CILP-1 Is a Biomarker for Backward Failure and Right Ventricular Dysfunction in HFrEF.

BACKGROUND: CILP-1 regulates myocardial fibrotic response and remodeling and was reported to indicate right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in pulmonary hypertension (PH) and heart failure (HF). This study examines CILP-1 as a potential biomarker for RVD and prognosis in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients on guideline-directed medical therapy. METHODS: CILP-1 levels were measured in 610 HFrEF patients from a prospective registry with biobanking (2016-2022). Correlations with echocardiographic and hemodynamic data and its association with RVD and prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 62 years (Q1-Q3: 52-72), 77.7% of patients were male, and the median NT-proBNP was 1810 pg/mL (Q1-Q3: 712-3962). CILP-1 levels increased with HF severity, as indicated by NT-proBNP and NYHA class (p < 0.0001, for both). CILP-1 showed a weak-moderate direct association with increased left ventricular filling pressures and its sequalae, i.e., backward failure (LA diameter rs = 0.15, p = 0.001; sPAP rs = 0.28, p = 0.010; RVF rs = 0.218, p < 0.0001), but not with cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). CILP-1 trended as a risk factor for all-cause mortality (crude HR for 500 pg/mL increase: 1.03 (95%CI: 1.00-1.06), p = 0.053) but lost significance when it was adjusted for NT-proBNP (adj. HR: 1.00 (95%CI: 1.00-1.00), p = 0.770). No association with cardiovascular hospitalization was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CILP-1 correlates with HFrEF severity and may indicate an elevated risk for all-cause mortality, though it is not independent from NT-proBNP. Increased CILP-1 is associated with backward failure and RVD rather than forward failure. Whether CILP-1 release in this context is based on elevated pulmonary pressures or is specific to RVD needs to be further investigated.

Obesity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without diabetes: risk factor or innocent bystander?

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a condition that commonly coexists with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Whether the obesity-related survival benefit generally observed in HFpEF extends to individuals with concomitant T2DM is unclear. This study sought to examine the prognostic role of overweight and obesity in a large cohort of HFpEF with and without T2DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: This large-scale cohort study included patients with HFpEF enrolled between 2010 and 2020. The relationship between body mass index (BMI), T2DM, and survival was assessed. A total of 6744 individuals with HFpEF were included, of which 1702 (25%) had T2DM. Patients with T2DM had higher BMI values (29.4 kg/m2 vs. 27.1 kg/m2, P < 0.001), higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values (864 mg/dL vs. 724 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of numerous risk factors/comorbidities than those without T2DM. During a median follow-up time of 47 months (Q1-Q3: 20-80), 2014 (30%) patients died. Patients with T2DM had a higher incidence of fatal events compared with those without T2DM, with a mortality rate of 39.2% and 26.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the overall cohort, using the BMI category 22.5-24.9 kg/m2 as the reference group, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death was increased in patients with BMI <22.5 kg/m2 [HR: 1.27 (confidence interval 1.09-1.48), P = 0.003] and decreased in BMI categories ≥25 kg/m2. After multivariate adjustment, BMI remained significantly inversely associated with survival in non-T2DM, whereas survival was unaltered at a wide range of BMI in patients with T2DM. CONCLUSION: Among the various phenotypes of HFpEF, the T2DM phenotype is specifically associated with a greater disease burden. Higher BMI is linked to improved survival in HFpEF overall, while this effect neutralises in patients with concomitant T2DM. Advising BMI-based weight targets and weight loss may be pursued with different intensity in the management of HFpEF, particularly in the presence of T2DM.

Individuals with HFpEF and concomitant diabetes show a distinct phenotype particularly associated with a higher disease burden and worse outcome. The obesity paradox observed in individuals with heart failure may not be generalized to HFpEF patients with concomitant diabetes.