A prospective randomized trial comparing computerized columnar insulin dosing chart (the Atlanta protocol) versus the joint British diabetes societies for inpatient care protocol in management of hyperglycemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to cardiac care unit in Alexandria, Egypt.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is linked to raised morbidity and mortality. Insulin administration using insulin infusion protocols (IIP) is the preferred strategy to control hyperglycemia in critically ill patients. To date, no specific IIP has been identified as the most efficient for achieving glycemic control. AIM: to compare glycemic achievements (safety) (primary objective), and coronary and other clinical outcomes (efficacy) (secondary objective) by hyperglycemia management in Cardiac Care Unit (CCU) using computerized Atlanta Protocol (Group (I)) versus paper-based Joint British Diabetes Societies (JBDS) For Inpatient Care Protocol (Group (II)). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was done on 100 ACS patients admitted to Alexandria Main University hospital CCU with RBG >180 mg/dL. They were randomized into the 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. CBG was measured hourly for 72 hours and was managed by IV insulin infusion. RESULTS: Group (I) showed statistically significant less mean time for target BG achievement (3.52 ± 1.53hours), lower incidence of Level 1 hypoglycemia (2%) than Group (II) (4.76 ± 2.33 hours, 22%, p = 0.013, 0.002 respectively) and statistically significant less mean number of episodes above the glycemic target after its achievement than Group (II) (p < 0.001). Regarding Level 2 hypoglycemia the difference was not significant statistically. CONCLUSION: Both protocols successfully maintained target BG level with low incidence of clinically significant hypoglycemia, however, the computerized Atlanta protocol achieved better glycemic outcomes. We recommend the use of the computerized Atlanta protocol in CCU rather than JBDS for Inpatient Care Protocol whenever this is feasible.

Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin in Cirrhotic Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: It is well known that development of acute kidney injury (AKI) increases mortality in hospitalized cirrhotic patients; therefore many novel markers have been studied for early detection, differential diagnosis and prognosis in cirrhotic patients with AKI. The aim of the current work is to evaluate urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (uNGAL) as a diagnostic biomarker for different causes of acute kidney injury in liver cirrhosis and to assess it as a prognostic marker. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of 83 cirrhotic patients with AKI admitted between October 2015 and June 2016; 70 patients were included in this prospective study. Routine laboratory tests, uNGAL and fractional excretion of Na were obtained on admission. End points were death or improvement of kidney function and discharge. RESULTS: The patients included in our study were 41 males and 29 females with mean age 54.27 ± 6.08 years. HCV was the etiology of cirrhosis in 69 cases while one had combined HBV and HCV infection. More than 50% of patients were classified as Child C. Causes of kidney injury were prerenal, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and intrinsic tubular injury (iAKI) in 39 patients (55.7%), 17 patients (24.3%) and 14 patients (20%) respectively. mean value of uNGAL in prerenal, HRS and iAKI was 21.70 ± 7.31, 115.53 ± 68.19 and 240.83 ± 116.94 ng/mg creatinine respectively. MELD above 20 and uNGL above 32 were predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: A single baseline measurement of uNGAL level has the ability to determine type of kidney dysfunction in cirrhotic patients, perhaps accelerating management decisions and improving outcomes.

miRNA-221 and miRNA-222 are promising biomarkers for progression of liver fibrosis in HCV Egyptian patients.

BACKGROUND: Current methodologies used to determine the progression of hepatic fibrosis rely heavily on liver biopsy, a dangerous and invasive procedure, with semi-subjective analysis of the results of the biopsy. Thus, a new approach is immensely needed for monitoring the progression of liver fibrosis in Hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. AIM OF WORK: The purpose of this study was to find highly specific and sensitive miRNA biomarkers that can be used to detect different stages of liver fibrosis. METHODOLOGY: The study consisted of 42 cases of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with early-stage fibrosis, 45 cases of CHC with late-stage fibrosis, and 40 healthy subjects with no CHC or fibrosis as controls. Expression patterns of 5 miRNAs (miR-16, miR-146a, miR-214-5p, miR-221, and miR-222) were analyzed in each group using TaqMan real-time PCR. RESULTS: Serum levels of miRNA-16, miRNA-146a, miRNA-221, and miRNA-222 were all significantly up-regulated in early and late stages of liver fibrosis. miRNA-222 had the highest sensitivity and specificity values in early and late fibrosis. miRNA-221 had the second highest sensitivity and specificity with the late-stage fibrosis group. Furthermore, miRNA-221 showed significant positive correlations with both miRNA-16 and miRNA-146a in the early- and late-stage fibrosis groups, with the early stage having a stronger correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that miRNA-16, miRNA-146a, miRNA-221, and miRNA-222 can be used to detect the presence of liver fibrosis. The high sensitivity and specificity of miRNA-222 and miRNA-221 in late-stage fibrosis indicate promising prognostic biomarkers for HCV-induced liver fibrosis.

Centralized Pan-Middle East Survey on the Under-Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia: Results from the CEPHEUS II Study in Egypt.

INTRODUCTION: As part of the CEPHEUS study, CEPHEUS I was conducted in 2010 and 2011 in Cairo and then the CEPHEUS II study was carried out in Alexandria and Delta Regions in Egypt between April 2014 and August 2015 to determine the proportion of dyslipidemic patients on lipid-lowering treatment reaching LDL-C treatment goals. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, observational, multicenter, cross-sectional survey where 90 investigators enrolled 1127 patients receiving lipid-lowering drugs for at least 3 months. After signing informed consent forms, the study questionnaires were completed by patients and investigators. Blood samples were taken for laboratory investigations. Patients with missing LDL-C data were excluded from the analysis and results from 896 patients were analyzed according to European Atherosclerosis Society and EAS/ESC 2011 guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 896 patients enrolled based on the risk stratification of EAS/ESC 2011 guidelines, 12.4% were classified as low risk, 20.0% as moderate risk, 2.5% as high risk, and 65.2% as very high risk. Achievement goals were 84.7, 44.7, 18.2, and 22.3% for low-risk, moderate-risk, high-risk, and very high risk patients, respectively, with an overall achievement goal of 34.4%. The study population included 50.2% diabetes, 64.4% hypertension, 54.9% metabolic syndrome, 32.2% family history of cardiovascular disease, 23.1% smokers, and 33.8% secondary prevention. Lipid-lowering agents were prescribed as a monotherapy to 90.1% and in combination in 9.9% with goal achievements of 34 and 38%, respectively (p > 0.05). Statins were prescribed to 86.9% of patients. The most frequent prescribed statins were rosuvastatin (47.1%) and atorvastatin (36.0%), followed by simvastatin (9.2%). Treatment goal was achieved in 34.2, 36.0, and 31.7% for rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin, respectively, with no significant difference in achievement goals (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hypercholesterolemia is still not being effectively managed in many at-risk patients in Egypt. The majority of patients enrolled in the study were being actively treated with lipid-lowering medications yet the percentage goal achievement was less when compared to CEPHEUS results.