assess the bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP) to the C-terminal telopeptide of type I (CTX) ratio and the FGF23*bAP product to CTX ratio in patients under hemodialysis. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a cross-sectional study, including 76 patients under hemodialysis. To assess bone fragility, we measured bAP, CTX, and FGF 23. We calculated the bAP to the CTX ratio (bAP/CTX) and the FGF23*bAP product to the CTX ratio (FGF23*bAP/CTX). We defined bone fragility as the existence of osteoporosis or fragility fractures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were evaluated for each biological using the existence of osteoporosis or fragility fracture as the gold standard for bone fragility. RESULTS: There were 51 men. The mean age was 53.36 ± 14.27 years. Bone fragility was noted in 25 cases. Patients with osteoporosis had higher FGF*bAP/CTX and bAP/CTX ratios. The ability of the ratio (bAP/CTX) to distinguish patients with osteoporosis from those without osteoporosis was good, with a ROC AUC of 0.707. The optimal ratio cut-off value with the highest accuracy was 9.72. The ability of the ratio (FGF23*bAP/CTX) to distinguish patients with bone fragility was good, with a ROC AUC of 0.701. The optimal ratio cut-off value with the highest accuracy was 1621.89 (sensitivity 60%, specificity 78.4%). CONCLUSION: Our study showed FGF23, FGF23*bAP product to CTX ratio, and the bAP to CTX ratio can be used as markers of bone fragility in hemodialysis patients. Therefore, these noninvasive and relatively inexpensive methods may serve to diagnose bone fragility in patients under hemodialysis.

Bilateral Sub-deltoid Bursitis in a Patient Receiving Infliximab for Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Infiximab has been shown to be effective in inducing and maintaining remission of intestinal bowel diseases. Infiximab has been associated with many adverse events. Articular manifestations are commonly reported, but they are of variable clinical expression and aetiology. Among them, inflammatory bursitis has rarely been described. OBJECTIVE: Herein a case of inflammatory bursitis in a patient with Crohn's disease after switching to biosimilar infliximab is reported. CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old man with Crohn's disease evolving from 3 years was referred to infliximab therapy at a dose of 5mg/kg because of an aggressive resistant perineal fistula. After 14 infusions of infliximab, the treatment was switched to infliximab biosimilar using the same dose and frequency of administration. Forty-eight hours after the second infusion, he developed an acute onset of muscle pain and stiffness on both of his shoulders. A musculoskeletal ultrasound was performed and revealed a hypoechoic widening of both subacromial bursae. It was more severe on the left side. DISCUSSION: The diagnosis of non-infective sub-acromial bursitis secondary to infliximab infusion was made as the patient's symptoms resolved rapidly without any antibiotics. Infliximab was definitively stopped and adalimumab was introduced. CONCLUSION: Musculoskeletal side effects of infliximab infusion are uncommonly reported. Among them, bursitis has been reported in only a few cases. Ultrasonography can help early diagnosis of bursitis. The time of occurring of this reaction regarding infliximab infusion, screening of Antibodies to Infliximab (ATI) and clinical outcome after drug discontinuation are the main helpful arguments.